advanced gastric cancer

晚期胃癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较新辅助放化疗(NCRT)和新辅助化疗(NCT)对晚期胃癌(AGC)患者并发症和复发的临床效果。
    这是一项回顾性研究。承德市中心医院1月之间共收治83例AGC患者2019年6月。选择2021年,采用随机数字表法分为观察组(n=41)和对照组(n=42)。对照组患者接受XELOX化疗,观察组接受调强放疗(IMRT)联合XELOX化疗.比较疗效,病理完全缓解率(pCR),R0切除率,不良反应,比较两组患者治疗前后的生活质量(QOL)。
    功效,pCR,与对照组相比,观察组的R0切除率明显升高。并发症的比较显示经历胃肠道(GI)反应的患者人数,增加BUN,GPT增加,脱发,与对照组相比,观察组的色素沉着减少,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),两组患者发生骨髓抑制的人数差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。物理子得分没有显着差异,角色,情感,认知,两组治疗前社会功能及生活质量总分比较(p>0.05)。
    与NCT相比,NCRT在AGC患者中更安全,更有效,能明显改善患者的生活质量。可广泛应用于临床。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the clinical effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) on complications and recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study. A total of 83 patients with AGC admitted to Chengde Central Hospital between Jan. 2019 and Jun. 2021 were selected and divided into the observation group(n=41) and the control group(n=42) using a random number table. Patients in the control group received XELOX chemotherapy, and those in the observation group received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent XELOX chemotherapy. Compared efficacy, pathological complete response rate (pCR), R0 resection rate, adverse reactions, and quality of life (QOL) before and after treatment between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The efficacy, pCR, and R0 resection rate of the observation group were significantly increased compared with those of the control group. Comparison of complications showed the number of patients experiencing gastrointestinal (GI) reactions, increased BUN, increased GPT, alopecia, and pigmentation in the observation group was decreased compared with that in the control group, with no statistically significant differences(p>0.05), and the number of patients experiencing myelosuppression was statistically significant between the two groups(p<0.05). There were no significant differences in sub-scores of physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functions and the overall score of QOL between the two groups(p>0.05) before treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: NCRT is safer and more effective in patients with AGC compared with NCT, and can significantly improve the QOL of patients. It can be widely used in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究评估了洛铂腹腔灌注化疗治疗晚期胃癌(GC)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:共有56例局部晚期GC患者(实验组)在接受D2根治术的同时接受了术中腹腔冲洗化疗,根据8个协变量与56例未接受药物治疗的患者(对照组)进行1:1匹配。收集并分析临床数据。
    结果:两组基本特征平衡,临床指标相当。所有患者的首次排气时间相似(2.8±0.3vs.2.9±0.3d,P=0.076),首次口服时间(3.5±3.4vs.4.1±4.6d,P=0.439),术后住院时间(9.1±3.2vs.9.6±4.0d,P=0.446)。术后并发症包括吻合口和十二指肠残端漏无显著差异,腹部和吻合口出血,腹膜,实验组与对照组切口感染差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。化疗相关副作用的发生率,包括过敏反应,神经毒性,腹泻,恶心/呕吐在两组之间也相似,术后前5天白细胞和血小板水平及肝肾功能均无异常。
    结论:洛铂腹腔灌注化疗对晚期胃癌患者是安全的。
    BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and efficiency of intraperitoneal irrigation chemotherapy with lobaplatin for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC).
    METHODS: A total of 56 locally advanced GC patients (experimental group) who received intraoperative intraperitoneal irrigation chemotherapy in addition to undergoing radical D2 surgery were matched 1:1 based on 8 covariates to 56 patients without drug treatment (control group). Clinical data were collected and analyzed.
    RESULTS: The two groups were well balanced in basic characteristics and had comparable clinical indices. All patients had similar time to first flatus (2.8 ± 0.3 vs. 2.9 ± 0.3 d, P = 0.076), time to first oral intake (3.5 ± 3.4 vs. 4.1 ± 4.6 d, P = 0.439), and duration of postoperative hospitalization (9.1 ± 3.2 vs. 9.6 ± 4.0 d, P = 0.446). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications including anastomotic and duodenal stump leakage, abdominal and anastomotic bleeding, seroperitoneum, and incision infection between the experimental and control groups (P > 0.05). The rates of chemotherapy-related side effects including allergic reaction, neurotoxicity, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting were also similar between the two groups, and there were no abnormalities in leukocyte and platelet levels and liver and renal function during the first 5 days after surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal irrigation chemotherapy with lobaplatin is safe for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在临床试验之外,通过D2淋巴结清扫术为主的围手术期或辅助化疗治疗的晚期胃癌(AGCs)的真实世界数据有限.
    方法:分析了2003年1月至2020年1月在塔塔纪念中心进行的胃腺癌的手术切除,比较标记年度胃切除术(GR)主要增量的三个时间段。
    结果:进行了1657例胃癌根治术,发病率和死亡率分别为34.9%和1.4%,分别。在连续三个时期,每年GRs的数量从56/年增加到97/年,再增加到156/年(P<0.001),手术规模和复杂性显著增加.手术质量指标的改善(中位淋巴结产生率从15到25,P<0.001,边缘阴性率从8.2到5.5%,P=0.002)观察到严重并发症(6.9%)或死亡率(1.4%)没有相应增加。发现远端癌和印戒癌的比例随着时间的推移而下降,随着近端癌症的增加和年龄的增加。总的来说,90%的GRs用于AGCs,中位总生存期(OS)为4.4年(±6个月),5年OS率为47.6%(±1.9%)。
    结论:观察到肿瘤特征模式的变化。逐步采用积极的AGC治疗方案,并具有出色的生存率。随着数量的增加,手术质量指标的改善,术后死亡率相对改善.这些结果为发展专门的胃癌中心提供了路线图。
    BACKGROUND: Outside of clinical trials, real-world data of advanced gastric cancers (AGCs) managed with perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy with a backbone of D2 lymphadenectomy is limited.
    METHODS: Curative resections for gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2003 and January 2020 at the Tata Memorial Centre were analyzed, comparing three time periods marking major increments in annual gastric resections (GRs).
    RESULTS: 1657 radical gastric resections were performed with a morbidity and mortality rate of 34.9% and 1.4%, respectively. Over three consecutive periods, the number of annual GRs increased from 56/year to 97/year to 156/year (P < 0.001) with a significant escalation in surgical magnitude and complexity. Improvement in surgical quality indicators (median lymph node yield from 15 to 25, P < 0.001 and margin negativity from 8.2 to 5.5%, P = 0.002) was observed with no corresponding increase in severe complications (6.9%) or mortality (1.4%). The proportion of distal and signet ring cancers was found to decrease over time, with an increase in proximal cancers and younger age at presentation. Overall, 90% of GRs were for AGCs with a median overall survival (OS) of 4.4 years (± 6 months), and 5-year OS rate of 47.6% (± 1.9%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Change in pattern of tumor characteristics was observed. Aggressive treatment options for AGC were employed progressively with excellent survival. With increase in volumes, improvements in surgical quality indicators, and a relative improvement in postoperative mortality was observed. These results provide a roadmap for developing dedicated gastric cancer centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:晚期胃癌是一种常见的恶性肿瘤,通常诊断为晚期,在根治性手术治疗后仍有复发的风险。放化疗,作为胃癌的重要治疗方法之一,对于提高患者的生存率具有重要意义。然而,胃癌患者放化疗后的肿瘤复发和生存预后仍不确定。
    目的:分析进展期胃癌根治性放化疗后肿瘤复发情况,为临床医生提供更深入的指导。
    方法:回顾性分析2021-2023年在我院接受术后辅助放化疗的171例胃癌患者的临床资料。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算复发率和生存率;采用log-rank法进行单因素预后分析;采用Cox模型进行多因素预后分析。
    结果:全组中位随访时间为63个月,随访率为93.6%。Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期患者分别占31.0%和66.7%,分别。3级及以上急性胃肠道反应和血液学不良反应发生率分别为8.8%和9.9%。分别。共有166名患者完成了整个放化疗方案,期间无不良反应相关死亡发生.就复发模式而言,17例患者局部复发,29例患者有远处转移,12例患者发生腹膜种植转移。1年,3年,5年总生存率(OS)为83.7%,66.3%,和60.0%,分别。1年,3年,5年无病生存率为75.5%,62.7%,56.5%,分别。多变量分析表明,T分期,周围神经侵犯,淋巴结转移率(LNR)是OS的独立预后因素。
    结论:胃癌术后调强放疗联合化疗治疗耐受性好,不良反应可接受。有利于肿瘤局部控制,提高患者的长期生存率。LNR是OS的独立预后因素。对于局部复发风险高的患者,应考虑术后辅助放化疗.
    BACKGROUND: Advanced gastric cancer is a common malignancy that is often diagnosed at an advanced stage and is still at risk of recurrence after radical surgical treatment. Chemoradiotherapy, as one of the important treatment methods for gastric cancer, is of great significance for improving the survival rate of patients. However, the tumor recurrence and survival prognosis of gastric cancer patients after radiotherapy and chemotherapy are still uncertain.
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the tumor recurrence after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer and provide more in-depth guidance for clinicians.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 171 patients with gastric cancer who received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in our hospital from 2021 to 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the recurrence rate and survival rate; the log-rank method was used to analyze the single-factor prognosis; and the Cox model was used to analyze the prognosis associated with multiple factors.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the whole group was 63 months, and the follow-up rate was 93.6%. Stage II and III patients accounted for 31.0% and 66.7%, respectively. The incidences of Grade 3 and above acute gastrointestinal reactions and hematological adverse reactions were 8.8% and 9.9%, respectively. A total of 166 patients completed the entire chemoradiotherapy regimen, during which no adverse reaction-related deaths occurred. In terms of the recurrence pattern, 17 patients had local recurrence, 29 patients had distant metastasis, and 12 patients had peritoneal implantation metastasis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.7%, 66.3%, and 60.0%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 75.5%, 62.7%, and 56.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that T stage, peripheral nerve invasion, and the lymph node metastasis rate (LNR) were independent prognostic factors for OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for gastric cancer treatment is well tolerated and has acceptable adverse effects, which is beneficial for local tumor control and can improve the long-term survival of patients. The LNR was an independent prognostic factor for OS. For patients with a high risk of local recurrence, postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)在中国已成为治疗晚期胃癌(AGC)的常用方法。然而,与开腹远端胃切除术(ODG)相比,其肿瘤结局存在不确定性.这项研究旨在比较中国北方接受AGC手术的患者的3年无病生存率(DFS)。
    方法:多中心,非自卑,开放标签,平行,我们在华北地区5家三级医院进行了随机临床试验,以评估有资格行远端胃切除术的AGC患者.在这次审判中,患者在术前按1:1的分配比例随机分配接受LDG或ODG.主要终点是术后30天内的发病率和死亡率,次要终点是3年DFS率。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符:NCT02464215)。
    结果:2014年3月至2017年8月,共有446例患者被随机分配到LDG组(n=223)或ODG组(n=223)。筛选后,共有214名患者接受了开放手术入路,216例患者接受了腹腔镜手术。LDG组3年DFS率为85.9%,ODG组为84.72%,差异无统计学意义(危险比1.12;95%CI0.68-1.84,P=0.65)。在Cox回归中,体重指数(BMI)<25kg/m2,晚期病理T4和病理N2-3类别被证实为DFS的独立危险因素。
    结论:与ODG相比,在诊断为AGC的患者中,D2淋巴结清扫术的LDG在3年DFS方面产生了相似的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) has become a common procedure for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in China. However, there is uncertainty regarding its oncological outcomes compared to open distal gastrectomy (ODG). This study aims to compare the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates among patients who underwent surgery for AGC in northern China.
    METHODS: A multicenter, non-inferiority, open-label, parallel, randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate patients with AGC who were eligible for distal gastrectomy at five tertiary hospitals in North China. In this trial, patients were randomly assigned preoperatively to receive either LDG or ODG in a 1:1 allocation ratio. The primary endpoint was postoperative morbidity and mortality within 30 days and the secondary endpoint was the 3-year DFS rate. This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02464215).
    RESULTS: A total of 446 patients were randomly allocated to LDG (n = 223) or ODG group (n = 223) between March 2014 and August 2017. After screening, a total of 214 patients underwent the open surgical approach, while 216 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The 3-year DFS rate was 85.9% for the LDG group and 84.72% for the ODG group, with no significant statistical difference (Hazard ratio 1.12; 95% CI 0.68-1.84, P = 0.65). Body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m2, advanced pathologic T4, and pathologic N2-3 category were confirmed as independent risk factors for DFS in the Cox regression.
    CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to ODG, LDG with D2 lymphadenectomy yielded similar outcomes in terms of 3-year DFS rates among patients diagnosed with AGC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在进行pembrolizumab联合化疗治疗中国HER2阴性晚期胃癌的成本效益分析。
    构建分区生存方法模型以模拟HER2阴性晚期胃癌的进展并评估不同治疗策略的结果。我们计算了增量成本效益比(ICER),以评估与获得的每个质量调整生命年(QALY)相关的成本。进行了单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析以评估鲁棒性和可靠性。
    在基础病例中进行的分析表明,在所有人群中,与pembrolizumab相关的ICER为$177405.83/QALY。在亚组分析中,发现PD-L1CPS≥1和PD-L1CPS≥10的个体的ICER为$152397.06/QALY和$109534.13/QALY,分别。在中国,所有人口组和亚组的所有ICER值都超过了WTP阈值。我们的分析表明了这些结果的稳健性,当输入参数在±25%范围内变化时,它们保持一致。
    这项成本效益分析的结果表明,在中国,pembrolizumab联合化疗不是HER2阴性晚期胃癌的经济有效治疗选择。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in China.
    UNASSIGNED: A partitioned survival approach model was constructed to simulate the progression of HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer and evaluate the outcomes of different treatment strategies. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) to assess the cost associated with each quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess robustness and reliability.
    UNASSIGNED: The analysis conducted in the base case demonstrated that the ICER associated with pembrolizumab was $177405.83/QALY gained in all population. In the subgroup analysis, it was found that individuals with a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 and those with a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 had ICERs of $152397.06/QALY and $109534.13/QALY, respectively. All ICER values for both the all population groups and the subgroups exceeded the WTP threshold in China. Our analysis shows the robustness of these results, as they remained consistent when input parameters were varied within a ± 25% range.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of this cost-effectiveness analysis suggest that pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy is not a cost-effective treatment option for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在开发和验证基于临床和影像学的列线图,用于术前预测晚期胃癌的神经周浸润(PNI)。
    纳入351例接受手术切除的晚期胃癌患者的回顾性队列。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定PNI的独立危险因素并构建列线图。使用校准曲线评估列线图的性能,一致性指数(C指数),曲线下面积(AUC),和决策曲线分析(DCA)。使用Log-Rank检验和Kaplan-Meier分析评估了列线图预测的PNI阳性组与列线图预测的PNI阴性组之间的无病生存(DFS)差异。
    壁外血管侵犯(EMVI),Borrmann分类,肿瘤厚度,全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)是PNI的独立危险因素。列线图模型显示了0.838的值得推荐的AUC值。校准曲线表现出优异的一致性,C指数为0.814。DCA表明该模型提供了良好的临床净效益。列线图预测的PNI阳性组的DFS显著低于列线图预测的PNI阴性组(p<0.001)。
    这项研究成功地开发了一种术前列线图模型,该模型不仅有效地预测了胃癌中的PNI,而且促进了术后风险分层。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical and imaging-based nomogram for preoperatively predicting perineural invasion (PNI) in advanced gastric cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort of 351 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection was included. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for PNI and to construct the nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed using calibration curves, the concordance index (C-index), the area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). The disparity in disease-free survival (DFS) between the nomogram-predicted PNI-positive group and the nomogram-predicted PNI-negative group was evaluated using the Log-Rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), Borrmann classification, tumor thickness, and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) emerged as independent risk factors for PNI. The nomogram model demonstrated a commendable AUC value of 0.838. Calibration curves exhibited excellent concordance, with a C-index of 0.814. DCA indicated that the model provided good clinical net benefit. The DFS of the nomogram-predicted PNI-positive group was significantly lower than that of the nomogram-predicted PNI-negative group (p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: This study successfully developed a preoperative nomogram model that not only effectively predicted PNI in gastric cancer but also facilitated postoperative risk stratification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抑制剂,当联合化疗时,在提高晚期胃癌患者的生存结局方面表现出显著的有效性。然而,重要的是要承认,并不是所有的患者都能从这种治疗方法中获得实质性的好处,强调确定有效的生物标志物以告知免疫治疗干预措施的关键必要性。在这项研究中,我们试图研究循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)作为生物标志物在30名诊断为晚期胃癌的患者队列中的预测效用。所有患者均接受了包括PD-1抑制剂给药和化疗的一线治疗.我们在基线和两个治疗周期完成后都获得了外周血样本。此外,收集基线组织标本用于基因组改变评估,采用47基因和737基因的下一代测序小组用于血浆和肿瘤组织,分别。我们将ctDNA应答描述为相对于基线水平的最大变异等位基因频率的根除。值得注意的是,与无反应者相比,显示ctDNA反应的个体的客观反应率显着优于无反应者(P=0.0073)。此外,与无ctDNA反应的患者并列时,表现出ctDNA反应的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)显着延长(中位PFS:15.6vs.6.0个月,P=0.003;中位OS:未达到[NR]与9.0个月,P=0.011)。总之,接受PD-1抑制剂和化疗一线治疗的晚期胃癌患者,ctDNA的动态变化可作为预测治疗疗效和长期结局的潜在生物标志物.
    Programmed Death Receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, when combined with chemotherapy, have exhibited notable effectiveness in enhancing the survival outcomes of patients afflicted with advanced gastric cancer. However, it is important to acknowledge that not all patients derive substantial benefits from this therapeutic approach, highlighting the crucial necessity of identifying efficacious biomarkers to inform immunotherapy interventions. In this study, we sought to investigate the predictive utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker in a cohort of 30 patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer, all of whom underwent first-line treatment involving PD-1 inhibitor administration alongside chemotherapy. We procured peripheral blood samples both at baseline and following the completion of two treatment cycles. Additionally, baseline tissue specimens were collected for the purpose of genomic alteration assessment, employing both 47-gene and 737-gene next-generation sequencing panels for plasma and tumor tissue, respectively. We delineated a ctDNA response as the eradication of maximum variant allele frequencies relative to baseline levels. Notably, the objective response rate among individuals exhibiting a ctDNA response proved significantly superior in comparison to non-responders (P = 0.0073). Furthermore, patients who manifested a ctDNA response experienced markedly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when juxtaposed with those devoid of a ctDNA response (median PFS: 15.6 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.003; median OS: not reached [NR] vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.011). In summation, patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy, dynamic changes in ctDNA can serve as a potential biomarker for predicting treatment efficacy and long-term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述中国近二十年来晚期胃癌(AGC)的治疗方式和生存状况,并客观评价规范化中医治疗对AGC患者生存的影响。
    方法:这项多中心注册设计和倾向评分分析研究描述了诊断特征,2000年1月1日至2021年7月31日,中国10家医院的AGC治疗模式发展和生存状况。评估非CM队列(标准药物治疗)和CM队列(综合标准CM治疗≥3个月)之间的总生存期(OS)。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)和治疗加权逆概率(IPTW),以调整平均结果中的任何偏差差异。
    结果:共纳入2,001例经组织学证实为局部晚期和/或转移的胃和胃食管交界处腺癌。其中,1,607人接受全身化疗,215(10.74%)接受分子靶向治疗,44(2.2%)接受了检查点抑制剂治疗,769(38.43%)收到CM。两药方案是一线治疗的主要选择,以氟嘧啶加铂为最常见的方案(530例,60.09%)。而45.71%(16例)的HER2扩增患者一线接受曲妥珠单抗治疗。三线阿帕替尼的应用增加(33.33%)。自2020年以来,检查点抑制剂的应用有所增加。COX分析显示,Lauren混合型(P=0.017),一线治疗周期>6(P=0.000),CM(P=0.000),姑息性胃切除术(P=0.000),曲妥珠单抗(P=0.011),和阿帕替尼(P=0.008)是AGCOS的独立预后因素。在PSM和IPTW之后,CM队列和非CM队列的中位OS分别为18.17和12.45个月,分别(P<0.001)。
    结论:在中国AGC的实际实践中,治疗选择与指南相关.两药方案是主要的一线选择。规范化CM治疗是中国AGC患者的独立预后因素,可以延长OS。(登记号NCT02781285)。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the treatment patterns and survival status of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in China in the past two decades, and objectively evaluate the impact of standardized Chinese medicine (CM) treatment on the survival of AGC patients.
    METHODS: This multicenter registry designed and propensity score analysis study described the diagnosis characteristics, treatment-pattern development and survival status of AGC from 10 hospitals in China between January 1, 2000 and July 31, 2021. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated between non-CM cohort (standard medical treatment) and CM cohort (integrated standard CM treatment ≥3 months). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to adjust any difference in average outcomes for bias.
    RESULTS: A total of 2,001 patients histologically confirmed locally advanced and/or metastasis stomach and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Among them, 1,607 received systemic chemotherapy, 215 (10.74%) accepted molecular targeted therapy, 44 (2.2%) received checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and 769 (38.43%) received CM. Two-drug regimen was the main choice for first-line treatment, with fluoropyrimidine plus platinum as the most common regimen (530 cases, 60.09%). While 45.71% (16 cases) of patients with HER2 amplification received trastuzumab in first-line. The application of apatinib increased (33.33%) in third-line. The application of checkpoint inhibitors has increased since 2020. COX analysis showed that Lauren mixed type (P=0.017), cycles of first-line treatment >6 (P=0.000), CM (P=0.000), palliative gastrectomy (P=0.000), trastuzumab (P=0.011), and apatinib (P=0.008) were independent prognostic factors for the OS of AGC. After PSM and IPTW, the median OS of CM cohort and non-CM cohort was 18.17 and 12.45 months, respectively (P<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice for AGC in China, therapy choices consisted with guidelines. Two-drug regimen was the main first-line choice. Standardized CM treatment was an independent prognostic factor and could prolong the OS of Chinese patients with AGC. (Registration No. NCT02781285).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在研究导致错配修复蛋白缺失(d-MMR)胃癌(GC)患者接受纳武单抗联合化疗(纳武单抗化疗)的不同临床结局的临床病理因素。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括28例接受一线纳武单抗化疗的d-MMR晚期GC患者。作为对照组,68例患者仅接受一线化疗。临床病理因素,包括中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和PD-L1联合阳性评分(CPS),对疗效结果进行了分析。
    结果:无进展生存期(PFS)更长(中位PFS;未达到[NR]vs.5.2个月,危险比[HR]0.28,P<0.001),总生存期(OS)趋于更长(中位OS;NR与17.9个月,HR0.43,P=0.057)在接受纳武单抗化疗治疗的患者中高于接受化疗的患者。在NLR较低(<3.80[NLR中位数])的亚组中,nivolumab化疗的PFS获益明显优于化疗(HR0.10),而在NLR高(≥3.80)(HR0.58)的患者中则不太明显.在接受纳武单抗化疗的患者中,NLR较高(≥3.80)的患者的PFS比NLR较低(<3.80)的患者更差。PD-L1CPS≥5和<5的患者的生存结局相似。
    结论:在d-MMRGC患者中,Nivolumab化疗比单独化疗具有更好的疗效。但对于NLR较高的患者,即使使用nivolumab化疗,生存结局也较差.根据PD-L1CPS,接受纳武单抗化疗的d-MMR患者的生存结果没有差异。
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate clinicopathologic factors leading to different clinical outcomes in patients with deficient mismatch repair protein (d-MMR) gastric cancer (GC) treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy (nivolumab chemotherapy).
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 28 patients with d-MMR advanced GC treated with first-line nivolumab chemotherapy. As a control group, 68 treated with first-line chemotherapy alone were included. Clinicopathological factors, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), were analyzed with regards to the efficacy outcomes.
    RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer (median PFS; not reached [NR] vs. 5.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, P < 0.001), and overall survival (OS) tended to be longer (median OS; NR vs. 17.9 months, HR 0.43, P = 0.057) in patients treated with nivolumab chemotherapy than those treated with chemotherapy. The PFS benefit of nivolumab chemotherapy over chemotherapy was pronounced in the subgroup with a lower NLR (< 3.80 [median NLR]) (HR 0.10), whereas it was less prominent in patients with a high NLR (≥ 3.80) (HR 0.58). Among patients treated with nivolumab chemotherapy, PFS was worse in patients with a higher NLR (≥ 3.80) than in those with a lower NLR (< 3.80), and survival outcomes were similar between those with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and < 5.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab chemotherapy was associated with better efficacy outcomes than chemotherapy alone among patients with d-MMR GC, but survival outcomes were poor even with nivolumab chemotherapy for those with a high NLR. Survival outcomes were not different according to PD-L1 CPS among d-MMR patients treated with nivolumab chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号