adjuvant radiotherapy

辅助放疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:局部晚期膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后的辅助放疗在精确放疗的进展后恢复,降低了正常盆腔组织的放射危害。然而,解决这一问题的随机对照研究仍然很少。
    方法:纳入了131例膀胱切除术后的尿路上皮膀胱癌患者;122例随机接受辅助放疗(ART)50Gy/25分,膀胱切除术或单纯膀胱切除术(CY)后4周。在ART组中包括62个,在CY组中包括60个。24例ART和30例CY患者接受了新辅助化疗。11例患者(9%)有共同的新膀胱改道,6在艺术中,和5在CY武器。所有ART患者均接受调强放疗(IMRT),每日验证锥形束CT(CBCT)。中位随访时间为42.7个月。
    结果:ART组的3年调整局部区域无复发生存率(LRFS)较高,测量81%(95CI:69-94),而71%(95%CI:60-80)(p=0.0457)。ART显着提高了膀胱切除术床和骨盆侧壁的局部无复发率(分别为p=0.016和0.001)。总生存率,无事件,无远处转移生存率在2组中没有达到统计学意义的水平。尽管ART的急性副作用略高,两组的晚期毒性几乎相等.
    结论:在根治性膀胱切除术后使用精确放射技术时,辅助放疗是安全且相当耐受的。这些技术显着改善了LRFS,但对总体生存率的改善不明显。ART不影响无远处转移生存率。在世界各地的不同中心进行了类似的研究,以证实ART在尿路上皮膀胱癌中的价值。
    BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical cystectomy in locally advanced bladder cancer was revived after the advancement in precise radiotherapy that decreased the normal pelvic tissue radiation hazards. However, there are still scarce controlled randomized studies addressing this issue.
    METHODS: One hundred thirty-one cystectomized urothelial bladder cancer patients were enrolled; a hundred and twenty-two were randomized to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) 50 Gy/25 fractions, 4 weeks\' post-cystectomy or cystectomy alone (CY). Sixty-two were included in the ART arm and sixty in the CY arm. Twenty-four ART and 30 CY patients received Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eleven patients (9%) had cotenant neo-bladder diversion, 6 in ART, and 5 in CY arms. All ART patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with daily verification cone-beam CT (CBCT). The median follow-up was 42.7 months.
    RESULTS: The 3-year adjusted Locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) rate was higher in the ART arm, measuring 81% (95%CI: 69-94) compared to 71% (95% CI: 60-80) (p=0.0457). ART significantly improved the locoregional relapse-free rate in the cystectomy bed and the pelvic side wall (p= 0.016 and 0.001, respectively). The overall survival, event-free, and distant metastasis-free survival did not rank to the level of statistical significance in the 2 arms. Even though the acute side effects were slightly higher in ART, the late toxicities were almost equal in the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant radiotherapy is safe and quite tolerable after radical cystectomy when using precise radiation techniques. These techniques significantly improved the LRFS but had insignificant improvement on the overall survival. ART did not affect the distant metastasis-free survival. Similar studies are performed in different centers around the world to confirm the value of ART in urothelial bladder cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管手术切除被广泛认为是治疗肝癌的最有效方法,其对位于中央的肝细胞癌(HCC)的安全性和有效性仍不令人满意。因此,寻求综合治疗,比如联合辅助放疗,提高患者的预后至关重要。通过招募2015年6月至2020年接受中央位置HCC手术切除的患者,他们被分为肝切除联合辅助放疗(LR+RT)和单纯肝切除(LR)组。使用倾向评分的计算和Cox比例风险回归模型。193名患者被招募到聚集中,包含88个正在接受LR+RT的,而105用LR处理。RT被证实是复发的独立预后因素(HR0.60)。在倾向得分分析中,辅助放疗与更好的无病生存期(DFS)之间存在显著关联(匹配,HR0.60;倾向评分调整,HR0.60;逆概率加权,HR0.63)。两组间DFS差异明显(p值=0.022),在亚组分析中,RT显着下调了早期复发(p值<0.05)。E值的计算揭示了不可测量的混杂的鲁棒性。肝脏手术切除与RT的组合是安全和有效的对患者的中央定位肝癌,这将显著提高预后和减少肝癌的早期复发。
    Despite that surgical resection is widely regarded as the most effective approach to the treatment of liver cancer, its safety and efficacy upon centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unsatisfactory. In consequence, seeking an integrated treatment, like combined with adjuvant radiotherapy, to enhance the prognosis of patients is of critical importance. By recruiting patients undergoing surgical resection for centrally located HCC ranging from June 2015 to 2020, they were divided into liver resection combined with adjuvant radiotherapy (LR + RT) and mere liver resection (LR) groups. The calculation of propensity score and model of Cox proportional hazards regression were utilized. 193 patients were recruited in aggregation, containing 88 ones undergoing LR + RT, while 105 handled with LR. RT was verified to be an independent factor of prognosis for relapse (HR 0.60). In propensity-score analyses, significant association existed between adjuvant radiotherapy and better disease-free survival (DFS) (Matched, HR 0.60; Adjustment of propensity score, HR 0.60; Inverse probability weighting, HR 0.63). The difference of DFS was apparent within two groups (p value = 0.022), and RT significantly down-regulated early relapse (p value < 0.05) in subgroup analysis. The calculation of E-value revealed robustness of unmeasured confounding. The combination of liver surgical resection with RT is safe and effective towards patients with centrally located HCC, which would notably enhance the prognosis and decrease the early relapse of HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:共享决策(SDM)已成为政治议程上的关键要素,代表了现代医疗保健的重要方面。然而,SDM的成功实施在很大程度上取决于临床医生对SDM的态度。我们研究的总体目标是探索肿瘤学家和护士使用决策助手使用SDM的经验,协商中的决策援助,在丹麦的四个放射治疗部门。
    方法:对20名临床医生进行了半结构化访谈。参与者是通过故意抽样选择的,包括护士和肿瘤学家,男性和女性,具有不同程度的SDM和临床工作经验。分析是数据驱动的,所有访谈的归纳编码和意义凝聚的迭代过程。
    结果:出现了两个主要主题:“使用决策助手改变咨询”和“丹麦肿瘤学家态度的改变”。“这两个主题中的每一个都包括四个详尽的子主题,这在本文中有支持引用的报道。简而言之,理想情况下,SDM和决策助手的使用应根据患者个人情况进行调整,并高度依赖于肿瘤科医生.参与者描述了“此时为该患者做出正确决定”的雄心。“医疗系统,然而,有可能阻碍SDM的陷阱,例如,对基于指南的建议进行严格的解释。
    结论:使用咨询决策助手具有个性化的潜力,结构化的患者参与决策。在临床指南中需要患者决策辅助以确保患者参与决策。
    BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) has become a crucial element on the political agenda and represents a vital aspect of modern healthcare. However, successful implementation of SDM highly depends on the attitude of clinicians towards SDM. The overall aim of our study was to explore the experience of oncologists and nurses with SDM using the Decision Helper, an in-consultation decision aid, at four Danish radiotherapy departments.
    METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 clinicians. The participants were selected using purposive sampling to include nurses and oncologists, male and female, with different levels of experience with SDM and clinical work. The analysis was a data-driven, iterative process with inductive coding of all interviews and meaning condensation.
    RESULTS: Two main themes emerged: \"Using the Decision Helper changes the consultation\" and \"Change of attitude among Danish oncologists.\" Each of the two themes included four elaborative subthemes, which are reported with supporting citations in this paper. In brief, the use of SDM and the Decision Helper should ideally be adjusted to the individual patient and depends highly on the oncologist. The participants described ambitions towards \"making the right decision for this patient at this time.\" The healthcare system, however, has pitfalls that may hinder SDM, e.g., rigid interpretation of guideline-based recommendations.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using an in-consultation Decision Helper has the potential for individualized, structured patient engagement in decision making. There is a need for patient decision aids in clinical guidelines to ensure patient engagement in decision making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:加速部分乳房照射(APBI)是一种替代的保乳治疗方法,与全胸照射(WBI)相比,放射时间更短,提高了患者的便利性,毒性较小,和成本节约。这项前瞻性随机研究在可行性方面比较了外束APBI和常用的中度低分割WBI。安全,容忍度,和美容效果。
    方法:将部分乳房切除术后的早期乳腺癌患者随机分为两例-臂外APBI和中度高分割WBI。使用了在靶向大分割放射治疗中通常使用的可用技术创新的外部束技术,以最大程度地减少被照射的体积(锥形束计算机断层扫描导航到肿瘤床中的夹子,深吸气屏气技术,体积调制电弧治疗剂量应用,使用展平过滤器自由梁和六自由度机器人治疗床)。使用问卷评估化妆品结果和毒性,CTCAE标准,和照片文档。
    结果:对84例中位年龄为64岁的患者进行的分析显示,APBI组皮肤反应方面的急性不良事件明显减少,中位随访37个月(范围21-45个月)期间的局部和一般症状.在≥2级晚期皮肤毒性中,APBI组的优势显着差异(p=0.026)。乳房区域的晚期毒性(变形,水肿,纤维化,和痛苦),影响生活质量和美容效果,在WBI和APBI组中分别有61%和17%的患者发生,分别。美容效果在APBI臂中更有利,特别是放疗后6~12个月。
    结论:在辅助治疗早期乳腺癌患者中,与标准方案相比,外用APBI显示出更好的可行性和更小的毒性。本研究证实了在日常临床实践中建立外部APBI的证据水平。
    背景:NCT06007118。
    BACKGROUND: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative breast-conserving therapy approach where radiation is delivered in less time compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI), resulting in improved patient convenience, less toxicity, and cost savings. This prospective randomized study compares the external beam APBI with commonly used moderate hypofractionated WBI in terms of feasibility, safety, tolerance, and cosmetic effects.
    METHODS: Early breast cancer patients after partial mastectomy were equally randomized into two arms- external APBI and moderate hypofractionated WBI. External beam technique using available technical innovations commonly used in targeted hypofractionated radiotherapy to minimize irradiated volumes was used (cone beam computed tomography navigation to clips in the tumor bed, deep inspiration breath hold technique, volumetric modulated arc therapy dose application, using flattening filter free beams and the six degrees of freedom robotic treatment couch). Cosmetics results and toxicity were evaluated using questionnaires, CTCAE criteria, and photo documentation.
    RESULTS: The analysis of 84 patients with a median age of 64 years showed significantly fewer acute adverse events in the APBI arm regarding skin reactions, local and general symptoms during a median follow-up of 37 months (range 21-45 months). A significant difference in favor of the APBI arm in grade ≥ 2 late skin toxicity was observed (p = 0.026). Late toxicity in the breast area (deformation, edema, fibrosis, and pain), affecting the quality of life and cosmetic effect, occurred in 61% and 17% of patients in WBI and APBI arms, respectively. The cosmetic effect was more favorable in the APBI arm, especially 6 to 12 months after the radiotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: External APBI demonstrated better feasibility and less toxicity than the standard regimen in the adjuvant setting for treating early breast cancer patients. The presented study confirmed the level of evidence for establishing the external APBI in daily clinical practice.
    BACKGROUND: NCT06007118.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:放射性肺炎(RP)是乳腺癌辅助放疗后常见的副作用之一。正常肺照射剂量与RP有关。我们旨在提出一种基于深度学习(DL)模型的器官特征,并评估正常肺剂量与器官特征之间的相关性。
    方法:纳入4个中心经病理证实的浸润性乳腺癌保乳术后辅助放疗患者。从2019年到2020年,共筛查了来自中国四个全国性中心的230名患者,其中208人注册了DL建模,来自另外三个中心的22名患者组成了外部测试队列。内部测试队列的子集(n=42)形成用于相关性分析的内部相关性测试队列。扫描前用导线标记同侧乳房的轮廓。然后,开发了基于高分辨率网络的DL模型,以自动检测CT图像的每个切片中的引线标记,并应用内部模型分割同侧肺区域。距离误差的平均值和标准偏差,平均精度,和平均召回率被用来衡量引线标记检测模型的性能。基于这些DL模型结果,我们提出了一个器官特征,计算出建议的器官特征与接受20Gray(Gy)或更多(V20)的同侧肺容积之间的Pearson相关系数。
    结果:对于引线标记检测模型,距离误差的平均值和标准偏差,在内部测试队列和外部测试队列中,AP(5mm)和AR(5mm)分别达到3.415±4.529、0.860、0.883和4.189±8.390、0.848、0.830,分别。根据检测到的与同侧肺V20相关的标记物计算出的拟议器官特征(Pearson相关系数,0.542,内部相关性测试队列中p<0.001,外部测试队列中p=0.008的0.554)。
    结论:提出的基于人工智能的CT器官特征与浸润性乳腺癌患者保乳手术后辅助放疗的正常肺剂量相关。
    背景:NCT05609058(2022年8月11日)。
    BACKGROUND: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is one of the common side effects after adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer. Irradiation dose to normal lung was related to RP. We aimed to propose an organ features based on deep learning (DL) model and to evaluate the correlation between normal lung dose and organ features.
    METHODS: Patients with pathology-confirmed invasive breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery in four centers were included. From 2019 to 2020, a total of 230 patients from four nationwide centers in China were screened, of whom 208 were enrolled for DL modeling, and 22 patients from another three centers formed the external testing cohort. The subset of the internal testing cohort (n = 42) formed the internal correlation testing cohort for correlation analysis. The outline of the ipsilateral breast was marked with a lead wire before the scanning. Then, a DL model based on the High-Resolution Net was developed to detect the lead wire marker in each slice of the CT images automatically, and an in-house model was applied to segment the ipsilateral lung region. The mean and standard deviation of the distance error, the average precision, and average recall were used to measure the performance of the lead wire marker detection model. Based on these DL model results, we proposed an organ feature, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the proposed organ feature and ipsilateral lung volume receiving 20 Gray (Gy) or more (V20).
    RESULTS: For the lead wire marker detection model, the mean and standard deviation of the distance error, AP (5 mm) and AR (5 mm) reached 3.415 ± 4.529, 0.860, 0.883, and 4.189 ± 8.390, 0.848, 0.830 in the internal testing cohort and external testing cohort, respectively. The proposed organ feature calculated from the detected marker correlated with ipsilateral lung V20 (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.542 with p < 0.001 in the internal correlation testing cohort and 0.554 with p = 0.008 in the external testing cohort).
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed artificial Intelligence-based CT organ feature was correlated with normal lung dose in adjuvant radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery in patients with invasive breast cancer.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05609058 (08/11/2022).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们前瞻性评估了采用吞咽困难优化调强放疗(Do-IMRT)与标准调强放疗(S-IMRT)治疗口腔鳞状细胞癌(PO-OCSCC)术后的急性和晚期毒性。
    方法:56例无联合化疗指征的PO-SCC患者被分为辅助Do-IMRT(n=28)和S-IMRT(n=28)组。高风险和低风险计划目标量分别获得60Gy和54Gy,分别,在6周内30分。吞咽困难误吸相关结构(DARS)的轮廓在两个手臂。虽然在Do-IMRT臂中给出了剂量学约束,仅在S-IMRT组中观察到DARS的剂量没有剂量限制。急性和晚期毒性通过常见的不良事件术语标准(CTCAE)v5.0和RTOG标准进行评估。分别。
    结果:疾病的原发部位是颊粘膜(64%vs.53%)和口腔舌头(21%vs.32%),在Do-IMRT和S-IMRT中,分别。与S-IMRT相比,Do-IMRT对DARS的平均剂量显著更低(所有p<0.001)。中位随访时间为24.2个月。Do-IMRT组口腔疼痛≥2级(50%vs.78.6%,p=0.05)。在Do-IMRT组中,2年≥2级的晚期吞咽困难明显减少(0%vs.17.9%,p=0.016)。两年局部区域控制在Do-IMRT中为89.2%,在S-IMRT中为78.5%(p=0.261)。
    结论:DARS可以在接受Do-IMRT治疗的PO-OCSCC患者中幸免,而不会损害目标体积的覆盖率。将剂量限制在DARS会导致较小的急性和晚期毒性,而不会损害局部控制。
    We prospectively assessed acute and late toxicity in post-operative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (PO-OCSCC) treated with adjuvant dysphagia optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard IMRT (S-IMRT).
    Fifty-six patients of PO-SCC without indications of concurrent chemotherapy were alternatively allocated to adjuvant Do-IMRT (n = 28) versus S-IMRT (n = 28) arms. High- and low-risk planning target volume received 60 and 54 Gy, respectively, in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Dysphagia aspiration-related structures (DARS) were contoured in both arms. While dosimetric constraints were given in Do-IMRT arm, doses to DARS were only observed without dose constraints in S-IMRT arm. Acute and late toxicity were assessed by common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0 and RTOG criteria, respectively.
    The primary site of disease was buccal mucosa (64% vs. 53%) and oral tongue (21% vs. 32%), in Do-IMRT and S-IMRT, respectively. The mean doses to DARS was significantly less with Do-IMRT (all p < 0.001) as compared to S-IMRT. Median follow-up was 24.2 months. Grade ≥2 oral pain was less in the Do-IMRT arm (50% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.05). Grade ≥2 late dysphagia at 2 years were significantly less in Do-IMRT arm (0% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.016). Two-year locoregional control was 89.2% in Do-IMRT and 78.5% in S-IMRT (p = 0.261).
    DARS can be spared in PO-OCSCC patients treated with Do-IMRT without compromising coverage of the target volumes. Limiting doses to DARS leads to lesser acute and late toxicity without compromising locoregional control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:符合指南标准的早期乳腺癌女性应接受保乳手术(BCS)辅助放疗替代乳房切除术。新西兰(NZ)记录了筛查和乳腺癌治疗途径方面的种族差异。这项研究旨在确定,在符合BCS资格的女性中,接受乳房切除术或放疗的比率因种族和其他因素而异。
    方法:该研究评估了2010年至2015年间注册的早期乳腺癌(导管原位癌[DCIS]和I-IIIA浸润性阶段)的女性的管理,摘自最近合并的新西兰乳腺癌注册中心(现为TeRñhitaMatetaetaeNZBCF国家乳腺癌注册中心)。应用特定标准来确定符合BCS条件的女性。进行了单变量和多变量分析,以检查人口统计学和临床病理因素的差异,主要关注种族(毛利人,太平洋,亚洲人,和其他;后者被定义为新西兰欧洲人,其他欧洲人,和中东拉丁美洲和非洲)。
    结果:5520名符合BCS标准的妇女中,有22.2%接受了乳房切除术,3807名接受BCS的女性中有91.1%接受了辅助放疗(93.5%用于浸润性癌,DCIS为78.3%)。在浸润性癌症组中,亚洲种族与较高的乳房切除术率相关(OR2.18;95CI1.72-2.75),与其他种族相比,随着年龄的增长,症状诊断,高级阶段,较大的肿瘤,HER2阳性,和激素受体阴性组。太平洋种族与较低的辅助放疗率有关,与其他种族相比,在侵入性和DCIS组中,随着年龄的增长,症状诊断,侵袭性组的肿瘤级别较低。乳房切除术和辅助放疗率都随着时间的推移而下降。对于那些没有接受放射治疗的人,临床医生不转诊是最常见的记录原因(8%),随后是转诊后患者下降(5%)。
    结论:按照国际标准,放疗的使用率很高。需要进一步的研究来了解太平洋女性BCS术后乳房切除术率和放疗率低的种族差异,以及临床医生不转诊的原因。
    BACKGROUND: Women with early breast cancer who meet guideline-based criteria should be offered breast conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiotherapy as an alternative to mastectomy. New Zealand (NZ) has documented ethnic disparities in screening access and in breast cancer treatment pathways. This study aimed to determine whether, among BCS-eligible women, rates of receipt of mastectomy or radiotherapy differed by ethnicity and other factors.
    METHODS: The study assessed management of women with early breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] and invasive stages I-IIIA) registered between 2010 and 2015, extracted from the recently consolidated New Zealand Breast Cancer Registry (now Te Rēhita Mate Ūtaetae NZBCF National Breast Cancer Register). Specific criteria were applied to determine women eligible for BCS. Uni- and multivariable analyses were undertaken to examine differences by demographic and clinicopathological factors with a primary focus on ethnicity (Māori, Pacific, Asian, and Other; the latter is defined as NZ European, Other European, and Middle Eastern Latin American and African).
    RESULTS: Overall 22.2% of 5520 BCS-eligible women were treated with mastectomy, and 91.1% of 3807 women who undertook BCS received adjuvant radiotherapy (93.5% for invasive cancer, and 78.3% for DCIS). Asian ethnicity was associated with a higher mastectomy rate in the invasive cancer group (OR 2.18; 95%CI 1.72-2.75), compared to Other ethnicity, along with older age, symptomatic diagnosis, advanced stage, larger tumour, HER2-positive, and hormone receptor-negative groups. Pacific ethnicity was associated with a lower adjuvant radiotherapy rate, compared to Other ethnicity, in both invasive and DCIS groups, along with older age, symptomatic diagnosis, and lower grade tumour in the invasive group. Both mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy rates decreased over time. For those who did not receive radiotherapy, non-referral by a clinician was the most common documented reason (8%), followed by patient decline after being referred (5%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Rates of radiotherapy use are high by international standards. Further research is required to understand differences by ethnicity in both rates of mastectomy and lower rates of radiotherapy after BCS for Pacific women, and the reasons for non-referral by clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:前列腺癌根治术和盆腔辅助放疗治疗男性压力性尿失禁是一项治疗挑战。可调节的经闭孔男性系统(ATOMS)在这些患者中的疗效和安全性尚未得到很好的确立,尽管人们普遍认为结果比没有放疗的患者差。(2)方法:回顾性多中心研究评估2016年至2022年期间在9个不同机构进行根治性前列腺切除术和放疗后接受硅胶覆盖阴囊孔(SSP)ATOMS植入物治疗的患者。主要终点是干燥患者率,定义为垫试验≤20毫升/天。次要终点是并发症发生率(使用Clavien-Dindo分类定义),使用患者总体改善印象(PGI-I)量表进行设备移除和自我感知满意度。Wilcoxon秩和检验,使用逐步方法进行Fisher精确检验和逻辑回归,标准为0.15和0.1。(3)结果:223例患者符合入选标准,12例(5.4%)在放疗后接受了挽救性前列腺切除术,27例(12.1%)以前的压力性尿失禁装置。ATOMS调整后,95例(42.6%)患者为干性,36例(16.1%)有任何级别的并发症(I级,n=20;二级,n=11;三级,术后前3个月n=5)。平均随访36±21个月,26例(11.7%)患者植入该装置.关于自我感知对植入物的满意度,125例患者中有105例(84%)认为自己满意(PGI-I1至3)。在单变量分析中,干燥与年龄较小有关(p=0.06),原发性前列腺切除术(p=0.08),以前没有尿失禁手术(p=0.02),无膀胱过度活动症状(p=0.04),无膀胱颈狭窄(p=0.001),无需手术翻修(p=0.008),基线失禁严重程度降低(p=0.0003).多变量分析确定没有手术翻修(p=0.018),无膀胱颈狭窄(p=0.05),原发性前列腺切除术(p=0.07)和基线失禁严重程度较低(p<0.0001)是干燥的独立预测因素.提出了逻辑回归模型并进行了内部验证。(4)结论:ATOMS是治疗前列腺癌根治术和辅助放疗后男性尿失禁的有效和安全的替代方法。在这种复杂的情况下,确定了预测干燥的因素,以便更好地选择患者。
    (1) Background: Treatment of male stress incontinence in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and adjuvant pelvic radiation is a therapeutic challenge. The efficacy and safety of the adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) in these patients is not well established, despite the general belief that outcomes are worse than in patients without radiation. (2) Methods: Retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients treated with silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP) ATOMS implant after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in nine different institutions between 2016 and 2022. The primary endpoint was dry patient rate, defined as pad-test ≤ 20 mL/day. The secondary endpoints were complication rate (defined using Clavien-Dindo classification), device removal and self-perceived satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher\'s exact test and logistic regression were performed using stepwise method with a 0.15 entry and 0.1 stay criteria. (3) Results: 223 patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion and 12 (5.4%) received salvage prostatectomy after radiation and 27 (12.1%) previous devices for stress incontinence. After ATOMS adjustment, 95 patients (42.6%) were dry and 36 (16.1%) had complications of any grade (grade I, n = 20; grade II, n = 11; grade III, n = 5) during the first 3 months postoperatively. At a mean of 36 ± 21 months follow-up, the device was explanted in 26 (11.7%) patients. Regarding self-perceived satisfaction with the implant, 105 of 125 patients (84%) considered themselves satisfied (PGI-I 1 to 3). In the univariate analysis, dryness was associated to younger age (p = 0.06), primary prostatectomy (p = 0.08), no previous incontinence surgery (p = 0.02), absence of overactive bladder symptoms (p = 0.04), absence of bladder neck stricture (p = 0.001), no need of surgical revision (p = 0.008) and lower baseline incontinence severity (p = 0.0003). Multivariate analysis identified absence of surgical revision (p = 0.018), absence of bladder neck stricture (p = 0.05), primary prostatectomy (p = 0.07) and lower baseline incontinence severity (p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of dryness. A logistic regression model was proposed and internally validated. (4) Conclusions: ATOMS is an efficacious and safe alternative to treat male incontinence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Factors predictive of dryness are identified in this complex scenario to allow for better patient selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:乳腺放疗(RT)引起弥漫性心肌改变,这可能会增加射血分数保留的心力衰竭的发生率。这项研究旨在评估RT后弥漫性纤维化的早期体征及其在六年随访期间的演变。
    方法:对30例早期左侧乳腺癌患者进行基线超声心动图和心电图检查。在RT之后,以及为期三年和六年的后续访问。超声心动图分析包括整合反向散射(IBS)的离线分析。分析心电图的碎裂QRS(fQRS)。此外,在6年对照时进行心脏磁共振(CMR)成像.左心室16段模型用于心脏成像,并分析了各自的局部辐射剂量。
    结果:在随访期间,下间隔段的局部心肌反射率增加了2.02(4.53)dB(p=0.026),具有fQRS的导线百分比从9.2%增加到16.4%(p=0.002)。在CMR成像中,发现异常的细胞外体积(ECV)和T1标测值,前间隔和根尖定位的中位数为3.5(1.00-5.75)和3(1.25-4.00),分别。较高的左心室辐射剂量与CMR和超声心动图同时变化的可能性增加有关(OR1.26,95%Cl。1.00-1.59,p=0.047)。
    结论:放疗后,在心电图和超声心动图中以多模态方式观察到弥漫性心肌纤维化标志物的进行性变化.超声心动图的变化和CMR的异常值位于间隔和心尖区,多种变化与较高的辐射剂量有关。
    BACKGROUND: Breast radiotherapy (RT) induces diffuse myocardial changes, which may increase the incidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This study aimed to evaluate the early signs of diffuse fibrosis after RT and their evolution during a six-year follow-up.
    METHODS: Thirty patients with early-stage left-sided breast cancer were studied with echocardiography and electrocardiography (ECG) at baseline, after RT, and at three-year and six-year follow-up visits. Echocardiography analysis included an off-line analysis of integrated backscatter (IBS). ECG was analysed for fragmented QRS (fQRS). In addition, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed at the six-year control. The left ventricle 16-segment model was used in cardiac imaging, and respective local radiation doses were analysed.
    RESULTS: Regional myocardial reflectivity in inferoseptal segments increased by 2.02 (4.53) dB (p = 0.026) and the percentage of leads with fQRS increased from 9.2 to 16.4% (p = 0.002) during the follow-up. In CMR imaging, abnormal extracellular volume (ECV) and T1 mapping values were found with anteroseptal and apical localization in a median of 3.5 (1.00-5.75) and 3 (1.25-4.00) segments, respectively. A higher left ventricle radiation dose was associated with an increased likelihood of having changes simultaneously in CMR and echocardiography (OR 1.26, 95% Cl. 1.00-1.59, p = 0.047).
    CONCLUSIONS: After radiotherapy, progressive changes in markers of diffuse myocardial fibrosis were observed in a multimodal manner in ECG and echocardiography. Changes in echocardiography and abnormal values in CMR were localized in the septal and apical regions, and multiple changes were associated with higher radiation doses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:术中放射治疗(IORT)是脑转移瘤(BM)切除后的辅助立体定向外束放射治疗(EBRT)的新兴替代方案。IORT的优势包括即时预防肿瘤再生,优化邻近健康脑组织的剂量节约,并立即完成BM治疗,允许更早入院接受随后的系统治疗。然而,前瞻性结果数据有限。我们试图评估IORT与EBRT的长期结果。
    方法:共有35名连续患者,在研究登记处前瞻性招募,在单个神经肿瘤中心接受BM切除后接受IORT的患者进行放射性坏死(RN)发生率评估,本地控制率(LCR),远端脑进展(DBP)和总生存期(OS)作为长期结局参数。在平衡比较配对分析中,将1年估计的OS和生存率与我们的机构数据库进行了比较,纳入了在BM切除术后接受辅助性EBRT的388例连续患者。
    结果:给涂药器表面的IORT剂量中位数为30Gy。观察到2.9%的RN率。估计1年LCR为97.1%,1年无DBP生存率为73.5%。在经历脑内进展的患者亚组中,DBP的中位时间为6.4(范围1.7-24)个月。中位OS为17.5个月(未达到0.5个月),1年生存率为61.3%,与比较队列没有显着差异(分别为p=0.55和p=0.82)。
    结论:IORT是BM切除后安全有效的快速途径,与辅助EBRT具有相当的长期结局。
    OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an emerging alternative to adjuvant stereotactic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following resection of brain metastases (BM). Advantages of IORT include an instant prevention of tumor regrowth, optimized dose-sparing of adjacent healthy brain tissue and immediate completion of BM treatment, allowing an earlier admission to subsequent systemic treatments. However, prospective outcome data are limited. We sought to assess long-term outcome of IORT in comparison to EBRT.
    METHODS: A total of 35 consecutive patients, prospectively recruited within a study registry, who received IORT following BM resection at a single neuro-oncological center were evaluated for radiation necrosis (RN) incidence rates, local control rates (LCR), distant brain progression (DBP) and overall survival (OS) as long-term outcome parameters. The 1 year-estimated OS and survival rates were compared in a balanced comparative matched-pair analysis to those of our institutional database, encompassing 388 consecutive patients who underwent adjuvant EBRT after BM resection.
    RESULTS: The median IORT dose was 30 Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. A 2.9% RN rate was observed. The estimated 1 year-LCR was 97.1% and the 1 year-DBP-free survival 73.5%. Median time to DBP was 6.4 (range 1.7-24) months in the subgroup of patients experiencing intracerebral progression. The median OS was 17.5 (0.5-not reached) months with a 1 year-survival rate of 61.3%, which did not not significantly differ from the comparative cohort (p = 0.55 and p = 0.82, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: IORT is a safe and effective fast-track approach following BM resection, with comparable long-term outcomes as adjuvant EBRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号