acute lung injury

急性肺损伤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较定义和分类小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征严重程度的两种方法:柏林分类,它使用氧分压和吸入氧气分数之间的关系,以及儿科急性肺损伤共识会议的分类,使用氧合指数。
    方法:这是一项针对0-18岁诊断为急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者的前瞻性研究,这些患者接受了有创机械通气并提供了一到三个动脉血气样本,总计140次有效测量。使用Spearman检验并使用两个分类之间的kappa系数对这些度量进行了相关性评估,最初使用研究的一般人群,然后将其细分为有和没有支气管痉挛的患者以及有和没有使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者。还使用双向方差分析评估了这两个因素(支气管痉挛和神经肌肉阻断剂)分别和一起对两种分类的影响。
    结果:在一般人群中,他们是54名0-18岁的患者,通过Spearman检验发现强烈的负相关(ρ-0.91;p<0.001),在柏林和小儿急性肺损伤共识会议之间的比较中,kappa系数(0.62;p<0.001)发现了很强的一致性。在有和没有支气管痉挛的人群中,有和没有使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的人群中,相关系数与普通人群相似,尽管在不使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者中,与使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者相比,这些分类之间的一致性更大(两者的kappa为0.67vs0.56,p<0.001).神经肌肉阻滞剂对氧分压与吸入氧分数(方差分析;F:12.9;p<0.001)和氧合指数(方差分析;F:8.3;p=0.004)之间的关系具有显着影响。
    结论:在一般人群和所研究的亚组中,两种分类之间存在很强的相关性和一致性。使用神经肌肉阻滞剂对急性呼吸窘迫综合征的严重程度有显著影响。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare two methods for defining and classifying the severity of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin classification, which uses the relationship between the partial pressure of oxygen and the fraction of inspired oxygen, and the classification of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference, which uses the oxygenation index.
    METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients aged 0 - 18 years with a diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome who were invasively mechanically ventilated and provided one to three arterial blood gas samples, totaling 140 valid measurements. These measures were evaluated for correlation using the Spearman test and agreement using the kappa coefficient between the two classifications, initially using the general population of the study and then subdividing it into patients with and without bronchospasm and those with and without the use of neuromuscular blockers. The effect of these two factors (bronchospasm and neuromuscular blocking agent) separately and together on both classifications was also assessed using two-way analysis of variance.
    RESULTS: In the general population, who were 54 patients aged 0 - 18 years a strong negative correlation was found by Spearman\'s test (ρ -0.91; p < 0.001), and strong agreement was found by the kappa coefficient (0.62; p < 0.001) in the comparison between Berlin and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. In the populations with and without bronchospasm and who did and did not use neuromuscular blockers, the correlation coefficients were similar to those of the general population, though among patients not using neuromuscular blockers, there was greater agreement between the classifications than for patients using neuromuscular blockers (kappa 0.67 versus 0.56, p < 0.001 for both). Neuromuscular blockers had a significant effect on the relationship between the partial pressure of oxygen and the fraction of inspired oxygen (analysis of variance; F: 12.9; p < 0.001) and the oxygenation index (analysis of variance; F: 8.3; p = 0.004).
    CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong correlation and agreement between the two classifications in the general population and in the subgroups studied. Use of neuromuscular blockers had a significant effect on the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于缺乏有效的诊断测试,有很大比例的急性肺损伤(ALI)的脓毒症患者被发现较晚,导致治疗推迟,因此死亡率更高。鉴定诊断性生物标记物可以改善筛查以更早地鉴定处于ALI高风险的败血症患者并提供潜在的有效治疗药物。机器学习代表了一种强大的方法,用于理解复杂的基因表达数据以找到强大的ALI诊断生物标志物。
    方法:数据集从GEO和ArrayExpress数据库获得。在质量控制和标准化之后,将数据集(GSE66890、GSE10474和GSE32707)合并为训练集,和四种机器学习特征选择方法(弹性网,SVM,随机森林和XGBoost)用于构建诊断模型。其他数据集被视为验证集。为了进一步评估诊断模型的性能和预测价值,列线图,构建决策曲线分析(DCA)和临床影响曲线(CIC)。最后,从CTD数据库中探索了与选定特征相互作用的潜在小分子化合物.
    结果:GSEA结果显示,免疫反应和代谢可能在脓毒症诱导的ALI的发病机制中起重要作用。然后,通过来自所有四种方法的共有特征选择将52个基因鉴定为推定的生物标志物。其中,5个基因(ARHGDIB,通过所有方法选择ALDH1A1,TACR3,TREM1和PI3),并用于预测ALI诊断的准确性。外部数据集(E-MTAB-5273和E-MTAB-5274)表明诊断模型具有很高的准确性,AUC值分别为0.725和0.833。此外,列线图,DCA和CIC表明该诊断模型具有良好的性能和预测价值。最后,小分子化合物(姜黄素,维甲酸,对乙酰氨基酚,雌二醇和地塞米松)被筛选为脓毒症诱导的ALI的潜在治疗剂。
    结论:多种机器学习算法的共识确定了5种能够区分ALI和脓毒症患者的基因。该诊断模型可以识别ALI高风险的脓毒症患者,并为脓毒症诱导的ALI提供潜在的治疗靶点。
    A significant proportion of septic patients with acute lung injury (ALI) are recognized late due to the absence of an efficient diagnostic test, leading to the postponed treatments and consequently higher mortality. Identifying diagnostic biomarkers may improve screening to identify septic patients at high risk of ALI earlier and provide the potential effective therapeutic drugs. Machine learning represents a powerful approach for making sense of complex gene expression data to find robust ALI diagnostic biomarkers.
    The datasets were obtained from GEO and ArrayExpress databases. Following quality control and normalization, the datasets (GSE66890, GSE10474 and GSE32707) were merged as the training set, and four machine learning feature selection methods (Elastic net, SVM, random forest and XGBoost) were applied to construct the diagnostic model. The other datasets were considered as the validation sets. To further evaluate the performance and predictive value of diagnostic model, nomogram, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and Clinical Impact Curve (CIC) were constructed. Finally, the potential small molecular compounds interacting with selected features were explored from the CTD database.
    The results of GSEA showed that immune response and metabolism might play an important role in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced ALI. Then, 52 genes were identified as putative biomarkers by consensus feature selection from all four methods. Among them, 5 genes (ARHGDIB, ALDH1A1, TACR3, TREM1 and PI3) were selected by all methods and used to predict ALI diagnosis with high accuracy. The external datasets (E-MTAB-5273 and E-MTAB-5274) demonstrated that the diagnostic model had great accuracy with AUC value of 0.725 and 0.833, respectively. In addition, the nomogram, DCA and CIC showed that the diagnostic model had great performance and predictive value. Finally, the small molecular compounds (Curcumin, Tretinoin, Acetaminophen, Estradiol and Dexamethasone) were screened as the potential therapeutic agents for sepsis-induced ALI.
    This consensus of multiple machine learning algorithms identified 5 genes that were able to distinguish ALI from septic patients. The diagnostic model could identify septic patients at high risk of ALI, and provide potential therapeutic targets for sepsis-induced ALI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PARDS)的诊断指南是在2015年儿童急性肺损伤共识会议(PALICC)上制定的。尽管这是在创建儿科特定诊断标准方面的改进,PARDS的鉴定仍存在差异的可能性。
    目的:2015年PALICC标准诊断中重度PARDS的评估者间可靠性如何?哪些临床标准和患者因素与诊断分歧相关?
    方法:两名PICU医师对2016-2021年收治的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者进行了回顾性分析。审稿人评估患者是否符合2015年PALICC中重度PARDS定义,并对其诊断置信度进行评级。使用Gwet协议系数(AC1)测量评估者间的可靠性。
    结果:191次相遇中有37次存在诊断分歧。评估者间可靠性为“实质性”(AC1=0.74,95%CI[0.65-0.83])。分歧是由于胸部X光片的不同解释(56.8%),肺水肿的起源不明确(37.8%),如果患者目前的状况与基线有显著差异(27.0%),或缺乏清晰度。长期通气的患者更有可能出现分歧(OR4.66,95%CI[2.16-10.08],p<0.001),有原发性心脏入院诊断(OR3.36,95%CI[1.18-9.53],p=0.02),或在入院期间接受了心胸外科手术(OR4.90,95%CI[1.60-15.00],p=0.005)。在73%的情况下,审稿人对他们的决定至少有适度的信心,然而,如果患者患有心脏病或慢性呼吸衰竭,则不太可能自信。
    结论:在该队列中,2015年PALICC诊断中重度PARDS标准的评分者间可靠性很高,诊断分歧通常是由于胸部X光片解释的差异。患有心脏病或慢性呼吸衰竭的患者更容易出现诊断分歧。在解释这些亚组的胸部X光片和诊断PARDS方面需要更多的指导。
    Diagnostic guidelines for pediatric ARDS (PARDS) were developed at the 2015 Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC). Although this was an improvement in creating pediatric-specific diagnostic criteria, there remains potential for variability in identification of PARDS.
    What is the interrater reliability of the 2015 PALICC criteria for diagnosing moderate to severe PARDS? What clinical criteria and patient factors are associated with diagnostic disagreements?
    Patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure admitted from 2016 to 2021 who received invasive mechanical ventilation were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric ICU physicians. Reviewers evaluated whether the patient met the 2015 PALICC definition of moderate to severe PARDS and rated their diagnostic confidence. Interrater reliability was measured using Gwet\'s agreement coefficient.
    Thirty-seven of 191 encounters had a diagnostic disagreement. Interrater reliability was substantial (Gwet\'s agreement coefficient, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65-0.83). Disagreements were caused by different interpretations of chest radiographs (56.8%), ambiguity in origin of pulmonary edema (37.8%), or lack of clarity if patient\'s current condition was significantly different from baseline (27.0%). Disagreement was more likely in patients who were chronically ventilated (OR, 4.66; 95% CI, 2.16-10.08; P < .001), had a primary cardiac admission diagnosis (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.18-9.53; P = .02), or underwent cardiothoracic surgery during the admission (OR, 4.90; 95% CI, 1.60-15.00; P = .005). Reviewers were at least moderately confident in their decision 73% of the time; however, they were less likely to be confident if the patient had cardiac disease or chronic respiratory failure.
    The interrater reliability of the 2015 PALICC criteria for diagnosing moderate to severe PARDS in this cohort was substantial, with diagnostic disagreements commonly caused by differences in chest radiograph interpretations. Patients with cardiac disease or chronic respiratory failure were more vulnerable to diagnostic disagreements. More guidance is needed on interpreting chest radiographs and diagnosing PARDS in these subgroups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:资源有限环境(RLS)中小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PARDS)的诊断具有挑战性,并且描述不充分。作为第二届小儿急性肺损伤共识会议(PALICC-2)的一部分,我们对文献进行了综述,以优化对RLS中PARDS的识别,并为这些环境中的临床实践和未来研究提供建议/声明。
    方法:MEDLINE(Ovid),Embase(Elsevier),和CINAHL完成(EBSCOhost)。
    方法:我们纳入了与PARDS的诱发因素相关的研究,机械通气(MV),肺和非肺辅助治疗,以及在RLS中存活PARDS的儿童的长期结局。
    方法:标题/摘要评论,全文回顾,和使用标准化的数据收集表格进行数据提取。
    结果:建议评估的分级,发展,采用评估方法进行证据识别和总结,并提出建议。确定了77项研究用于全文提取。我们无法确定任何文献作为推荐的基础。我们在六项临床声明(良好做法,定义,和政策)和五项研究声明。临床医生应该意识到疾病和合并症,在大多数高收入环境中并不常见,容易在RLS中发展PARDS。由于难以识别PARDS和避免诊断不足,PALICC-2可能的PARDS定义允许在满足所有其他标准时排除成像标准,包括低氧血症的非侵入性指标。MV支持的可用性,定期MV培训和教育,以及肺和非肺辅助治疗的可及性和费用是与RLS中PARDS管理相关的其他问题.也缺乏来自RLS的PARDS幸存者的长期结果和随访可行性的数据。
    结论:迄今为止,PARDS在RLS中的描述仍然很差。在这些环境中工作的临床医生应该意识到患者PARDS的常见诱发因素。未来的研究迫切需要利用PALICC-2定义来描述流行病学,管理,以及RLS中PARDS的结果。
    Diagnosis of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) in resource-limited settings (RLS) is challenging and remains poorly described. We conducted a review of the literature to optimize recognition of PARDS in RLS and to provide recommendations/statements for clinical practice and future research in these settings as part of the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2).
    MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost).
    We included studies related to precipitating factors for PARDS, mechanical ventilation (MV), pulmonary and nonpulmonary ancillary treatments, and long-term outcomes in children who survive PARDS in RLS.
    Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form.
    The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize evidence and develop recommendations. Seventy-seven studies were identified for full-text extraction. We were unable to identify any literature on which to base recommendations. We gained consensus on six clinical statements (good practice, definition, and policy) and five research statements. Clinicians should be aware of diseases and comorbidities, uncommon in most high-income settings, that predispose to the development of PARDS in RLS. Because of difficulties in recognizing PARDS and to avoid underdiagnosis, the PALICC-2 possible PARDS definition allows exclusion of imaging criteria when all other criteria are met, including noninvasive metrics of hypoxemia. The availability of MV support, regular MV training and education, as well as accessibility and costs of pulmonary and nonpulmonary ancillary therapies are other concerns related to management of PARDS in RLS. Data on long-term outcomes and feasibility of follow-up in PARDS survivors from RLS are also lacking.
    To date, PARDS remains poorly described in RLS. Clinicians working in these settings should be aware of common precipitating factors for PARDS in their patients. Future studies utilizing the PALICC-2 definitions are urgently needed to describe the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of PARDS in RLS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为第二届小儿急性肺损伤共识会议(PALICC)制定有关无创呼吸支持治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PARDS)有效性的循证建议。这些包括考虑无创通气(NIV)和高流量鼻插管(HFNC)的时机和持续时间,有效性是否因疾病严重程度或治疗交付特征而异,以及使用NIV的最佳实践。
    方法:MEDLINE(Ovid),Embase(Elsevier),和CINAHL完成(EBSCOhost)。
    方法:搜索包括所有在PARDS或低氧性呼吸衰竭患儿中使用NIV或HFNC的研究。
    方法:标题/摘要评论,全文回顾,和使用标准化的数据提取表单进行数据提取。
    结果:建议评估的分级,发展,采用评估方法进行证据识别和总结,并提出建议。在6,336项研究中,我们确定了187个全文审查。产生了四项临床建议,与适应症有关,PARDS患者NIV的时间和持续时间,NIV失败和需要插管的预测因素(疾病恶化的体征和症状,包括脉搏血氧饱和度/Fio2比值),以及在资源有限的环境中使用NIV。就如何以及在哪里提供NIV,训练有素的经验丰富的工作人员和监测的重要性,NIV接口的类型,使用镇静剂,以及这种疗法的潜在并发症。产生了一项与PARDS患者的HFNC适应症相关的研究声明。
    结论:NIV是一种广泛使用的治疗儿童呼吸衰竭的方法,可能对部分PARDS患者有益。然而,需要密切监测疾病恶化和NIV失败。
    To develop evidence-based recommendations for the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) regarding the effectiveness of noninvasive respiratory support for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). These include consideration of the timing and duration of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), whether effectiveness varies by disease severity or by characteristics of treatment delivery, and best practices for the use of NIV.
    MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost).
    Searches included all studies involving the use of NIV or HFNC in children with PARDS or hypoxemic respiratory failure.
    Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction using a standardized data extraction form.
    The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize evidence and develop recommendations. Out of 6,336 studies, we identified 187 for full-text review. Four clinical recommendations were generated, related to indications, timing and duration of NIV in patients with PARDS, predictors of NIV failure and need for intubation (signs and symptoms of worsening disease including pulse oximetry saturation/Fio2 ratio), and use of NIV in resource-limited settings. Six good practice statements were generated related to how and where to deliver NIV, the importance of trained experienced staff and monitoring, types of NIV interfaces, the use of sedation, and the potential complications of this therapy. One research statement was generated related to indications of HFNC in patients with PARDS.
    NIV is a widely used modality for the treatment of respiratory failure in children and may be beneficial in a subset of patients with PARDS. However, there needs to be close monitoring for worsening disease and NIV failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:系统回顾和吸收有关儿童接受体外膜氧合(ECMO)支持治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PARDS)的文献,目的是更新小儿急性肺损伤共识会议的建议和关于临床实践和研究的声明。
    方法:电子搜索MEDLINE(Ovid),Embase(Elsevier),和CINAHL完成(EBSCOhost)。
    方法:搜索使用医学主题标题术语和文本词捕获ECMO在PARDS或急性呼吸衰竭中的研究。我们的综述中排除了使用动物模型和病例报告的研究。
    方法:标题/摘要评论,全文回顾,和使用标准化的数据收集表格进行数据提取。
    结果:建议评估的分级,发展,采用评估方法进行证据识别和总结,并提出建议。有18项研究确定用于全文提取。当缺乏儿科数据时,我们考虑了来自随机临床试验和观察性研究的成人和新生儿数据.产生了与ECMO适应症相关的六项临床建议,initiation,和PARDS的管理。产生了三个与ECMO适应症有关的良好做法声明,initiation,以及PARDS的后续行动。产生了两个政策声明,涉及ECMO团队组织和PARDS培训的影响。最后,有一个研究声明。
    结论:基于系统的文献综述,我们提出临床管理,ECMO适应症领域内的良好做法和政策声明,initiation,团队组织,团队训练,管理,以及与PARDS相关的后续行动。
    To systematically review and assimilate literature on children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) with the goal of developing an update to the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference recommendations and statements about clinical practice and research.
    Electronic searches of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost).
    The search used a medical subject heading terms and text words to capture studies of ECMO in PARDS or acute respiratory failure. Studies using animal models and case reports were excluded from our review.
    Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form.
    The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize evidence and develop recommendations. There were 18 studies identified for full-text extraction. When pediatric data was lacking, adult and neonatal data from randomized clinical trials and observational studies were considered. Six clinical recommendations were generated related to ECMO indications, initiation, and management in PARDS. There were three good practice statements generated related to ECMO indications, initiation, and follow-up in PARDS. Two policy statements were generated involving the impact of ECMO team organization and training in PARDS. Last, there was one research statement.
    Based on a systematic literature review, we propose clinical management, good practice and policy statements within the domains of ECMO indications, initiation, team organization, team training, management, and follow-up as they relate to PARDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:监测对于评估肺部状况的变化至关重要,为了识别心肺相互作用,并个性化和改善小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PARDS)的呼吸支持和辅助治疗。本文的目的是报告第二次儿科急性肺损伤共识会议(PALICC-2)修订后的监测建议/声明的基本原理。
    方法:MEDLINE(Ovid),Embase(Elsevier),和CINAHL完成(EBSCOhost)。
    方法:我们纳入了对18岁以下诊断为PARDS的儿童进行呼吸或心血管监测的研究。我们排除了针对新生儿的研究。
    方法:标题/摘要评论,全文回顾,和使用标准化的数据收集表格进行数据提取。
    结果:建议评估的分级,使用开发和评估方法来识别和总结证据并提出建议。我们确定了342项研究进行全文回顾。产生了与呼吸和心血管监测有关的17项良好实践声明。产生了与呼吸力学和成像监测有关的四个研究陈述,血流动力学监测,和拔管准备监测。
    结论:制定了PALICC-2监测良好实践和研究声明,以改善对PARDS患者的护理,并基于近年来在PARDS患者中产生的新知识,特别是在一般监测的主题中,呼吸系统力学,气体交换,断奶考虑,肺成像,和血流动力学监测。
    Monitoring is essential to assess changes in the lung condition, to identify heart-lung interactions, and to personalize and improve respiratory support and adjuvant therapies in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). The objective of this article is to report the rationale of the revised recommendations/statements on monitoring from the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2).
    MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost).
    We included studies focused on respiratory or cardiovascular monitoring of children less than 18 years old with a diagnosis of PARDS. We excluded studies focused on neonates.
    Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form.
    The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize evidence and develop recommendations. We identified 342 studies for full-text review. Seventeen good practice statements were generated related to respiratory and cardiovascular monitoring. Four research statements were generated related to respiratory mechanics and imaging monitoring, hemodynamics monitoring, and extubation readiness monitoring.
    PALICC-2 monitoring good practice and research statements were developed to improve the care of patients with PARDS and were based on new knowledge generated in recent years in patients with PARDS, specifically in topics of general monitoring, respiratory system mechanics, gas exchange, weaning considerations, lung imaging, and hemodynamic monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:我们对儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PARDS)的肺特异性辅助治疗的文献进行了更新,以提供儿科急性肺损伤共识会议关于临床实践和研究的建议和声明的更新。
    方法:MEDLINE(Ovid),Embase(Elsevier),和CINAHL完成(EBSCOhost)。
    方法:搜索仅限于儿童,PARDS或低氧性呼吸衰竭,并与肺部特异性辅助治疗重叠。
    方法:标题/摘要评论,全文回顾,和使用标准化的数据收集表格进行数据提取。
    结果:建议评估的分级,发展,采用评估方法进行证据识别和总结,并提出建议。确定了26项研究用于全文提取。产生了四项临床建议,与吸入一氧化氮的使用有关,表面活性剂,俯卧定位,和皮质类固醇。关于使用常规气管内抽吸和在气管内抽吸之前安装等渗盐水的两个良好实践声明。产生了三个研究陈述,涉及:使用开放式和封闭式抽吸,气道清除的具体方法,和其他各种辅助疗法。
    结论:支持或反驳PARDS儿童任何特定辅助治疗的证据仍然很少。进一步调查,包括对特定亚群的关注,需要更好地理解角色,如果有的话,这些不同的辅助治疗PARDS。
    We conducted an updated review of the literature on pulmonary-specific ancillary therapies for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) to provide an update to the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference recommendations and statements about clinical practice and research.
    MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost).
    Searches were limited to children, PARDS or hypoxic respiratory failure and overlap with pulmonary-specific ancillary therapies.
    Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form.
    The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize evidence and develop recommendations. Twenty-six studies were identified for full-text extraction. Four clinical recommendations were generated, related to use of inhaled nitric oxide, surfactant, prone positioning, and corticosteroids. Two good practice statements were generated on the use of routine endotracheal suctioning and installation of isotonic saline prior to endotracheal suctioning. Three research statements were generated related to: the use of open versus closed suctioning, specific methods of airway clearance, and various other ancillary therapies.
    The evidence to support or refute any of the specific ancillary therapies in children with PARDS remains low. Further investigation, including a focus on specific subpopulations, is needed to better understand the role, if any, of these various ancillary therapies in PARDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号