achalasia

失语症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:贲门失弛缓症,食道的原发性运动障碍,造成严重的营养不良风险。本研究旨在全面评估未经治疗的门失弛缓症患者的营养状况,将其与功能性胃肠病(FGIDs)病例进行比较,并在一年内进行经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)对营养的影响。
    方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,包括连续的贲门失弛缓症,从2021年12月到2022年4月在三级护理中心。生化参数,人体测量学,使用主观整体评估(SGA)和营养不良通用筛查工具进行营养评估.诊断为FGIDs的病例作为对照。
    结果:多达118例(41.2±13.9年,61%的男性)患有贲门失弛缓症和200名对照(43.4±11.9岁,69%的男性)被纳入研究。贲门失弛缓症的亚型包括I型(16.9%),II(76.3%)和III(6.8%)。总的来说,中,重度营养不良占38.1%和6.8%,分别。与对照组相比,贲门失弛缓症患者的前白蛋白较低(19.4vs.25.2;p=0.001),血清钙(p=0.012),维生素D(p=0.001),血清铁(p=0.001),三头肌褶皱厚度(p=0.002)和握力(p=0.001)。在单变量分析中,I型贲门失弛缓症,身体质量指数,%重量损失,食管下括约肌压和Eckardt评分是营养不良(SGA)的预测因子.在多变量分析中,贲门失弛缓症的类型,中臂围和低体重指数是贲门失弛缓症患者营养不良的重要预测因素。在一年的随访中,POEM后营养状况显着改善。
    结论:贲门失弛缓症患者与FGIDs患者相比,营养不良的风险明显更高。POEM后营养状况明显改善。(NCT05161923)。
    OBJECTIVE: Achalasia cardia, a primary motility disorder of the esophagus, poses significant malnutrition risks. This study aims at comprehensively assessing the nutritional status in untreated achalasia patients, contrasting it with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) cases and impact of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on nutrition at one-year.
    METHODS: We conducted a prospective study, including consecutive achalasia cases, from December 2021 to April 2022 at a tertiary care centre. Biochemical parameters, anthropometry, subjective global assessment (SGA) and malnutrition universal screening tool were used for nutritional assessment. Cases diagnosed with FGIDs served as controls.
    RESULTS: As many as 118 cases (41.2 ± 13.9 years, 61% males) with achalasia and 200 controls (43.4 ± 11.9 years, 69% males) were included in the study. Sub-types of achalasia included type I (16.9%), II (76.3%) and III (6.8%). Overall, 38.1% and 6.8% cases were moderately and severely malnourished, respectively. As compared to controls, cases with achalasia had lower pre-albumin (19.4 vs. 25.2; p = 0.001), serum calcium (p = 0.012), vitamin D (p = 0.001), serum iron (p = 0.001), triceps fold thickness (p = 0.002) and hand-grip strength (p = 0.001). On univariate analysis, type-I achalasia, body mass index, % weight loss, lower esophageal sphincter pressures and Eckardt scores were predictors of malnourishment (SGA). On multivariate analysis, type of achalasia, mid arm circumference and low body mass index were significant predictors of malnourishment in cases with achalasia. There was significant improvement in the nutritional status after POEM at one-year follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Achalasia patients demonstrate a notably higher risk of malnutrition compared to individuals with FGIDs. Nutritional status significantly improves after POEM. (NCT05161923).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:内镜压力研究集成系统(EPSIS)是一种用于评估食管下括约肌功能的内镜诊断系统。尽管以前的研究已经确定EPSIS作为诊断门失弛缓症的工具是有效的,尚不确定EPSIS是否可以在经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)之前和之后检测到明显的变化,这是贲门失弛缓症的首要治疗方法。本研究旨在评估EPSIS作为评估POEM临床效果的客观诊断工具的有效性。
    方法:我们对2022年1月至2023年12月接受POEM的患者进行了回顾性分析。患者术前和术后2个月接受EPSIS。胃内压力(IGP)参数,包括最大IGP,IGP差异,比较了POEM前后的波形梯度。这些参数也在两组之间进行了比较:术后胃食管反流病(GERD)组和非GERD组。
    结果:共50例患者被分析。术后平均最大IGP显著低于术前(15.0mmHgvs.19.8mmHg,P<0.001)。术后平均IGP差异和波形梯度也显著低于术前(8.0mmHgvs.12.2mmHg,P<0.001;和0.26mmHg/svs.0.43mmHg/s,分别为P<0.001)。GERD组术后平均波形梯度显著降低(17例,34%)高于非GERD组(33例,66%)(0.207mmHg与0.291mmHg,P=0.034)。
    结论:结果支持使用EPSIS作为评估POEM效果的有效诊断工具。
    OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is an endoscopic diagnostic system utilized for evaluation of lower esophageal sphincter function. Although previous studies have determined that EPSIS was effective as a tool for the diagnosis of achalasia, it remains uncertain if EPSIS can detect significant changes before and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), which is the premier treatment for achalasia. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of EPSIS as an objective diagnostic tool for assessing the clinical effect of POEM.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent POEM from January 2022 to December 2023. The patients underwent EPSIS preoperatively and 2 months postoperatively. Intragastric pressure (IGP) parameters, including the maximum IGP, IGP difference, and waveform gradient were compared pre- and post-POEM. These parameters also were compared between two groups: the postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) group and the non-GERD group.
    RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were analyzed. The mean maximum IGP was significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (15.0 mmHg vs. 19.8 mmHg, P < 0.001). The mean IGP difference and waveform gradient were also significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (8.0 mmHg vs. 12.2 mmHg, P < 0.001; and 0.26 mmHg/s vs. 0.43 mmHg/s, P < 0.001, respectively). The mean postoperative waveform gradient was significantly lower in the GERD group (17 patients, 34%) than in the non-GERD group (33 patients, 66%) (0.207 mmHg vs. 0.291 mmHg, P = 0.034).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results supported the use of EPSIS as an effective diagnostic tool for assessing the effect of POEM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然肌切开术在经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)手术中至关重要,其最佳长度仍然存在争议。在这里,我们提出了一种改良的POEM,具有新的定制肌切开术长度的方法,旨在评估安全性,功效,以及与标准POEM相比,该改良POEM在I型或II型贲门失弛缓症的临床结果。
    方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年12月在吉林大学第一医院接受POEM治疗的75例I型或II型门失弛缓症患者。根据肌切开术,这些患者被分为按需逆行肌切开术(RDM,n=34),通过确定食管下括约肌(LES)扩张的程度,从胃侧和长度开始切开术,和标准肌切开术(SM,n=41)组。基线数据,肌切开术长度,操作时间,临床成功率,不良事件发生率,并对与反流相关的不良事件进行比较分析。
    结果:RDM组的中位肌切开术长度明显短于SM组(6vs.8厘米,分别为;p<0.001)。此外,RDM组的中位肌切开术时间明显短于SM组(10vs.16分钟,分别为;p<0.001)。所有患者均成功实施POEM。在2年的随访中,在RDM和SM组中观察到较高的临床成功率(92.0%vs.93.3%,分别为;p=1.000)。两组的术中不良事件和术后反流相关不良事件发生率较低,具有可比性。
    结论:RDMPOEM是I型或II型贲门失弛缓症患者安全有效的治疗方法。此外,与标准POEM技术相比,它的肌切开术长度和手术时间更短。
    BACKGROUND: Although myotomy is crucial in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) surgeries, its optimum length remains controversial. Herein, we propose a modified POEM with new method of tailoring myotomy length aim to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of this modified POEM compared with standard POEM in type I or II achalasia.
    METHODS: Seventy-five patients with type I or II achalasia who underwent POEM at the First Hospital of Jilin University between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the myotomy approach, these patients were divided into the retrograde on-demand myotomy (RDM, n = 34), with myotomy beginning on gastric side and length tailored by determining the degree of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) distention, and standard myotomy (SM, n = 41) groups. The baseline data, myotomy length, operation time, clinical success rate, adverse event rate, and reflux-related adverse events were compared and analyzed.
    RESULTS: The median myotomy length in the RDM group was significantly shorter than that in the SM group (6 vs. 8 cm, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, the median myotomy time in the RDM group was significantly shorter than that in the SM group (10 vs. 16 min, respectively; p < 0.001). POEM was successfully performed in all the patients. At the 2-year follow-up, high clinical success rates were observed in both the RDM and SM groups (92.0% vs. 93.3%, respectively; p = 1.000). The incidence of intraoperative adverse events and postoperative reflux-related adverse events was low and comparable in both groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: RDM POEM is a safe and effective method for patients with type I or II achalasia. Furthermore, it has a shorter myotomy length and operation time than standard POEM technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    贲门失弛缓症是一种影响食管括约肌功能的神经退行性疾病。治疗方案包括非手术和手术入路,例如Heller肌切开术(HM)。将Dor胃底折叠术与HM联合存在争议,但可以预防胃食管反流病(GERD)。这项回顾性队列研究旨在评估合并Dor胃底折叠术的HM是否能降低GERD发生率并增加吞咽困难发生率。包括2018年1月至2023年8月期间接受HM的80名患者。64例患者患有Dor胃底折叠术,与4:1至16例没有胃底折叠术的患者相匹配。在不同的术后时间点回顾GERD和贲门失弛缓症的记录。在任何时间点,两组之间的GERD或吞咽困难症状均未发现显着差异。同样,胸痛或吞咽困难治疗无显著差异.总之,这项研究表明,在HM中添加Dor胃底折叠术对术后GERD或贲门失弛缓症相关症状无显著影响.
    Achalasia is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting esophageal sphincter function. Treatment options include non-surgical and surgical approaches, such as Heller myotomy (HM). Combining Dor fundoplication with HM is controversial but may prevent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether HM with Dor fundoplication reduces GERD rates and increases dysphagia rates. Eighty patients who underwent HM between January 2018 and August 2023 were included. Sixty-four patients had Dor fundoplication and were matched 4:1 to 16 patients without fundoplication. Records were reviewed for GERD and achalasia symptoms at various postoperative time points. No significant differences in GERD or dysphagia symptoms were found between the two groups at any time point. Similarly, there were no significant differences in chest pain or dysphagia treatment. In conclusion, this study suggests that the addition of Dor fundoplication to HM does not significantly impact postoperative GERD or achalasia-related symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:贲门失弛缓症是一种罕见的食管疾病,具有潜在的致命并发症。了解Heller心肌切开术(HCM)对贲门失弛缓症的不同手术治疗方式的结果,有助于选择最安全和最有效的选择。然而,在非洲,使用Heller肌切开术治疗脱位的数据有限。因此,我们的目标是确定围手术期的发病率,喀麦隆HCM的死亡率和短期功能结局。
    方法:我们在喀麦隆的两个三级卫生中心进行了一项为期10年的队列研究,研究对象是因贲门失弛缓症而接受HCM的患者,术后随访至少3个月。我们分析了人口统计数据,术前临床和影像学数据,治疗细节,以及使用Eckardt评分的HCM后3至12个月的结局。
    结果:我们招募了29例门失弛缓症患者,平均年龄为24±16岁,主要为女性(M/F为1/3.8)。平均症状持续时间为51±20个月。在80%的案例中,通过常规X线对比成像或"钡吞咽试验"(93%)和/或上消化道内窥镜检查(86%)进行诊断.无法通过食管测压的金标准诊断方法。术前,所有患者均有表现为活动性贲门失弛缓症的症状.通过剖腹手术进行HCM的比例为75%,而腹腔镜手术的比例为25%。Dor的前部分胃底折叠术是主要的抗反流手术(59%)。粘膜穿孔是8例患者中唯一的术中并发症(腹腔镜检查期间2例与6在剖腹手术中;p>0.5),并通过简单的缝线成功治疗。术后并发症是非严重的,在所有通过剖腹手术的患者中发生了10%。开腹手术的平均术后住院时间为7±3天。腹腔镜检查为5±2天;p>0.5。围手术期死亡率为零。总的来说,术后短期功能结局被评为优;平均Eckardt评分为1.5±0.5(vs.术前Eckardt评分为9±1;p<0.0001)。
    结论:在这种资源有限的情况下,贲门失弛缓症的诊断较晚。HCM产生令人满意的结果,尤其是通过腹腔镜管理。需要改善诊断性食管测压和微创外科基础设施以及所需的外科培训/技能,以实现最佳的门失弛缓症护理。
    BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a rare esophageal disease with potentially lethal complications. Knowledge of the outcomes of the different surgical treatment modalities for achalasia by Heller\'s cardiomyotomy (HCM) helps to choose the safest and most effective option. However, data on the management of achalsia using a Heller myotomy is limited in Africa. Thus, our aim was to determine the perioperative morbidity, mortality and short-term functional outcomes of HCM in Cameroon.
    METHODS: We conducted a cohort study throughout a 10-year chart review of patients who underwent HCM for achalasia and were followed up postoperatively for at least three months at two tertiary health centers in Cameroon. We analyzed demographic data, preoperative clinical and imaging data, treatment details, and outcomes at three to twelve months after HCM using the Eckardt score.
    RESULTS: We enrolled 29 patients with achalasia having a mean age of 24 ± 16 years and predominantly females (M/F of 1/3.8). The mean symptom duration was 51 ± 20 months. In 80% of cases, the diagnosis was made through a conventional x-ray contrast imaging or \"barium swallow test\" (93%) and/or an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (86%). The gold standard diagnostic method via esophageal manometry was unavailable. Preoperatievly, all patients had symptoms suggestive of an active achalasia. HCM was performed via laparotomy in 75% as opposed to 25% laparoscopic HCM procedures. Dor\'s anterior partial fundoplication was the main anti-reflux procedure performed (59%). Mucosal perforations were the only intraoperative complications in eight patients (2 during laparoscopy vs. 6 during laparotomy; p > 0.5) and were managed successfully by simple sutures. Postoperative complications were non-severe and occurred in 10% of patients all operated via laparotomy. The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was 7 ± 3 days for laparotomy vs. 5 ± 2 days for laparoscopy; p > 0.5. The perioperative mortality rate was nil. Overall, the short-term postoperative functional outcome was rated excellent; average Eckardt score of 1.5 ± 0.5 (vs. preoperative Eckardt Score of 9 ± 1; p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Achalasia is diagnosed late in this resource-limited setting. HCM yields satisfactory outcomes, especially via laparoscopic management. An improvement in diagnostic esophageal manometry and mini-invasive surgical infrastructure and the required surgical training/skills are needed for optimal achalasia care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:阿片类药物诱导的食管紊乱(OIED)常表现为痉挛性食管紊乱(SED)和食管胃结合部流出道梗阻(EGJOO)。我们旨在评估和比较POEM在阿片类药物使用者和非使用者中的SED和EGJOO的临床结果。
    方法:在2018年1月至2022年9月期间接受SED和EGJOOPOEM的连续阿片类药物使用者和非使用者的倾向得分(PS)匹配研究。以下协变量用于PS计算:年龄,性别,症状持续时间,Eckardt得分,运动障碍的类型,和POEM期间的肌切开术长度。临床反应定义为POEM后Eckardt评分≤3。
    结果:在研究期间共有277名连续患者接受了POEM。PS匹配导致选择64对严格1:1匹配的患者(n=128),在人口统计学上没有统计学上的显着差异,基线和程序特征或两组之间PS考虑的参数。在中位随访18个月时,阿片类药物使用者(51/64;79.7%)对POEM的临床反应明显低于非使用者(60/64;93.8%)(p=0.03)。在阿片类药物使用者中,较高的阿片类药物剂量(每天>60吗啡毫克当量)与POEM无效的可能性较高相关(赔率比:4.59;95%CI:1.31~3.98;p=0.02).
    结论:阿片类药物使用者对SED和EGJOO的POEM的临床反应明显较低。非用户。阿片类药物和对POEM的反应之间存在剂量关系,每日阿片类药物使用率较高,治疗失败的可能性较高。
    Opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED) often presents as spastic esophageal disorders (SEDs) and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for SEDs and EGJOO among opioid users and nonusers.
    This propensity score (PS) matching study included consecutive opioid users and nonusers who underwent POEM for SEDs and EGJOO between January 2018 and September 2022. The following covariates were used for the PS calculation: age, sex, duration of symptoms, Eckardt score, type of motility disorder, and length of myotomy during POEM. Clinical response was defined as a post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3.
    A total of 277 consecutive patients underwent POEM during the study period. PS matching resulted in the selection of 64 pairs of patients strictly matched 1:1 (n = 128) with no statistically significant differences in demographic, baseline, or procedural characteristics or in the parameters considered for the PS between the 2 groups. Clinical response to POEM was significantly lower among opioid users (51 of 64 [79.7%]) versus nonusers (60 of 64 [93.8%]) (P = .03) at a median follow-up of 18 months. Among opioid users, higher opioid dose (>60 morphine milligram equivalents per day) was associated with a higher likelihood of failure to respond to POEM (odds ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.98; P = .02).
    Clinical response to POEM for SEDs and EGJOO is significantly lower among opioid users versus nonusers. There was a dose-relationship between opioids and response to POEM, with higher daily opioid usage associated with a higher likelihood of treatment failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是一种安全有效的内镜治疗门失弛缓症和其他食管动力障碍的方法,和多功能刀(TriangleTipKnifeJ[TTJ];奥林巴斯,东京,日本)目前在POEM中广泛使用。最近,我们报道了一种新的TTJ修饰,通过将一次性夹子(QuickClipPro;Olympus)护套作为引擎盖附件连接到尖端,将其调整为2mm的刀长度。这项研究比较了TTJ和TTJ与POEM中的引擎盖附件(TTJ-H)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:这项1:1倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究比较了手术时间,肌切开术效率,使用凝血钳的数量,不良事件,POEM后的住院时间,程序上的成功,TTJ和TTJ-H组之间的临床成功率。
    结果:共检查了2021年1月至2023年6月期间接受POEM的682例连续患者。我们排除了134例已经接受POEM或腹腔镜Heller肌切开术的患者。最后,鉴定出98对倾向得分匹配的对(n=196)。平均手术时间从93.5分钟缩短到80.2分钟(减少14%,P=.012)比较TTJ-H组与TTJ组。平均肌切开术效率从2.76min/cm提高到2.32min/cm(提高16%,P≤.001),使用凝血钳止血从3.87降至0.55(减少86%,P≤.001)。
    结论:这项研究表明,使用TTJ-H可以减少总手术时间,提高肌切开术的效率,与TTJ相比,降低成本。
    OBJECTIVE: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a safe and effective endoscopic treatment for achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders, and a versatile knife (TriangleTipKnife J [TTJ]; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) is currently widely used in POEM. Recently, we reported a novel modification of TTJ, which was adjusted to a knife length of 2 mm by attaching a disposable clip (QuickClip Pro; Olympus) sheath to the tip as a hood attachment. This study compares the safety and effectiveness of TTJ and TTJ with a hood attachment (TTJ-H) in POEM.
    METHODS: This 1:1 propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study compared the procedure time, myotomy efficiency, number of coagulation forceps usage, adverse events, length of hospital stay after POEM, procedural success, and clinical success between the TTJ and TTJ-H groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 682 consecutive patients who underwent POEM between January 2021 and June 2023 were examined. We excluded 134 patients who had already undergone POEM or laparoscopic Heller myotomy as prior myotomy. Finally, 98 propensity score-matched pairs (n = 196) were identified. The mean procedure time was shortened from 93.5 minutes to 80.2 minutes (14% reduction, P = .012) when comparing the TTJ-H group versus the TTJ group. The mean myotomy efficiency was improved from 2.76 min/cm to 2.32 min/cm (16% improvement, P ≤ .001), and usage of coagulation forceps for hemostasis was decreased from 3.87 to .55 (86% reduction, P ≤ .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that use of TTJ-H could reduce total procedure time, improve myotomy efficiency, and reduce costs compared with TTJ.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:食管憩室(ED)是一种罕见的结构性疾病,具有异质性表现和难以捉摸的病理生理学。我们的目的是基于高分辨率阻抗测压(HRIM)研究ED患者的食管运动和相关症状特征。
    方法:在我们的电子数据库中确定了2015年至2022年期间到我们的动力实验室转诊的连续ED患者。所有患者均根据上消化道内窥镜检查进行评估,HRIM,和标准化症状问卷。ED患者进一步分层为上,中间,和较低的(顿音)病例。用HRIM和更新的芝加哥分类v4.0评估食管运动性。
    结果:24例ED患者(9例,4个中间,和11个顿性)进行了分析。ED患者通常年龄较大(平均:65±13.3岁),主要是女性(58.3%)。大多数ED病例位于单侧(95.8%)和左侧(62.5%)。平均症状持续时间为20个月(范围:1-120),最常见的症状是吞咽困难(70.8%)和反流(37.5%)。16例患者出现糜烂性食管炎(69.6%),5例患者(20.8%)出现钡淤滞。14例患者(58.3%)使用HRIM诊断为食管运动障碍,门失弛缓症是最常见的诊断(n=5,20.8%)。上膈憩室患者的症状评分和贲门失弛缓症患病率明显较高。
    结论:ED患者往往年龄较大,并且与EMD的高患病率相关。多学科评估,包括完整的解剖学和运动性调查,可能有助于阐明潜在的病理生理学,并制定进一步的治疗策略。
    BACKGROUND: Esophageal diverticulum (ED) is an uncommon structural disorder with heterogenous manifestations and elusive pathophysiology. Our aim was to investigate esophageal motility and associated symptom profiles in patients with ED based on high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM).
    METHODS: Consecutive patients with ED referred to our motility laboratory between 2015 to 2022 were identified in our electronic database. All patients were evaluated based on an upper endoscopy, HRIM, and standardized symptom questionnaires. Patients with ED were further stratified into upper, middle, and lower (epiphrenic) cases. Esophageal motility was evaluated with HRIM and the updated Chicago Classification v4.0.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with ED (9 upper, 4 middle, and 11 epiphrenic) were analyzed. Patients with ED were generally older (mean: 65 ± 13.3 years) and predominantly women (58.3%). Most ED cases were unilaterally located (95.8%) and left-side predominant (62.5%). Mean symptom duration was 20 months (range: 1-120) and the most common symptoms were dysphagia (70.8%) and regurgitation (37.5%). Erosive esophagitis was noted in 16 patients (69.6%), while barium stasis was noted in 5 patients (20.8%). Fourteen patients (58.3%) were diagnosed with esophageal motility disorders using HRIM, with achalasia being the most common diagnosis (n = 5, 20.8%). Patients with epiphrenic diverticulum had significantly higher symptom scores and achalasia prevalence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ED tended to be older and was associated with a high prevalence of EMD. A multi-disciplinary evaluation, including complete anatomical and motility surveys, may help clarify the underlying pathophysiology and tailor further treatment strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:由于门失弛缓症是一种慢性疾病,比较不同治疗方法的长期随访数据对于选择最佳的临床管理至关重要.这里,我们报道了10年随访的欧洲失语症试验,该试验比较了内镜下静脉扩张术(PD)和腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术(LHM).
    方法:共201例新诊断的贲门失弛缓症患者随机接受一系列PD(n=96)或LHM(n=105)。患者完成症状(Eckardt评分)和生活质量问卷,进行了功能测试和上消化道内窥镜检查。主要结果是治疗成功定义为每年随访时Eckardt评分<3。次要结果是需要再治疗,食管下括约肌压力,食管排空,胃食管反流和并发症发生率。
    结果:经过10年的随访,LHM(n=40)和PD(n=36)在两个完整分析集中同样有效(74%vs74%,p=0.84)和每个协议集(74%vs86%,分别,p=0.07)。亚组分析显示,2型贲门失弛缓症的PD优于LHM(p=0.03),但有趋势,虽然不显著(p=0.05),LHM对3型贲门失弛缓症的表现更好。与LHM相比,接受PD治疗的患者在定时钡食管5分钟后的钡柱高度显着升高,而其他参数,包括胃食管反流,没有什么不同。
    结论:即使经过10年的随访,PD和LHM也同样有效,发生胃食管反流的风险有限。基于这些数据,我们得出的结论是,PD和LHM都可以作为门失弛缓症的初始治疗。
    As achalasia is a chronic disorder, long-term follow-up data comparing different treatments are essential to select optimal clinical management. Here, we report on the 10-year follow-up of the European Achalasia Trial comparing endoscopic pneumodilation (PD) with laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM).
    A total of 201 newly diagnosed patients with achalasia were randomised to either a series of PDs (n=96) or LHM (n=105). Patients completed symptom (Eckardt score) and quality-of-life questionnaires, underwent functional tests and upper endoscopy. Primary outcome was therapeutic success defined as Eckardt score <3 at yearly follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the need for retreatment, lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, oesophageal emptying, gastro-oesophageal reflux and the rate of complications.
    After 10 years of follow-up, LHM (n=40) and PD (n=36) were equally effective in both the full analysis set (74% vs 74%, p=0.84) and the per protocol set (74% vs 86%, respectively, p=0.07). Subgroup analysis revealed that PD was superior to LHM for type 2 achalasia (p=0.03) while there was a trend, although not significant (p=0.05), that LHM performed better for type 3 achalasia. Barium column height after 5 min at timed barium oesophagram was significantly higher for patients treated with PD compared with LHM, while other parameters, including gastro-oesophageal reflux, were not different.
    PD and LHM are equally effective even after 10 years of follow-up with limited risk to develop gastro-oesophageal reflux. Based on these data, we conclude that PD and LHM can both be proposed as initial treatment of achalasia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:气动扩张术(PD)是许多贲门失弛缓症患者的有效一线治疗选择。由于担心不良事件(AE),年龄超过65岁的门失弛缓症成人可能会受到限制,并且通常使用不太有效的疗法。我们探讨了老年人PD的围手术期安全性。
    方法:一项2006-2020年间在两个三级中心接受PD患者的国际现实世界横断面研究。比较了患有门失弛缓症的老年人(65岁及以上)和年轻患者之间30天的AE。
    结果:共有252例患者接受了319例PDs。在319个PD中,发生18例(5.7%)并发症:6例(1.9%)穿孔和12例(3.8%)急诊转诊伴良性(非穿孔)胸痛,其中9人(2.8%)住院。30天内无出血或死亡。两个年龄组和门失弛缓症亚型的穿孔率相似。在单因素分析中,高龄是良性胸痛并发症的保护作用,并且AE的数量有限,排除了多变量分析。
    结论:PD在老年人中的安全性至少与年轻患者相当,应作为老年门失弛缓症患者的确定性治疗选择。我们的结果可能会影响知情同意讨论。
    BACKGROUND: Pneumatic dilation (PD) is an effective first line treatment option for many patients with achalasia. PD use may be limited in adults with achalasia who are older than 65 because of concern for adverse events (AE), and less efficacious therapies are often utilized. We explored the periprocedural safety profile of PD in older adults.
    METHODS: An international real world cross-sectional study of patients undergoing PD between 2006-2020 in two tertiary centers. Thirty-day AEs were compared between older adults (65 and older) with achalasia and younger patients.
    RESULTS: A total of 252 patients underwent 319 PDs. In 319 PDs, 18 (5.7%) complications occurred: 6 (1.9%) perforations and 12 (3.8%) emergency department referrals with benign (non-perforation) chest pain, of which 9 (2.8%) were hospitalized. No bleeding or death occurred within 30 days. Perforation rates were similar in both age groups and across achalasia subtypes. Advanced age was protective of benign chest pain complications in univariate analysis, and the limited number of AEs precluded multivariable analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The safety of PD in older adults is at least comparable to that of younger patients and should be offered as an option for definitive therapy for older patients with achalasia. Our results may affect informed consent discussions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号