BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists on the influence of hospital procedure volume, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities on surgical abortion outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to assess the association between hospital procedure volume, individual and neighborhood deprivation, comorbidities, and abortion-related adverse events.
METHODS: A nationwide population-based cohort study of all women hospitalized for surgical abortion was conducted from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019 in France. Annual hospital procedure volume was categorized into four levels based on spline function visualization: very low (<80), low ([80-300[), high ([300-650[), and very high-volume (≥650) centers. The primary outcome was the occurrence of at least one surgical-related adverse event, including hemorrhage, retained products of conception, genital tract and pelvic infection, transfusion, fistulas and neighboring lesions, local hematoma, failure of abortion, admission to an intensive care unit or death. These events were monitored during the index stay and during a subsequent hospitalization up to 90 days. The secondary outcome encompassed general adverse events not directly linked to surgery.
RESULTS: Of the 112,842 hospital stays, 4,951 (4.39%) had surgical-related adverse events and 256 (0.23%) had general adverse events. The multivariate analysis showed a volume-outcome relationship, with lower rates of surgical-related adverse events in very high-volume (2.25%, aOR=0.34, 95%CI [0.29-0.39], p<0.001), high-volume (4.24%, aOR=0.61, 95%CI [0.55-0.69], p<0.001), and low-volume (4.69%, aOR=0.81, 95%CI [0.75-0.88], p<0.001) when compared to very low-volume centers (6.65%). Individual socioeconomic status (aOR=1.69, 95%CI [1.47-1.94], p<0.001), neighborhood deprivation (aOR=1.31, 95% CI [1.22-1.39], p<0.001), and comorbidities (aOR=1.79, 95%CI [1.35-2.38], p<0.001) were associated with surgical-related adverse events. Conversely, the multivariate analysis of general adverse events did not reveal any volume-outcome relationship.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a volume-outcome relationship underscores the need for enhanced safety standards in low-volume centers to ensure equity in women\'s safety during surgical abortions. However, our findings also highlight the complexity of this safety concern which involves multiple other factors including socioeconomic status and comorbidities that policymakers must consider.

BACKGROUND: This prospective single-arm study was conducted to understand the expulsion rate of the gestational sac in the management of early pregnancy loss (EPL).
METHODS: We recruited 441 participants; 188 met eligibility criteria. Participants were 18 years of age and older who experienced a confirmed early pregnancy loss (<12 weeks gestational age) defined by an intrauterine pregnancy with a non-viable embryonic or anembryonic gestational sac with no fetal heart activity. Participants were given 200 mg of mifepristone pretreatment orally followed by two doses of misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally after 24 and 48 hours. Participants were seen in follow-up on day 14 to confirm the absence of a gestational sac, classified as treatment success. For failed treatment (defined by retained gestational sac), we offered expectant management or a third dose of misoprostol and/or dilatation and curettage (D & C). We followed all participants for 30 days. We collected data on overtreatment for retained products of conception and hospital admissions for adverse events.
RESULTS: 181 participants followed the protocol, and 169 (93.3%) participants had a complete expulsion of the gestational sac by the second visit (day 14). Twelve (6.6%) failed the treatment and one had an adverse event of heavy vaginal bleeding requiring D & C. Despite the expulsion of the gestational sac, 29 cases (17.1%) at subsequent follow-up were diagnosed as retained products of conception based on ultrasound assessment of thickened endometrium.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with mifepristone followed by 2 doses of misoprostol with a 14-day follow-up resulted in a high expulsion rate and is a safe management option for EPL.

暂无摘要。

Pregnant women in rural Uganda largely rely on medicinal plants for inducing labor, treating postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and inducing abortion. 90% of the women in both rural and urban Uganda use plants to manage pregnancy symptoms like constipation, heartburn, morning sickness, body aches, nausea, and vomiting. After delivery women continue using plants to manage postpartum complications and for infant care especially herbal baths. This study documented how ethnomedical folklore has been used to aid childbirth, manage postpartum hemorrhage, and induce abortion.
METHODS: A cross-sectional ethnobotanical survey was conducted from May - December 2023 in Najjemebe sub-county, Buikwe district. 206 respondents from 12 villages were selected using snowball sampling. Key informants included Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) and herbalists. Data was collected using semi-structured questionnaires and focus group discussions. Voucher specimens of the plants were identified and authenticated at Makerere University Herbarium. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Informant Consensus factor (ICF), Use Reports (URs), paired comparisons, and GraphPad Prism® version 9.0.0 software.
RESULTS: All respondents (N = 206, 100%), used plants to induce labour, treat PPH, and induce abortion. One hundred four plant species were documented: most cited or preferred were: Hoslundia opposita (N = 109, 53%), Phytolacca dodecandra (N = 72, 35%), and Commelina erecta (N = 47, 23%). The plants belonged to 49 families, Lamiaceae (16.3%) and Fabaceae (14.3%) having the majority of the species. Herbs were 42 (40%) and trees 23 (22%). Oral administration 95(72%) was the commonest, then topical 19 (14.4%) and vaginal 14(10.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Health surveys revealed that about 27% of deliveries in Uganda take place outside a health facility. Due to the oxytocic effects of plant species reported in this study, they play a triple role of being uterotonics, abortifacients, and treating postpartum haemmorhage. The dilemma lies in the unknown dosages and toxicity levels that could endanger both the mother\'s and the unborn child\'s lives. Due to Uganda\'s high rates of population growth, overall fertility, maternal mortality, and morbidity, policies, and programmes on gendered health provision need to be reevaluated. Integrating herbal medicine into health care systems appears to be a feasible solution.

OBJECTIVE: To report a study investigating the implementation of the \"conscience clause\" by practising nurses in two National Health Service Hospital Trusts in the UK.
METHODS: A qualitative study.
METHODS: Data were collected from 2018 to 2020 through qualitative face-to-face interviews with 20 nurses, transcribed verbatim and analyzed by thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Major themes were developing conscience, negotiating conscience and parameters of participation.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants had varied views on conscientious objection, reflecting a continuum from unwillingness to be near anything related to abortion to being willing to participate in the whole process. Most participants framed involvement as fulfilling their \"duty of care\" to their patient. Direct experience of witnessing abortion overrode faith-based foundations to shape participants\' beliefs as objectors or non-objectors. Non-objectors were supportive of objecting colleagues.
UNASSIGNED: The complex nature of conscience as a fundamental human right is inherently related to the cultural and social context of nursing. \"Employability\" raised important questions over the real world of a nurse\'s legal right to invoke conscientious objection without consequences.
CONCLUSIONS: Problem addressed Conscientious objection to abortion continues to affect nursing. Main findings There was little knowledge of the law and a reluctance to make formal objections. Where and on whom will the research have an impact It highlights the need for delineated and implemented guidelines on conscientious objection in practice for nurses. Its findings, while local, may be applicable to other abortion services.
UNASSIGNED: Representatives of each were key in our advisory group.
UNASSIGNED: COREQ checklist for qualitative research.

BACKGROUND: A negative attitude towards abortion among health care providers providing abortion services could be an obstacle even under a law, which permits abortion on request. Healthcare providers are expected to perform and be change agents of abortion services. However, little information is known about the attitude toward safe abortion among healthcare providers in Ethiopia.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess health care provider\'s attitudes towards safe abortion care and its associated factors at the public health facilities of Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia.
METHODS: A health facility-based cross-sectional study was employed from March 1 to 30/2021 among 416 health-care providers. The data were collected by computer-based generated simple random sampling technique, entered, coded, and cleaned using Epi data version 4.2 and analyzed using Statistical Package of Social Sciences version 25.0. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to estimate the crude and adjusted odds ratio with a confidence interval of 95% and a P-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The response rate of the study was 99.3%, and 70.2% [95% CI: 65.6-74.6] of health-care providers had a favorable attitude towards safe abortion care. Multivariable analysis indicated that health care providers who are found in the age group of 25-29, 30-34, and ≥ 35 years [AOR = 3.34, 95% CI = 1.03-10.85], [AOR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.33- 15.83] and [AOR = 5.30, 95% CI = 1.43-19.66] respectively, male health care providers [AOR = 3.20, 95% CI = 1.55-6.60], midwives [AOR = 6.50, 95% CI = 2.40-17.44], working at hospital [AOR = 4.77, 95% CI = 1.53-14.91], ever trained on safe abortion [AOR = 5.09, 95% CI = 2.29-11.32], practicing of an abortion procedure [AOR = 2.52, 95%, CI = 1.13-5.60], knowledge of abortion [AOR = 7.35, 95% CI = 3.23-16.71], awareness on revised abortion law [AOR = 6.44, 95% CI = 3.15-13.17] and need further legalization of abortion law [AOR = 11.78, 95% CI = 5.52-24.26] were associated with a favorable attitude towards safe abortion care.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers who had a favorable attitude toward safe abortion care were relatively high compared to the previous studies. Age, sex, profession, workplace, training, knowledge, and practice-related factors were associated with a favorable attitude toward safe abortion. This study indicated that, a need for intervention to help improve the attitude of healthcare providers toward safe abortion care, especially for those working in the maternity care units.

BACKGROUND: In countries where abortion laws are stringent, induced abortions are prevalent. The limited availability of abortion services within these regions amplifies the likelihood of maternal complications and mortality. Induced abortions represent a significant public health concern in Iran and are characterized by a multitude of intricate factors that remain largely unexplored. Gaps in knowledge persist pertaining to the influences driving induced abortion within the Iranian context. To adequately address the issue of induced abortion, it is imperative to discern the determinants that shape the decision-making process. The primary objective of this study was to design an intervention program focused on mitigating the occurrence of induced abortion within couples, with an emphasis on identifying the key factors that contribute to this phenomenon.
METHODS: This study comprises three phases. In the first phase, a qualitative approach based on the I-change model will be employed to identify the factors influencing induced abortion. The second phase involves a systematic review to identify the determinants of induced abortion and strategies to prevent induced abortion. In the third phase, the outcomes of the qualitative approach and systematic review will be shared with experts and specialists using the Delphi method to categorize and prioritize strategies. Subsequently, based on the final consensus, a comprehensive program will be developed to prevent induced abortion.
CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces an I-change model-based program for the prevention of induced abortion. The prevention of induced abortion holds great significance in mitigating maternal morbidity and mortality, curtailing healthcare expenses, and fostering population growth rates. The research findings will be disseminated via reputable peer-reviewed journals and communicated to the academic and medical communities. This dissemination aims to provide valuable insights that can contribute to the advancement of induced abortion and abortion prevention programs.
Induced abortion is restricted in Iran, and many married women with unintended pregnancies resort to clandestine procedures, resulting in adverse health outcomes. Induced abortion contributes to 2.3% of maternal mortality rates in the country. Understanding the factors influencing abortion is crucial for designing effective preventive interventions. Due to cultural and political sensitivities, reliable data on the determinants of induced abortion in Iran, particularly from the perspective of male partners, remain scarce. Existing research primarily focuses on women’s views, neglecting the potential influence of men on abortion-related decisions. This study aims to bridge this gap by investigating the determinants of induced abortion in couples and developing a comprehensive couple-based abortion prevention program in Iran. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study explored the factors associated with couples’ decisions regarding abortion. Subsequently, a systematic review will identify existing knowledge on abortion determinants and preventive strategies. On the basis of this comprehensive understanding, an evidence-informed abortion prevention plan will be devised. The findings of this study can inform policymakers and population/reproductive health experts, ultimately aiming to reduce the burden of negative health and social consequences associated with abortion, leading to cost reductions and improved health outcomes for women, families, and society.

Models of abortion care have changed significantly in the last decade, most markedly during the COVID-19 pandemic, when home management of early medical abortion with telemedical support was approved in Britain.
Our study aimed to examine women\'s satisfaction with abortion care and their suggestions for improvements.
Qualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews.
A purposive sample of 48 women with recent experience of abortion was recruited between July 2021 and August 2022 from independent sector and National Health Service abortion services in Scotland, Wales and England. Interviews were conducted by phone or via video call. Women were asked about their abortion experience and for suggestions for any improvements that could be made along their patient journey - from help-seeking, the initial consultation, referral, treatment, to aftercare. Data were analyzed using the Framework Method.
Participants were aged 16-43 years; 39 had had a medical abortion, 8 a surgical abortion, and 1 both. The majority were satisfied with their clinical care. The supportive, kind and non-judgmental attitudes of abortion providers were highly valued, as was the convenience afforded by remotely supported home management of medical abortion. Suggestions for improvement across the patient journey centred around the need for timely care; greater correspondence between expectations and reality; the importance of choice; and the need for greater personal and emotional support.
Recent changes in models of care present both opportunities and challenges for quality of care. The perspectives of patients highlight further opportunities for improving care and support. The principles of timely care, choice, management of expectations, and emotional support should inform further service configuration.
How can patients’ experience of abortion care in Britain be improved?Provision of abortion care and support in Britain has changed in recent decades. The COVID-19 pandemic also brought called for new ways of managing early medical abortions, at home, with remote support. We wanted to know how women in Britain felt about this kind of abortion care, and what ideas they had to make it better. Between July 2021 and August 2022, we spoke with 48 women who had recently had an abortion in Scotland, Wales and England. Some received got care from independent clinics, and some from the National Health Service (NHS). We talked to them over the phone or through video calls. We asked about their experiences, and what could be done to improve different parts of their care journey – from looking fo asking for help, the first appointment, the treatment, to the follow-up care. Most women generally felt satisfied with how they were taken care of by the medical staff. They appreciated the supportive, kind and non-judgmental attitude of the health professionals providing abortion care. They also liked the convenience of telemedicine and remote care, which made it easier to have a medical abortion at home. The changes in provision of abortion care and support have mostly had positive effects on women’s experience. Yet the feedback from women interviewed shows that there are still more opportunities to make improvements, focusing on prompt care, offering choices of abortion method and location, managing expectations better, and providing more emotional support. These principles should guide how services are set up in the future.

Brucellosis is one of the most common and widespread bacterial zoonoses and is caused by Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the genus Brucella. These organisms are able to infect and replicate within the placenta, resulting in abortion, one of the main clinical signs of brucellosis. Although the mouse model is widely used to study Brucella virulence and, more recently, to evaluate the protection of new vaccines, there is no clear consensus on the experimental conditions (e.g., mouse strains, doses, routes of inoculation, infection/pregnancy time) and the natural host reproducibility of the pregnant mouse model for reproductive brucellosis. This lack of consensus calls for a review that integrates the major findings regarding the effect of Brucella wild-type and vaccine strains infections on mouse pregnancy. We found sufficient evidence on the utility of the pregnant mouse model to study Brucella-induced placentitis and abortion and propose suitable experimental conditions (dose, time of infection) and pregnancy outcome readouts for B. abortus and B. melitensis studies. Finally, we discuss the utility and limitations of the pregnant mouse as a predictive model for the abortifacient effect of live Brucella vaccines.

BACKGROUND: The United States Supreme Court overturned federal abortion protections in Dobbs v Jackson Women\'s Health Organization. Many states in the Southeastern United States responded with restrictive policies that limit and criminalize abortion care.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the effect of abortion restrictions on maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the Southeastern United States after the Dobbs decision.
METHODS: Qualitative, semistructured interviews with 35 maternal-fetal medicine physicians in 10 Southeastern states between February 2023 and June 2023 were conducted. Our recruitment strategy relied on convenience and snowball sampling. Audio-recorded interviews were analyzed using Dedoose software and a descriptive qualitative approach that incorporated deductive and inductive approaches.
RESULTS: Emergent themes were identified, and a conceptual framework was developed on the basis of overarching themes. This study found that abortion laws and external constraints after the Dobbs decision resulted in ethical, professional, and legal challenges for maternal-fetal medicine physicians that led to changes in clinical practice and deviations from patient-centered care. These forced changes resulted in negative effects on maternal-fetal medicine physicians, such as increased fear, hypervigilance, and increased workload. In addition, these changes prompted concerns about health risks and negative emotional effects for patients. Supportive colleagues, hospital systems, and policies were associated with decreased stress, emotional distress, and disruption of healthcare delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Abortion restrictions in the Southeastern United States limit the ability of maternal-fetal medicine physicians to provide or facilitate abortions in the setting of fetal anomalies and maternal health risks. Maternal-fetal medicine physicians perceived these restrictions to have negative professional and emotional repercussions for themselves and negative effects on patients. Supportive colleagues and clear guidance from hospital systems and departments on how to interpret the laws were protective. Our findings have implications for the maternal-fetal medicine workforce and patient care in the region.