To assess and compare the precision and predictability of zygomatic implants in atrophic maxilla using conventional and dynamic navigation methods. This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in patients requiring zygomatic implant placements in the atrophic maxilla. Forty zygomatic implants were placed in systemically healthy individuals. Zygomatic implant placement was done using the freehand technique in the control group, and the test group involved implant placement using a dynamic navigation system, and the entry, apex, and angular deviations were evaluated. The mean deviations at the site of entry (2D) in the navigation system (2.531.42) as compared to the free hand (4.151.29) were statistically significant. The variation in the free-hand group was greater than the navigation method at the apex (3D)(p<0.05). The navigation method had a higher accuracy in angular deviation than the freehand method (4.02±1.80 and 12.67±2.11). Also, the accuracy was checked on the right and left sides in both the conventional and dynamic groups. The dynamic navigation technology had better predictability in terms of accuracy and precision, and it\'s the need of the hour for clinicians to master this technology and thereby aid in better prognostic level of implant placements.

OBJECTIVE: Severe anterior maxillary atrophy offers few implant-supported rehabilitation solutions to Quad Zygoma characterized by a wide anterior cantilever. One of the possible alternatives to consider before the quad zygoma is the extra-long nasal/trans-nasal implant placement. This retrospective multicentric study shows the predictability of nasal/transnasal implant placement in patients affected by severe anterior maxilla atrophy, with residual anatomical features that indicate this surgery. This specific remote anchorage can often be safely involved in immediate loading with other remote anchorages, such as zygoma and pterygoid implants. In this rehabilitation, it\'s mandatory to reduce the instability of the frameworks and mechanical stress that could unfavorably affect the implant\'s prognosis due to the overloading derived from anterior bending.
METHODS: In this retrospective multicentric study, 52 nasal or trans-nasal implants were inserted in 31 atrophic anterior maxillas (Cawood and Howell\'s class V-VI). All implants were successful after the healing period; even if 27 nasal implants reached an insertional torque equal to or greater than 50 n/cm2, the threshold value estimated to be able to support an immediate load.
RESULTS: All 52 implants were successful, so the proportion of success was 100%, with a 97.5% one-sided confidence interval of 88.8-100%. The success rate is achieved only if at least two of the following criteria are met: 1) a greater torque than 50 Ncm as a minimum sufficient condition to plan immediate loading; 2) after a healing period of 16 weeks, the secondary stability is clinically and radiographically evaluated to exclude possible coronal bone resorption: this condition allows the successive prosthetic finalization; 3) the possibility of carrying out a full arch rehabilitation with minimal anterior spread. Insertion torque was <50 Newton centimeters (Ncm) in 14 patients (45%) and 50 Ncm in 17 (55%). Mechanical load was delayed in the former and immediate in the latter. The proportion of torque <50 Ncm was higher in men than in women (69% versus 28%, p=0.033). Immediate torque was not significantly affected by age.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample is not extremely numerically significant, it conveys a clear and significant clinical, surgical indication as never before in the literature; we can state that nasal/trans nasal implants have been very useful in reducing the anterior cantilever and overcoming the anatomical limitations affecting conventional Quad Zygoma.

OBJECTIVE: This non-interventional study investigates variations in the type and frequency of late complications linked to novel zygomatic implant designs, installed adhering to the Zygoma Anatomy-Guided Approach (ZAGA) concept, over an extended follow-up period of at least 3 years.
METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting indications for treatment with ZIs were treated according to ZAGA recommendations. Implants were immediately loaded. The ORIS success criteria for prosthetic offset, stability, sinus changes and soft-tissue status were used to evaluate the outcome.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated. Ten patients received two ZIs and regular implants; one received three ZIs plus regular implants, and nine received four ZIs. Fifty-nine ZIs were placed: thirty-six (61%) Straumann ZAGA-Flat implants and twenty-three (39%) Straumann ZAGA-Round implants. Four patients (20%) presented earlier sinus floor discontinuities. Fifteen patients (75%) had prior sinus opacities. Nineteen patients were followed for between 38 and 53 months (mean 46.5 months). One patient dropped out after 20 months. When comparing pre-surgical CBCT with post-surgical CBCT, 84.7% of the sites presented identical or less sinus opacity; nine locations (15%) showed decreased, and another nine increased (15%) post-surgical sinus opacity. Fifty-three ZIs (89.8%) maintained stable soft tissue. Six ZIs had recessions with no signs of infection. ZIs and prosthesis survival rate was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the effectiveness of ZAGA-based zygomatic implant rehabilitations using Round and Flat designs. Despite patient number constraints, minimal changes in the frequency of late complications from the 1-year follow-up were observed. 100% implant and prosthesis survival rate over a mean follow-up of 46.5 months is reported.

UNASSIGNED: Zygomatic implants are an effective solution for rehabilitation of edentulous atrophic maxillae. However, the conventional technique of zygomatic implant placement is invasive, requires a longer healing period and is economically cumbersome. Therefore, the flapless technique of insertion of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation system has been introduced. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of flapless insertion of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation to the conventional flap technique.
UNASSIGNED: The study participants were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 20) included patients treated by flapless insertion of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation and Group B (n = 20) included patients treated with zygomatic implants using the flap technique. An analysis of the effectiveness of the implants was done using the concept of quality-adjusted prosthesis years, and an analysis of the costs was done by evaluating the treatment costs at each step. The data were collected, and analysis was done using IBM SPSS software. The Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test was employed to analyse variations in costs and effects between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: The study showed that the distribution of costs varies across both the categories of the procedure. Group B shows lesser cost-effectiveness as compared to Group A.
UNASSIGNED: The technique of flapless insertion of zygomatic implants is cost-effective. However, further studies considering factors such as time and cost of productivity evaluating the cost-effectiveness should be conducted.

In the present study, anatomical assessment of zygomaticofacial foramina (ZFFs) and zygomatic canals communicating with ZFFs were performed using cadaver micro-computed tomography images. It was suggested that all ZFFs were located above the jugale (Ju)-zygomaxillare (Zm) line, which is the reference line connecting the Ju and Zm, and most were located in the zygomatic body area (ZBA). The anteroposterior position of the ZFF in the ZBA was within a middle to posterior region and was most often located slightly posteriorly in males and closer to the middle of the region in females. The mean distance from the Ju-Zm line to the ZFF in the ZBA was 12.36 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.52 mm) in males and 11.48 mm (SD 1.61 mm) in females. In zygomatic canals communicating with ZFFs, most zygomatic canals were type I canals, communicating from the zygomaticoorbital foramen and harboring the zygomaticofacial nerve, and the others were type II canals, communicating from the zygomaticotemporal foramen and located near the posterior margin of the frontal process. These results provide useful anatomical information for preventing nerve injury during surgical procedures for zygomatic implant treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the difference in the incidence of peri-zygomatic complications (PZCs) when zygomatic implants (ZIs) penetrate or do not penetrate the external surface of zygoma.
METHODS: This study included 32 patients with edentulous maxillae or potentially edentulous maxillae undergo zygomatic implantation. The patients were divided into the penetration group (P-group) and the non-penetration group (N-group) according to whether the apex of implants penetrated the external surface of zygoma in postoperative CBCT. The extension length, the penetration section of the implants, and the skin thickness at the corresponding position were simultaneously measured. Clinical follow-up was conducted regularly until 2 years after surgery. The occurrence of PZCs (including peri-zygomatic infection, skin numbness, non-infectious pain, and foreign body sensation) was recorded. A mixed effect logistic model was used to compare the difference of complication rate between the P-group and the N-group, and odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Then identify the impact of the extension length, penetration section and skin thickness in P-group with the same model.
RESULTS: A total of 71 ZIs were implanted in 32 patients, including 37 implants in the P-group and 34 implants in the N-group. During the 2-year follow-up, a total of 13 implants occurred PZCs, with an overall complication rate of 18.3%. Thereinto, the incidence rate was 29.7% in the P-group, and 5.9% in the N-group (OR = 6.77). In P-group, there was a significant difference in complication rate of different extension lengths, while the penetration section and skin thickness had no statistical significance on the complication rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the limitation of this study, to minimize the risk of PZCs, ZI should be placed in a manner that avoids the apex penetrating the external surface of the zygoma.

To assess the feasibility and accuracy of a semi-autonomous two-stage dental robotic technique for zygomatic implants.
Twenty-six zygomatic implants were designed and randomly divided into two groups using 10 three-dimensionally printed resin models with severe maxillary atrophy. In one group, the conventional drilling technique was used, in the other group, the drilling process for the alveolar ridge section (first stage) was completed, after which drilling for the zygoma section (second stage) was done. Based on preoperative planning combined with postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), coronal, apical, depth, and angle deviations were measured. Zygomatic implant placement technique-related deviations (sinus slot, intrasinus, and extrasinus) were also recorded and analyzed.
The two-stage technical group\'s coronal, apical, depth, and angle deviations were 0.57 ± 0.19 mm, 1.07 ± 0.48 mm, 0.30 ± 0.38 mm, and 0.91 ± 0.51°, respectively. The accuracy of the two-stage technique was significantly higher than that of the conventional one-stage technique (p < 0.05). The apical deviation in the intrasinus group was 1.12 ± 0.56 mm, which was significantly better than that in the other two groups (p < 0.05). The angle deviation in the sinus slot group was 1.96 ± 0.83°, which was significantly worse than that in the other two groups (p < 0.05).
Using the semi-autonomous two-stage dental robotic technique for zygomatic implants is feasible and is more accurate than using the conventional one-stage technique.
The two-stage technique enabled the semi-autonomous robot to overcome the mouth-opening restriction for zygomatic implants and improved accuracy.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of zygomatic implant placement using customized bone-supported laser-sintered titanium templates. Pre-surgical computed tomography (CT) scans allowed to develop the ideal virtual planning for each patient. Direct metal laser-sintering was used to create the surgical guides for the implant placement. Post-operative CT scans were taken 6 months after surgery to assess any differences between the planned and placed zygomatic implants. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional analyses were performed with the software Slicer3D, recording linear and angular displacements after the surface registration of the planned and placed models of each implant. A total of 59 zygomatic implants were analyzed. Apical displacement showed a mean movement of 0.57 ± 0.49 mm on the X-axis, 1.1 ± 0.6 mm on the Y-axis, and 1.15 ± 0.69 mm on the Z-axis for the anterior implant, with a linear displacement of 0.51 ± 0.51 mm on the X-axis, 1.48 ± 0.9 mm on the Y-axis, and 1.34 ± 0.9 mm on the Z-axis for the posterior implant. The basal displacement showed a mean movement of 0.33 ± 0.25 mm on the X-axis, 0.66 ± 0.47 mm on the Y-axis, and 0.58 ± 0.4 mm on the Z-axis for the anterior implant, with a linear displacement of 0.39 ± 0.43 mm on the X-axis, 0.42 ± 0.35 mm on the Y-axis, and 0.66 ± 0.4 mm on the Z-axis for the posterior implant. The angular displacements recorded significative differences between the anterior implants (yaw: 0.56 ± 0.46°; pitch: 0.52 ± 0.45°; roll: 0.57 ± 0.44°) and posterior implants (yaw: 1.3 ± 0.8°; pitch: 1.3 ± 0.78°; roll: 1.28 ± 1.1°) (p < 0.05). Fully guided surgery showed good accuracy for zygomatic implant placement and it should be considered in the decision-making process.

There are few zygomatic implants (ZI) designs available. The objective of this non-interventional study was to report the effectiveness of two new site-specific ZI, selected and placed following the zygoma anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA).
Consecutive patients presenting indications for rehabilitation using ZI were treated according to ZAGA Concept recommendations. Implants were immediately loaded following the manufacturer\'s instructions. Success criteria regarding prosthetic offset, rhino-sinus status, soft tissue condition, and implant stability were additionally used as outcome parameters.
Twenty patients were followed for a period of 12 to 28 months (average 18.8 months). Ten received 2 ZI plus regular anterior implants; One received 3 ZI plus regular implants and nine received 4 ZI. In total, 59 ZI were placed, 34 (58%) Straumann ZAGA-Flat design, and 25 (42%) ZAGA-Round. Forty-nine percent of the sites were classified as ZAGA-4 type and 27% as ZAGA-2. Four patients (20%) presented discontinuities of the sinus-nose floor before surgery and 15 patients (75%) presented previous sinus opacities. All implants bar one reached more than 45 N.cm of insertion torque. No surgical complications were observed. After 1 year, the modified Lund-Mackay score was negative in 17 patients. Seventeen sites in 11 patients exhibited decreased opacity when pre-surgical imaging was compared to 1-year post-surgical CBCT. All implants and prostheses remained stable and in function.
The study concluded 100% implant/prosthesis survival rates and low complication levels. Within the limitations of the sample and observation period, results suggest that even in cases of extremely resorbed maxillae (as per cases in this study), ZAGA-Flat and ZAGA-Round ZI are viable treatment options when restoring atrophic maxillae following the ZAGA protocol.

The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of zygomatic dental implant (ZI) placement carried out using a dynamic navigation system. Materials and Methods: Forty (40) ZIs were randomly distributed into one of two study groups: (A) ZI placement via a computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 20) (navigation implant (NI)); and (B) ZI placement using a conventional free-hand technique (n = 20) (free-hand implant (FHI)). A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of the existing situation was performed preoperatively to plan the surgical approach for the computer-aided study group. Four zygomatic dental implants were placed in anatomically based polyurethane models (n = 10) manufactured by stereolithography, and a postoperative CBCT scan was performed. Subsequently, the preoperative planning and postoperative CBCT scans were added to dental implant software to analyze the coronal entry point, apical end point, and angular deviations. Results were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences in the apical end-point deviations between FHI and NI (p = 0.0018); however, no statistically significant differences were shown in the coronal entry point (p = 0.2617) or in the angular deviations (p = 0.3132). Furthermore, ZIs placed in the posterior region showed more deviations than the anterior region at the coronal entry point, apical end point, and angular level. Conclusions: The conventional free-hand technique enabled more accurate placement of ZIs than the computer-assisted surgical technique. In addition, placement of ZIs in the anterior region was more accurate than that in the posterior region.