Wechsler Scales

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:该研究旨在确定具有中央颞区棘波(SeLECTS)的自限性癫痫患者中注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的患病率,以及与这种合并症相关的电临床特征和使用心理测验的神经认知效应。此外,我们分析了ADHD患者的电生理结果和神经认知状态,以评估ADHD人群中癫痫的患病率和神经认知效应,并评估其临床特征.
    方法:本研究纳入年龄和性别匹配的诊断为SeLECT和ADHD的患者。电生理试验,心理测验,我们分析了年龄在7~13岁的SeLECTS患者和年龄相似的ADHD患者的人口统计学和临床特征.这项研究检查了电生理和心理测验,以及人口统计学和临床特征。两组均使用韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC-R)进行测试,Stroop颜色和文字测试(SCWT),和EEG(脑电图)。SeLECT组还接受了Bender视觉运动格式塔测试。
    结果:在年龄和性别方面,SeLECT组和ADHD组之间没有发现显著关系。在ADHD组中,未诊断为癫痫的EEG发现中的癫痫样放电率为5.6%(n=2)。SeLECTS组的ADHD发生率为28%(n=11)。尽管WISCR测试的所有小节在ADHD患者组中都高于SeLECTS患者组,只有言语智商和总智商表现出显著差异。在完成时间之间没有发现显着差异,错误率,两组SCWT切片的校正平均值。表现智商之间没有发现显著的相关性,言语智商,孤立的SeLECTS患者组或SeLECTS+ADHD患者组的总智力评分(p>0.05)。然而,值得注意的是,两组的言语智商均低于正常水平,而SeLECT+ADHD组略低。此外,SeLECT+ADHD组的平均SeWT完成时间明显长于单独的SeLECT组.然而,在Bender格式塔视觉运动感知测试中没有发现显着差异。在比较孤立的SELECTS的心理测量分析中,SLECT+ADHD,多动症患者群体,SeLECT+ADHD组的SCWT完成时间明显长于其他两组.ADHD组的言语智商得分明显高于其他两组。
    结论:结论:虽然SeLECTS通常被认为是一种良性的癫痫,我们的研究发现ADHD合并症的发生率很高.这种情况对言语智力和持续注意力有负面影响,强调在癫痫诊断阶段进行完整的神经心理学评估的重要性。至关重要的是,不要忽视ADHD诊断的可能性。
    OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in patients with self-limiting epilepsy with centrotemporal spike wave (SeLECTS), as well as the electroclinical features associated with this comorbid condition and the neurocognitive effects using psychometric tests. Additionally, we analysed the electrophysiological findings and neurocognitive status of patients with ADHD to estimate the prevalence of epilepsy and neurocognitive effects in the ADHD population and evaluate their clinical features.
    METHODS: The study included patients diagnosed with SeLECTS and ADHD who were matched for age and gender. Electrophysiological tests, psychometric tests, demographic and clinical characteristics of SeLECTS patients aged 7-13 years and ADHD patients of similar age were analysed. The study examined electrophysiological and psychometric tests, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics. Both groups underwent testing using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R), Stroop Colour and Word Test (SCWT), and EEG (Electroencephalogram). The SeLECTS group also underwent the Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test.
    RESULTS: No significant relationship was found between the SeLECTS and ADHD groups in terms of age and gender. The rate of epileptiform discharge in EEG findings without a diagnosis of epilepsy was 5.6 % (n = 2) in the ADHD group. The rate of ADHD in the SeLECTS group was 28 % (n = 11). Although all subsections of the WISCR test were higher in the ADHD patient group than in the SeLECTS patient group, only verbal IQ and total IQ showed a significant difference. No significant differences were found between the completion times, error rates, and correction averages of the SCWT sections in both groups. There was no significant correlation found between the performance IQ, verbal IQ, and total intelligence scores in either the isolated SeLECTS patient group or the SeLECTS + ADHD patient group (p > 0.05). However, it is worth noting that verbal IQ was below normal in both groups and slightly lower in the SeLECT + ADHD group. Additionally, the mean SCWT completion time was significantly longer in the SeLECT + ADHD group than in the isolated SeLECTS group. However, no significant difference was found in the Bender Gestalt Visual Motor Perception Test. In the psychometric analyses comparing the isolated SeLECTS, SeLECT + ADHD, and ADHD patient groups, the SCWT completion times were significantly longer in the SeLECT + ADHD group than in the other two groups. The verbal IQ score was significantly higher in the ADHD group than in the other two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, although SeLECTS is commonly considered a benign form of epilepsy, our study found a high rate of comorbidity with ADHD. This condition has a negative impact on verbal intelligence and sustained attention, highlighting the importance of a complete neuropsychological evaluation at the stage of epilepsy diagnosis. It is crucial not to overlook the possibility of an ADHD diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:BUTTERFLY观察性研究旨在阐明Dravet综合征(DS)和相关合并症的自然轨迹,以建立临床治疗的基线。我们介绍了该研究的12个月中期分析。
    方法:本研究纳入基因确诊为DS的患者。使用Vineland适应行为量表测量适应功能和神经发育状态,第三版(Vineland-III),Bayley婴儿发育量表,第三版(BSID-III),和韦克斯勒学龄前和初级智力量表,第四版(WPPSI-IV)。执行功能,步行功能和运动活动,使用执行功能行为评定量表-学龄前版(BRIEF-P)量表测量总体临床状况,吉列功能评估问卷(吉列FAQ),和临床医生或护理人员的整体变化印象量表(CGI-C或CaGI-C)。
    结果:总体而言,36名患者被纳入三个年龄组,35例患者在第12个月内完成了至少部分或全部一次基线后访视。在接受沟通方面有了显著的改进,根据Vineland-III和BSID-III原始分数评估,在口头理解子测试中,根据WPPSI-IV原始分数评估,在所有患者组中观察到蝴蝶患者。许多患者在基线时在BRIEF-PGlobalExecutiveComposite量表受损端进行,提示执行功能困难,所有患者组的BRIEF-P评分无显著变化.大多数患者在基线时在GilletteFAQ的动态范围内进行,所有患者组的GilletteFAQ评分无显著变化.最后,所有患者组的CaGI-C评分均有显著改善.
    结论:这项BUTTERFLY期中分析显示,从基线到第12个月,参与研究的DS患者的沟通能力以及其他发育能力的稳定性都有微小改善。
    OBJECTIVE: The BUTTERFLY observational study aims to elucidate the natural trajectory of Dravet syndrome (DS) and associated comorbidities in order to establish a baseline for clinical therapies. We present the 12-month interim analysis of the study.
    METHODS: Patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of DS were enrolled in the study. Adaptive functioning and neurodevelopmental status were measured using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Third Edition (Vineland-III), Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition (BSID-III), and Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Fourth Edition (WPPSI-IV). Executive function, ambulatory function and locomotor activities, and overall clinical status were measured using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool Version (BRIEF-P) scale, Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (Gillette FAQ), and Clinician or Caregiver Global Impression of Change scales (CGI-C or CaGI-C) respectively.
    RESULTS: Overall, 36 patients were enrolled across three age groups, with 35 patients completing at least part or all of one post-baseline visit through Month 12. Significant improvements in receptive communication, as assessed by Vineland-III and BSID-III raw scores, and in verbal comprehension subtests, as assessed by WPPSI-IV raw scores, were observed in BUTTERFLY patients for the all-patient group. Many patients performed on the impaired end of the BRIEF-P Global Executive Composite scale at baseline suggesting difficulties in executive function, and no significant change was observed in BRIEF-P scores for the all-patient group. Most patients performed in the dynamic range of the Gillette FAQ at baseline, and no significant change was observed in Gillette FAQ scores for the all-patient group. Lastly, there was significant improvement observed in the CaGI-C scores for the all-patient group.
    CONCLUSIONS: This BUTTERFLY interim analysis shows small improvements in communication skills along with stability in other developmental abilities across patients with DS enrolled in the study from baseline to Month 12.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:瑞典韦克斯勒学龄前和初级智力量表(WPPSI-IV)通常用于评估芬兰(芬兰-瑞典)讲瑞典语的少数民族的幼儿,但是没有关于这个测试及其规范对这个少数人的普遍性的信息。WPPSI-IV的跨文化比较也很少。我们将芬兰-瑞典儿童的表现与瑞典WPPSI-IV的斯堪的纳维亚规范进行了比较,并探讨了社会人口统计学因素之间的关系(年龄,性别,父母的教育水平,双语)和表演。
    方法:对FinSwed研究评估的79名典型的5-6岁芬兰-瑞典儿童给予瑞典WPPSI-IV。使用MANOVA将他们的表现与斯堪的纳维亚规范进行了比较,t检验,和置信区间比较。使用回归分析探索与社会人口统计学变量的关联。
    结果:芬兰-瑞典儿童表演,平均而言,比斯堪的纳维亚标准高1/3SD,与中等效应有统计学意义的差异。然而,各个子检验和指标与规范没有显着差异。对于某些但并非所有指标得分,发现与社会人口统计学因素存在显着关联。
    结论:本研究提供了与芬兰-瑞典少数民族一起使用瑞典WPPSI-IV的临床重要信息,并表明了与该少数民族一起工作的临床医生应考虑的方面。结果可能部分由当前样品的特征解释,部分原因是芬兰-瑞典人口与斯堪的纳维亚国家之间的文化和语言差异。研究结果还表明,即使在具有相同语言的相似文化之间,认知表现也可能存在跨文化差异。
    The Swedish Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-IV) is commonly used for assessing young children belonging to the Swedish-speaking minority in Finland (Finland-Swedes), but there is no information about the generalizability of this test and its norms to this minority. Cross-cultural comparisons of WPPSI-IV are also scarce. We compared the performance of Finland-Swedish children to the Scandinavian norms of the Swedish WPPSI-IV and explored the relationship between sociodemographic factors (age, sex, parental education level, bilingualism) and the performance.
    The Swedish WPPSI-IV was administered to 79 typically developing 5-6-year-old Finland-Swedish children assessed for The FinSwed Study. Their performance was compared to the Scandinavian norms using MANOVA, t-test, and confidence interval comparisons. Associations with sociodemographic variables were explored using regression analyses.
    Finland-Swedish children performed, on average, 1/3 SD higher than the Scandinavian norms, a difference which was statistically significant with medium-sized effects. However, individual subtests and indexes did not differ significantly from the norms. Significant associations with sociodemographic factors were found for some but not all index scores.
    This study provides clinically important information for using the Swedish WPPSI-IV with the Finland-Swedish minority and demonstrates aspects that clinicians working with this minority should take into account. The results are presumably partly explained by characteristics of the present sample, and partly by cultural and linguistic differences between the Finland-Swedish population and the Scandinavian countries. The findings also illustrate that cross-cultural differences in cognitive performance may be present even between similar cultures with the same language.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非语言认知能力预测多种重要的生活结果,例如,学校和工作表现。在成人和青少年人群的先前研究中,它与顶额叶皮质解剖学有关,而年幼的孩子受到的关注相对较少。我们在165名5岁的参与者中探索了皮质解剖学与非语言认知能力之间的关联(平均扫描年龄5.40岁,SD0.13;90名男性)来自FinnBrain出生队列研究。使用FreeSurfer处理T1加权脑磁共振图像。非语言认知能力是使用从韦克斯勒学前和初级智力量表(WPPSI-III)的块设计和矩阵推理子测试估计的性能智商(PIQ)来测量的。在顶点方向的一般线性模型中,PIQ评分与左尾中额叶和右胆周围区域的体积呈正相关,以及左尾中部额叶的表面积,左颞下,和正确的语言区域。PIQ和皮质厚度之间没有关联。据我们所知,这是第一项研究非语言认知能力的结构相关性,该研究在一个典型发育中的5岁儿童的大样本中进行.这些发现通常与先前来自老年人群的发现一致,重要的是,右内侧枕区的体积/表面积与非语言认知能力之间的正相关。这一发现通过发现一个新的大脑区域来增加文献,该区域应在未来的研究中考虑,以探索皮质结构在幼儿认知发育中的作用。
    Non-verbal cognitive ability predicts multiple important life outcomes, for example, school and job performance. It has been associated with parieto-frontal cortical anatomy in prior studies in adult and adolescent populations, while young children have received relatively little attention. We explored the associations between cortical anatomy and non-verbal cognitive ability in 165 5-year-old participants (mean scan age 5.40 years, SD 0.13; 90 males) from the FinnBrain Birth Cohort study. T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance images were processed using FreeSurfer. Non-verbal cognitive ability was measured using the Performance Intelligence Quotient (PIQ) estimated from the Block Design and Matrix Reasoning subtests from the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III). In vertex-wise general linear models, PIQ scores associated positively with volumes in the left caudal middle frontal and right pericalcarine regions, as well as surface area in left the caudal middle frontal, left inferior temporal, and right lingual regions. There were no associations between PIQ and cortical thickness. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine structural correlates of non-verbal cognitive ability in a large sample of typically developing 5-year-olds. The findings are generally in line with prior findings from older age groups, with the important addition of the positive association between volume / surface area in the right medial occipital region and non-verbal cognitive ability. This finding adds to the literature by discovering a new brain region that should be considered in future studies exploring the role of cortical structure for cognitive development in young children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童的语言背景与他们的神经认知发展有关。了解这种关系很重要,因为双语是常见的。然而,关于WPPSI-IV和NEPSY-II等认知测试表现的语言背景研究很少。本研究比较了芬兰5岁和6岁的讲瑞典语的单语(n=45)和讲瑞典语的同时双语(n=34)儿童的WPPSI-IV和NEPSY-II表现。参与者通过分层抽样收集,并用瑞典版本的测试进行评估。在配置文件分析中,在一些需要表达词汇的WPPSI-IV子测试和索引中发现了显着的单语优势(词汇,相似之处,图片命名,和词汇习得索引)和视觉空间技能(对象组装和视觉空间索引)。在接受语言方面,单语和双语儿童之间没有发现群体差异,视觉记忆,或者流体智力。此外,在全量表智商上没有发现差异。当考虑瑞典语和芬兰语的答案时,在双语者的子群中,WPPSI-IV相似性子测验的性能得到了改善,而不是只接受瑞典语的答案。在NEPSY-II的语言和记忆任务上,双语者之间没有发现显着差异。这些发现强调了在评估幼儿表达语言时考虑儿童语言背景的重要性。以及用两种语言评估双语者的好处。
    Children\'s language background relates to their neurocognitive development. Knowledge of this relationship is important as bilingualism is common. However, research regarding language background in relation to performance on cognitive tests such as the WPPSI-IV and NEPSY-II is scarce. The present study compared WPPSI-IV and NEPSY-II performances between 5- and 6-year-old Swedish-speaking monolingual (n = 45) and Swedish-Finnish-speaking simultaneous bilingual (n = 34) children in Finland. The participants were gathered by stratified sampling and were assessed with the Swedish versions of the tests. In profile analyses, a significant monolingual advantage was found in some WPPSI-IV subtests and indexes requiring expressive vocabulary (Vocabulary, Similarities, Picture Naming, and Vocabulary Acquisition Index) and visuospatial skills (Object Assembly and Visual Spatial Index). No group differences were found between mono- and bilingual children in receptive language, visual memory, or fluid intelligence. Additionally, no differences were found on the Full Scale IQ. The performance on the WPPSI-IV Similarities subtest improved in a subgroup of bilinguals when answers in both Swedish and Finnish were accounted for, instead of accepting only answers in Swedish. No significant differences were found between mono- and bilinguals on the language and memory tasks of NEPSY-II. These findings highlight the importance of considering the child\'s language background when assessing expressive language in young children, as well as the benefits of assessing bilinguals in both of their languages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在特定人才分布的顶部表现的表现构成了天赋。虽然根据智商识别有才华的年轻人一直是以前研究的重点,检查他们的认知概况是一项新的努力。本研究评估了意大利天才儿童样本的智商和认知能力,并使用韦氏量表将其与父母进行了比较。59名6至14岁的天才儿童接受了WISC-IV治疗,而他们的父母(N=53名母亲和N=55名父亲)则接受了WAIS-IV治疗。天才儿童(IQ≥120)在言语理解(VCI)和视觉感知推理(PRI)方面获得了特别高的分数。超过三分之二的母亲和超过一半的父亲也达到了智商≥120。在VCI和PRI中,天才儿童的得分明显高于父母。在处理速度方面,母亲明显高于子女。相关分析强调,儿童的智商与母亲的智商呈正相关。为了与文学保持一致,发现天才儿童的认知特征因认知能力而异。因此,一般能力指数是WISC-IV指数,与有天赋的年轻人的潜力最匹配。与以前的研究一致,我们的研究表明,智力,特别是工作记忆和处理速度,被维持,并可能从一代传给下一代。
    The manifestation of performance at the top of a given talent distribution constitutes giftedness. While identifying talented youths based on IQ has been the focus of previous research, examining their cognitive profile is a new endeavor. The present study assessed the IQ and cognitive abilities of a sample of gifted Italian children and compared them to their parents using the Wechsler scales. Fifty-nine gifted children aged 6 to 14 years were administered the WISC-IV while their parents (N = 53 mothers and N = 55 fathers) took the WAIS-IV. The gifted children (IQ ≥ 120) obtained particularly high scores in verbal comprehension (VCI) and visual-perceptual reasoning (PRI). More than two-thirds of the mothers and over half of the fathers also achieved an IQ ≥ 120. The gifted children scored significantly higher than both mothers and fathers in VCI and PRI. The mothers were significantly higher than their children in the processing speed domain. Correlational analyses highlighted that children\'s IQ was positively related to that of their mothers. In keeping with the literature, the cognitive profile of gifted children was found to vary across cognitive abilities. It follows that the General Ability Index was the WISC-IV index that best matched the potential of gifted youths. Consistent with previous research, our study suggests that intellectual abilities, especially working memory and processing speed, are maintained and presumably passed on from one generation to the next.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    关系能力指数(RAI)已被证明与智力能力的标准化度量一致相关,比如韦克斯勒成人智力量表.然而,该程序尚未得到系统研究,当与成年人一起使用时,它在区分中等能力和高能力参与者方面存在问题。因此,本实验的目的是研究参与者在不同分析水平和不同试验持续时间下的表现.62名参与者被随机分配到两组中的一组(30秒或20秒)。我们使用了涉及55个三段论前提的RAI版本(试验),每个都与一个YES/NO问题相关联。试验分为四个街区,每个测试不同的关系框架。结果显示,当试验缩短时,总分较低。然而,这种减少仅对能力较低的参与者是明显的.20s组的RAI评分接近正态分布,当试验持续时间减少时,试验难度增加。试验难度仅在一半的块中作为块内试验序列的函数而增加。节点距离可预测试验难度。基于这些结果,提供并讨论了对程序的拟议更改列表。
    The relational abilities index (RAI) has been shown to consistently correlate with standardized measures of intellectual aptitude, such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. However, the procedure has not been systematically studied and, when used with adults, it has problems in discriminating between medium and high-ability participants. Therefore, the aim of this experiment was to study participants\' performance at different levels of analysis and under different trial durations. Sixty-two participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (30 s or 20 s). We used a version of the RAI involving 55 syllogistic premises (trials), each associated with a YES/NO question. Trials were dived into four blocks, each testing a different relational frame. Results showed that total scores were lower when trials were shortened. However, this reduction was evident only for lower-ability participants. RAI scores in the 20 s group approximated a normal distribution and trial difficulty increased when trial duration decreased. Trial difficulty increased as a function of trial sequence within a block in only half of the blocks. Nodal distance was predictive of trial difficulty. Based on these results, a list of proposed changes to the procedure is provided and discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Wechsler量表是认知和神经心理学评估中使用最广泛的测试之一。在评估6:0-7:7岁的儿童时,临床医生可以在韦氏学龄前和初级智力量表-第四版(WPPSI-IV)和韦氏儿童智力量表-第五版(WISC-V)之间进行选择。有关测试在此重叠年龄范围内的功能和差异的信息有限。使用受试者之间的设计,本研究比较了芬兰典型发展中讲瑞典语的儿童在这个重叠年龄范围(6:1-7:2岁)的认知概况,用瑞典版本的WPPSI-IV(n=38)或WISC-V(n=24)进行评估。进行了概况分析和单向ANCOVA,以调查可比子测试中的差异,指数和全面智商。在子测试级别上,用WISC-V评估的儿童在词汇分测验中得分明显较低,矩阵推理,和Bug/符号搜索与使用WPPSI-IV评估的儿童相比。在索引级别,使用WISC-V评估的儿童的言语理解指数和流体推理指数得分明显较低。WISC-V的全尺度智商明显较低。一起来看,研究结果表明,WPPSI-IV和WISC-V产生部分不同的认知特征。在选择使用哪种测试以及解释该年龄组儿童的临床评估结果时,这些差异对于识别很重要。
    The Wechsler scales are among the most widely used tests in cognitive and neuropsychological assessments. When assessing children aged 6:0-7:7 years the clinician can choose between Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence - Fourth Edition (WPPSI-IV) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fifth Edition (WISC-V). Information about how the tests function and differ in this overlapping age range is limited. Using a between-subjects design, the present study compared the cognitive profiles of typically developing Swedish-speaking children in Finland in this overlapping age range (6:1 - 7:2 years), assessed with the Swedish versions of either WPPSI-IV (n = 38) or WISC-V (n = 24). Profile analyses and one-way ANCOVA were performed to investigate differences in the comparable subtests, indexes and Full Scale IQ. On the subtest level, children assessed with WISC-V had significantly lower scores on the subtests Vocabulary, Matrix Reasoning, and Bug/Symbol Search compared to children assessed with WPPSI-IV. On the index level, scores for the Verbal Comprehension Index and the Fluid Reasoning Index were significantly lower for children assessed with WISC-V. The Full Scale IQ was significantly lower on WISC-V. Taken together, the findings indicate that WPPSI-IV and WISC-V produce partly different cognitive profiles. These differences are important to recognize when choosing which test to use and when interpreting the results of clinical assessments of children in this age group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前有关早产儿童言语智力得分(VIQ)和表现智力得分(PIQ)差异的知识有限。由于早期的运动表现可能对于发展后期的视觉感知和视觉运动技能至关重要,早期的运动性能可能与PIQ有关。
    评估早产儿2岁时的运动表现是否与8岁时的PIQ相关。
    单中心队列研究包括2007年至2011年之间出生<30周的88名儿童,他们在两年时完成了Bayley婴幼儿发育量表-III(BSID-III)和Wechsler儿童智力量表-III-NL(WISC-III-NL)。结果测量值(平均值(SD))是基于BSID-III的总体和精细运动性能,以及基于WISC-III-NL的PIQ和VIQ。进行线性回归分析以评估两年时的运动表现与八年时的PIQ之间的关联。
    两年后,平均BSID-III总体运动评分为9.0(SD3.0),精细运动评分为11.5(SD2.3).在八年的时候,平均PIQ为94.9(SD13.5),平均VIQ为101.8(SD13.7)。精细运动评分增加1分与PIQ增加1.7分(95%CI0.5-2.8)相关。总运动评分与PIQ无关。
    幼儿时期的良好运动表现与学龄儿童的PIQ有关,得分较低表示PIQ较低。对精细运动表现的早期评估可能有助于识别处于低表现智力风险的儿童。
    Current knowledge regarding differences in verbal intelligence scores (VIQ) and performance intelligence scores (PIQ) in preterm born children is limited. As early motor performance may be essential for developing later visual-perceptual and visual-motor skills, early motor performance may be associated with PIQ.
    To evaluate whether in preterm born children motor performance at two years was associated with PIQ at eight years.
    Single-centre cohort study including 88 children born <30 weeks\' gestation between 2007 and 2011, who completed the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III (BSID-III) at two years and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III-NL (WISC-III-NL) at eight years. Outcome measurements (mean (SD)) were gross and fine motor performance based on the BSID-III, and PIQ and VIQ based on the WISC-III-NL. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between motor performance at two years and PIQ at eight years.
    At two years, mean BSID-III gross motor scaled score was 9.0 (SD 3.0) and fine motor score was 11.5 (SD 2.3). At eight years, mean PIQ was 94.9 (SD 13.5) and mean VIQ 101.8 (SD 13.7). A one-point increase in fine motor scaled score was associated with 1.7 points (95% CI 0.5-2.8) increase in PIQ. Gross motor scaled score was not associated with PIQ.
    Fine motor performance in toddlerhood was related to PIQ at school age, with lower scores indicating a lower PIQ. Early assessment of fine motor performance may be beneficial in identifying children at risk for lower performance intelligence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究表明,认知异质性随着个体内部和个体之间的衰老而发生。这项研究的目的是探讨衰老的认知异质性是否与成功和正常衰老的亚组有关。
    方法:参与者是正常老年人的代表性样本(n=65,年龄范围70-89岁)。所有受试者都参加了Nord-Trøndelag健康调查(HUNT3)的第三阶段,并完成了韦氏记忆量表(WMS-III)和韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS-III)的所有子测试。在研究中,成功的衰老被定义为四种方式:(1)没有疾病,(2)高功能,(3)积极参与生活,或(4)所有三个组件的组合。使用线性回归分析研究了记忆和智力功能的五个领域,以组成员身份(成功与通常的衰老)作为预测因素和年龄,性和教育是相关的。
    结果:处理速度表现与成功的衰老成分无疾病相关,年龄较小,属于女性,而工作记忆表现与成功的衰老部分没有疾病和更多年的教育相关。其他领域的表现(口头,视觉空间,和情景记忆)与任何成功的衰老定义无关。对于所有成功的老化定义,年龄对处理速度域具有一致的负面影响。教育与言语和工作记忆领域的认知表现呈正相关。女性与处理速度和情景记忆呈正相关。
    结论:当被定义为没有疾病时,处理速度和工作记忆与成功衰老有关。但不是成功衰老的其他组成部分,即特定域。相比之下,其他认知领域与成功衰老的任何组成部分无关.
    BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated that cognitive heterogeneity occurs with aging both within and between individuals. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the cognitive heterogeneity in aging was related to the subgroups of successful and usual aging.
    METHODS: Participants were a representative sample of normal older adults (n = 65, age range 70-89 years). All subjects had participated in the third phase of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Survey (HUNT3) and completed all subtests in the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III). Successful aging was defined in four ways in the study: as (1) absence of disease, (2) high functioning, (3) active engagement with life, or (4) all three components combined. Five domains of memory and intelligence functions were investigated using linear regression analysis, with group membership (successful versus usual aging) as predictors and age, sex and education as correlates.
    RESULTS: Processing speed performance was correlated with the successful aging component absence of disease, younger age and being of the female sex, while working memory performance was correlated with the successful aging component absence of disease and more years of education. Performance in other domains (verbal, visuospatial, and episodic memory) were not related to any successful aging definition. Age had a consistent negative effect on the processing speed domain for all successful aging definitions. Education was positively linked to cognitive performance on the verbal and working memory domains. Being female was positively linked to processing speed and episodic memory.
    CONCLUSIONS: Processing speed and working memory were linked to successful aging when it was defined as absence of disease, but not by other components of successful aging, i.e. domain-specific. In contrast, other cognitive domains were not related to any components of successful aging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号