Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

心室功能障碍,左侧
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    指导医学治疗(GDMT)是降低射血分数(HFrEF)的心力衰竭的主要治疗方法,但是它们没有得到充分利用。对于新诊断的HFrEF,GDMT的启动和强化是否存在性别差异尚不明确。
    从2016年至2020年Optum取消识别的诊所数据集市数据库中确定了HFrEF事件的患者,它来自大型商业和MedicareAdvantage健康计划成员的行政健康索赔数据库。主要结果是在HFrEF诊断后12个月内使用最佳GDMT。与研究期间的指南建议一致,最佳GDMT定义为≥50%的目标剂量的循证β受体阻滞剂加上≥50%的目标剂量的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,或任何剂量的血管紧张素受体脑啡肽抑制剂加任何剂量的盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂。采用调整后的Cox比例风险模型,通过时间到事件分析评估了在随访中达到最佳GDMT的概率和最佳GDMT的预测因子。
    研究队列包括63759名患者(平均年龄,71.3岁;15.2%的非西班牙裔黑人种族;56.6%的男性)。6.2%的患者在诊断后12个月实现了GDMT的最佳使用。女性(与男性相比)HFrEF患者在每个GDMT类别中的使用率较低,并且在随访时的每个时间点的最佳GDMT使用率较低。在调整后的Cox模型中,女性与诊断后达到最佳GDMT的概率降低23%相关(风险比[HR],0.77[95%CI,0.71-0.83];P<0.001)。HFrEF诊断后GDMT使用的性别差异在商业保险患者中最为明显(女性与男性相比;HR,0.66[95%CI,0.58-0.76])与医疗保险(HR,0.85[95%CI,0.77-0.92]);Pinteraction性别×保险状态=0.005)和年轻患者(年龄<65岁:HR,0.65[95%CI,0.58-0.74])与老年患者(年龄≥65岁:HR,87[95%CI,80-96])Pinteraction性别×年龄=0.009)。
    HFrEF诊断后最佳GDMT的总体使用较低,女性(与男性相比)患者的使用率明显较低。这些发现强调了针对改进GDMT引发和滴定的实施工作的必要性。
    Guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) are the mainstay of treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but they are underused. Whether sex differences exist in the initiation and intensification of GDMT for newly diagnosed HFrEF is not well established.
    Patients with incident HFrEF were identified from the 2016 to 2020 Optum deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database, which is derived from a database of administrative health claims for members of large commercial and Medicare Advantage health plans. The primary outcome was the use of optimal GDMT within 12 months of HFrEF diagnosis. Consistent with the guideline recommendations during the time period of the study, optimal GDMT was defined as ≥50% of the target dose of evidence-based beta-blocker plus ≥50% of the target dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, or any dose of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor plus any dose of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. The probability of achieving optimal GDMT on follow-up and predictors of optimal GDMT were evaluated with time-to-event analysis with adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.
    The study cohort included 63 759 patients (mean age, 71.3 years; 15.2% non-Hispanic Black race; 56.6% male). Optimal GDMT use was achieved by 6.2% of patients at 12 months after diagnosis. Female (compared with male) patients with HFrEF had lower use across every GDMT class and lower use of optimal GDMT at each time point at follow-up. In an adjusted Cox model, female sex was associated with a 23% lower probability of achieving optimal GDMT after diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.71-0.83]; P<0.001). The sex disparities in GDMT use after HFrEF diagnosis were most pronounced among patients with commercial insurance (females compared with males; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.58-0.76]) compared with Medicare (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.77-0.92]); Pinteraction sex×insurance status=0.005) and for younger patients (age <65 years: HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58-0.74]) compared with older patients (age ≥65 years: HR, 87 [95% CI, 80-96]) Pinteraction sex×age=0.009).
    Overall use of optimal GDMT after HFrEF diagnosis was low, with significantly lower use among female (compared with male) patients. These findings highlight the need for implementation efforts directed at improving GDMT initiation and titration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管最近在针对射血分数(HFrEF)降低的心力衰竭患者的指南指导药物治疗(GDMT)方面取得了进展,目标GDMT利用率的实现和对目标剂量的上调仍然是适度的。近年来,已经发表了许多不同的干预方法来改善GDMT,但许多人受到样本量小的单中心经验的限制。然而,策略,包括使用多学科团队,专用GDMT滴定算法,和具有反馈的临床医生审核显示出希望。仍然迫切需要大量的,严格的试验,以评估不同干预措施对改善HFrEF中GDMT的使用和滴定的效用。这里,我们回顾了HFrEFGDMT实现的现有文献,并讨论该领域未来的方向和考虑因素。
    Despite recent advances in the use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), achievement of target GDMT use and up-titration to goal dosages continue to be modest. In recent years, a number of interventional approaches to improve the usage of GDMT have been published, but many are limited by single-center experiences with small sample sizes. However, strategies including the use of multidisciplinary teams, dedicated GDMT titration algorithms and clinician audits with feedback have shown promise. There remains a critical need for large, rigorous trials to assess the utility of differing interventions to improve the use and titration of GDMT in HFrEF. Here, we review existing literature in GDMT implementation for those with HFrEF and discuss future directions and considerations in the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目前的心力衰竭(HF)指南建议在射血分数降低(HFrEF)的HF患者中使用四种药物。充分实施关于药物测序和及时达到目标剂量的指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)存在明显的挑战。在日常临床实践中,如何从药物治疗的串行和顺序方法转变为四种药物的早期并行应用,这在很大程度上是未知的。以及临床医生可能不遵守新指南的原因。我们提出了现实世界中的TITRATE-HF研究的设计和基本原理,旨在评估GDMT启动的测序策略,剂量滴定模式(顺序和速度),对GDMT的不容忍,实施障碍,和患者的长期结果,慢性,恶化的HF。
    结果:共4000例HFrEF患者,射血分数轻度降低的HF,射血分数改善的HF将在>40个荷兰中心登记,随访至少3年。数据收集将包括人口统计,体检和重要参数,心电图,实验室测量,超声心动图,药物,和生活质量。将收集四种GDMT药物类别的滴定步骤的详细信息。信息将包括日期,改变的主要原因,潜在的不容忍。主要临床终点是HF相关的住院治疗,HF相关的紧急访问需要静脉利尿剂,全因死亡率,和心血管死亡率。
    结论:TITRATE-HF是一个真实的多中心纵向注册中心,将提供有关当代GDMT实施的独特信息,测序策略(顺序和速度),和从头预测,恶化,和慢性HF患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Current heart failure (HF) guidelines recommend to prescribe four drug classes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A clear challenge exists to adequately implement guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) regarding the sequencing of drugs and timely reaching target dose. It is largely unknown how the paradigm shift from a serial and sequential approach for drug therapy to early parallel application of the four drug classes will be executed in daily clinical practice, as well as the reason clinicians may not adhere to new guidelines. We present the design and rationale for the real-world TITRATE-HF study, which aims to assess sequencing strategies for GDMT initiation, dose titration patterns (order and speed), intolerance for GDMT, barriers for implementation, and long-term outcomes in patients with de novo, chronic, and worsening HF.
    RESULTS: A total of 4000 patients with HFrEF, HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction, and HF with improved ejection fraction will be enrolled in >40 Dutch centres with a follow-up of at least 3 years. Data collection will include demographics, physical examination and vital parameters, electrocardiogram, laboratory measurements, echocardiogram, medication, and quality of life. Detailed information on titration steps will be collected for the four GDMT drug classes. Information will include date, primary reason for change, and potential intolerances. The primary clinical endpoints are HF-related hospitalizations, HF-related urgent visits with a need for intravenous diuretics, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: TITRATE-HF is a real-world multicentre longitudinal registry that will provide unique information on contemporary GDMT implementation, sequencing strategies (order and speed), and prognosis in de novo, worsening, and chronic HF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Heart failure (HF) is a significant event for public health. It has a prevalence between 1-2%, mortality rate between 7-17%, and hospitalization between 32-44%. This implies a risk to health and quality of life, but also great financial efforts for health systems. Sacubitril/valsartan is a medication recognized for its efficacy, and this consensus seeks to synthesize the available information regarding its use for the benefit of patients. This document consists of a description of the epidemiology of HF, pharmacology of the drug, clinical trials, use of the drug in cases with reduced ejection fraction, mildly reduced ejection fraction and preserved ejection fraction, available literature on HF guidelines, recommendations and conclusions.
    La insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) es un evento significativo para la salud pública. Tiene una prevalencia entre el 1 y 2%, tasa de mortalidad entre el 7 y 17% y de hospitalización entre el 32 y 44%. Esto implica un riesgo a la salud y calidad de vida, pero también grandes esfuerzos financieros para los sistemas de salud. El sacubitrilo/valsartán es un medicamento reconocido por su eficacia, y este consenso busca sintetizar la información disponible respecto a su uso en búsqueda del beneficio de los pacientes. El presente documento se compone de una descripción de la epidemiología de la IC, farmacología del medicamento, estudios clínicos sobre este, uso del medicamento en casos con fracción de eyección reducida, fracción de eyección ligeramente reducida y fracción de eyección preservada, literatura disponible en guías de IC, recomendaciones y conclusiones.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管对于射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭,可提供救生指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT),在符合条件的患者中,这些疗法的使用仍存在很大差距.在这些护理质量差距的同时,HFrEF仍然是死亡和住院的主要原因,其相关临床风险远远超过大多数其他心血管和非心血管疾病。在这种迫切需要改善适当治疗的情况下,多种证据支持各种实施策略。这些策略包括在医院内启动GDMT,GDMT的同时或快速序列启动,参与质量改进登记册,以评估现场绩效并提供反馈,多学科滴定诊所,虚拟咨询团队,减少成本分摊,基于远程算法的药物优化,基于电子健康记录的干预措施,和直接对病人的教育计划。这篇综述描述并介绍了围绕这些潜在途径的证据,以改善HFrEF患者对基础GDMT的使用。
    Despite the availability of lifesaving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), there remain major gaps in utilization of these therapies among eligible patients. Simultaneous with these gaps in quality of care, HFrEF continues as a leading cause of death and hospitalization with associated clinical risk far exceeding most other cardiovascular and noncardiovascular conditions. In the context of this urgent need to improve provision of appropriate therapy, multiple lines of evidence support various implementation strategies. Such strategies include in-hospital initiation of GDMT, simultaneous or rapid sequence initiation of GDMT, participation in quality improvement registries to assess site performance and provide feedback, multidisciplinary titration clinics, virtual consult teams, reduction of cost-sharing, remote algorithm-based medication optimization, electronic health record-based interventions, and direct-to-patient educational initiatives. This review describes and contextualizes the evidence surrounding each of these potential avenues for improving use of foundational GDMTs for patients with HFrEF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们根据试验调查了真实世界心力衰竭(HF)人群的Vericiguat资格,准则和标签标准。
    方法:来自瑞典HF注册表,2000年至2018年期间纳入23,573例HFrEF患者,HF持续时间≥6个月,被考虑。Vericiguat的资格是根据以下标准计算的:1)在心力衰竭和射血分数降低的受试者中的Vericiguat全球研究(VICTORIA)试验;2)欧洲和美国HF指南;3)根据食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局的产品标签。
    结果:试验中Vericiguat的估计合格性,指导方针,标签场景为21.4%,47.4%和47.4%,分别。在6个月内之前的HF住院是所有情况中限制资格最多的标准(49.1%的人口满足)。在审判场景中,其他有意义限制入选的标准包括N末端B型利钠肽前体水平升高和硝酸盐使用.在所有情况下,基线时因HF住院的患者的资格较高(44.3%vs.21.4%[试验方案]和97.3%与47.4%[指南/标签方案]用于住院与住院非住院患者,分别)。总的来说,符合条件的患者年龄较大,有更严重的HF,更多的合并症,因此,与所有不合格患者相比,CV死亡率和HF住院率更高。
    结论:在一个庞大而现代的现实世界HFrEF队列中,根据VICTORIA试验选择标准,我们估计21.4%的患者符合Vericiguat的条件,47.4%基于指南和标签。Vericiguat的资格转化为选择发病率/死亡率高的人群。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    We investigated the eligibility for vericiguat in a real-world heart failure (HF) population based on trial, guideline and label criteria.
    From the Swedish HF registry, 23 573 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled between 2000 and 2018, with a HF duration ≥6 months, were considered. Eligibility for vericiguat was calculated based on criteria from (i) the Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction (VICTORIA) trial; (ii) European and American guidelines on HF; (iii) product labelling according to the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. Estimated eligibility for vericiguat in the trial, guidelines, and label scenarios was 21.4%, 47.4%, and 47.4%, respectively. Prior HF hospitalization within 6 months was the criterion limiting eligibility the most in all scenarios (met by 49.1% of the population). In the trial scenario, other criteria meaningfully limiting eligibility were elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and nitrate use. In all scenarios, eligibility was higher among patients hospitalized for HF at baseline (44.3% vs. 21.4% [trial scenario] and 97.3% vs. 47.4% [guideline/label scenarios] for hospitalized vs. non-hospitalized patients). Overall, eligible patients were older, had more severe HF, more comorbidities, and consequently higher cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization rates compared with ineligible patients across all scenarios.
    In a large and contemporary real-world HFrEF cohort, we estimated that 21.4% of patients would be eligible for vericiguat according to the VICTORIA trial selection criteria, 47.4% based on guidelines and labelling. Eligibility for vericiguat translated into the selection of a population at high risk of morbidity/mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭患者的临床指南强烈建议使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)治疗以降低心血管死亡率或HF住院。在美国,在全国范围内采用SGLT2i用于HFrEF是未知的。
    描述因HFrEF住院的合格美国患者中SGLT2i的使用模式。
    这项回顾性队列研究分析了2021年7月1日至2022年6月30日在GetWithTheGuidelines-HeartFailure(GWTG-HF)注册的489个地点因HFrEF住院的49399例患者。估计肾小球滤过率小于20mL/min/1.73m2,1型糖尿病患者,和以前对SGLT2i的不耐受被排除。
    出院时SGLT2i的患者级和医院级处方。
    在49399名患者中,16548(33.5%)为女性,中位年龄(IQR)为67(56-78)岁。总的来说,9988名患者(20.2%)服用SGLT2i。SGLT2i处方在慢性肾脏病患者中的可能性较小(CKD;24437中的4550[18.6%]vs24962中的5438[21.8%];P<.001),但在2型糖尿病患者中的可能性更大(T2D;21830中的5721[26.2%]vs27545中的4262[15.5%];P<.001)以及T2D和使用SGLT2i治疗的患者更有可能使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂进行背景三联疗法,β-受体阻滞剂,和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(9988的4624[46.3%]vs39411的10880[27.6%];P<.001),49399名总研究患者中的4624名(9.4%)出院,接受包括SGLT2i在内的四联药物治疗。在有10家或以上合格出院的461家医院中,19家医院(4.1%)出院50%或更多的患者服用SGLT2i处方,而344家医院(74.6%)的SGLT2i处方患者出院比例低于25%(包括29家[6.3%]的SGLT2i处方患者出院比例为零).在未调整的模型中,SGLT2i处方率的医院间差异很高(中位数比值比,2.53;95%CI,2.36-2.74)和调整患者和医院特征后(中位比值比,2.51;95%CI,2.34-2.71)。
    在这项研究中,合格的HFrEF患者出院时SGLT2i的处方较低,包括有多种治疗指征的CKD和T2D合并症患者,美国医院之间存在很大差异。需要进一步努力克服实施障碍并改善HFrEF患者中SGLT2i的使用。
    Clinical guidelines for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) strongly recommend treatment with a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) to reduce cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization. Nationwide adoption of SGLT2i for HFrEF in the US is unknown.
    To characterize patterns of SGLT2i use among eligible US patients hospitalized for HFrEF.
    This retrospective cohort study analyzed 49 399 patients hospitalized for HFrEF across 489 sites in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) registry between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, type 1 diabetes, and previous intolerance to SGLT2i were excluded.
    Patient-level and hospital-level prescription of SGLT2i at hospital discharge.
    Of 49 399 included patients, 16 548 (33.5%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 67 (56-78) years. Overall, 9988 patients (20.2%) were prescribed an SGLT2i. SGLT2i prescription was less likely among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD; 4550 of 24 437 [18.6%] vs 5438 of 24 962 [21.8%]; P < .001) but more likely among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D; 5721 of 21 830 [26.2%] vs 4262 of 27 545 [15.5%]; P < .001) and those with both T2D and CKD (2905 of 12 236 [23.7%] vs 7078 vs 37 139 [19.1%]; P < .001). Patients prescribed SGLT2i therapy were more likely to be prescribed background triple therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, β-blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (4624 of 9988 [46.3%] vs 10 880 of 39 411 [27.6%]; P < .001), and 4624 of 49 399 total study patients (9.4%) were discharged with prescriptions for quadruple medical therapy including SGLT2i. Among 461 hospitals with 10 or more eligible discharges, 19 hospitals (4.1%) discharged 50% or more of patients with prescriptions for SGLT2i, whereas 344 hospitals (74.6%) discharged less than 25% of patients with prescriptions for SGLT2i (including 29 [6.3%] that discharged zero patients with SGLT2i prescriptions). There was high between-hospital variance in the rate of SGLT2i prescription in unadjusted models (median odds ratio, 2.53; 95% CI, 2.36-2.74) and after adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics (median odds ratio, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.34-2.71).
    In this study, prescription of SGLT2i at hospital discharge among eligible patients with HFrEF was low, including among patients with comorbid CKD and T2D who have multiple indications for therapy, with substantial variation among US hospitals. Further efforts are needed to overcome implementation barriers and improve use of SGLT2i among patients with HFrEF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号