The reported case is of a 68-year-old man who was admitted to the ICU at our tertiary care medical center with severe COVID-19. He was admitted to the ICU due to a worsening respiratory condition during his hospitalization at the same medical center, which included the development of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Ventilator management was started with alveolar protection in mind. On the ninth day of ventilator management, we judged that it was necessary to introduce extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Although the ninth day of ventilator management is considered relatively late for starting ECMO, there are no absolute contraindications for ECMO at this stage, and improvements in oxygenation can be expected. After introducing ECMO, the patient\'s oxygenation capacity improved, and ECMO was successfully withdrawn within 16 days. The patient required long-term rehabilitation but was discharged from the hospital to his home without lingering disease complications on the 150th day of illness and subsequently resumed his former work, daily activities, and quality of life. We conclude that, in regard to the introduction of ECMO for ARDS, it is necessary to reach a comprehensive judgment without being bound by any one index (such as the ventilation management period prior to ECMO introduction).

We herein report a case in which the trachea could be completely sealed only when the cuff pressure reached 100 cmH2O. An excessive cross-sectional area of the trachea is a rare phenomenon, but we believe that our case will be helpful for clinicians who encounter similar situations.

Tracheostomy is a common procedure seen in critically ill patients that require long term ventilatory support. As with all airway access procedures, tracheotomy with prolonged tracheal tube placement comes with possible risks such as tracheal scarring, tracheal rupture, pneumothorax, tracheoesophageal fistula among others. Another possible complication, though rare, is escape of free air into the surrounding tissue, as well as pneumomediastinum (PM). This may occur due to various reasons, some of them being tracheal rupture, barotrauma or tracheal tube mispositioning. Pneumomediastinum may present with concurrent free air in other body cavities such as the peritoneum, thorax or subcutaneous tissue. Though often not life-threatening it may require treatment including high flow oxygen, ventilator management or occasionally, surgical intervention. Herein we describe a rare case of PM with communicating pneumoperitoneum and massive subcutaneous emphysema due to tracheal tube mispositioning along with a review of the literature.