OBJECTIVE: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are the most common symptoms during menopause including hot flushes and night sweats. They are highly disruptive to the quality of life. Fezolinetant is an FDA-approved non-hormonal selective neurokinin3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of VMS. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for VMS associated with menopause.
METHODS: Databases were searched until September 2023 for relevant studies comparing fezolinetant against placebo. Data was extracted into an online form and analyzed using RevMan (Version 5.4.1). The GRADE approach was conducted to evaluate the quality of evidence regarding efficacy outcomes. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fezolinetant to placebo in postmenopausal women experiencing VMS. Exclusion criteria comprised studies involving participants with contraindications to fezolinetant or those evaluating its efficacy for indications other than VMS associated with menopause.
RESULTS: Six studies were included in this study involving 3301 patients. Compared to placebo, fezolinetant reduced the frequency of VMS episodes from baseline (SMD = -0.64, 95 % CI [-0.77, -0.5]) and (SMD = -0.63, 95 % CI [-0.72, -0.53] at weeks 4 and 12 respectively. Additionally, fezolinetant reduced VMS severity score (SMD = -0.59, 95 %CI [-0.77, -0.42]) and (SMD = -0.4, 95 % CI [-0.54, -0.27]) at weeks 4 at 12 respectively. These reductions were positively reflected on Menopause specific quality of life score (SMD = -0.46, 95 %CI [-57, -0.34]), (SMD = -0.37, 95 %CI [-0.48, -0.25]) at weeks 4 and 12 respectively. Regarding safety analysis, fezolinetant showed increased risk for drug-related TEAEs (RR = 1.47, 95 %CI [1.06,2.04]), serious TEAEs (RR = 1.67, 95 %CI [1.09,2.55]), fatigue (RR = 4.05, 95 %CI [1.27,12.88]), arthralgia (RR = 2.83, 95 %CI [1.02,7.8]) and ALT or AST > 3 times (RR = 2, 95 %CI [1.12,3.57]), with no other statistically significant difference regarding other safety terms.
CONCLUSIONS: Fezolinetant has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the frequency and severity of VMS in postmenopausal women, leading to an improvement in their quality of life. These findings suggest that Fezolinetant may serve as a viable alternative to hormonal therapy for managing VMS.

OBJECTIVE: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) adversely affect postmenopausal quality of life. However, their association with bone health has not been elucidated. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence regarding the association of VMS with fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD) in peri- and postmenopausal women.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases until 31 August 2023. Fracture, low BMD (osteoporosis/osteopenia) and mean change in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD were assessed. The results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD), respectively, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The I2 index quantified heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in the qualitative and 12 in the quantitative analysis (n=49,659). No difference in fractures between women with and without VMS was found (n=5, OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.93-1.16, I2 16%). However, VMS were associated with low BMD (n=5, OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.42-1.67, I2 0%). This difference was evident for LS (MD -0.019 g/cm2, 95% CI -0.03 to -0.008, I2 85.2%), but not for FN BMD (MD -0.010 g/cm2, 95% CI -0.021 to 0.001, I2 78.2%). These results were independent of VMS severity, age and study design. When the analysis was confined to studies that excluded menopausal hormone therapy use, the association with BMD remained significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of VMS is associated with low BMD in postmenopausal women, although it does not seem to increase fracture risk.

BACKGROUND: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as hot flashes and night sweats, are highly prevalent and burdensome for women experiencing menopausal transition. Fezolinetant, a selective neurokinin 3 receptor (NK3R) antagonist, is a potential therapeutic option for mitigating VMS.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to assess the efficacy and evaluate the safety profile of fezolinetant compared with placebo in post-menopausal women suffering from VMS, by pooling all the relevant data and reflecting the most current evidence.
UNASSIGNED: An extensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Library databases from inception until June 2023 to identify relevant trials.
METHODS: Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using R Statistical Software.
RESULTS: A total of six randomized controlled trials were added. For the frequency of daily VMS, the combined pooled result favored the fezolinetant group over placebo (MD -2.38, 95% CI -2.64 to -2.12; P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). For the severity of daily VMS, fezolinetant was again found to be superior to the placebo group (MD -0.40, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.29; P < 0.001, I2 = 70%). Fezolinetant (120 mg) consistently demonstrated a significant reduction in the severity of daily moderate/severe VMS compared with other doses at both 4 and 12 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), PROMIS the Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) scores indicated significant improvement with fezolinetant. No significant difference in efficacy of fezolinetant at 4 and 12 weeks were observed in any outcome. As for safety, no significant differences in the treatment emergent adverse events at 12 weeks were found between fezolinetant and placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study significantly favors fezolinetant over placebo regarding the primary efficacy outcomes of daily moderate to severe VMS frequency and severity, including PROs, while both the groups are comparable in terms of treatment emergent adverse events. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

OBJECTIVE: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) affect many postmenopausal persons and impact sleep and quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines the literature describing the safety and efficacy of neurokinin-3 receptor antagonists approved and in development for postmenopausal persons with VMS.
METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts was conducted using the search terms and permutations of neurokinin-3 receptor antagonist, elinzanetant, fezolinetant, and osanetant. Inclusion criteria of reporting on efficacy or safety of fezolinetant, elinzanetant, or osanetant; studies in participants identifying as female; full record in English; and primary literature were applied. Abstract-only records were excluded. Extracted data were synthesized to allow comparison of reported study characteristics, efficacy outcomes, and safety events. Eligible records were evaluated for risk of bias via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized studies and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used. This study was neither funded nor registered.
RESULTS: The search returned 191 records; 186 were screened after deduplication. Inclusion criteria were met by six randomized controlled trials (RCT), four reported on fezolinetant, and two reported on elinzanetant. One record was a post hoc analysis of a fezolinetant RCT. An additional study was identified outside the database search. Three fezolinetant RCT demonstrated a reduction in VMS frequency/severity, improvement in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life scores, and improvement in sleep quality at weeks 4 and 12 compared with placebo without serious adverse events. The two RCT on elinzanetant also showed improvements in VMS frequency and severity. All eight records evaluated safety through treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common adverse events were COVID-19, headache, somnolence, and gastrointestinal. Each record evaluated had a low risk of bias. There is a strong certainty of evidence as per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high-quality evidence supporting the efficacy of fezolinetant and elinzanetant, these agents may be an effective option with mild adverse events for women seeking nonhormone treatment of VMS.

Studies have shown racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of vasomotor symptoms (VMS), sleep disturbance and VMS treatment in menopause. To assess the reproducibility of these differences, we systematically reviewed observational studies, published in 2000-2021, reporting the prevalence/incidence of VMS, sleep disturbance or treatment use in menopausal women stratified by race/ethnicity. We screened 3799 records from PubMed and Embase and included 27 papers (19 studies). No incidence data were found. Prevalence data varied widely, but some common patterns emerged. In all five studies comparing VMS between Black women and White, Hispanic and/or East Asian women, the prevalence was highest in Black women and lowest in East Asian women. The prevalence of sleep disturbance overall was compared among Black, White and East Asian women in two study populations, and was highest in White women in both papers. Sleep disturbance was more common than VMS in East Asian women. In all four studies comparing hormone therapy use between White women and Black and/or East Asian women, treatment use was more common in White women. These results highlight the need for individualized counseling and treatment, outreach to under-served minorities, and standardized definitions and outcome measures for VMS and sleep disturbance for future studies.

BACKGROUND: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are the symptoms most frequently experienced by women transitioning to menopause and are a primary indication for menopausal hormone therapy. A growing body of evidence has associated the presence of VMS with future risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. This study aimed to systematically evaluate, qualitatively and quantitatively, the possible association between VMS and the risk for incident CVD.
METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 11 studies evaluating peri- and postmenopausal women in a prospective design. The association between VMS (hot flashes and/or night sweats) and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, was explored. Associations are expressed as relative risks (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: The risk for incident CVD events in women with and without VMS differed according to the age of participants. Women with VSM younger than 60 years at baseline had a higher risk of an incident CVD event than women without VSM of the same age (RR 1.12, 95 % CI 1.05-1.19, I2 0%). Conversely, the incidence of CVD events was not different between women with and without VMS in the age group >60 years (RR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.92-1.01, I2 55%).
CONCLUSIONS: The association between VMS and incident CVD events differs with age. VMS increases the incidence of CVD only in women under 60 years of age at baseline. The findings of this study are limited by the high heterogeneity among studies, pertaining mainly to different population characteristics, definitions of menopausal symptoms and recall bias.

Idiopathic small fiber neuropathy (iSFN) lacks broadly accepted diagnostic criteria, which hinders its timely diagnosis and treatment. A systematic literature review was performed to assess the published screening and diagnostic criteria for iSFN, excluding studies where SFN was of well-established etiology. Eighty-four clinical studies and seven guideline/review publications were included in this systematic review. Substantial heterogeneity existed in iSFN diagnostic criteria. The most common set of criteria to diagnose iSFN [presence of any symptoms of iSFN, absence of large fiber involvement, and reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD)] was used in only 14% of studies. Mandatory individual criteria to confirm iSFN included any sensory symptoms (60% of studies), pain (19% of studies), small fiber signs (20% of studies), absence of large fiber signs (62% of studies), reduced IENFD (38% of studies), and autonomic symptoms (1% of studies). This review highlights a clear need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines for diagnosing iSFN.

Fine and ultra-fine particulate matter (PM) are major constituents of urban air pollution and recognized risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. This review examined the effects of PM exposure on vascular tissue. Specific mechanisms by which PM affects the vasculature include inflammation, oxidative stress, actions on vascular tone and vasomotor responses, as well as atherosclerotic plaque formation. Further, there appears to be a greater PM exposure effect on susceptible individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions.

Vasomotor symptoms are common among postmenopausal women and patients receiving hormone deprivation therapies, and emerging studies are exploring gabapentin\'s and pregabalin\'s effects as nonhormonal treatment options. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of these 2 drugs.
Based on a preregistered protocol (Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews -CRD42019133650), we searched 10 databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese Biological Medical Literature, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Journals Full-text Database [VIP], and Wanfang) as well as the World Health Organization international clinical trials registry platform and reference lists of related literatures.
Randomized controlled trials and randomized crossover studies exploring gabapentin and pregabalin among women patients with vasomotor symptoms were included.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement was followed. Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed bias, and extracted data. Mean difference and standardized mean difference with 95% confidence intervals were assessed by random-effects models. Heterogeneities were assessed by I2 statistics, and the quality of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Nineteen randomized controlled trials and 2 randomized crossover trials reporting results from 3519 participants were included. Gabapentin could reduce hot flash frequency (mean difference, -1.62, 95% confidence interval, -1.98 to -1.26 after 4 weeks; mean difference, -2.77, 95% confidence interval, -4.29 to -1.24 after 12 weeks) and composite score (standardized mean difference, -0.47, 95% confidence interval, -0.71 to -0.23 after 4 weeks; standardized mean difference, -0.77, 95% confidence interval, -1.15 to -0.40 after 12 weeks) compared with placebo. Both menopausal participants and patients with breast cancer benefited from treatment. Higher risks of dizziness and somnolence were found in the gabapentin group than in the control group (risk ratio, 4.45, 95% confidence interval, 2.50-7.94; risk ratio, 3.29, 95% confidence interval, 1.97-5.48, respectively). Estrogen was more effective in reducing hot flash frequency than gabapentin. No statistically significant difference in reduction of hot flash severity score was found between gabapentin and antidepressants. The trials comparing gabapentin or pregabalin with the other interventions were too limited to make a conclusion.
Favorable effects of gabapentin in relieving vasomotor symptoms were observed, compared with controls, but were less effective than those of estrogen. Evidence supporting the therapeutic effect of pregabalin is still lacking.

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are novel carbon based nanomaterials (NMs) that could be used in many areas ranging from electronics to biotechnology. The present review summarized pharmacological and toxicological aspects of CNTs to vascular systems, because the vascular systems are important targets for CNTs during manufacturing process, daily contact and biomedical uses. Functionalized CNTs could be used as novel nanoplateforms to regulate angiogenesis for cancer therapy, as well as nanocarriers to cross blood brain barrier (BBB), one of the major obstacles to prevent the entering of therapeutic substances into brains. However, it has also been shown that inhalational or intravenous contact with CNTs might induce adverse vascular effects, such as progression of atherosclerotic plaque, vasomotor dysfunction, and changes of blood pressure and/or heart rate in laboratory animals, although currently there are only limited reports obtained from CNT-exposed human beings and the results are inconclusive. The mechanisms associated with the vascular toxicity of CNTs remain poorly understood, and it appears that multiple signaling pathways are likely to be involved. The toxicity of CNTs to vascular systems might be reduced by controlling the physicochemical properties of CNTs, particularly lengths, diameters and surface chemistry. At present, the beneficial and adverse effects of CNTs to vascular systems are still largely unknown and require further extensive studies.