BACKGROUND: Clinically-oriented outcome measures are increasingly being recognized as lacking in consideration of factors important to patients. There is an emerging move of guideline bodies advocating a more patient-centred approach. Aneurysms in autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) can be considered unsightly and a constant reminder for patients of their dependence on dialysis. However, their impact on patient\'s perception has not previously been reported.
METHODS: Between April 2017-18, the Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) was administered to prevalent haemodialysis patients across ten dialysis units via structured interviews, as part of a quality improvement project. Data for the subgroup of patients with aneurysmal AVF (categorised as per classification by Valenti et al.), were retrospectively evaluated and compared to the wider cohort.
RESULTS: Data were collected for 539 patients (median age: 66 years; 59% male), of whom 195 (36%) had aneurysmal AVF, with Type 2 morphology (cannulation site) being the most common (75%). Duration of AVF was found to be significantly associated with aneurysmal development, with estimated likelihoods of 11%, 43% and 61% after one, five and ten years, respectively. Interestingly, patients with diabetes had a significantly lower prevalence of aneurysmal development than those that were non-diabetic (25% vs. 43%, p < 0.001). Overall VAQ scores were not found to differ significantly by aneurysm status (p = 0.816) or across morphology types (p = 0.277). However, patients with aneurysmal AVF were significantly more concerned with the appearance of their AVF (p < 0.001) than the wider cohort. Despite this, patients with aneurysmal AVF gave significantly higher scores for satisfaction and ease of use and lower scores for bruising and clotting (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysmal AVF are often cited as an important factor by patients for not proceeding with fistula formation. In this evaluation of patient reported experiences, those with aneurysmal AVF reported high satisfaction levels. This may help clinicians highlight positive patient reported outcomes of aneurysmal AVF during preprocedural consent processes.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the barriers and facilitators influencing emergency department clinicians\' adherence to the Australian Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIVC) Clinical Care Standard, using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW).
BACKGROUND: Suboptimal PIVC practices are frequently linked to a range of patient-important adverse outcomes. The first Australian Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Clinical Care Standard was introduced in 2021, aiming to standardize practice. However, a recent national survey revealed a lack of adherence to the Standard among emergency department clinicians.
METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study.
METHODS: The study was conducted across two Australian emergency departments in 2023. Utilizing purposive sampling, semi-structured interviews were conducted. The analysis incorporated both deductive and inductive approaches, mapping the findings to the BCW.
RESULTS: Interviews with 25 nurses and doctors revealed nine key subthemes. The main barriers were the stressful environment, insufficient education and training, and the absence of a feedback mechanism. The main facilitators were recognition of suboptimal practice, belief in the importance of patient engagement, and the desire to improve practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple complex factors have an impact on clinicians\' adherence to the Standard. The identified interventions will serve as a guide for future implementation of the Standard.
UNASSIGNED: The findings inform healthcare organizations of the significance of implementing strategies to enhance clinicians\' acceptance of the Standard. Clinicians should consider incorporating the multifaceted interventions developed in accordance with the BCW for future implementation projects.
CONCLUSIONS: Promoting adherence to standards opens avenues to challenge suboptimal practice and has the potential to instigate a culture shift in the fundamental skills of frontline clinicians.
UNASSIGNED: The study is designed and reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
UNASSIGNED: No patient or public contribution.

BACKGROUND: The Guatemalan Foundation for Children with Kidney Diseases collaborated with Bridge of Life, a not-for-profit charitable organization, to establish a vascular access program. We reviewed our experience with graded surgical responsibility and structured didactic training, creating arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for Guatemalan children.
METHODS: Pediatric vascular access missions were completed from 2015 to 2023 and analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up was completed by the Guatemalan pediatric surgeons, nephrologists, and nursing staff. AVF patency and patient survival were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis with univariate and multivariable association between patient demographic variables by Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Among a total of 153 vascular access operations, there were 139 new patient procedures, forming the study group for this review. The mean age was 13.6 years, 42.6% were female, and the mean BMI was 17.3. Radial or ulnar artery-based direct AVFs were established in 100 patients (71.9%) and ten of the 25 transposition procedures. Brachial artery inflow was required in 29 direct AVFs (20.9%). Two patients underwent femoral vein transpositions. Access-related distal ischemia was not encountered. Seven of the AVF patients later required access banding for arm edema; all had previous dialysis catheters (mean = 9, range 4-12). Primary and cumulative patency rates were 84% and 86% at 12 months and 64% and 81% at 24 months, respectively. The median follow-up was 12 months. Overall patient survival was 84% and 67% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. There were no deaths related to AVF access.
CONCLUSIONS: Safe and functional AVFs were established in a teaching environment within a Guatemalan comprehensive pediatric nephrology center.

This review describes the history of vascular access for hemodialysis (HD) over the past 8 decades. Reliable, repeatable vascular access for outpatient HD began in the 1960s with the Quinton-Scribner shunt. This was followed by the autologous Brecia-Cimino radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF), which dominated HD vascular access for the next 20 years. Delayed referral and the requirement of 1.5-3 months for AVF maturation led to the development of and increasing dependence on synthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and tunneled central venous catheters, both of which have higher thrombosis and infection risks than AVFs. The use of AVGs and tunneled central venous catheters increased progressively to the point that, in 1997, the first evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for HD vascular access recommended that they only be used if a functioning AVF could not be established. Efforts to promote AVF use in the United States during the past 2 decades doubled their prevalence; however, recent practice guidelines acknowledge that not all patients receiving HD are ideally suited for an AVF. Nonetheless, improved referral for AVF placement before dialysis initiation and improved conversion of failing AVGs to AVFs may increase AVF use among patients in whom they are appropriate.

OBJECTIVE: Limited knowledge exists regarding access site complication rates between trans-axillary and trans-brachial approaches with sheath sizes ≥6Fr. We retrospectively reviewed our institution experience with access site complications for percutaneous trans-axillary and trans-brachial arterial interventions using sheath sizes ranging from 6Fr to 10Fr.
METHODS: We examined 67 endovascular interventions performed over 18 months, restricted to sheath sizes of 6Fr to 10Fr. Procedures utilizing trans-brachial (41 cases) and trans-axillary (26 cases) approaches under sonographic guidance were included. Cases involving hemodialysis accesses and those requiring surgical cut-down were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of major access site complications (SIR grade-II/III) within 30 days, with data collected on hemostasis method, sheath size, and complications. Statistical analysis involved ANCOVA and Fisher\'s exact tests, with significance set at p < .05.
RESULTS: Successful percutaneous arterial access was achieved in all cases using either approach (trans-axillary or trans-brachial). Closure devices were employed in all axillary punctures and in 71% of brachial punctures. Major access site complications occurred in 7 out of 41 cases (17%) in the trans-brachial group and in 4 out of 26 cases (15%) in the trans-axillary group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups, regardless of access site or sheath size.
CONCLUSIONS: Trans-axillary access serves as a safe and effective upper limb access method for percutaneous endovascular procedures requiring sheath size of 7Fr or larger when compared to trans-brachial approach.

With the increasing utilization of endovascular mechanical circulatory support devices, such as the Impella CP (Abiomed), there is a need for standardized guidelines for its safe removal. Development of the Perclose post-closure technique was facilitated by the introduction of a new Impella repositioning sheath in 2019, which enabled re-access to the sidearm and stylet, rewiring of the access artery, and Impella sheath removal. Our retrospective single-center study included all patients undergoing Perclose post-closure technique for vascular access closure after Impella removal between 2018 and 2024. Forty-six patients, with a mean age of 63.8 years, predominantly male (82.6%), were included in the analysis. Indications for Impella placement included complex percutaneous coronary intervention (34.8%) and cardiogenic shock (CS) (heart failure-CS: 32.6%, myocardial infarction-CS: 21.7%). Clinically relevant complications were encountered in less than 5% of cases. No instances of covered stent placement, fasciotomy, amputation, or access site infections were reported. Our study underscores the safety of the Perclose post-closure technique following Impella removal in a diverse cohort of patients, with an overall clinically significant complication rate of less than 5%. The Perclose post-closure technique is a reliable and well-tolerated method for vascular access closure in patients undergoing Impella support.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy has become increasingly preferred in the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions. The choice of arterial access usually depends on the type of procedure being performed with most via the common femoral artery and increasingly via the radial artery. Percutaneous access via the brachial artery has however been approached with caution due to the perceived increased risk for development of complications. Percutaneous brachial artery access (pBAA) has insufficient evidence when compared to femoral and radial access, with no large-scale studies available. The objective of this study is to review the literature and report the clinical and radiological complications associated with pBAA.
METHODS: EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL and Medline were searched for existing data on the complications associated with pBAA. Systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out on the data of 31 studies.
RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that the probability of post procedural haematoma was 4.76%, haemorrhage 1.43%, perforation 1.11% pseudoaneurysm 1.06%, spasm 0.9%, thrombus 0.55%, neuropathy 0.53%, occlusion 0.51%, ischaemia 0.37% and infection 0.24 %. Non-target vessel puncture, stenosis and stroke had a 0% incidence among the assessed population.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence to support clinical decision making when it comes to the utility of pBAA in endovascular diagnosis or therapy. The results demonstrate that pBAA is relatively safe with a low incidence of serious complications and thereby provide the clinician with the option of an alternate access point when planning treatment.

Autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is considered the preferred vascular access choice for individuals undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and is widely utilized in China, as reported by the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Despite its popularity, the significant incidence of poor AVF maturation often leads to the need for central venous catheter insertion, increasing the risk of complications like superior vena cava stenosis and catheter-related infections, which in turn raises the overall mortality risk. With the prevalence of diabetes rising globally among the elderly and diabetic kidney disease being a leading cause of end-stage renal disease necessitating renal replacement therapy, our retrospective review aims to explore the various factors affecting AVF maturation in this specific patient population. While there have been numerous studies examining AVF complications in MHD patients, including issues like failure, patency loss, stenosis, thrombosis, poor maturation, and other influencing factors, there remains a gap in large-scale clinical studies focusing on the incidence and risk factors for immature AVF specifically in elderly diabetic patients. This paper delves into the pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic criteria, and unique considerations surrounding AVF maturation in elderly diabetic patients, distinguishing them from the general population. Our literature review reveals that elderly diabetic patients exhibit a higher risk of AVF immaturity compared to the general population. Additionally, there exists a continuing discourse regarding several aspects related to this group, including the choice of dialysis access, timing of AVF surgery, and surgical site selection. Furthermore, we delve into the management strategies for vascular access within this specific group with the goal of providing evidence-based guidance for the establishment and maintenance of functional vascular access in elderly diabetic patients.

While the native arterio-venous fistula (AVF) remains the first choice in vascular access for most hemodialysis patients, tunneled hemodialysis catheters (tHDC) continue to be an option in selected patients. Since timely access to vascular surgery-due to delayed referral or resource limitations-is not always possible, nephrologists have to become more actively involved in planning, creation and monitoring of vascular access. Moreover, this approach could also strengthen patient-centered care in nephrology. This manuscript reviews the current standard in tHDC creation, patient selection and strategies to mitigate the risk of infectious complications and catheter thrombosis. Presentation of novel developments in catheter placement with ultrasound-guided or ECG-guided positioning, their benefits and possible disadvantages emphasizes the complexity of vascular access planning. We offer an approach for choice of insertion method, depending on selected side and existing resources and set focus on the necessity and required resources of \'interventional nephrology\' training programs.

The construction and utilization of dependable vascular access are essential for hemodialysis. Despite its importance, complications with vascular access are common, significantly impacting patient morbidity and mortality. This report presents a novel approach to treating chronic total occlusion (CTO) in hemodialysis vascular access using the \"wire kissing technique\" an \"externalization and pull-through technique.\" An 82-year-old woman on hemodialysis had a thrombotic obstruction in her cephalic vein, which conventional methods failed to address. The wire kissing technique allowed the meeting of antegrade and retrograde wires within the CTO lesion, stabilizing the wire and facilitating balloon passage. The externalization and pull-through technique further enabled the balloon to cross the rigid CTO lesion, successfully completing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Post-procedure ultrasonography showed significant improvements in flow volume and resistance index. These techniques, commonly used in coronary and femoral arteries, have not been previously reported for dialysis vascular access. This case highlights a novel and effective solution for overcoming technical difficulties in crossing CTO lesions, potentially improving outcomes in vascular access for hemodialysis patients.