Vascular Patency

血管通畅
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性髂股深静脉血栓形成和慢性髂股静脉阻塞会对患者造成重大伤害,并且越来越多地通过血管内静脉介入治疗。包括经皮机械血栓切除术和支架置入术。然而,这些治疗要素的研究尚未设计和报道足够严谨,以支持有关其临床效用的可靠结论.在这个项目中,可信的基于共识的陈述方法被用来发展,通过一个结构化的过程,基于共识的声明,以指导未来的静脉干预研究人员。起草了30份声明,涵盖与静脉研究描述和设计相关的主要主题,安全结果评估,疗效结果评估,以及评估经皮静脉血栓切除术和支架放置的特定主题。使用改进的德尔菲技术达成共识,由血管疾病方面的医师专家组成的小组对这些陈述进行了投票,并成功地在所有30项陈述中达到了>80%的共识(一致或强烈一致)的预定阈值.希望这些声明的指导意见能提高标准化程度,客观性,在临床研究中,血管内介入治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓形成和慢性髂股静脉阻塞的临床结果报告中,以患者为中心的相关性,从而增强静脉患者的护理。
    Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:放射性头颅动静脉瘘历来被认为需要多次随访程序干预以达到成熟和维持通畅。国家肾脏基金会的肾脏疾病结果质量倡议(KDOQI)最近的临床实践指南强调了以患者为中心的血液透析策略,并具有新的干预率最高目标。可能与优先考虑自体前臂血液透析通路的建议相冲突。本描述性研究旨在评估放射状瘘管是否可以满足KDOQI指南基准的干预措施,并阐明与放射性头颅动静脉瘘创建后的干预时间和频率相关的临床和解剖特征。
    方法:来自多中心PATENCY-1和PATENCY-2随机试验的前瞻性患者水平数据,招募接受新的放射性头颅动静脉瘘创建的患者,进行了分析(ClinicalTrials.govNCT02110901和NCT02414841)。主要结果是术后1年的干预率。计算了发病率,使用Cox比例风险模型的复发事件扩展对瘘管形成后的手术或血管内介入治疗时间进行建模.使用非参数自举计算95%水平的置信区间。
    结果:该队列由914名患者组成;平均(SD)年龄为57(13)岁,女性占22%。中位随访时间为707天(IQR447-1066)。每人年干预措施的发生率(95%CI)为1.04(0.95-1.13);在使用瘘管之前为1.10(0.98-1.21),瘘管使用后0.96(0.82-1.11)。总体上最常见的干预措施是球囊血管成形术(占所有干预措施的54.9%)。静脉侧支结扎(16.4%),和开放修订(例如,从鼻烟盒接近手腕,16.4%)。需要球囊血管成形术的部位包括吻合段(51.7%的血管成形术),流出静脉(29.2%),流入动脉(14.8%),中央静脉(3.8%),和头弓(0.5%)。常见的适应症是恢复或维持通畅(所有干预措施的75.6%)。协助成熟(14.9%),改善深度(4.4%),或改善增强(3.0%)。在多元回归分析中,女性(调整后的危险比[HR]1.21,95%CI1.05-1.45),糖尿病(HR1.21,95%CI1.01-1.46),术中静脉直径<3.0mm(vs.≥4.0mm,HR1.33,95%CI1.02-1.66)与更早和更频繁的干预相关。在创建瘘管时未进行血液透析的患者接受了较低频率的干预(HR0.69,95%CI0.59-0.81)。
    结论:放射性头颅动静脉瘘患者可以接受一次干预,平均而言,在创作后的第一年,这与当前的KDOQI指南一致。已经需要血液透析的病人,女性患者,糖尿病患者,术中静脉直径<3.0mm的患者重复干预的风险增加。没有亚组超过指南建议的复发干预的最大阈值。总的来说,结果表明,在适当选择的患者中,作为终末期肾脏疾病生活计划的一部分,建立放射性头颅动静脉瘘仍然是一个指南一致的策略.
    Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas have been historically perceived as requiring multiple follow-up procedural interventions to achieve maturation and maintain patency. Recent clinical practice guidelines from the National Kidney Foundation\'s Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) emphasize a patient-centered hemodialysis access strategy with new maximum targets for intervention rates, potentially conflicting with concomitant recommendations to prioritize autogenous forearm hemodialysis access creation. The present descriptive study seeks to assess whether radiocephalic fistulas can meet the KDOQI guideline benchmarks for interventions following access creation, and to elucidate clinical and anatomic characteristics associated with the timing and frequency of interventions following radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation.
    Prospective patient-level data from the multicenter PATENCY-1 and PATENCY-2 randomized trials, which enrolled patients undergoing new radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation, was analyzed (ClinicalTrials.govNCT02110901 and NCT02414841). The primary outcome was the rate of interventions at 1 year postoperatively. Incidence rates were calculated, and time to surgical or endovascular intervention following fistula creation was modeled using recurrent event extensions of the Cox proportional hazards model. Confidence intervals at the 95% level were calculated using nonparametric bootstrapping.
    The cohort consisted of 914 patients; mean age was 57 years (standard deviation, 13 years), and 22% were female. Median follow-up was 707 days (interquartile range, 447-1066 days). The incidence of interventions per person-year was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.13) overall; 1.10 (95% CI, 0.98-1.21) before fistula use, and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.82-1.11) after fistula use. The most common interventions overall were balloon angioplasty (54.9% of all interventions), venous side-branch ligation (16.4%), and open revisions (eg, proximalization from snuffbox to wrist, 16.4%). The locations requiring balloon angioplasty included the juxta-anastomotic segment (51.7% of angioplasties), the outflow vein (29.2%), the inflow artery (14.8%), the central veins (3.8%), and the cephalic arch (0.5%). Common indications were to restore or maintain patency (75.6% of all interventions), assist maturation (14.9%), improve depth (4.4%), or improve augmentation (3.0%). In the multivariable regression analysis, female sex (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.45), diabetes (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.46), and intraoperative vein diameter <3.0 mm (vs ≥4.0 mm: HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.66) were associated with earlier and more frequent interventions. Patients not on hemodialysis at the time of fistula creation underwent less frequent interventions (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.81).
    Patients with radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas can expect to undergo one intervention, on average, in the first year after creation, which aligns with current KDOQI guidelines. Patients already requiring hemodialysis, female patients, patients with diabetes, and patients with intraoperative vein diameters <3.0 mm were at increased risk for repeated intervention. No subgroup exceeded guideline-suggested maximum thresholds for recurrent interventions. Overall, the results demonstrate that creation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula remains a guideline-concordant strategy when part of an end-stage kidney disease life-plan in appropriately selected patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:描述使用不同技术对累及肾下主动脉和主动脉分叉的TASCC/D病变进行血管内重建的结果。
    方法:这是一个观察性的,回顾性,单中心研究。五年后,我们选择了所有经血管内手术治疗累及肾下主动脉和/或主动脉分叉的主动脉-髂动脉TASCC/D病变的患者.早期(<30天)结果为死亡率,严重截肢和血栓形成。晚期中期(1、3年)结局是主要的,辅助原发性和继发性通畅,保肢率和免于再干预。
    结果:在检查期间共治疗了87例患者。接吻覆膜支架(cKS),在35例(40.4%)中进行了主动脉分叉(CERAB)的覆盖重建和单模态分叉AFX单体支架(Bif-SG)植入,26例(29.8%)和26例(29.8%),分别。Bif-SG组包括11例(11/26,42.3%)治疗与主动脉分叉阻塞相关的腹主动脉瘤的患者。在所有情况下都取得了技术成功,并且没有重新编码破裂或转换为开放手术。中位随访年龄为18个月(四分位距[IQR],8-34).1年时的总原发性通畅率为91.2%(95%置信区间[CI]:81.3-95.9),3年时为83.5%(95%CI:69.6-91.4)。在1年和3年辅助的初级通畅率为96.9%(95%CI:87.8-99.2)。3年时,继发性通畅率为97.8%(95%CI:85.5-99.6)。1年和3年的肢体抢救率为98.6%(95%CI:90.1-99.7),1年时无再干预率为98.4%(95%CI:88.9-99.7),3年时无再干预率为87%(95%CI:66.1-95.4).单因素分析未发现任何影响原发性通畅率的因素。
    结论:使用先进技术的血管内重建在严重的主动脉-髂动脉阻塞中提供了有希望的中期通畅率和安全性。各种重建结构使外科医生可以根据患者的解剖结构定制血运重建的类型。
    BACKGROUND: To describe the outcomes of the endovascular reconstruction of TASC C/D lesions involving the infrarenal aorta and aortic bifurcation with different techniques.
    METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective, single-center study. In a 5-year period, we selected all the patients treated with an endovascular procedure for an aorto-iliac TASC C/D lesion involving the infrarenal aorta and/or the aortic bifurcation. Early (<30 days) outcomes were mortality, major amputation, and thrombosis. Late mid-term (1 and 3 years) outcomes were primary, assisted primary and secondary patency, limb salvage rate, and freedom from reintervention.
    RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were treated during the index period. Kissing covered stent (cKS), covered reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB), and unimodular bifurcated AFX Unibody stent-graft (Bif-SG) implantation were performed in 35 (40.4%), 26 (29.8%), and 26 (29.8%) cases, respectively. Bif-SG group included 11 (11/26, 42.3%) patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with the obstruction of the aortic bifurcation. Technical success was achieved in all cases and no ruptures or conversions to open surgery were recoded. Median follow-up age was 18 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8-34). Overall primary patency rate was 91.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.3-95.9) at 1 year and 83.5% (95% CI: 69.6-91.4) at 3 years. Assisted primary patency was 96.9% (95% CI: 87.8-99.2) at 1 and 3 years. Secondary patency was 97.8% (95% CI: 85.5-99.6) at 3 years. Limb salvage rate was 98.6% (95% CI: 90.1-99.7) at 1 and 3 years and, freedom from reintervention was 98.4% (95% CI: 88.9-99.7) at 1 year and 87% (95% CI: 66.1-95.4) at 3 years. Univariate analysis did not identify any factor affecting primary patency rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular reconstruction in severe aorto-iliac obstructions using advanced techniques offered promising mid-term patency rates and profiles of safety. The variety of reconstructive configurations allows surgeons to customize on patients\' anatomies the type of revascularization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据解剖复杂性和肢体严重程度,全球血管指南(GVGs)推荐慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)的初始血运重建(搭桥或血管内治疗)。该决定是基于对血管内介入治疗后结果的预测做出的。这项研究是为了评估推荐GVG旁路的远端旁路后的结果。
    方法:在2009年至2020年期间,在日本的一个中心,对195例建议接受GVG旁路治疗的患者中总共239例CLTI远端旁路进行了评估。比较了脚踏和脚踏旁路情况。
    结果:195名患者(中位年龄,77岁;67%的男性)接受了133次硬旁路(106例;54%)和106次踏板旁路(89例;46%)。血液透析在踏板病例中比在小腿病例中更常见(P=0.03)。30天内有2例(1%)发生医院死亡。整个队列平均28±26个月的随访率为96%,3年保肢率为87%,3年初治,辅助小学,二次通畅率为40%,65%,67%,所有病例和踏板病例之间没有显着差异。1年伤口愈合率为88%,并且在小腿病例中倾向于高于踏板病例(P=.068)。队列中的3年生存率为52%,在小腿和踏板病例之间没有显着差异。
    结论:建议行GVG搭桥的CLTI患者的保肢效果可接受,移植物通畅,伤口愈合,远端旁路手术后的存活率,不管旁路方法。这些发现表明,作为初始血运重建方法的GVG旁路建议在现实世界中是有效的。
    The Global Vascular Guidelines (GVGs) recommend initial revascularization (bypass or endovascular therapy) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) based on anatomical complexity and limb severity. This decision is made based on a prediction of the outcomes after endovascular intervention. This study was performed to evaluate outcomes after distal bypass in cases recommended for GVG bypass.
    A total of 239 distal bypasses for CLTI were evaluated in 195 patients with a GVG bypass recommendation treated between 2009 and 2020 at a single center in Japan. Comparisons were made between crural and pedal bypass cases.
    The 195 patients (median age, 77 years; 67% male) underwent 133 crural bypasses (106 patients; 54%) and 106 pedal bypasses (89 patients; 46%). Hemodialysis was more common in pedal cases than in crural cases (P = .03). Hospital deaths occurred in two cases (1%) within 30 days. The whole cohort has a follow-up rate of 96% over a mean of 28 ± 26 months, with 3-year limb salvage rates of 87% and 3-year primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of 40%, 65%, and 67%, all without significant differences between crural and pedal cases. The 1-year wound healing rate was 88% and tended to be higher in crural cases than in pedal cases (P = .068). The 3-year survival rate was 52% in the cohort and did not differ significantly between crural and pedal cases.
    Patients with CLTI with a GVG bypass recommendation had acceptable limb salvage, graft patency, wound healing, and survival after distal bypass, regardless of the bypass method. These findings indicate that a GVG bypass recommendation as an initial revascularization method is valid in the real world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近开发的血管内技术来创建经皮动静脉瘘是外科动静脉瘘创建的替代方法。尽管目前缺乏有关其创作的高级证据,成熟,利用率,和长期功能。认识到这一点,介入放射学基金会赞助了一个研究共识小组和峰会,以确定研究议程的优先次序,以确定和解决当前知识的差距。
    Recently developed endovascular techniques to create percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas are an alternative to surgical arteriovenous fistula creation, although there is currently a lack of high-level evidence regarding their creation, maturation, utilization, and long-term function. Recognizing this, the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation sponsored a Research Consensus Panel and Summit for the prioritization of a research agenda to identify and address the gaps in current knowledge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Stenoses in mature arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are common and can negatively impact on the quality of haemodialysis, the longevity of the AVF and lead to debilitating symptoms. Multiple treatment options exist; however, management can vary between different centres. We aimed to establish multidisciplinary consensus on the optimal stepwise application of interventions based on evidence and consensus.
    METHODS: A modified Delphi process was conducted with 13 participants from hospitals across the UK, all of whom have high-volume dialysis access practice.
    RESULTS: The usual intervention to rectify de novo stenoses of mature AVFs is fistuloplasty, although surgery for inflow segment stenoses is also clinically acceptable. Appropriate first-line interventions include plain old balloon angioplasty or high-pressure balloon angioplasty; if these fail during the fistuloplasty, consider upsizing the balloon, prolonged balloon inflation or using alternative interventions, such as cutting or scoring balloons and ultra-high-pressure balloons. Alternative or subsequent interventions vary by anatomical site and may require additional multidisciplinary team input. For a stenoses recurring between 3 and 12 months, it is appropriate to consider interventions used de novo, but with a lower threshold for using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in all regions and for using stent grafts in all regions but inflow segment. Recurrence after 12 months should be treated as a de novo lesion, with DCBs considered if they have been used successfully during previous interventions.
    CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations aim to provide a practical guide to multidisciplinary teams in order to optimise the use of multiple interventions for rectifying AVF stenoses and provide unified evidence-based practice guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    股动脉粥样硬化病变的血管内治疗的进步导致了更复杂病变的治疗,特别是长病变。这项研究的目的是确定meta分析的主要通畅性,以及在股pop段非常长的病变(>200mm)治疗的患者中是否需要重新干预,并确定通畅性丧失的潜在风险因素。
    本研究根据PRISMA指南进行。进行了随机效应模型的荟萃分析,并使用I平方来评估异质性。
    纳入了由3029名患者组成的51项研究。平均病变长度为269mm。30天的主要通畅率,6米,1-,2年和5年的随访率为98%,76%,62%,55%,分别为39%。TLR的发病率在一年时为16%,在两年时为32%。1、2、3和5年的二次通畅率为85%,71%,64%,分别为64%。肝素结合的ePTFE覆盖支架(69%)和紫杉醇洗脱支架(73%)的1年主要通畅率高于自膨胀镍钛诺支架(55%)或无涂层的经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)和临时支架(54%)。与BMS或PTA治疗的病变相比,使用肝素结合的ePTFE覆膜支架治疗的病变在随访1年时保留专利的几率具有统计学意义(OR:2.74;95CI:1.63-4.61;p<0.001)。在平均26个月的随访期间,与接受跛行治疗的患者相比,股pop骨长病变导致严重肢体缺血(CLI)的患者发生再狭窄或闭塞的频率更高(HR:1.63;95CI:1.06-2.49;p=0.026)。
    使用药物洗脱支架或覆膜支架对股pop动脉TASCD病变的主要支架置入术可随时间持续通畅。PTA或未涂覆的镍钛诺支架显示较低的通畅率。然而,还需要进行更多的比较研究,以确定新技术治疗复杂股pop病变的疗效,并为最佳治疗方法提供证据.
    Advancements in the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions have led to treatment of more complex lesions, particularly long lesions. The aim of this study was to determine the meta-analytic primary patency and need for re-intervention among patients treated for very long lesions (>200 mm) at the femoropopliteal segment and to identify potential risk factors for loss of patency.
    This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I-square was used to assess heterogeneity.
    Fifty-one studies comprised of 3029 patients were included. The mean lesion length was 269 mm. The primary patency rate at 30 days, 6 m, 1-, 2- and 5-years of follow-up was 98%, 76%, 62%, 55%, and 39% respectively. The incidence of TLR was 16% at one year and 32% at two years. The secondary patency rate at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was 85%, 71%, 64%, and 64% respectively. Heparin bonded ePTFE covered stents (69%) and paclitaxel eluting stents (73%) demonstrated higher 1-year primary patency rates than self-expanding nitinol stents (55%) or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with provisional stenting (54%). Lesions treated with a heparin bonded ePTFE covered stent had statistically significant higher odds of remaining patent at 1-year of follow-up (OR: 2.74; 95%CI: 1.63-4.61; p < 0.001) than lesions treated with BMS or PTA. Patients with long femoropopliteal lesions causing critical limb ischemia (CLI) developed restenosis or occlusion more often than patients treated for claudication (HR: 1.63; 95%CI: 1.06-2.49; p = 0.026) during an average follow-up of 26 months.
    Primary stenting of femoropopliteal TASC D lesions using drug eluting stents or covered stents results in sustained patency over time. PTA or uncoated nitinol stents demonstrated lower patency rates. However, additional comparative studies are needed to determine the efficacy of newer technologies for the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions and provide evidence for the most optimal treatment approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Transradial angiography and intervention continues to become increasingly common as an access site for coronary procedures. Since the first \"Best Practices\" paper in 2013, ongoing trials have shed further light onto the safest and most efficient methods to perform these procedures. Specifically, this document comments on the use of ultrasound to facilitate radial access, the role of ulnar artery access, the utility of non-invasive testing of collateral flow, strategies to prevent radial artery occlusion, radial access for primary PCI and topics that require further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经桡动脉入路(TRA)在全球范围内越来越多地用于经皮介入手术,并且与经股动脉入路相比,出血和血管并发症更低。桡动脉闭塞(RAO)是TRA术后最常见的并发症,限制在将来的手术中使用相同的桡动脉,并将其用作冠状动脉旁路移植术的导管。作者回顾了经皮TRA诊断或介入手术后预防RAO的最新进展。根据现有数据,作者提供了容易适用且有效的建议,以预防围手术期RAO,并在重复导管插入术或冠状动脉旁路移植术的情况下最大限度地增加介入机会.
    Transradial access (TRA) is increasingly used worldwide for percutaneous interventional procedures and associated with lower bleeding and vascular complications than transfemoral artery access. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most frequent post-procedural complication of TRA, restricting the use of the same radial artery for future procedures and as a conduit for coronary artery bypass graft. The authors review recent advances in the prevention of RAO following percutaneous TRA diagnostic or interventional procedures. Based on the available data, the authors provide easily applicable and effective recommendations to prevent periprocedural RAO and maximize the chances of access in case of repeat catheterization or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号