Value-based care initiatives require accurate quantification of resource utilization. This study explores hospital resource documentation performance for total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA) implants and how this may differ between hospitals. This retrospective study utilized the Premier discharge database, years 2006 to 2020. TKA/THA cases were categorized into 5 tiers based upon the completeness of implant component documentation: Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze, Poor. Correlation between TKA and THA documentation performance (per-hospital percentage of Platinum cases) was assessed. Logistic regression analyses measured the association between hospital characteristics (region, teaching status, bed size, urban/rural) and satisfactory documentation. TKA/THA implant documentation performance was compared to documentation for endovascular stent procedures. Individual hospitals tended to have very complete (Platinum) or very incomplete (Poor) documentation for both TKA and THA. TKA and THA documentation performance were correlated (correlation coefficient = .70). Teaching hospitals were less likely to have satisfactory documentation for both TKA (P = .002) and THA (P = .029). Documentation for endovascular stent procedures was superior compared to TKA/THA. Hospitals\' TKA and THA-related implant documentation performance is generally either very proficient or very poor, in contrast with often well-documented endovascular stent procedures. Hospital characteristics, other than teaching status, do not appear to impact TKA/THA documentation completeness.

Cancer patients and their caregivers have substantial unmet needs, that negatively impact the clinical outcome and quality of life. However, interventions aimed to address such needs are still suboptimal, failing to answer the recent healthcare call for the adoption of value-based models of care. In the case of incurable oncologic and hematologic cancers, a value-based model of care should plan advanced care on patients\' needs and include the quality of death as an outcome. The integration of early palliative care into standard oncologic care for patients with advanced cancers represents a recent innovative model of assistance whose benefits for patients and caregivers are now widely recognized. The key elements underlying the reasons behind these benefits are the multidisciplinary collaboration (teamwork), an honest and empathetic communication between the early palliative care team, the patient, and the caregiver (rapport building), and the ability to detect changes in the physical/psychosocial wellbeing of the patient, along the whole disease trajectory (constant monitoring).
This community case study documents the quantitative and qualitative results of a long term clinical and research experience in delivering early palliative care service to address both solid and blood cancer patients\' and their primary caregivers\' needs.
Data showed decreased use of chemotherapy, blood transfusions and referral to intensive care units near the end of life; increased life expectancy; improved symptom burden and mood; increased frequency of goals-of-care and advanced care planning conversations. Hope perception among bereaved caregivers was associated with resilience and realistic expectations raising from honest communication with the early palliative care team and appreciation toward the model. Patients and caregivers perceived the possibility of a good death as realistic and not as an unlikely event as it was for patients and caregivers on standard oncologic care only. Gratitude expressions toward the model and the team were frequently identified in their reports and positively associated with communication and spirituality.
These findings are discussed in the context of an updated literature review regarding value-based care and suggest that early palliative care integrated into standard oncology care may be considered as an effective model of value-based care.

暂无摘要。

Despite limited benefit, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a common procedure that is often performed for uncertain or inappropriate indications in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). PCI cases per capita have increased year-over-year in most European countries, and many have higher rates than the U.S. Meanwhile, first-line therapy such as optimal medical therapy (OMT) and lifestyle changes, continue to be under-utilized. This article reviews the evidence on use of PCI in stable CAD. Specifically, we analyzed randomized control trials, systematic reviews, appropriate use criteria, and professional society guidelines that examine the risks and benefits of PCI compared to OMT. We then highlight utilization patterns as well as interventions that better align current practice with evidence-based care.

Hospital care is the single, largest contributor to health spending, yet evidence to guide value transformation is lacking. The large, real-world studies required to fill this void are challenging to conduct in the complex and fast-paced acute care environment. To address these challenges, we created a framework that combines Lean manufacturing methodology and Applied Research principles. We deployed this framework to design, pilot, and iteratively improve a study protocol testing the effectiveness of an innovative care pathway for patients hospitalized with acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Over a three month period, the protocol was successfully piloted and refined at a single site, subsequently becoming the basis for a large system-wide randomized controlled trial. This framework combining Lean and Applied Research methods resulted in synergies that neither method could accomplish alone and may serve as a template for learning healthcare systems to efficiently generate real-world evidence in the acute care setting.

BACKGROUND: The radiology report serves as the primary means of communication between radiologist and clinician. However, the value clinicians place on imaging and reports is variable, with many images of studies or their reports never being viewed. This has implications on the perceived value of the radiologist in the imaging chain. We hypothesized that neurologists, neurosurgeons, and otolaryngologists would view neuroradiology images most frequently and neuroradiology reports least frequently of all medical specialties.
METHODS: Ordering data were collected on all neuroradiology studies over a 1-month period. Imaging study date and time stamps were obtained for (1) when imaging study orders were placed, (2) when the patient underwent the imaging study, (3) when the imaging studies were viewed, and (4) when the radiology reports were accessed and by whom. Each data point included provider names, locations, departments, and level of training.
RESULTS: There were 7,438 imaging neuroradiology studies ordered. Overall, 85.7% (6,372) of reports and 53.2% (3,956) of imaging studies were viewed and 13.1% (977) of studies had neither images nor reports viewed. Inpatient neurosurgeons and neurologists viewed both imaging and reports significantly more than primary care specialties (P < .001). In the outpatient setting, this trend stayed true for neurosurgeons though was not true for neurologists (P < .001). Outpatient study imaging and reports were both viewed the least (48.6%), and inpatient study reports were viewed the most (95.2%; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Viewing of imaging and reports varies with neurosurgeons viewing neuroradiology studies more than all other medical specialties. Overall, the reports were viewed significantly more than the images, suggesting that the radiologist and his or her interpretation are more valuable than the study\'s images. The radiologists\' value, as measured by reports viewed, was maximal with obstetricians and gynecologists and psychiatry clinicians.

There is a trend towards value-based health service, striving to cut costs while generating value for the patient. The overall objective comprises higher-quality health services and improved patient safety and cost efficiency. The approach could align with patient-centred care, as it entails a focus on the patient\'s experience of her or his entire cycle of care, including the use of well-defined outcome measurements. Challenges arise when the approach is applied to health services for people living with long-term complex conditions that require support from various healthcare services. The aim of this work is to critically discuss the value-based approach and its implications for patients with long-term complex conditions. Two cases from clinical practice and research form the foundation for our reasoning, illustrating several challenges regarding value-based health services for people living with long-term complex conditions.
Achieving value-based health services that provide the health outcomes that matter to patients and providing greater patient-centredness will place increased demands on the healthcare system. Patients and their informal caregivers must be included in the development and establishment of outcome measures. The outcome measures must be standardized to allow evaluation of specific conditions at an aggregated level, but they must also be sensitive enough to capture each patient\'s individual needs and goals. Healthcare systems that strive to establish value-based services must collaborate beyond the organizational boundaries to create clear patient trajectories in order to avoid fragmentation. The shift towards value-based health services has the potential to align healthcare-service delivery with patient-centred care if serious efforts to take the patient\'s perspective into account are made. This is especially challenging in fragmented healthcare systems and for patients with long-term- and multi-setting-care needs.

An enhanced recovery after surgery strategy will be increasingly adopted in the era of value-based care. The various elements in each enhanced recovery after surgery protocol are likely to add value to the overall patient surgical journey. Although the evidence varies considerably based on type of surgery and patient group, the team-based approach of care should be universally applied to patient care. This article provides an overview of up-to-date techniques and methodology for enhanced recovery, including an overview of value-based care, delivery, and the evidence base supporting enhanced recovery after surgery.