Urine cytology

尿细胞学
  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    背景:目的是提出法国泌尿外科协会癌症委员会(ccAFU)关于上尿路尿路上皮癌(UUT-UC)管理的最新建议。
    方法:在2020年至2022年之间进行了系统的Medline搜索,考虑到诊断,UUT-UC的治疗选择和随访,同时用证据水平评估参考文献。
    结果:这种罕见病理的诊断是基于排泄过程中的CTU采集以及输尿管软性肾镜检查和组织学活检。根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)仍然是手术治疗的金标准。然而,对于低风险病变,可以讨论保守治疗:低级别肿瘤,在成像上没有浸润,单焦<2cm,有资格接受全面治疗,因此需要通过输尿管软镜对患者进行密切的内镜监测。RNU之后,建议术后滴注化疗以降低膀胱复发的风险。与RNU肿瘤后的监测相比,辅助化疗已显示出临床益处(pT2-T4N0-3M0)。
    结论:这些更新的建议不仅有助于提高患者的护理水平,以及UUT-UC的诊断和治疗决策。
    BACKGROUND: The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC).
    METHODS: A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence.
    RESULTS: The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0).
    CONCLUSIONS: These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients\' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:更新ccAFU对不浸润膀胱肌肉的膀胱肿瘤(NBMIC)的治疗建议。
    方法:对2020年至2022年的文献进行了系统综述(Medline),考虑到诊断,NMIBC的治疗选择和监测,同时用证据水平评估参考文献。
    结果:NMIBC的诊断(Ta,T1,CIS)是在完全全厚度肿瘤切除后进行的。使用膀胱荧光和第二次观察(4-6周)的指示有助于改善初始诊断。EORTC评分用于评估复发和/或肿瘤进展的风险。通过对患者进行分层,中等和高风险类别,可以建议辅助治疗:膀胱内化疗(术后立即,起始方案)或BCG(起始和维持方案)滴注,甚至是对卡介苗耐药患者进行膀胱切除术的指征。
    结论:更新ccAFU建议应有助于改善患者管理,以及NMIBC的诊断和治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: To update the ccAFU recommendations for the management of bladder tumours that do not infiltrate the bladder muscle (NBMIC).
    METHODS: A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2020 to 2022 was performed, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and surveillance of NMIBC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence.
    RESULTS: The diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is made after complete full-thickness tumour resection. The use of bladder fluorescence and the indication of a second look (4-6 weeks) help to improve the initial diagnosis. The EORTC score is used to assess the risk of recurrence and/or tumour progression. Through the stratification of patients in low, intermediate and high-risk categories, adjuvant treatment can be proposed: intravesical chemotherapy (immediate postoperative, initiation regimen) or BCG (initiation and maintenance regimen) instillations, or even the indication of cystectomy for BCG-resistant patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Updating the ccAFU recommendations should contribute to improving patient management, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    Assessment of patients with asymptomatic microhematuria (aMh) has been a challenge to urologists for decades. The aMh is a condition with a high prevalence in the general population and also an established diagnostic indicator of bladder cancer. Acknowledging aMh needs to be assessed within a complex context, multiple guidelines have been developed to identify individuals at high risk of being diagnosed with bladder cancer.
    This structured review and consensus of the International Bladder Cancer Network (IBCN) identified and examined 9 major guidelines. These recommendations are partly based on findings from a long-term study on the effects of home dipstick testing, but also on the assumption that early detection of malignancy might be beneficial.
    Despite similar designs, these guidelines differ in a variety of parameters including definition of aMh, rating of risks, use of imaging modalities, and the role of urine cytology. In addition, recommendations for further follow-up after negative initial assessment are controversial. In this review, different aspects for aMh assessment are analyzed based upon the evidence currently available.
    We question whether adherence to the complicated algorithms as recommended by most guidelines is practical for routine use. Based upon a consensus, the authors postulate a need for better tools. New concepts for risk assessment permitting improved risk stratification and prepone cystoscopy before refined imaging procedures (computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging) are suggested.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号