UNASSIGNED: Conventional rosacea treatments are not uniformly pervasive, and the adverse reactions can potentially constrain their utility. The clinical use of JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib in the treatment of refractory rosacea has rarely been explored.
UNASSIGNED: We presented two cases of patients who received the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib and four cases of patients who received the JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib for the treatment of refractory rosacea.
UNASSIGNED: The JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib may be promising medical options for patients with refractory rosacea. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib and abrocitinib require prospective controlled studies to assess them more comprehensively.

UNASSIGNED: In the realm of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, understanding JAK inhibitors (JAKi) nuances is vital. Baricitinib, tofacitinib, upaacitinib, filgotinib, and peficitinib exhibit subtle yet impactful pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variations.
UNASSIGNED: This narrative review critically assesses PK and PD distinctions among globally approved JAKi for rheumatoid arthritis, which primarily guide clinical decisions in autoimmune diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis. It explores the intricate JAK-STAT signaling pathway, offering insights into JAKs\' roles in inflammation, hematopoiesis, and immune homeostasis. Emphasis on PK parameters, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, along with CYP3A4 drug interactions, is highlighted. The review underscores integrating PK and PD properties, considering patient-specific factors like hepatic and renal clearance, for judicious JAKi selection in RA and related autoimmune conditions. The literature has been collected from all available databases based on the review question.
UNASSIGNED: Integrating PK and PD properties with patient-specific factors is pivotal for judicious JAKi selection. Recognizing disparities in PK and PD across diseases, ethnicities, and environmental factors is crucial for personalized JAKi choices. This expert opinion underscores the significance of a second compartment analysis, elucidating the interplay between PK and PD and its impact on JAKi efficacy.

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) relapse despite standard therapy with glucocorticoids, methotrexate and tocilizumab. The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signalling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of GCA and JAK inhibitors (JAKi) could be a therapeutic alternative. We evaluated the effectiveness of JAKi in relapsing GCA patients in a real-world setting and reviewed available literature.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of GCA patients treated with JAKi for relapsing disease at thirteen centers in Spain and one center in United States (01/2017-12/2022). Outcomes assessed included clinical remission, complete remission and safety. Clinical remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms regardless of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values. Complete remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms along with normal ESR and CRP values. A systematic literature search for other JAKi-treated GCA cases was conducted.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (86% females, mean age 72.3) with relapsing GCA received JAKi therapy (baricitinib, n = 15; tofacitinib, n = 10; upadacitinib, n = 10). Before JAKi therapy, 22 (63%) patients had received conventional synthetic immunosuppressants (e.g., methotrexate), and 30 (86%) biologics (e.g., tocilizumab). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 11 (6-15.5) months, 20 (57%) patients achieved and maintained clinical remission, 16 (46%) patients achieved and maintained complete remission, and 15 (43%) patients discontinued the initial JAKi due to relapse (n = 11 [31%]) or serious adverse events (n = 4 [11%]). A literature search identified another 36 JAKi-treated GCA cases with clinical improvement reported for the majority of them.
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis and literature review suggest that JAKi could be effective in GCA, including in patients failing established glucocorticoid-sparing therapies such as tocilizumab and methotrexate. A phase III randomized controlled trial of upadacitinib is currently ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03725202).

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have revolutionized the treatment of diverse dermatoses. However, there are concerns regarding their safety, especially the risk of cancer and opportunistic infections. Here, we discuss the risk of cancer associated with the BD and JAKi used in dermatology.
METHODS: A narrative review was carried out. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of cancer associated with BD or JAKi and published between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected.
RESULTS: Multiple large studies have evaluated the association between BD, JAKi and cancer risk. However, there is a lack of prospective, comparative studies. Overall, patients undergoing BD and JAKi present a cutaneous cancer incidence similar to that in the general population. The drugs more strongly associated with non-skin cancer risk were anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFs) agents and JAKi (especially tofacitinib and oral ruxolitinib). This risk appears to increase with age, the presence of other factors (such as chronic immunosuppression from previous drugs or other comorbidities), and specific diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and myelodysplastic syndrome. Conversely, BD such as interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may even reduce the risk of some visceral and hematological malignancies. In patients with dermatological conditions such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, the risk of malignancies may be lower than in other subgroups, and probably comparable to the general population.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cancer in patients undergoing BD or JAKi is generally low. This incidence can be higher in elderly patients with RA or myelodysplastic syndrome, and in those undergoing prolonged therapy with tofacitinib or ruxolitinib (oral), or anti-TNF agents.

Psoriasis is a highly prevalent dermatological disease associated with an increased systemic inflammatory response. In addition, joint involvement is also present in around 20% of patients. Therefore, treatment modalities used in this condition should be simultaneously effective at improving skin manifestations, reducing inflammation, and addressing psoriatic arthritis when present. Twenty years ago, the introduction of biologic treatments for psoriasis was a turning point in the management of this condition, offering an effective and reasonably safe option for patients whose disease could not be adequately controlled with conventional therapies. At the moment, Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are a new class of promising molecules in the management of psoriasis. They are orally administered and can show benefits in patients who failed biologic therapy. We conducted a scoping review in order to identify randomized-controlled trials that investigated different JAKis in patients with plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, with an emphasis on molecules that have been approved by the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration. The added value of this study is that it collected information about JAKis approved for two different indications, plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, in order to provide an integrated understanding of the range of effects that JAKis have on the whole spectrum of psoriasis manifestations.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients have an increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). The relationship of dupilumab, tralokinumab, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib to HZ incidence in AD patients remains unclear.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate and compare the incidence and risk of HZ among patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis treated with advanced systemic therapies.
UNASSIGNED: Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid Medline and Embase. The primary outcome was incidence of HZ in patients with moderate to severe AD receiving placebo or the aforementioned treatments. A frequentist random-effects NMA was conducted with odds ratio.
UNASSIGNED: Our search identified 16 trials comprising 10,689 patients. Upadacitinib was associated with a dose-dependent increase in the incidence of HZ compared to placebo (OR = 2.55 [1.09, 5.95] and (OR = 4.29 [1.89, 9.74], respectively) and compared to various dupilumab doses (OR = 4.48 [1.29, 15.57], 3.61 [1.28, 10.18] and 7.54 [2.21, 25.68], 6.09 [2.24, 16.52], respectively). Upadacitinib 30 mg was associated with a higher incidence of HZ when compared to upadacitinib 15 mg (OR = 1.68 [1.19, 2.38]). Abrocitinib 200 mg was associated with a higher increase in HZ compared to placebo (OR = 3.34 [1.34, 8.31]). According to SUCRA ranks, both JAK-1 inhibitors had a higher cumulative incidence of HZ compared to dupilumab.
UNASSIGNED: JAK-1 inhibitors are associated with a significantly higher incidence of HZ compared to dupilumab and placebo. Our results suggest that recombinant HZ vaccination should be highly considered for all adult patients prior to starting oral JAK-1 inhibitors.

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This systematic review aims to summarize the most recent data in terms of effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of severe AD in a real-world setting. The review included a comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search initially identified 242 studies. Of these, 214 were excluded after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We then conducted a full-text review of 25 studies, of which 17 met our inclusion criteria and were therefore included in our systematic review. The analysis of real-world studies showed high effectiveness of upadacitinib, in terms of both clinical signs and subjective symptoms, in different patient populations, including those resistant to other treatments. No new significant safety concerns have emerged as compared to randomized clinical trials.

UNASSIGNED: Upadacitinib, an oral selective-JAK1 inhibitor, has been used in clinical trials to treat atopic dermatitis (AD).
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe AD.
UNASSIGNED: We searched clinical trials from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Web of Science. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of upadacitinib treatment on patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included. A meta-analysis was performed using the fixed- or random-effects models to calculate pooled standard mean differences or relative risks (SMD or RR, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: Compared with the placebo group, our meta-analysis revealed that upadacitinib was related to a significant decrease in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, and pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) scores. A higher response rate in Investigator\'s Global Assessment (IGA) and EASI-75 were also detected in the upadacitinib group. Although patients treated with upadacitinib experienced a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs), these AEs were mild and tolerated. As for serious adverse events (SAEs), there was no difference between the placebo group and the upadacitinib group.
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis demonstrated that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD. Further long-term trials are required for confirmation.