Universal healthcare

全民医疗保健
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当地卫生领导人和世界卫生组织总干事都观察到,COVID-19“没有歧视。“尽管如此,低社会经济地位的人在感染者中的比例过高,类似于歧视。这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究调查了安大略省的COVID-19病例数和公共资助的医疗保健费用,加拿大,注重边缘化。
    从2020年1月1日至2020年6月30日,首次检测出严重急性呼吸道综合症冠状病毒2阳性的个体与管理数据库相关联,并与阴性/未测试的对照进行匹配。估计诊断前后30天的平均净(COVID-19-归属)成本,以及年龄阶层之间的差异,性别,合并症,和边缘化的措施进行了评估,使用方差分析检验。
    我们包括28893例COVID-19(平均年龄54岁,56%女性)。大多数病例留在社区(20.545,71.1%)或长期护理机构(4478,15.5%),944例(3.3%)和2926例(10.1%)住院,有和没有重症监护室,分别。在边缘化阶层中,病例数出现偏差,低收入社区的病例数增加了2到7倍,物质匮乏,和最高的种族集中。男性诊断后的平均净成本较高(4752美元vs女性2520美元)和合并症较高的病例(1394-7751美元)(两者P<.001),但大多数边缘化维度的水平相似(范围为3232-3737美元,所有P≥.19)。
    这项研究表明,不平等地将资源分配给边缘化个人可能会改善结果的平等。它强调了降低边缘化人群感染COVID-19风险的重要性,以降低总体成本并提高系统能力。
    Local health leaders and the Director General of the World Health Organization alike have observed that COVID-19 \"does not discriminate.\" Nevertheless, the disproportionate representation of people of low socioeconomic status among those infected resembles discrimination. This population-based retrospective cohort study examined COVID-19 case counts and publicly funded healthcare costs in Ontario, Canada, with a focus on marginalization.
    Individuals with their first positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020, were linked to administrative databases and matched to negative/untested controls. Mean net (COVID-19-attributable) costs were estimated for 30 days before and after diagnosis, and differences among strata of age, sex, comorbidity, and measures of marginalization were assessed using analysis of variance tests.
    We included 28 893 COVID-19 cases (mean age 54 years, 56% female). Most cases remained in the community (20 545, 71.1%) or in long-term care facilities (4478, 15.5%), whereas 944 (3.3%) and 2926 (10.1%) were hospitalized, with and without intensive care unit, respectively. Case counts were skewed across marginalization strata with 2 to 7 times more cases in neighborhoods with low income, high material deprivation, and highest ethnic concentration. Mean net costs after diagnosis were higher for males ($4752 vs $2520 for females) and for cases with higher comorbidity ($1394-$7751) (both P < .001) but were similar across levels of most marginalization dimensions (range $3232-$3737, all P ≥ .19).
    This study suggests that allocating resources unequally to marginalized individuals may improve equality in outcomes. It highlights the importance of reducing risk of COVID-19 infection among marginalized individuals to reduce overall costs and increase system capacity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    呼吁在全民医疗(UHC)领域进行口腔卫生系统改革,而在国际上,口腔健康缺乏政治优先地位。在爱尔兰共和国,整个人口的口腔保健覆盖面非常有限。“SmileagusSláinte”爱尔兰于2019年发布的口腔健康政策代表了25年来国家政策的首次变化。
    这项研究调查了影响口腔健康政策的关键因素,发展,并在1994-2021年期间在爱尔兰实施。采用了案例研究方法,收集了两条数据:文献分析和对精英参与者的半结构化访谈。分析以Howlett的五流框架为指导。
    爱尔兰分享口腔健康的国际经验,其政治优先地位非常低。这使得儿童和特殊需求人群获得公共牙科服务的机会一直不平等,而适用于成人计划的紧缩措施导致需求增加,没有全民牙科保健。对口腔健康有政治兴趣的唯一领域是正畸护理。这种政治上的低优先级,加上在卫生和卫生服务执行部的国家领导职位中缺乏行动者的权力,导致了口腔健康政策建议的连续未执行。这在2009年未能发布《国家口腔健康政策草案》中最为明显。研究发现未能与关键利益相关者充分接触,特别是牙科专业在2019年政策制定中。所有这些弱点都因COVID-19大流行而加剧。
    爱尔兰新的口腔健康政策,\'SmileagusSláinte\',为提供急需的公共牙科服务提供了机会。然而,成功的改革将需要强有力的政治意愿和与牙科领导层的合作,以在国家一级提供宣传。全球呼吁将口腔健康纳入UHC议程,并就爱尔兰的UHC达成一致的政治共识可能为变革提供机会。所有利益攸关方的真正参与制定实施战略是必要的,以利用这一潜在的机会之窗进行口腔卫生系统改革。
    Calls are emerging for oral health system reform under the Universal Healthcare (UHC) domain, while internationally there is an absence of political priority for oral health. In the Republic of Ireland there is very limited coverage of oral healthcare for the whole population. \'Smile agus Sláinte\' Ireland\'s oral health policy published in 2019, represents the first change to national policy in over 25 years.
    This research examined the key factors influencing oral health policy, development, and implementation in Ireland during the period 1994-2021. A case study approach was adopted with two strands of data collection: documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with elite participants. Analysis was guided by Howlett\'s five stream framework.
    Ireland shares the international experience of oral health having very low political priority. This has perpetuated unequal access to public dental services for children and special needs populations while austerity measures applied to adult schemes resulted in increased unmet need with no universal coverage for dental care. The only area where there is political interest in oral health is orthodontic care. This low political priority combined with a lack of actor power in national leadership positions in the Department of Health and Health Service Executive has contributed to successive non-implementation of oral health policy recommendations. This is most evident in the failure to publish the Draft National Oral Health Policy in 2009. The research finds a failure to adequately engage with key stakeholders, particularly the dental profession in the development of the 2019 policy. All these weaknesses have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Ireland\'s new oral health policy, \'Smile agus Sláinte\', presents an opportunity for the provision of much needed public dental services. However, successful reform will require strong political will and collaboration with dental leadership to provide advocacy at national level. Global calls to incorporate oral health into the UHC agenda and an agreed political consensus for UHC in Ireland may provide an opportunity for change. Genuine engagement of all stakeholders to develop an implementation strategy is necessary to harness this potential window of opportunity for oral health system reform.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This report focuses on opportunities, challenges and outcomes of health literacy related interventions in Israel, based on health literacy measurement. The importance of a system\'s and community approaches are discussed, as is cultural appropriateness. Two case studies are highlighted - the first on childhood immunization and the second on self-management of chronic health situations. In the second example, a combination of community, media, digital, and face-to-face interventions comprise a broad approach to intervention. The impact and some findings are presented, including conclusions derived from each initiative.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号