Undifferentiated round cell sarcoma

未分化圆形细胞肉瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:未分化小圆细胞肉瘤(URCS)是一种诊断挑战,他们的最佳治疗方法是未知的。我们旨在定义临床特征,治疗,和URCS患者的结果。
    方法:对1983年至2019年在全球21个肉瘤参考中心接受治疗的URCS患者进行回顾性鉴定。基于分子评估,病例分类如下:(1)CIC重排的圆形细胞肉瘤,(2)BCOR::CCNB3重排的圆形细胞肉瘤,(3)未分类的URCS。治疗,对预后因素和结局进行了回顾。
    结果:总计,148例患者被确定[88/148(60%)CIC重排肉瘤(中位年龄32岁,范围7-78),33/148(22%)BCOR::CCNB3-重排(中位年龄17岁,范围5-91),和27/148(18%)未分类的URCS(中位年龄37岁,范围4-70)]。101例(68.2%)患有局部疾病;47例(31.8%)在诊断时发生了转移。男性患病率,年龄较小,骨原发部位,在BCOR::CCNB3重排的病例中观察到同步转移率低。局部治疗是手术治疗67/148(45%)患者,手术+放疗52/148(35%)。122/148(82%)患者接受了化疗。在42.7个月的中位随访中,BCOR::CCNB3患者的3年总生存率(OS)为92.2%(95%CI71.5-98.0),C重排肉瘤的39.6%(95%CI27.7-51.3),未分类URCS为78.7%(95%CI56.1-90.6;p<0.0001)。
    结论:这项研究是在URCS中进行的最大规模的研究,证实了URCS亚型之间的主要结果差异。当怀疑诊断为URCS时,应进行全面的分子评估。需要进行前瞻性研究以更好地确定每种URCS亚型的最佳治疗策略。
    Undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas (URCSs) represent a diagnostic challenge, and their optimal treatment is unknown. We aimed to define the clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome of URCS patients.
    URCS patients treated from 1983 to 2019 at 21 worldwide sarcoma reference centres were retrospectively identified. Based on molecular assessment, cases were classified as follows: (1) CIC-rearranged round cell sarcomas, (2) BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged round cell sarcomas, (3) unclassified URCSs. Treatment, prognostic factors and outcome were reviewed.
    In total, 148 patients were identified [88/148 (60%) CIC-rearranged sarcoma (median age 32 years, range 7-78), 33/148 (22%) BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged (median age 17 years, range 5-91), and 27/148 (18%) unclassified URCSs (median age 37 years, range 4-70)]. One hundred-one (68.2%) cases presented with localised disease; 47 (31.8%) had metastases at diagnosis. Male prevalence, younger age, bone primary site, and a low rate of synchronous metastases were observed in BCOR::CCNB3-rearranged cases. Local treatment was surgery in 67/148 (45%) patients, and surgery + radiotherapy in 52/148 (35%). Chemotherapy was given to 122/148 (82%) patients. At a 42.7-month median follow-up, the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.2% (95% CI 71.5-98.0) in BCOR::CCNB3 patients, 39.6% (95% CI 27.7-51.3) in CIC-rearranged sarcomas, and 78.7% in unclassified URCSs (95% CI 56.1-90.6; p < 0.0001).
    This study is the largest conducted in URCS and confirms major differences in outcomes between URCS subtypes. A full molecular assessment should be undertaken when a diagnosis of URCS is suspected. Prospective studies are needed to better define the optimal treatment strategy in each URCS subtype.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:CIC重排肉瘤(CIC-RS)代表“尤因样”未分化小圆细胞肉瘤的最常见子集。这些肿瘤往往比尤因肉瘤更具侵袭性。此外,治疗策略可能因团队而异。这项回顾性研究的主要目的是描述其特征,治疗,和CIC-RS患者的结局包括在法国NETSARC+数据库中。
    方法:从2008年10月至2021年3月登记了13个法国中心诊断为CIC-RS的儿科和成年患者。患者和肿瘤特征收集自国家网络NETSARC+数据库(http://netsarc。sarcomabcb.org)。CIC-RS诊断在病理和分子上得到了专家病理学家的集中审查。研究了两组患者:根据ESMO和/或EpSSG指南,作为经典尤因肉瘤(EwS队列)治疗的患者和作为高级软组织肉瘤(STS队列)治疗的患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算存活率,并且使用对数秩检验来比较存活率。
    结果:在79名患者中,男女性别比例为0.7,诊断时的中位年龄为27岁(范围2~87岁).中位随访时间为37个月,39例患者死于该疾病。诊断后的中位总生存期为18个月,两组之间没有显着差异(p=0.9)。然而,当专注于诊断时患有转移性疾病的患者(N=21),来自队列STS的所有患者均死于疾病,而来自队列EwS的一些患者仍然存活并且处于完全缓解.
    结论:FSG的经验证实了无论化疗方案如何,CDS患者的积极临床过程。
    CIC-rearranged sarcomas (CIC-RS) represent the most frequent subset of \"Ewing-like\" undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas. These tumors tend to be more aggressive than Ewing sarcomas. Moreover, treatment strategy can differ according to teams. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics, treatments, and outcome for patients with CIC-RS included in the French NETSARC+ database.
    Pediatric and adult patients from 13 French centers with a diagnosis of CIC-RS were registered from October 2008 to March 2021. Patients and tumors characteristics were collected from the national network NETSARC+ database (http://netsarc.sarcomabcb.org). CIC-RS diagnosis was pathologically and molecularly confirmed with a central review by expert pathologists. Two groups of patients were studied: those treated as classical Ewing sarcomas (cohort EwS) and those treated as high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (cohort STS) according to ESMO and/or EpSSG guidelines. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare survival.
    Among 79 patients, the male/female sex ratio was 0.7 and the median age at diagnosis was 27 years (range 2-87). With a median follow-up of 37 months, 39 patients died of the disease. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 18 months, with no significant difference between both cohorts (p = 0.9). Nevertheless, when focusing on patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis (N = 21), all patients from cohort STS died of disease while some patients from cohort EwS were still alive and in complete remission.
    FSG experience confirms the aggressive clinical course of CDS patients regardless of chemotherapy regimen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号