OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present review is to analyze and summarize the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for adenomyosis according to largest studies available in current literature, so as to provide a more robust foundation for its use in the treatment of patients with this condition.
BACKGROUND: Adenomyosis is a common and frequently occurring gynecological disease. It can lead to clinical symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, menostaxis, menorrhagia, and anemia, and can seriously affect patients\' quality of life. Treatments for adenomyosis include drug, minimally invasive, and surgical therapies. Among them, ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation has become a new hotspot in the minimally invasive treatment of adenomyosis in recent years, with its advantages of small trauma and a good therapeutic effect.
METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved from the CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure), CQVIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases. The retrieval time range was from January 2000 to June 2021. Chinese search terms included \"adenomyosis\", \"microwave ablation\", and \"ultrasound\". English search terms included \"microwave ablation\", \"ultrasound\", \"(adenomyosis) OR (endometrioma) OR (adenomyoma)\".
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation therapy is a feasible, safe, and effective technique for the treatment of adenomyosis, and is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIV) is a common and necessary procedure in the emergency department (ED). Patients with PIV access encounter significant treatment delay. Ultrasound guidance for PIV (USGPIV) cannulation is a modality to reduce delay of care in such patients, but its efficacy, when compared with cannulation by the standard of care (SOC), the landmark and palpation method, has not been well established. We performed a random effects meta-analysis of available literature that compared USGPIV with SOC cannulation. We searched PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE until October 2020 for eligible studies in adult patients. We excluded non-English language, non-full-text studies. Our primary outcome was rate of first successful cannulation. Other outcomes were number of attempts and patient satisfaction. After identifying 284 studies and screening 74 studies, we included 10 studies. There were 1860 patients, 966 (52%) in the USGPIV group and 894 (48%) who received the SOC. Sixty-six percent of patients were female. USGPIV cannulation was associated with a two-times higher likelihood of first successful cannulation (odds ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65-2.7, p < 0.001, I2 = 2.9%). While procedure length was similar in both groups, USGPIV was associated with a significantly smaller number of attempts (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.272, 95% CI: -0.539 to -0.004, p = 0.047) and significantly higher patient satisfaction (SMD: 1.467, 95% CI: 0.92-2.012, p < 0.001). There was low heterogeneity among our included studies, which were mostly randomized control trials. Our study confirmed that USGPIV cannulation offers a more effective modality, compared with SOC, to improve quality of care for patients with difficult PIV access.

Subclavian access is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) for central venous catheterization. Many complications have been reported during the placement of central venous catheters including pneumothorax, hemothorax, hematoma, and bleeding. The direct, through the thoracic wall, catheterization of pulmonary artery is a very rare one with only three previous reports in the literature. We report a patient who was catheterized for subclavian venous catheter placement, but the imaging techniques (chest X-ray and computed tomography with reconstruction of the images) revealed the direct positioning of the catheter into the pulmonary trunk, fortunately without other adverse events for the patient. Our case report in accordance with recent review of the literature strongly emphasizes the benefits of performing ultrasound-guided interventions in ICU.

In light of the rising rate of incidentally detected subcentimetre thyroid nodules due to improved surveillance and diagnostic imaging, the decision of whether to perform fine needle aspiration cytology is increasingly pertinent. We aim to assess (1) the sampling adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology, (2) malignancy rate, (3) thyroidectomy rate and (4) diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology. A total of 245 subcentimetre nodules in 220 patients underwent fine needle aspiration cytology between 2011 and 2014. Medical records were reviewed for cytology results, subsequent management and histopathological results in the event the patient underwent thyroidectomy. Sampling adequacy was calculated as the percentage of diagnostic results (Bethesda II-VI). Malignancy rate was defined as the percentage of Bethesda IV-VI diagnoses. Amongst patients with Bethesda IV-VI diagnoses who underwent thyroidectomy, their cytology reports were correlated with post-operative histopathological findings. The sampling adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology was 77.1%. Malignancy rate (Bethesda IV-VI) was 9.7%. The respective malignancy rates in the < 5 mm nodule group and ≥ 5 mm nodule group were 6.67 and 10.0%. In total, 79.2% (19/24) of the malignant nodules underwent surgical excision. The rest declined surgery and/or were lost to follow-up. Amongst the malignant nodules which were surgically resected, 84.2% (16/19) had definitive malignant histology. Five of these demonstrated multifocal carcinoma and/or extrathyroidal extension of carcinoma on histology. Initial fine needle aspiration cytology and subsequent histopathological diagnoses matched in all cases except for three that had false-positive fine needle aspiration cytology results. Majority of our patients with suspicious cytology results subsequently underwent thyroidectomy, notwithstanding the relatively lower diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in subcentimetre thyroid nodules.

Kidney biopsy is an essential tool for guiding clinicians towards diagnoses, treatment and determining prognosis in renal disease. However, the procedure can be marred by various complications. The reported occurrence of complications varies among countries or regions and is also affected by several clinical and technical factors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence of major complications after percutaneous native renal biopsy in low-income to middle-income countries (LMICs).
We will include studies of populations from LMIC as per World Bank 2017 country list. Relevant abstracts published from 1 January 1980 to 30 December 2017 will be searched in PubMed, Cochrane, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase) and African Journals Online, without language restriction. Two reviewers will independently screen, select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias in each study. A third reviewer will arbitrate in cases of disagreements. The study-specific estimates will be pooled through a random-effects model meta-analysis to obtain an overall summary estimate of the incidence of major complications across studies. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity will be evaluated by Cochrane\'s Q statistic. Funnel-plot analysis and Egger\'s test will be used to assess publication bias. Results will be presented by geographical region and income group.
This study will use published data. Therefore, there is no requirement for ethical approval. This systematic review and meta-analysis is expected to inform healthcare workers and providers about the occurrence of major complications following renal biopsies and highlight possible actions needed to improve the safety of the procedure in LMICs. The final report will be published as an original article in a peer-reviewed journal. Findings will also be presented at a conference and submitted to relevant health authorities.
CRD42017077656.

BACKGROUND: The transverse abdominal plan blockade (TAP) is a block of abdominal wall that has diffused rapidly in the clinical practice as part of a multimodal analgesia for abdominal surgery. The performance of the ultrasound-guided technique has allowed the lowering of potential complications, as well as new approaches that according to the descriptions carried out and the prospective studies would make it possible to utilize the TAP in different surgical interventions; however, the results obtained in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE: To prepare a systematic review aiming to determine the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided TAP for different surgical interventions, as well as the indications according to the approaches and their influences.
METHODS: Two research approaches, one manual, and the other in Pubmed returned 28 RCT where an intervention with ultrasound-guided TAP were performed to compare the analgesic efficacy in contrast to another technique in adults, published between 2007 and October 2013, in English or Spanish, with Jadad score > 1, according to the inclusion criteria for this review. The authors analyzed independently all the RCT.
CONCLUSIONS: The TAP have been shown to be an effective technique in colorectal surgery, cesarean section, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, appendectomy, donor nephrectomy, retropubic prostatectomy, and bariatric surgery. However, the data found in RCT are not conclusive, and as a result, it is necessary to develop new and well designed RCT, with enough statistical power to compare different approaches, drugs, doses, and volumes for the same intervention, aiming to answer the current questions and their effects in the habitual clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The transverse abdominal plan blockade is a block of abdominal wall that has diffused rapidly in the clinical practice as part of a multimodal analgesia for abdominal surgery. The performance of the ultrasound-guided technique has allowed the lowering of potential complications, as well as new approaches that were carried out according to the descriptions, and the prospective studies would make it possible to utilize the transverse abdominal plan blockade in different surgical interventions; however, the results obtained in randomized clinical trials are inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE: To prepare a systematic review aiming to determine the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plan blockade for different surgical interventions, as well as the indications according to the approaches and their influences.
METHODS: Two research approaches, one manual, and the other in Pubmed returned 28 randomized clinical trials where intervention with ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plan blockades was performed to compare the analgesic efficacy in contrast to another technique in adults, published between 2007 and October 2013, in English or Spanish, with Jadad score>1, according to the inclusion criteria for this review. The authors analyzed independently all the randomized clinical trials.
CONCLUSIONS: The transverse abdominal plan blockades have been shown to be an effective technique in colorectal surgery, cesarean section, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, appendectomy, donor nephrectomy, retropubic prostatectomy, and bariatric surgery. However, the data found in randomized clinical trial are not conclusive, and as a result, it is necessary to develop new and well designed randomized clinical trial, with enough statistical power to compare different approaches, drugs, doses, and volumes for the same intervention, aiming to answer the current questions and their effects in the habitual clinical practice.