Type D Personality

D 型人格
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    纤维肌痛(FM)是一种与多种因素有关的复杂疾病。心理社会因素,比如D型人格和低自尊,可能会增加疾病负担。本研究旨在调查FM患者的D型人格和自尊。FM和年龄匹配的女性患者,这项横断面研究纳入了健康对照.使用D型量表(DS-14)评估D型人格。Rosenberg自尊量表(RSES)用于评估自尊和心身症状。在58.6%的患者(n=70)和21.7%的对照组(n=60)中观察到D型人格(p<0.001)。与非D型人格患者相比,那些具有D型人格的人表现出更低的自尊和更差的健康状况(两者的p<0.05),和更高的焦虑和抑郁评分(p<0.001)。在二元逻辑回归分析中,D型人格患者发生FM的几率高出3.6倍(OR=3.653,95%CI1.547-8.625),在调整了年龄和教育水平后。此外,抑郁(OR=1.178,Cl95%1.055-1.316)和较低的教育水平(OR=0.818,Cl95%0.682-0.982)与FM中的D型人格显着相关。D型人格与FM密切相关。与健康女性相比,女性FM患者的D型人格更为常见。抑郁和低教育水平是FM中D型人格的潜在混杂因素。
    Fibromyalgia (FM) is a complex disease related to several factors. Psychosocial elements, such as type D personality and low level of self-esteem, might increase disease burden. The current study aimed to investigate type D personality and self-esteem in patients with FM. Female patients with FM and age-matched, healthy controls were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Type D personality was evaluated using the type D scale (DS-14). The Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) was used to assess self-esteem and psychosomatic symptoms. Type D personality was observed in 58.6% of the patients (n = 70) and in 21.7% of the controls (n = 60) (p < 0.001). When compared to patients with non-type D personality, those with type D personality revealed lower self-esteem and poorer health status (p < 0.05 for both), and higher anxiety and depression scores (p < 0.001 for both). In binary logistic regression analysis, the odds of FM were 3.6 times higher (OR = 3.653, 95% CI 1.547-8.625) for patients with type D personality, after adjusting for age and education level. In addition, depression (OR= 1.178, Cl 95% 1.055 - 1.316) and lower education level (OR= 0.818, Cl 95% 0.682 - 0.982) were significantly related to type D personality in FM. Type D personality is closely associated with FM. Type D personality is more common in female patients with FM when compared to healthy women. Depression and lower education level are potential confounders of type D personality in FM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究的目的是建立一组新诊断的乳腺癌患者与一组对照组之间D型人格和大五人格特征的差异。
    UNASSIGNED:对乳腺癌患者和没有癌症病史的女性进行了比较研究。我们使用D型量表14作为评估D型人格模式的工具,使用NEO-FFI评估大五人格特征。使用条件逻辑回归模型来估计优势比,并通过人格特质因素将95%置信区间应用于乳腺癌。
    未经评估:负情感(NA)(OR=4.4595%CI:1.96-10.61),神经质高(OR=3.97,95%CI:1.08-15.81),开放体验高(OR=3.4795%CI:1.11-11.49),是与乳腺癌风险增加显著相关的相关因素,而社会抑制(SI)是降低乳腺癌风险的相关因素(OR=0.4095%CI:0.16-0.92)。
    UNASSIGNED:这是第一个分析乳腺癌患者NA和SI特征的病例对照研究。SI作为乳腺癌风险降低因素可能表明表达负面情绪并不总是其调节的健康机制。
    UNASSIGNED: The goal of this study is to establish the differences in Type D personality and Big five personality traits between a group of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and a group of controls.
    UNASSIGNED: A comparative study of breast cancer patients and women without previous history of cancer was carried out. We used Type D Scale-14 as an instrument for the assessment of the type-D personality pattern and NEO-FFI for the assessment of the Big Five personality traits. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were applied for breast cancer by personality trait factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Negative affectivity (NA) (OR = 4.45 95% CI: 1.96-10.61), neuroticism HIGH (OR = 3.97, 95% CI: 1.08-15.81), openness to experience HIGH (OR = 3.47 95% CI: 1.11-11.49), were associated factors significantly related to an increased risk of breast cancer, whereas Social Inhibition (SI) was associated factor with a decreased risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.40 95% CI: 0.16-0.92).
    UNASSIGNED: This was the first case-control study which analyzed NA and SI traits in breast cancer patients. SI as a breast-cancer risk decreasing factor might indicate that expressing negative emotions is not always a healthy mechanism of their regulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠心病(CHD)是一种在发达国家以及发展中国家和经济转型国家即将到来的全球性流行病。比如印度。心肌梗死(MI)的发生率显着增加,最常见的CHD类型之一,据报道在印度,喀拉拉邦年轻人的发病率和严重程度更高。在印度,评估心理因素与MI之间关联的研究很少。
    我们采用了病例对照研究设计。Trivandrum三级护理医院共有150例(患有MI)和150例对照(无MI,年龄和性别匹配),喀拉拉邦,印度,采用方便的抽样方法选择,2016年9月至2017年8月。
    与33.3%的对照组相比,50.7%的MI患者具有D型人格特征。校正混杂因素后的多因素logistic回归分析显示,D型人格与MI呈正相关,具有统计学意义:OR=4.14,95%CI=2.19~8.85,P=0.003。
    D型性格与MI有关。
    BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is an impending global pandemic in developed countries as well as developing countries and economies in transition, such as India. A significant increase in the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), one of the most common types of CHD, is being reported in India, and the incidence and severity of the disease are more among the youth in Kerala. Studies assessing the association between psychological factors and MI are few in India.
    METHODS: We adopted a case-control study design. A total of 150 cases (with MI) and 150 controls (without MI and matched for age and gender) from a tertiary care hospital in Trivandrum, Kerala, India, were selected using convenient sampling method, between September 2016 and August 2017.
    RESULTS: As compared to 33.3% of the controls, 50.7% of patients with MI had type D personality characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis after adjusting for the confounders indicated a positive and statistically significant association between type D personality and MI: OR = 4.14, 95% CI = 2.19-8.85, P = 0.003.
    CONCLUSIONS: Type D personality is associated with MI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    严重的左主干(LM)干疾病可能危及生命,并要求进行血运重建。本研究旨在评估患者如何评价冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的特定特征的重要性。这如何决定他们对特定治疗策略的偏好,以及特定的个性特征是否会影响这种偏好。
    总共,要求访问伊拉斯谟医学中心门诊治疗稳定型冠状动脉疾病的1145名患者填写有关适合PCI或CABG的假设的显着LM狭窄的病例小插图问卷。评估个人的人格倾向和一般痛苦水平,每个患者必须完成一组3个标准化,经过验证的问卷具有令人满意的心理测量特性。总体上89%的患者首选PCI而不是CABG。PCI是首选策略,尽管重复血运重建的风险较高,需要更多的药物治疗。值得注意的是,PCI组中重复血运重建的风险更常见,这一事实对于选择PCI的患者不那么重要.卒中和出血的风险是选择PCI而不是CABG的最重要论据。D型人格,抑郁症,焦虑与CABG作为血运重建策略的偏好相对较高相关.
    总的来说,如果有选择,患者似乎更倾向于PCI而不是CABG,并考虑卒中和出血与手术相关的重要并发症。D型人格患者,抑郁症,或焦虑倾向于CABG。
    Significant left main (LM) stem disease is potentially life-threatening and mandates revascularization. This study aimed to assess how patients rate the importance of particular features of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), how this determines their preference for a particular treatment strategy, and whether particular personality characteristics influence this preference.
    In total, 1145 patients who visited the outpatient clinic of the Erasmus Medical Center for stable coronary artery disease were asked to complete a case vignette-questionnaire on a hypothetical significant LM stenosis amenable to PCI or CABG. To assess the individual\'s personality disposition and general distress level, each patient had to complete a set of 3 standardized, validated questionnaires with satisfactory psychometric properties. Overall 89% of patients preferred PCI to CABG. PCI was the preferred strategy despite a higher risk for repeat revascularization and need for more medication. Remarkably, the fact that a risk for repeat revascularization is more common in the PCI group is less important for the patients who opt for PCI. Risk for stroke and bleeding were the most important arguments to opt for PCI over CABG. Type D personality, depression, and anxiety were all associated with a relatively higher preference for CABG as revascularization strategy.
    Overall, when given the choice patients seem to have a clear preference for PCI over CABG and consider stroke and bleeding important procedure-related complications. Patients with Type D personality, depression, or anxiety favor CABG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent and disabling health condition. While there have been some suggestions that personality may be linked to migraine incidence, dose-response links to disability or impact are yet to be conducted and multivariate analyses are uncommon.
    OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study are to evaluate the personality characteristics differentiating migraine and probable migraine sufferers from matched controls in multivariate models and assess the possibility of a dose-response relationship.
    METHODS: Fifty migraine sufferers and 50 age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched controls in New Zealand completed personality measures including negative affectivity, coping, and monitoring-blunting.
    RESULTS: Logistic regressions indicated that migraine status was concurrently predicted by Type D negative affectivity, more frequent venting and planning coping, and lower monitoring. There was little evidence to suggest a consistent dose-response type effect of personality on migraine; lower impact and disability were associated with greater openness to experiences, acceptance, and behavioural disengagement.
    CONCLUSIONS: A personality profile characterised by moderate levels of negative emotion and irritability together with failures in inhibitory self-regulation may be associated with an increased risk of strict and probable migraine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号