OBJECTIVE: Twin pregnancies are at increased risk of preterm birth (PTB) compared to singletons. Evaluation of cervical length (CL) represents the optimal tool to screen PTB in singleton. Conversely, there is less evidence on the use of CL in twins. Our aim was to evaluate the methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the CL application in twins using AGREE II methodology.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, and websites of the main scientific societies were examined. The following aspects were evaluated: diagnostic accuracy of CL, optimal gestational age at assessment and interventions in twin pregnancies with reduced CL. The quality of the published CPGs was carried out using \"The Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation (AGREE II)\" tool. The quality of guideline was rated using a scoring system. Each considered item was evaluated by the reviewers on a seven-point scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). A cut-off >60 % identifies a CPGs as recommended.
RESULTS: The AGREE II standardized domain scores for the first overall assessment had a mean of 74 %. The score was more than 60 % in the 66.6 % of CPGs analyzed indicating an agreement between the reviewers on recommending the use of these CPGs. A significant heterogeneity was found; there was no specific recommendation on CL assessment in about half of the published CPGs. There was also significant heterogeneity on the CL cut-off to prompt intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the AGREE II analysis showed that the majority of the included guidelines are of good quality, there was a significant heterogeneity among CPGs as regard as the indication, timing, and cut-off of CL in twins as well as in the indication of interventions.

Twin gestations are associated with increased risk of pregnancy complications. However, high-quality evidence regarding the management of twin pregnancies is limited, often resulting in inconsistencies in the recommendations of various national and international professional societies. In addition, some recommendations related to the management of twin gestations are often missing from the clinical guidelines dedicated to twin pregnancies and are instead included in the practice guidelines on specific pregnancy complications (eg, preterm birth) of the same professional society. This can make it challenging for care providers to easily identify and compare recommendations for the management of twin pregnancies. This study aimed to identify, summarize, and compare the recommendations of selected professional societies from high-income countries on the management of twin pregnancies, highlighting areas of both consensus and controversy. We reviewed clinical practice guidelines of selected major professional societies that were either specific to twin pregnancies or were focused on pregnancy complications or aspects of antenatal care that may be relevant for twin pregnancies. We decided a priori to include clinical guidelines from 7 high-income countries (United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Australia and New Zealand grouped together) and from 2 international societies (International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics). We identified recommendations regarding the following care areas: first-trimester care, antenatal surveillance, preterm birth and other pregnancy complications (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and gestational diabetes mellitus), and timing and mode of delivery. We identified 28 guidelines published by 11 professional societies from the 7 countries and 2 international societies. Thirteen of these guidelines focus on twin pregnancies, whereas the other 16 focus on specific pregnancy complications predominantly in singletons but also include some recommendations for twin pregnancies. Most of the guidelines are recent, with 15 of the 29 guidelines published over the past 3 years. We identified considerable disagreement among guidelines, primarily in 4 key areas: screening and prevention of preterm birth, using aspirin to prevent preeclampsia, defining fetal growth restriction, and the timing of delivery. In addition, there is limited guidance on several important areas, including the implications of the \"vanishing twin\" phenomenon, technical aspects and risks of invasive procedures, nutrition and weight gain, physical and sexual activity, the optimal growth chart to be used in twin pregnancies, the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes mellitus, and intrapartum care.This consolidation of key recommendations across several clinical practice guidelines can assist healthcare providers in accessing and comparing recommendations on the management of twin pregnancies and identifies high-priority areas for future research based on either continued disagreement among societies or limited current evidence to guide care.

OBJECTIVE: To review current international clinical guidelines on the antenatal and intrapartum management of twin pregnancies, examining areas of consensus and conflict.
METHODS: We conducted a database search using Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL and ERCI Guidelines website. Guidelines were screened for eligibility using our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those deemed eligible were quality assessed using the AGREE II tool and relevant data was extracted.
RESULTS: We identified 21 relevant guidelines from 16 countries including two international society guidelines. There was consensus in determination of chorionicity and amnionicity within the first trimester, fetal anomaly scan between 18 and 22 weeks and the recommended screening for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). For those that provided intrapartum guidance, there was agreement in recommending caesarean section to deliver monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twins, epidural anaesthesia for intrapartum analgesia and the use of cardiotocography (CTG) for intrapartum fetal monitoring. The main areas of conflict included cervical length screening, frequency of ultrasound surveillance, timing of delivery of dichorionic twin pregnancies and circumstances for recommending vaginal delivery. There was a lack of advice on intrapartum management.
CONCLUSIONS: This review has highlighted the need for unified international guidance on the management of twin pregnancy. Comparisons of current guidance demonstrates a lack of confidence in the management of labour in twin pregnancies. Further evidence on intrapartum care of twin pregnancies is needed to inform practice guidelines and improve both short and long term maternal and fetal outcomes.

To compare the prevalence of preterm birth (PTB) (delivery before 37 weeks) in Israel before and after publication of national guidelines recommending second-trimester sonographic cervical-length (CL) measurement.
The Israeli Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISOG) guidelines, issued on 1 January 2012, specified that CL should be measured transabdominally or, if this is not possible, transvaginally, at the 19-25-week ultrasound anomaly scan and that CL < 25 mm should indicate further work-up and treatment, although the type of treatment was unspecified. In 2000, the Israel Ministry of Health issued a legal requirement for the submission of delivery records to a national registry. These data were used to compare PTB prevalence in the period before (2000-2011) and that after (2012-2020) publication of the guidelines, as well as trends within each time period. Information was available on singleton and multiple pregnancy and maternal age and parity, as well as low birth weight (< 2500 g).
During the period 2000-2020, there were 3 403 976 infants liveborn in Israel: 1 797 657 before and 1 606 319 after publication of the ISOG guidelines. There were 247 187 PTBs overall, with a prevalence of 7.64% (95% CI, 7.52-7.77%) before publication of the guidelines and 6.84% (95% CI, 6.43-7.24%) afterwards (P < 0.0002, two-tailed). The annual PTB prevalence was static in the first time period but declined by 0.18% per annum during the second period, after publication of the guidelines. The proportionate reduction in PTB prevalence after compared with before publication of the guidelines was 10% overall, 9% for PTB at 33-36 weeks, 18% for PTB at 28-32 weeks and 24% for PTB at < 28 weeks. After publication of the guidelines, reduced prevalence of PTB was observed among singletons (5.49% before vs 4.83% after, P < 0.0001), but not among infants in twin or higher-order multiple pregnancy. There was a statistically significant reduction in the rate of PTB following publication of the guidelines in both nulliparous and parous women and in the 19-39-year-old maternal-age group. Although reductions in PTB prevalence were also noted in high-risk age groups (maternal age < 19 years and ≥ 40 years), these did not reach statistical significance. Following publication of the guidelines, there was a statistically significant reduction in the prevalence of birth weight under 2500 g, of a magnitude similar to that for PTB prevalence.
The publication of national guidelines recommending routine CL measurement at the time of the second-trimester anomaly scan was associated with a fall in PTB prevalence in singleton pregnancies. Whilst direct evidence linking screening with this fall in prevalence is lacking, it is likely that implementation of routine CL screening played an important role in the reduction of PTB rate. Our experience indicates that screening can be incorporated into the second-trimester anomaly scan. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

To review evidence-based recommendations for the management of dichorionic twin pregnancies.
Pregnant women with a dichorionic twin pregnancy.
Implementation of the recommendations in this guideline may improve the management of twin pregnancies and reduce neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.
Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., twin, preterm birth). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits, but results were limited to English- or French-language materials.
The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).
Obstetricians, family physicians, nurses, midwives, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, radiologists, and other health care providers who care for women with twin pregnancies.
RECOMMENDATIONS.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for optimal gestational weight gain (GWG) in twin pregnancies are applicable to Japanese women.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving women who delivered full-term twins at our tertiary center diagnosed with a normal prepregnancy body mass index. The women were divided into two groups, according to the optimal GWG recommended by the IOM (16.8-24.5 kg): the adequate GWG (AGWG) group with GWG meeting the guidelines and the low GWG (LGWG) group with GWG below the guidelines. Next, the women were divided into two groups according to birthweight: a group with both twins born appropriate for gestational age (AGA group) and a group with one or both twins born small for gestational age (SGA group). Their GWG as well as their pregnancy outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 265 women were included. The AGWG group had a significantly higher proportion of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy than the LGWG group. There was no significant difference in the proportion of women with both twins born AGA or the rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Meanwhile, the median GWG in the AGA group was 13.6 kg, which was significantly higher than 12.0 kg in the SGA group. And even the median GWG in the AGA group was below the lower limit of the IOM guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal GWG for Japanese women with twin pregnancies may be below the IOM guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended a gestational weight gain for full-term twin pregnancies of 17-25 kg for normal Body mass Index patients\', and characterize its guidelines on during twin pregnancies as \"provisional\". Indeed, they are exclusively based on observational epidemiological data. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the IOM\'s gestational weight gain guidelines are optimal for maternal and neonatal.
UNASSIGNED: We included all consecutive twin pregnancies delivering two live births retrospectively. Monoamniotic pregnancies, major congenital abnormalities, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, patients with missing gestational weight gain data in the last month before delivery, and patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≤18.5 were excluded. To control for gestational length, we divided the total weight gain by the gestational age in weeks at the last weight measurement to obtain the weight gain per week. Patients were classified as having low gestational weight gain, adequate gestational weight gain, or excessive gestational weight gain, with the results adjusted for BMI and tobacco use.
RESULTS: There were 878 patients in our level-III university hospital maternity ward who met the inclusion criteria in 1997-2013. Excessive gestational weight gain women had greater rates of preeclampsia than adequate gestational weight gain women did. Low gestational weight gain women showed a lower rate of gestational hypertension than AGWG women did. Delivery before 37 weeks of gestation (26.9% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.009), birth weight <2500 g, respiratory distress syndrome, and transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit were more frequent in the LGWG group compared with the AGWG group. Apgar score <7 at 5 min were more frequent in the EGWG group.
CONCLUSIONS: Adequate gestational weight gain was associated with better outcomes. Our results suggest that the IOM guidelines for twin pregnancy are appropriate and therefore should be routinely used.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) is associated with increased perinatal mortality and morbidity. Inconsistencies in the diagnostic criteria for sFGR employed in existing studies hinder the ability to compare or combine their findings. It is therefore challenging to establish robust evidence-based management or monitoring pathways for these pregnancies. The main aim of this study was to determine, by expert consensus using a Delphi procedure, the key diagnostic features of and the essential reporting parameters in sFGR.
METHODS: A Delphi process was conducted among an international panel of experts in sFGR in twin pregnancy. Panel members were provided with a list of literature-based parameters for diagnosing sFGR and were asked to rate their importance on a five-point Likert scale. Parameters were described as solitary (sufficient to diagnose sFGR, even if all other parameters are normal) or contributory (those that require other abnormal parameter(s) to be present for the diagnosis of sFGR). Consensus was sought to determine the cut-off values for accepted parameters, as well as parameters used in the monitoring, management and assessment of outcome of twin pregnancy complicated by sFGR. The questions were presented in two separate categories according to chorionicity.
RESULTS: A total of 72 experts were approached, of whom 60 agreed to participate and entered the first round; 48 (80%) completed all four rounds. For the definition of sFGR irrespective of chorionicity, one solitary parameter (estimated fetal weight (EFW) of one twin < 3rd centile) was agreed. For monochorionic twin pregnancy, at least two out of four contributory parameters (EFW of one twin < 10th centile, abdominal circumference of one twin < 10th centile, EFW discordance of ≥ 25%, and umbilical artery pulsatility index of the smaller twin > 95th centile) were agreed. For sFGR in dichorionic twin pregnancy, at least two out of three contributory parameters (EFW of one twin < 10th centile, EFW discordance of ≥ 25%, and umbilical artery pulsatility index of the smaller twin > 95th centile) were agreed.
CONCLUSIONS: Consensus-based diagnostic features of sFGR in both monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies, as well as cut-off values for the parameters involved, were agreed upon by a panel of experts. Future studies are needed to validate these diagnostic features before they can be used in clinical trials of interventions. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain during pregnancy has an important impact on maternal and neonatal health. Unlike the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations for weight gain in singleton pregnancies, those for twin gestations are termed \"provisional\", as they are based on limited data. The objectives of this study were to determine the neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with gaining weight below, within and above the IOM provisional guidelines on gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies, and additionally, to explore ranges of gestational weight gain among women who delivered twins at the recommended gestational age and birth weight, and those who did not.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women who gave birth to twins at ≥20 weeks gestation, with a birth weight ≥ 500 g was conducted in Nova Scotia, Canada (2003-2014). Our primary outcome of interest was small for gestational age (<10th percentile). In order to account for gestational age at delivery, weekly rates of 2nd and 3rd trimester weight gain were used to categorize women as gaining below, within, or above guidelines. We performed traditional regression analyses for maternal outcomes, and to account for the correlated nature of the neonatal outcomes in twins, we used generalized estimating equations (GEE).
RESULTS: A total of 1482 twins and 741 mothers were included, of whom 27%, 43%, and 30% gained below, within, and above guidelines, respectively. The incidence of small for gestational age in these three groups was 30%, 21%, and 20%, respectively, and relative to gaining within guidelines, the adjusted odds ratios were 1.44 (95% CI 1.01-2.06) for gaining below and 0.92 (95% CI 0.62-1.36) for gaining above. The gestational weight gain in women who delivered twins at 37-42 weeks with average birth weight ≥ 2500 g and those who delivered twins outside of the recommend ranges were comparable to each other and the IOM recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: While gestational weight gain below guidelines for twins was associated with some adverse neonatal outcomes, additional research exploring alternate ranges of gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies is warranted, in order to optimize neonatal and maternal outcomes.