Turner syndrome (TS) affects 50 per 100 000 females. TS affects multiple organs through all stages of life, necessitating multidisciplinary care. This guideline extends previous ones and includes important new advances, within diagnostics and genetics, estrogen treatment, fertility, co-morbidities, and neurocognition and neuropsychology. Exploratory meetings were held in 2021 in Europe and United States culminating with a consensus meeting in Aarhus, Denmark in June 2023. Prior to this, eight groups addressed important areas in TS care: (1) diagnosis and genetics, (2) growth, (3) puberty and estrogen treatment, (4) cardiovascular health, (5) transition, (6) fertility assessment, monitoring, and counselling, (7) health surveillance for comorbidities throughout the lifespan, and (8) neurocognition and its implications for mental health and well-being. Each group produced proposals for the present guidelines, which were meticulously discussed by the entire group. Four pertinent questions were submitted for formal GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) evaluation with systematic review of the literature. The guidelines project was initiated by the European Society for Endocrinology and the Pediatric Endocrine Society, in collaboration with members from the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions, the Society for Endocrinology, and the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, Australia and New Zealand Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Latin American Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, Arab Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, and the Asia Pacific Pediatric Endocrine Society. Advocacy groups appointed representatives for pre-meeting discussions and the consensus meeting.

OBJECTIVE: Transition from pediatric to adult care is associated with significant challenges in patients with Turner syndrome (TS). The objective of the TRansition Age Management In Turner syndrome in Italy (TRAMITI) project was to improve the care provided to patients with TS by harnessing the knowledge and expertise of various Italian centers through a Delphi-like consensus process.
METHODS: A panel of 15 physicians and 1 psychologist discussed 4 key domains: transition and referral, sexual and bone health and oncological risks, social and psychological aspects and systemic and metabolic disorders.
RESULTS: A total of 41 consensus statements were drafted. The transition from pediatric to adult care is a critical period for patients with TS, necessitating tailored approaches and early disclosure of the diagnosis to promote self-reliance and healthcare autonomy. Fertility preservation and bone health strategies are recommended to mitigate long-term complications, and psychiatric evaluations are recommended to address the increased prevalence of anxiety and depression. The consensus also addresses the heightened risk of metabolic, cardiovascular and autoimmune disorders in patients with TS; regular screenings and interventions are advised to manage these conditions effectively. In addition, cardiac abnormalities, including aortic dissections, require regular monitoring and early surgical intervention if certain criteria are met.
CONCLUSIONS: The TRAMITI consensus statement provides valuable insights and evidence-based recommendations to guide healthcare practitioners in delivering comprehensive and patient-centered care for patients with TS. By addressing the complex medical and psychosocial aspects of the condition, this consensus aims to enhance TS management and improve the overall well-being and long-term outcomes of these individuals.
The TRansition Age Management in Turner syndrome in Italy (TRAMITI) project aims to improve care for individuals with Turner Syndrome (TS) during their transition from pediatric to adult care. A team of 15 physicians and 1 psychologist collaborated to create a comprehensive set of 41 consensus statements, covering four key areas: transition and referral, sexual and bone health and oncological risks, social and psychological aspects and systemic and metabolic disorders. The consensus statements highlight the importance of patient-centered care, early intervention and long-term monitoring. They emphasize a multidisciplinary approach to address the complex medical and psychosocial aspects of TS. During the critical transition period, tailored approaches and early disclosure of the diagnosis are recommended to promote self-reliance and healthcare autonomy. To mitigate long-term complications, the consensus addresses fertility preservation and bone health strategies. It also recommends psychological or psychiatric evaluations to tackle the increased prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with TS. In addition, strategies for addressing the heightened risk of metabolic, cardiovascular and autoimmune disorders in patients with TS are proposed. Regular screenings and interventions are advised to effectively manage these conditions. Furthermore, cardiac abnormalities, including aortic dissections, require close monitoring and early surgical intervention if specific criteria are met. Overall, the TRAMITI consensus statement provides valuable insights and evidence-based recommendations. It offers guidance for healthcare practitioners in delivering comprehensive and patient-centered care for individuals with TS. By addressing both medical and psychosocial aspects, the consensus aims to enhance TS management and improve the well-being and long-term outcomes of those affected by this genetic disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner syndrome (TS) consensus guideline adherence within our pediatric tertiary referral center and determine if patients managed in our single-day, coordinated multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) format showed superior adherence rates when compared with those managed outside our MDC format.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with TS followed at our center from January 1, 2018, to April 30, 2020. The individual and overall adherence rates of 9 age-appropriate screening recommendations were evaluated along with rates of TS comorbidities within our cohort.
RESULTS: A total of 111 girls met the study criteria. Sixty-eight were managed in the MDC and 43 were managed outside the MDC. Only 42% of all the girls met all 9 evaluated age-appropriate screening recommendations, of 47 girls, 33 (70%) were managed in MDC compared with 14 (30%) who were managed in the non-MDC. Girls managed in the MDC had higher screening adherence rates versus non-MDC girls for 7 of the 9 evaluated screenings with especially large differences noted for thyroid stimulating hormone (95% vs 78%, P = .034), auditory evaluation (97% vs 65%, P < .001), and HgA1c levels (82% vs 54%, P = .014).
CONCLUSIONS: Girls managed in the MDC format showed higher rates of screening guideline adherence, both overall and with multiple specific screening tests, than those managed outside the MDC format. Overall guideline adherence remained low (42%), highlighting the need for continued optimization and improvement in guideline adherence in this unique subset of the population.

A woman in her 50s with Turner syndrome was referred to the endocrine clinic, having been unaware of her diagnosis until she received a shielding letter from the UK government during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite a neonatal diagnosis of Turner syndrome on her general practitioner record and despite having undergone laparoscopic examination for absent puberty and primary amenorrhoea aged 18 years, she had not received any prior hormone treatment or cardiovascular screening.Though Turner syndrome is rare, recent data from the UK Biobank suggest that it may be underdiagnosed. Clinicians should be aware of the clinical features and associated complications of Turner syndrome to avoid delayed diagnosis and missed opportunities for treatment.In this report, we discuss the clinical features of this rare syndrome and current guidelines for screening and treatment. We stress the importance of peer-to-peer support and information sharing through patient-led groups, such as the Turner Syndrome Support Society.

What is the standpoint of an international expert panel on ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) in young females with Turner syndrome (TS)?
The expert panel states that OTC should be offered to young females with TS, but under strict conditions only.
OTC is already an option for preserving the fertility of young females at risk of iatrogenic primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). Offering OTC to females with a genetic cause of POI could be the next step. One of the most common genetic disorders related to POI is TS. Due to an early depletion of the ovarian reserve, most females with TS are confronted with infertility before reaching adulthood. However, before offering OTC as an experimental fertility preservation option to young females with TS, medical and ethical concerns need to be addressed.
A three-round ethical Delphi study was conducted to systematically discuss whether the expected benefits exceed the expected negative consequences of OTC in young females with TS. The aim was to reach group consensus and form an international standpoint based on selected key statements. The study took place between February and December 2018.
Anonymous panel selection was based on expertise in TS, fertility preservation or medical ethics. A mixed panel of 12 gynaecologists, 13 (paediatric) endocrinologists, 10 medical ethicists and 20 patient representatives from 16 different countries gave consent to participate in this international Delphi study. In the first two rounds, experts were asked to rate and rank 38 statements regarding OTC in females with TS. Participants were offered the possibility to adjust their opinions after repetitive feedback. The selection of key statements was based on strict inclusion criteria.
A total of 46 participants completed the first Delphi round (response rate 84%). Based on strict selection criteria, six key statements were selected, and 13 statements were discarded. The remaining 19 statements and two additional statements submitted by the expert panel were re-evaluated in the second round by 41 participants (response rate 75%). The analysis of the second survey resulted in the inclusion of two additional key statements. After the approval of these eight key statements, the majority of the expert panel (96%) believed that OTC should be offered to young females with TS, but in a safe and controlled research setting first, with proper counselling and informed consent procedures, before offering this procedure in routine care. The remaining participants (4%) did not object but did not respond despite several reminders.
The anonymous nature of this study may have led to lack of accountability. The selection of experts was based on their willingness to participate. The fact that not all panellists took part in all rounds may have resulted in selection bias.
This international standpoint is the first step in the global acceptance of OTC in females with TS. Future collaborative research with a focus on efficacy and safety and long-term follow-up is urgently needed. Furthermore, we recommend an international register for fertility preservation procedures in females with TS.
Unconditional funding (A16-1395) was received from Merck B.V., The Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

BACKGROUND: The observed rate of termination of pregnancy (TOP) for Turner syndrome varies worldwide and even within countries. In this vignette study we quantified agreement among ten multidisciplinary prenatal diagnosis centers in Paris.
METHODS: We submitted online three cases of Turner syndrome (increased nuchal translucency, normal ultrasound, aortic coarctation) to fetal medicine experts: one obstetrician, one pediatrician and one geneticist in each of the ten Parisian centers. Each case was presented in the form of a progressive clinical history with conditional links dependent upon responses. The background to each case was provided, along with the medical history of the parents and the counseling they got from medical staff. The experts indicated online whether or not they would accept the parents\' request for TOP. We assessed the percentage of agreement for acceptance or refusal of TOP. We also used a multilevel logistic regression model to evaluate differences among obstetrician-gynecologists, pediatricians and cytogeneticists.
RESULTS: Overall agreement among the experts to accept or refuse TOP was, respectively, 25 and 28%. The percentage of disagreement was 47%. The percentage of agreement to accept TOP was 33, 8 and 33% for obstetrician-gynecologists, pediatricians and cytogeneticists, respectively. The respective percentages of agreement to refuse TOP were 19, 47 and 26%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the lack of consensus with regard to decisions related to termination of pregnancy for Turner Syndrome. This lack of consensus in turn underscores the importance of multidisciplinary management of these pregnancies in specialized fetal medicine centers.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the application of the French guidelines for pregnancies in Turner syndrome (TS) and their impact on perinatal prognosis.
METHODS: We performed a French multi-center retrospective study (14 centers), including TS pregnant patients (spontaneously or by Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)) between January 2006 and July 2017. Only clinical pregnancies were analyzed. The adjustment of medical follow-up modalities to French guidelines was evaluated for all pregnancies after 2009. Pregnancies from oocyte donation (OD) after 2009 were compared to those of a cohort of TS pregnancies obtained by OD before 2009, which were reported by the French Study Group for Oocyte Donation.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy pregnancies in 103 patients were included: 35 spontaneous, 5 by means of intra-conjugal ART, and 130 with OD. No serious maternal complications were observed. We reported two stillbirths and one intra uterine fetal death. The French guidelines were partially respected. The preconceptional assessment was carried out in 74% of cases. Cardiology follow-up during pregnancy was performed in accordance with guidelines in 74% of patients. Postpartum cardiac ultrasonography was performed in 45% of pregnancies but only in 11% within 8 days post-partum. When compared to the 2009 historical cohort, the rates of high blood pressure (19% vs. 38%; p < 0.005) pre-eclampsia (8% vs. 21%; p < 0.005) and prematurity <35 weeks (15% vs 38%; p < 0.0001) were lower.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of guidelines has allowed the standardization of TS pregnancy care and improved perinatal indicators for both mothers and children. However, an effort must be done, in a postpartum survey.

Turner syndrome affects 25-50 per 100,000 females and can involve multiple organs through all stages of life, necessitating multidisciplinary approach to care. Previous guidelines have highlighted this, but numerous important advances have been noted recently. These advances cover all specialty fields involved in the care of girls and women with TS. This paper is based on an international effort that started with exploratory meetings in 2014 in both Europe and the USA, and culminated with a Consensus Meeting held in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA in July 2016. Prior to this meeting, five groups each addressed important areas in TS care: 1) diagnostic and genetic issues, 2) growth and development during childhood and adolescence, 3) congenital and acquired cardiovascular disease, 4) transition and adult care, and 5) other comorbidities and neurocognitive issues. These groups produced proposals for the present guidelines. Additionally, four pertinent questions were submitted for formal GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) evaluation with a separate systematic review of the literature. These four questions related to the efficacy and most optimal treatment of short stature, infertility, hypertension, and hormonal replacement therapy. The guidelines project was initiated by the European Society for Endocrinology and the Pediatric Endocrine Society, in collaboration with The European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, The Endocrine Society, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, The American Heart Association, The Society for Endocrinology, and the European Society of Cardiology. The guideline has been formally endorsed by the European Society for Endocrinology, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the Endocrine Society. Advocacy groups appointed representatives who participated in pre-meeting discussions and in the consensus meeting.

暂无摘要。