Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly treated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms of the TJA for thumb CMC OA compared with other treatment strategies.
We performed a systematic search on MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases on August 2, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of TJA in people with thumb CMC joint OA regardless of the stage or etiology of the disease or comparator. The outcomes were pooled with a random effect meta-analysis.
We identified 4 studies randomizing 420 participants to TJA or trapeziectomy. At 3 months, TJA\'s benefits for pain may exceed the clinically important difference. However, after 1-year follow-up TJA does not improve pain compared with trapeziectomy (mean difference 0.53 points on a 0 to 10 scale; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.81). Furthermore, it provides a transient benefit in hand function at 3 months (measured with Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, scale 0-100, lower is better) compared with trapeziectomy with or without ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. The benefit in function diminished to a clinically unimportant level at 1-year follow-up (4.4 points better; CI 0.42-8.4).
Transient benefit in hand function for TJA implies that it could be a preferable option over trapeziectomy for people who consider fast postoperative recovery important. However, current evidence fails to inform us if TJA carries long-term higher risks of revisions compared with trapeziectomy.

OBJECTIVE: As osteoarthritis (OA) of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint leads to a high degree of disease burden with compromises in rudimentary and fine movements of the hand, intra-articular injections may be a desirable treatment option. However, because there are no evidence-based guidelines, the choice of intra-articular injection type is left to the discretion of the individual surgeon in collaboration with the patient. The purpose of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using level I studies to compare outcomes following corticosteroid and alternative methods of intra-articular injections for the management of TMC OA. Our hypothesis was that intra-articular corticosteroid injections were no more effective than other methods of intra-articular injections for the management of TMC OA.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed. Eligible for inclusion were randomized control trials reporting on intra-articular corticosteroid injection for the management of TMC OA. Clinical outcomes were recorded.
RESULTS: The 10 included studies comprised 673 patients. The mean age was 57.8 ± 8.3 years, with a mean follow-up of 6.4 ± 2.7 months. There was no significant difference in visual analog scale scores, grip strength and tip pinch strength between corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid at short- and medium-term follow-up. Further, there was no difference in visual analog scale pain scores at rest at medium-term follow-up between corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite short-term improvement with intra-articular corticosteroid injections, there was no significant difference in pain and functional outcomes following intra-articular corticosteroid injections compared to hyaluronic acid or platelet-rich plasma administration. Given the affordability, ease of administration, and efficacy associated with corticosteroids, they are a favorable option when considering the choice of intra-articular injection for the management of TMC OA.
METHODS: Therapeutic II.

Thumb osteoarthritis is a frequent pathology, mainly affecting the elderly. The surgical treatment initially described and having proved its worth is total trapeziectomy. Since the advent of trapeziometacarpal prostheses, several studies showed the non-inferiority of this technique on clinical criteria, with superiority in bone sparing, although neither technique demonstrated overall superiority. We therefore examined the specific complications of each surgical technique by analyzing their nature and prevalence through a review of the literature to compare them on these new parameters.
Seventy-four of the 320 articles reviewed were included, 38 of which concerned trapeziectomy, and 36 concerned prostheses, for a total of 4,865 patients. They were original studies, involving adults undergoing trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty or trapeziectomy, published after 2015, reporting at least one well-described complication.
6.13% of trapeziectomies presented severe complications (in particular thumb collapse and metacarpophalangeal hyperextension), 3.31% moderate complications and 1.90% minor complications, leading to a 2.0% revision rate. 23.88% of prostheses had severe complications (loosening, dislocation and wear), 5.06% moderate complications and 1.36% minor complications, leading to a 12.8% revision rate. In addition, we analyzed more recent prosthesis designs separately, and found lower prevalence of severe complications (16.56%) and revision surgery (4.3%).
Revision surgery for trapeziometacarpal prostheses is usually only a standard trapeziectomy with the same follow-up as first-line trapeziectomy, whereas revision surgery for trapeziectomies is much more complex and the results are uncertain. For this reason, we would reserve total trapeziectomy for revision surgeries and patients with low functional demand for whom a second surgery is not desirable. Further studies could confirm this attitude, especially focusing on the latest generation of dual mobility implants.

» The scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint is a common location of degenerative osteoarthritis (OA) in the wrist.» STT OA may occur in isolation or with concomitant thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) OA or scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and other wrist OA patterns.» Nonoperative management strategies include activity modification, bracing, anti-inflammatory medications, occupational therapy, and injections.» Surgical treatment may be determined by whether the STT OA occurs in isolation or with concomitant thumb CMCJ or SLAC OA and includes STT arthrodesis, distal scaphoid excision with or without interposition or implant arthroplasty, trapeziectomy with proximal trapezoid excision, four-corner fusion in combination with scaphoid/radial column excision, and proximal row carpectomy.

The optimal management of trapeziometacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis remains controversial. This meta-analysis assessed the subjective and objective outcomes of trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis (TMA) versus trapeziec-tomy with ligament reconstruction (LRTI). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of science data-bases were searched from inception to June 30, 2022. Keywords included \"trapeziometacarpal osteoarthrosis\", \"trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis\" and \"trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction\". Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) including patients treated for TMC osteoarthritis were included. The subjective outcomes visual analogue scale (VAS) , Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores, Kapanji scores, objective outcomes total interphalangeal (IP) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint motion, palmar abduction, grip strength, tip, key pinch strength and complications were extracted. The methodological quality of each was assessed in- dependently. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative trials. From the 5 included studies (2 RCTs, 3 CCTs), 208 cases were divided into TMA group (n = 107) and LRTI group (n =101) groups. Compared with the TMA group, PRWHE, tip pinch strength and palmar abduction was better in the LRTI group. There was no statistical difference in DASH score, VAS, kapandji score, grip strength, key pinch strength, total IP joint motion, total MCP joint motion and complications. The LRTI group had more obvious advantages in term of PRWHE, tip pinch strength and palmar abduction. Moreover, there was no statistical difference in DASH score, VAS, kapandji score, grip strength, key pinch strength, total IP joint and total MCP joint motion and complications. Therefore, we concluded LRTI was more recommendable for more management of TMC osteoarthritis. Certainly, high-quality studies are required in long-term follow-up.

We describe the case of a 58-year-old woman with AVN of the left trapezium which was treated surgically. This paper aims to review the etiologies leading to the pathology and the different therapeutic options. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the carpal bones most commonly involves the lunate and the scaphoid . AVN of the trapezium is extremely rare. To our knowledge only 3 cases have been published in the literature so far and they were all treated differently.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis directly compares joint replacement (JR) and trapeziectomy techniques to provide an update as to which surgical intervention is superior for first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) joint osteoarthritis.
METHODS: In August 2020, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies that compared these two techniques for the treatment of CMC-1 joint osteoarthritis (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42020189728). Primary outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), QuickDASH (QDASH) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Secondary outcomes, such as total complication, dislocation and revision surgery rates, were also measured.
RESULTS: From 1909 studies identified, 14 studies (1005 patients) were eligible. Our meta-analysis found that post-operative QDASH scores were lower for patients in the JR group (five studies, p = 0.0004). Similarly, significantly better postoperative key pinch strength in favour of JR was noted (three studies, p = 0.001). However, pain (VAS) scores were similar between the two groups (five studies, p = 0.21). Moreover, JR techniques had significantly greater odds of overall complications (12 studies; OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.13-3.96, p = 0.02) and significantly greater odds of revision surgery (9 studies; OR 5.14; 95% CI 2.06-12.81, p = 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, based on very low- to moderate-quality evidence, JR treatments may result in better function with less disability with comparable pain (VAS) scores; however, JR has greater odds of complications and greater odds of requiring revision surgery. More robust RCTs that compare JR and TRAP with standardised outcome measures and long-term follow-up would add to the overall quality of evidence.

The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the failure rates among different trapeziometacarpal interposition implants used to treat thumb basal joint osteoarthritis. We searched Medline (PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus databases, to identify articles reporting on thumb interpositional arthroplasty, in English literature. We excluded studies with less than 35 cases and with a follow-up shorter than 24 months. Twenty-one studies were included. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Coleman Methodological Score. The mean quality of the studies was moderate. The total number of procedures included in this review was 1205. The failure rate for interposition implants was 11%. The main longterm complication was dislocation, which is also the major reason for revision.

UNASSIGNED: Trapezium, as a carpal bone positioned at the distal row, is often associated with other wrist injuries such as distal radius fracture. Isolated trapezium fracture, especially in a comminuted form, rarely occurs. There are only six reports of isolated comminuted trapezium fractures in the literature to the best of our knowledge.
METHODS: We present a case with an isolated comminuted trapezium fracture presenting pain in his thenar eminence and thumb motion limitation. He was treated by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) with the K wire pin.
UNASSIGNED: We searched the published related studies and summarized the signs and symptoms of patients presented with trapezium fracture. The most common presentation of trapezial fracture include pain/tenderness at the base of the first metacarpal bone, pain/tenderness at the snuffbox area and 1st digit motion limitation. The treatment options described in the literature for isolated comminuted trapezium fracture are also presented. Open reduction and fixation with pin is the most common treatment mentioned in the literature. The priority is restoring the scaphotrapezial and trapeziometacarpal joint congruency to save the 1st digit range of motion.
CONCLUSIONS: Comminuted trapezial fracture may happen following either low energy (like our patient) or high energy trauma. This paper highlights the fact that even a comminuted trapezium fracture can be easily missed. Regardless of the trauma mechanism (high energy versus low energy trauma), a high index of suspicion and delicate work up would be necessary in order not to miss this type of fracture.

Background: The treatment of rhizarthritis involves several surgical techniques; among them, bioabsorbable scaffolds have begun to be proposed to avoid the use of other biological tissues or artificial permanent devices. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of poly-ld-lactic acid scaffold in interposition arthroplasty in a series of patients treated in our department. Results: Strength, range of motion, and pain improved after the intervention and lasted over the years; nonetheless, most of the radiographs showed a progressive collapse of the first metacarpal. Conclusions: Despite radiological findings, we believe that poly-ld-lactic acid scaffold can be considered a good alternative to traditional trapeziectomy with tendon interposition and suspensionplasty, with long-lasting satisfactory clinical results.