Transgender Persons

变性人
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    性别确认激素疗法(GAHT)是跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)个体寻求的常见医疗干预措施。根据临床指南建议启动GAHT可确保提供高质量的护理。然而,之前没有研究检查当前的GAHT起始与推荐的GAHT起始相比如何.
    这项研究评估了退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)关于女性化和男性化GAHT启动的指南一致性。
    样本包括4,676名患有性别认同障碍的退伍军人,他们在2007年至2018年期间在VHA中开始女性化(n=3,547)和男性化(n=1,129)GAHT。评估了接受女性化和男性化GAHT的退伍军人的人口统计学和健康状况。确定了有关女性化和男性化GAHT启动的六个VHA指南中的指南一致退伍军人的比例。
    与接受男性化GAHT的退伍军人相比,接受女性化GAHT的退伍军人年龄较大(≥60岁:23.7%vs.6.3%),白人非西班牙裔(83.5%vs.57.6%),并有更多的合并症(≥7:14.0%vs.10.6%)。接受男性化GAHT的退伍军人比例较高的是黑人非西班牙裔(21.5%vs.3.5%),患有创伤后应激障碍(43.0%vs.33.9%)和积极的军事性创伤(33.5%vs.16.8%;所有p值<0.001)比接受女性化GAHT的退伍军人。在开始用雌激素使GAHT女性化的退伍军人中,由于没有禁忌症的记录,97.0%的人是指南一致的,包括静脉血栓栓塞,乳腺癌,中风,或者心肌梗塞.在开始螺内酯作为女性化GAHT的一部分的退伍军人中,98.1%是指南一致的,因为他们没有禁忌症的文件,包括高钾血症或急性肾功能衰竭。在开始将GAHT男性化的退伍军人中,由于没有禁忌症的记录,90.1%的人是指南一致的,如乳腺癌或前列腺癌。在开始男性化GAHT之前,已经在91.8%的退伍军人中测量了血细胞比容,96.5%的患者在开始男性化GAHT之前没有血细胞比容升高(>50%)。在发起女性化和男性化GAHT的退伍军人中,91.2%的人在GAHT开始之前有性别认同障碍诊断的记录。
    我们观察到VHA中当前的GAHT启动实践与指南之间的高度一致性,特别是女性化的GAHT。研究结果表明,VHA临床医生正在根据临床指南开始女性化GAHT。未来的工作应评估VHA中GAHT监测和管理的指南一致性。
    UNASSIGNED: Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is a common medical intervention sought by transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals. Initiating GAHT in accordance with clinical guideline recommendations ensures delivery of high-quality care. However, no prior studies have examined how current GAHT initiation compares to recommended GAHT initiation.
    UNASSIGNED: This study assessed guideline concordance around feminizing and masculinizing GAHT initiation in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
    UNASSIGNED: The sample included 4,676 veterans with a gender identity disorder diagnosis who initiated feminizing (n=3,547) and masculinizing (n=1,129) GAHT between 2007 and 2018 in VHA. Demographics and health conditions on veterans receiving feminizing and masculinizing GAHT were assessed. Proportion of guideline concordant veterans on six VHA guidelines on feminizing and masculinizing GAHT initiation were determined.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to veterans receiving masculinizing GAHT, a higher proportion of veterans receiving feminizing GAHT were older (≥60 years: 23.7% vs. 6.3%), White non-Hispanic (83.5% vs. 57.6%), and had a higher number of comorbidities (≥7: 14.0% vs. 10.6%). A higher proportion of veterans receiving masculinizing GAHT were Black non-Hispanic (21.5% vs. 3.5%), had posttraumatic stress disorder (43.0% vs. 33.9%) and positive military sexual trauma (33.5% vs.16.8%; all p-values<0.001) than veterans receiving feminizing GAHT. Among veterans who started feminizing GAHT with estrogen, 97.0% were guideline concordant due to no documentation of contraindication, including venous thromboembolism, breast cancer, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Among veterans who started spironolactone as part of feminizing GAHT, 98.1% were guideline concordant as they had no documentation of contraindication, including hyperkalemia or acute renal failure. Among veterans starting masculinizing GAHT, 90.1% were guideline concordant due to no documentation of contraindications, such as breast or prostate cancer. Hematocrit had been measured in 91.8% of veterans before initiating masculinizing GAHT, with 96.5% not having an elevated hematocrit (>50%) prior to starting masculinizing GAHT. Among veterans initiating feminizing and masculinizing GAHT, 91.2% had documentation of a gender identity disorder diagnosis prior to GAHT initiation.
    UNASSIGNED: We observed high concordance between current GAHT initiation practices in VHA and guidelines, particularly for feminizing GAHT. Findings suggest that VHA clinicians are initiating feminizing GAHT in concordance with clinical guidelines. Future work should assess guideline concordance on monitoring and management of GAHT in VHA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着时间的推移,制定医学临床实践指南的过程发生了巨大变化。以前,一小组临床医生根据他们的专业知识制定了临床实践指南,但是指南制定者必须越来越多地考虑患者的专业知识,全球专业知识,和循证医学的原则。本文分析了世界跨性别健康专业协会在创建其“跨性别和性别人群健康护理标准”的过程中如何与各种形式的专业知识和循证医学进行斗争,版本8“(此后,SOC-8),一套著名的跨性别医学临床实践指南。分析基于对临床医生的83次访谈,病人,和2019年至2021年期间美国和泰国的活动人士,以及对跨性别健康会议的观察和书面材料的内容分析。我发现,尽管在这个版本的指南中加入更多不同的专业知识是表面上的目标,SOC-8最终再现了科学和医学领域的传统知识层级,在这些层级中,跨性别者和性别不符合患者的非专业知识以及来自全球南方的专业知识仍然被边缘化.我将这种重新边缘化归因于SOC-8修订过程中制定的监管客观性,将专业知识重新合法化,没有建立确保全球南方利益攸关方平等参与的正式基础设施,并允许有限地纳入具有相对较高特权水平的跨性别者和性别不符合者的外行专业知识(根据种族,教育,和其他社会地位)。这些发现对未来科学和医学知识层次的研究以及临床实践指南的制定具有重要意义。
    The process for developing clinical practice guidelines in medicine has changed dramatically over time. Previously, small groups of clinicians crafted clinical practice guidelines based on their professional expertise, but guideline developers must increasingly consider patients\' lay expertise, global expertise, and principles of evidence-based medicine. This article analyzes how the World Professional Association for Transgender Health grappled with diverse forms of expertise and evidence-based medicine in the process of creating its \"Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8\" (hereafter, SOC-8), a prominent set of clinical practice guidelines in transgender medicine. Analysis is based on 83 interviews with clinicians, patients, and activists in the U.S. and Thailand between 2019 and 2021, as well as observation of transgender health conferences and content analysis of written materials. I find that despite the ostensible goal of incorporating more diverse expertise in this version of the guidelines, the SOC-8 ultimately reproduced traditional knowledge hierarchies in science and medicine in which the lay expertise of transgender and gender non-conforming patients and expertise from the Global South remain marginalized. I attribute this re-marginalization to the regulatory objectivity enacted in the SOC-8 revision process, which re-legitimized professional expertise, established no formal infrastructure for ensuring the equal participation of Global South stakeholders, and permitted limited inclusion of lay expertise from transgender and gender non-conforming people with relatively high levels of privilege (according to race, education, and other social statuses). These findings have implications for future research on knowledge hierarchies in science and medicine and the creation of clinical practice guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迫切需要进一步的研究来解决跨性别者饮食失调(ED)的比例过高的问题。性别多样化,和双性人(TGDI)与顺性人相比,endosex(non-intersex)populations.作为TGDI的倡导者,学者,和有ED生活/生活经验的临床医生,我们提出了一套建议来指导有关TGDI人群中ED和饮食紊乱行为的伦理研究.此处包含的指南旨在教育非TGDI研究人员并支持寻求进行此类研究的TGDI研究人员。学习设计的注意事项,规划,数据收集,和传播都包括在内。
    Further research is urgently needed to address the disproportionately high rates of eating disorders (EDs) among transgender, gender diverse, and intersex (TGDI) individuals in comparison to cisgender, endosex (non-intersex) populations. As TGDI advocates, academics, and clinicians with lived/living experience with EDs, we propose a set of recommendations to guide ethical research specifically about EDs and disordered eating behaviors in TGDI populations. The guidelines included here aim to educate non-TGDI researchers and support TGDI researchers seeking to carry out such research. Considerations for study design, planning, data collection, and dissemination are included.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    我们进行了这项系统审查,以确定当前国际上跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)人群护理指南中急诊科(ED)的相关建议。
    使用PRISMA标准,我们对OvidMedline进行了系统搜索,EMBASE,和CINAHL,并手动搜索2021年6月31日之前发布的临床实践指南(CPG)或最佳实践声明(BPS)的灰色文献。如果文章是英文的,包括任何年龄的TGD人群的医疗或辅助医疗护理,在任何设置中,地区或国家,并且在范围上是国家或国际的。排除标准包括初级研究,评论文章,叙述性评论或其他非CPG或BPS,社论,或者给编辑的信,区域或个别医院范围的文章,非医学文章,文章不是英文的,或者是否存在最新版本的指南。确定了与ED护理相关的建议,记录,并使用AGREE-II和AGREE-REX标准进行质量评估。我们对评分者间可靠性进行了类间相关系数。在急诊室期间,针对相关护理点编写了建议(分诊,注册,房间,调查,等。).
    我们筛选了1,658篇独特文章,1,555人被排除在外。在其余103篇文章中,七个有与急诊室护理相关的建议,共10条建议。四项准则和八项建议是高质量的。其中包括测试建议,预防,转介,并提供艾滋病毒暴露后预防,以及对TGD人的文化胜任护理。
    这是迄今为止最全面的指南和最佳实践声明,为EDTGD患者的护理提供建议。有几个可以立即采取行动。也有许多机会建立社区主导的研究计划,以综合和告知在紧急情况下照顾TGD人员的全面专门指南。
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted this systematic review to identify emergency department (ED) relevant recommendations in current guidelines for care of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people internationally.
    UNASSIGNED: Using PRISMA criteria, we did a systematic search of Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL and a hand search of gray literature for clinical practice guidelines (CPG) or best practice statements (BPS) published until June 31, 2021. Articles were included if they were in English, included medical or paramedical care of TGD populations of any age, in any setting, region or nation, and were national or international in scope. Exclusion criteria included primary research studies, review articles, narrative reviews or otherwise non-CPG or BPS, editorials, or letters to the editor, articles of regional or individual hospital scope, non-medical articles, articles not in English, or if a more recent version of the guideline existed. Recommendations relevant to ED care were identified, recorded, and assessed for quality using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX criteria. We performed interclass correlation coefficient for interrater reliability. Recommendations were coded for the relevant point of care while in the ED (triage, registration, rooming, investigations, etc.).
    UNASSIGNED: We screened 1,658 unique articles, and 1,555 were excluded. Of the remaining 103 articles included, seven had recommendations relevant to care in the ED, comprising a total of 10 recommendations. Four guidelines and eight recommendations were of high quality. They included recommendations for testing, prevention, referral, and provision of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV, and culturally competent care of TGD people.
    UNASSIGNED: This is the most comprehensive review to date of guidelines and best practices statements offering recommendations for care of ED TGD patients, and several are immediately actionable. There are also many opportunities to build community-led research programs to synthesize and inform a comprehensive dedicated guideline for care of TGD people in emergency settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    很少有跨性别特异性癌症筛查建议存在。这篇综述旨在涵盖变性患者癌症筛查的现行指南和实践模式,缺乏循证数据的地方,从cisgender筛查指南中借鉴,根据解剖清单为变性患者提供最佳实践。没有足够的证据来确定性别确认激素治疗对癌症风险的长期影响。在未来,癌症筛查和预防应侧重于解剖清单和高危行为。
    Few transgender-specific cancer screening recommendations exist. This review aims to cover current guidelines and practice patterns of cancer screening in transgender patients and, where evidence-based data are lacking, to draw from cisgender screening guidelines to suggest best practices for transgender patients based on anatomic inventory. Sufficient evidence does not exist to determine the long-term effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy on cancer risk. In the future, cancer screening and prevention should be focused on anatomic inventory and high-risk behaviors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号