BACKGROUND: Current research lacks comprehensive investigation into the biomechanical changes in the spinal cord and nerve roots during scoliosis correction. This study employs finite element analysis to extensively explore these biomechanical variations across different Cobb angles, providing valuable insights for clinical treatment.
METHODS: A personalized finite element model, incorporating vertebrae, ligaments, spinal cord, and nerve roots, was constructed using engineering software. Forces and displacements were applied to achieve Cobb angle improvements, designating T1/2-T4/5 as the upper segment, T5/6-T8/9 as the middle segment, and T9/10-L1/2 as the lower segment. Simulations under traction, pushing, and traction + torsion conditions were conducted, and biomechanical changes in each spinal cord segment and nerve roots were analyzed.
RESULTS: Throughout the scoliosis correction process, the middle spinal cord segment consistently exhibited a risk of injury under various conditions and displacements. The lower spinal cord segment showed no significant injury changes under traction + torsion conditions. In the early correction phase, the upper spinal cord segment demonstrated a risk of injury under all conditions, and the lower spinal cord segment presented a risk of injury under pushing conditions. Traction conditions posed a risk of nerve injury on both sides in the middle and lower segments. Under pushing conditions, there was a risk of nerve injury on both sides in all segments. Traction + torsion conditions implicated a risk of injury to the right nerves in the upper segment, both sides in the middle segment, and the left side in the lower segment. In the later correction stage, there was a risk of injury to the upper spinal cord segment under traction + torsion conditions, the left nerves in the middle segment under traction conditions, and the right nerves in the upper segment under pushing conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: When the correction rate reaches 61-68%, particular attention should be given to the upper-mid spinal cord. Pushing conditions also warrant attention to the lower spinal cord and the nerve roots on both sides of the main thoracic curve. Traction conditions require attention to nerve roots bilaterally in the middle and lower segments, while traction combined with torsion conditions necessitate focus on the right-side nerve roots in the upper segment, both sides in the middle segment, and the left-side nerve roots in the lower segment.

BACKGROUND The spring-and-loop with clip (S-O clip) consists of a spring and a nylon loop located on one side of the claws of the clip, and is used in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to allow countertraction. This retrospective study included 290 patients with early gastric neoplasms (eGNs) and aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of ESD with and without the use of the S-O clip. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the data of 347 patients with eGN who underwent ESD, with or without an S-O clip, at our institution between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Overall, 290 patients were analyzed after excluding ineligible participants. The control group (n=149; adenoma: 1, carcinoma: 148) underwent ESD without an S-O clip between April 2017 and March 2020, while the S-O group (n=141; adenoma: 4, carcinoma: 137) used the clip between April 2020 and March 2023. Primary outcomes included procedure time, en bloc resection rate, and complete resection rate. Subgroup analysis for examined procedure time concerning endoscopist expertise, submucosal fibrosis, and neoplasm locations. RESULTS The S-O group had a shorter procedure time (44.4±23.9 vs 61.1±40.9 min, P<0.001) and a higher complete resection rate (97.9% vs 92.6%, P<0.05) than the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed that the S-O clip significantly reduced procedure time for trainees compared to the control group (40.8±18.3 vs 61.1±35.6 min, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The scheduled use of S-O clips in gastric ESD is effective in improving procedural time and complete resection rates, benefiting endoscopists across all experience levels.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal symptoms, such as neck pain and low back pain (LBP) are common after a traffic accident (TA). While motion-style acupuncture treatment (MSAT) is effective in relieving pain, MSAT using traction (T-MSAT) has rarely been studied, and evidence for its efficacy and safety is lacking. To address this gap, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of T-MSAT for pain and functional disturbances in patients with acute LBP caused by a TA.
METHODS: This two-armed, parallel, assessor blinded randomized controlled trial, conducted at Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, included 100 patients with acute LBP occurring within 1 week of a TA. The participants were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive either combined T-MSAT and integrative Korean medicine treatment (IKMT) or only conventional IKMT, applied for 3 consecutive days after admission. The primary outcome was the difference between numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for LBP at baseline and after treatment completion on day 4 after admission.
RESULTS: At the primary endpoint, the difference in NRS scores for LBP between the T-MSAT and control groups was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-1.48). The T-MSAT group showed a significantly lower NRS score for LBP than the control group. Differences in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the T-MSAT and control groups were significant at baseline and discharge. The area under the curve of the VAS score showed a significant difference (-46.86 [95% CI -85.13 to -8.59]), indicating faster pain reduction in the T-MSAT group than in the control group. Recovery (30% pain reduction) was achieved more rapidly in the T-MSAT group than in the control group (log-rank test P = .005). Meanwhile, the NRS, VAS, Oswestry disability index, and quality of life scores at discharge or at the 12-week follow-up showed no significant difference. The rates of mild adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the groups. No severe AEs were reported, and none of the AEs were associated with the clinical trial.
CONCLUSIONS: T-MSAT combined with IKMT is a safe treatment that can effectively and quickly reduce initial pain in patients with LBP.

UNASSIGNED: Manual traction, a therapeutic technique frequently employed in healthcare, involves applying controlled pulling force by hand, usually to the spine, to stretch muscles and decompress joints, thereby alleviating pain. This method can be particularly beneficial for addressing lumbosacral spine pain exacerbated by radicular symptoms, characterized by pain radiating from the lower back due to compression or irritation of spinal nerves.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare the effects of manual traction against control group in alleviating the lumbosacral spine pain caused by radicular symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: A randomized controlled study design was utilized with a sample of 60 patients experiencing lumbosacral spine pain, evenly distributed between an experimental group (n = 30; receiving manual traction) and a control group (n = 30). Patients underwent assessments before and after six treatment sessions, which included the Straight Leg Raise test, modified Bragard\'s test, Kernig\'s test, and the visual analogue scale for pain perception.
UNASSIGNED: Between-group significant differences were found at post-intervention, favoring the experimental group on SLR - Left (°) (p = 0.004; medium effect size), SLR - Right (°) (p = 0.004; medium effect size), Modified Bragard test - Left (°) (p = 0.024; small effect size), Modified Bragard test - Right (°) (p = 0.003; medium effect size), Kernig\'s Test - Left (°) (p = 0.013; medium effect size) and Kernig\'s Test - Right (°) (p = 0.010; medium effect size). Additionally, between-group significant differences were found at post-intervention, favoring the experimental group on VAS scores at SLR left (p < 0.001; medium effect size), and right (p < 0.001); medium effect size, Modified Bragard test left (p < 0.001; medium effect size) and right (p < 0.001; medium effect size) and at Kernig\'s Test left (p < 0.001; medium effect size) and right (p < 0.001; medium effect size).
UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, manual traction is recommended as an effective approach for alleviating lumbosacral spine pain in patients experiencing symptoms resulting from irritation or compression of a spinal nerve root.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether Cobb and pelvic obliquity corrections can be predicted using supine traction radiographs in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) from T2/3 to L5.
METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2020, 167 non-ambulatory patients with CP scoliosis underwent PSF using pedicle screws in two quaternary centers with a minimum of 2 years follow-up (FU). Radiological measurements and chart reviews were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients aged 15.6 ± 0.4 years were included. All patients had significant correction of the Cobb angle (MC), pelvic obliquity (PO), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and lumbar lordosis (LL) without loss of correction at the last FU (LFU). Curve flexibility was significantly correlated with Cobb correction (δMC) immediately postoperatively (p < 0.0001, r = 0.8950), followed by the amount of correction in pelvic obliquity under traction (δPOT) (p = 0.0252, r = 0.2174). For correction in PO (δPO), the most significant variable was δPOT (p < 0.0001, r = 0.7553), followed by curve flexibility (p = 0.0059, r = 0.26) and the amount of correction in Cobb under traction (p = 0.0252, r = 0.2174).
CONCLUSIONS: Cobb and PO corrections can be predicted using supine traction films for non-ambulatory CP patients treated with PSF from T2/3 to L5. The variables evaluated were interconnected, reinforcing preoperative planning for these patients. Comparative large-scale studies on patient-related clinical outcomes are required to determine whether this predicted correction is associated with improved surgical outcomes and reduced complication rates.
METHODS: IV.

UNASSIGNED: Traction on the per-urethral catheter is commonly employed after monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (mTURP) to reduce bleeding. However, its efficacy and impact on postoperative pain remain uncertain. Further, there is limited evidence to suggest any benefit regarding post-operative blood loss.
UNASSIGNED: In a randomized controlled trial, 62 patients undergoing mTURP were assigned to either a traction (n = 30) or non-traction (n = 32) group. Blood loss, postoperative pain, and analgesic requirements were assessed between January 2022 and April 2023. {(IHEC-PGR/2021/DM/M.Ch/Jan/02), CTRI Registration: CTRI/2022/01/039199.}.
UNASSIGNED: No significant differences were observed between the traction and non-traction groups regarding postoperative blood loss (p-value- 0.632), fall in hemoglobin (p-value- 0.719) and hematocrit (p-value- 0.937) levels, and length of postoperative hospital stay (p-value- 0.797). However, the traction group reported significantly higher postoperative pain scores (p-value < 0.001) and increased analgesic requirements (p-value < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: The study suggests that 12-hours catheter traction after mTURP does not reduce blood loss and is associated with increased postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: EndoTrac is a line-attached sheath-type traction device that enables us to control the direction and the force of traction during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The efficacy of EndoTrac for gastric ESD has not been fully verified.
METHODS: The G-Trac study is a multicentre (nine general hospitals and two university hospitals in Japan) collaborative trial assessing the efficacy of EndoTrac for gastric ESDs. Patients with superficial gastric neoplasms will be enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo either conventional ESD or EndoTrac ESD. Allocation will be stratified according to tumour location, operator experience and tumour diameter at an allocation rate of 1:1. The type of endoknife used will be confirmed before randomisation. The primary outcome, procedure time, will be compared between the groups in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The efficacy-related, safety-related and device-related outcomes will be assessed in the secondary analysis. The planned sample size of the 142 patients in the two groups will enable us to detect a difference with a power of 80% by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, assuming an effect size of 0.54, asymptotic relative efficiency of 0.864 and a two-sided type 1 error rate of 5%.
BACKGROUND: This trial was approved by the certified review board of Kobe University (22 December 2022). The results from this trial will be disseminated through peer-review journals, presentations at national and international conferences, and data sharing with other researchers.
BACKGROUND: jRCT1052220166.

BACKGROUND: Insertion of a skeletal traction pin in the distal femur or proximal tibia can be a painful and unpleasant experience for patients with a lower-extremity fracture. The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing patients with audio distraction (AD) during traction pin insertion can help to improve the patient-reported and the physician-reported experience and decrease pain and/or anxiety during the procedure.
METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at 2 level-I trauma centers. Patients ≥18 years of age who were conscious and oriented and had a medical need for skeletal traction were included. Patients were randomized to receive AD or not receive AD during the procedure. All other procedure protocols were standardized and were the same for both groups. Surveys were completed by the patient and the physician immediately following the procedure. Patients rated their overall experience, pain, and anxiety during the procedure, and physicians rated the difficulty of the procedure, both on a 1-to-10 Likert scale.
RESULTS: A total of 54 patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight received AD and 26 did not. Femoral fractures were the most common injury (33 of 55, 60.0%). Baseline demographic characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. The overall patient-reported procedure experience was similar between the AD and no-AD groups (3.9 ± 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.1 to 4.7] versus 3.5 ± 2.2 [95% CI, 2.9 to 4.1], respectively; p = 0.55), as was pain (5.3 ± 3.2 [95% CI, 4.4 to 6.2] versus 6.1 ± 2.4 [95% CI, 5.4 to 6.8]; p = 0.28). However, anxiety levels were lower in the AD group (4.8 ± 3.3 [95% CI, 3.9 to 5.7] versus 7.1 ± 2.8 [95% CI, 6.3 to 7.9]; p = 0.007). Physician-reported procedure difficulty was similar between the groups (2.6 ± 2.0 [95% CI, 2.1 to 3.1] versus 2.8 ± 1.7 [95% CI, 2.3 to 3.3]; p = 0.69).
CONCLUSIONS: AD is a practical, low-cost intervention that may reduce patient anxiety during lower-extremity skeletal traction pin insertion.
METHODS: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been recommended as the first-line treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, poor visualization of the operative field increases both the procedure time and the risk of complications, especially for large and difficult lesions. We introduced a novel technique, magnetic anchor-guided ESD (MAG-ESD) and compared it with conventional ESD (C-ESD) for the treatment of large EGCs in terms of efficacy, safety, and advantages.
METHODS: Patients with large EGCs who underwent MAG-ESD or C-ESD at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi\'an Jiaotong University from March 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The patients in the MAG-ESD cohort were matched to those in the C-ESD cohort using propensity score-based matching. The operation time, submucosal dissection time, complete resection status, magnetic anchor, adverse event rate, and tumor recurrence rate were evaluated.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients who underwent MAG-ESD were ultimately matched to those who underwent C-ESD. The median operation time of MAG-ESD and C-ESD was 43 minutes (IQR, 35.2-49.5) and 50.5 minutes (IQR, 42.0-76.0), respectively, among which the submucosal dissection time was 7.6 minutes (IQR, 5.2-10.4) and 14.8 minutes (IQR, 10.8-19.6), respectively. The operation time of MAG-ESD was shorter than that of C-ESD, especially the submucosal dissection time (P < .05). There was a lower incidence of adverse events associated with MAG-ESD (P < .05) when magnetic anchors were successfully placed and retrieved.
CONCLUSIONS: MAG-ESD is feasible, effective, safe, and simple for the treatment of large EGCs at different sites and has a high anchor success rate, which could shorten the operation time and reduce the adverse event rate.

暂无摘要。