OBJECTIVE: This work introduces the first assessment of CT calibration following the ESTRO\'s consensus guidelines and validating the HLUT through the irradiation of biological material.
METHODS: Two electron density phantoms were scanned with two CT scanners using two CT scan energies. The stopping power ratio (SPR) and mass density (MD) HLUTs for different CT scan energies were derived using Schneider\'s and ESTRO\'s methods. The comparison metric in this work is based on the Water-Equivalent Thickness (WET) difference between the treatment planning system and biological irradiation measurement. The SPR HLUTs were compared between the two calibration methods. To assess the accuracy of using MD HLUT for dose calculation in the treatment planning system, MD vs SPR HLUT was compared. Lastly, the feasibility of using a single SPR HLUT to replace two different energy CT scans was explored.
RESULTS: The results show a WET difference of less than 3.5% except for the result in the Bone region between Schneider\'s and ESTRO\'s methods. Comparing MD and SPR HLUT, the results from MD HLUT show less than a 3.5% difference except for the Bone region. However, the SPR HLUT shows a lower mean absolute percentage difference as compared to MD HLUT between the measured and calculated WET difference. Lastly, it is possible to use a single SPR HLUT for two different CT scan energies since both WET differences are within 3.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on calibrating an HLUT following the ESTRO\'s guidelines. While our result shows incremental improvement in range uncertainty using the ESTRO\'s guideline, the prescriptional approach of the guideline does promote harmonization of CT calibration protocols between different centres.

BACKGROUND: [18F]FDG imaging on total-body PET/CT (TB PET/CT) scanners, with improved sensitivity, offers new potentials for cancer diagnosis, staging, and radiation treatment planning. This consensus provides the protocols for clinical practices with a goal of paving the way for future studies with the total-body scanners in oncological [18F]FDG TB PET/CT imaging.
METHODS: The consensus was summarized based on the published guidelines and peer-reviewed articles of TB PET/CT in the literature, along with the opinions of the experts from major research institutions with a total of 40,000 cases performed on the TB PET/CT scanners.
RESULTS: This consensus describes the protocols for routine and dynamic [18F]FDG TB PET/CT scanning focusing on the reduction of imaging acquisition time and FDG injected activity, which may serve as a reference for research and clinic oncological PET/CT studies.
CONCLUSIONS: This expert consensus focuses on the reduction of acquisition time and FDG injected activity with a TB PET/CT scanner, which may improve the patient throughput or reduce the radiation exposure in daily clinical oncologic imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: • [18F]FDG-imaging protocols for oncological total-body PET/CT with reduced acquisition time or with different FDG activity levels have been summarized from multicenter studies. • Total-body PET/CT provides better image quality and improved diagnostic insights. • Clinical workflow and patient management have been improved.

BACKGROUND: Growing skull fracture (GSF) is a rare complication of pediatric head trauma and causes delayed onset neurological deficits and cranial defect. GSF usually develops following linear fracture with underlying dural tear resulting in herniation of the brain. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to avoid complications. However, there are no clear-cut guidelines for the early diagnosis of GSF. The present study was conducted to identify the criteria for the early diagnosis of GSF.
METHODS: From 2010 to 2015, all pediatric patients of head trauma with linear fracture were evaluated. Patients of age <5 years with cephalhematoma, bone diastasis of 4 mm or more with underlying brain contusion were subjected to contrast brain MRI to find out the dural tear and herniation of the brain matter. Patients with contrast MRI showing dural tear and herniation of the brain matter were considered high risk for the development of GSF and treated surgically within 1 month of trauma. Patients with contrast brain MRI not showing dural tear and herniation of the brain matter were regularly followed for any signs of GSF.
RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were evaluated, out of which 16 showed dural defects with herniation of the brain matter and were subjected to duraplasty. Four patients in which MRI did not show dural tear and herniation of the brain matter were regularly followed-up and have not shown any sign of GSF later on follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of GSF can be made based on the four criteria, i.e., (1) age <5 year with cephalhematoma, (2) bone diastasis 4 mm or more (3) underlying brain contusion (4) contrast MRI showing dural tear and herniation of the brain matter. Dural tear with herniation of the brain matter is the main etiopathogenic factor for the development of GSF. Early diagnosis and treatment of GSF can yield a good outcome.

暂无摘要。

The Dutch College of General Practitioners has revised the practice guideline \'Urolithiasis\'. In the acute phase, violent colic pain is treated with diclophenac or morphine. In the post-acute phase, imaging diagnostics are performed. Initially this is ultrasound examination and, ifindicated, an x-ray of the abdomen and at a later stage, a CT scan. The recommendation to consider the use oftamsulosin in the post acute phase is new. This alpha-1 blocking agent can enhance expulsion of the stone and contribute to the relief of pain.

To enhance the quality of treatment of patients with multiple injuries (blunt trauma), guidelines for the acute clinical management (trauma-algorithm) were implemented at our clinic in 1994. The impact of these guidelines was analysed, comparing two prospectively recorded collectives of polytraumatized patients 4/1988-12/1993 (A; n = 126) and 1/1994-6/1996 (B; n = 74). Nine specifically defined parameters were used to assess the therapeutic process of early clinical trauma management. All parameters showed an improvement after implementation of the algorithm (group B): (1) Complete radiological and sonographic basic diagnostics in 97% vs. 92% of patients; (2) time interval of 38 min vs. 55 min until cranial CT was done after severe head injury (GCS < 10); (3) reduction of delayed diagnosis of lesions to 5% vs. 24%; (4) duration of 16 min vs. 20 min until intubation; (5) period of 23 min to 30 min to pleural drainage; (6) duration of 18 min vs. 32 min until transfusion in shock; (7) period of 79 min vs. 98 min until emergency operation in shock; (8) duration of 95 min vs. 124 min until trepanation, and (9) operation rate within 24 h after admission to ICU in 3% vs. 12%. The lethality rates of each collective were assessed after subdivision in three groups (I-III) with middle (ISS: 18-24), high (ISS: 25-49) and extreme (ISS: 50-75) injury severity. In all groups of both collectives ISS values, age, initial loss of consciousness (GCS) and shock were comparable (except the higher injury severity of collective B in group I). In all groups a reduction of lethality could be shown for collective B: Group I, 0% vs. 20% (P < 0.05); group II, 8% vs. 24% (P < 0.05); and group III, 40% vs. 71%, not significant because of the small group in B (n = 5). The implementation of therapeutic management guidelines led to an improvement of both treatment processes and outcome. In order to regularly reassess validity and practicability of such guidelines as well as further enhance therapeutic quality, a continuous evaluation programme representing a quality management system should be inaugurated.