Toll-Like Receptor 8

Toll 样受体 8
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:创伤性软骨损伤是骨关节炎(OA)和肢体残疾的重要原因,Toll样受体(TLRs)介导的先天免疫应答已被证实在软骨损伤中起着至关重要的作用。在之前的研究中,通过建立兔膝关节冲击损伤动物模型,发现损伤关节软骨中TLR8分子的激活比其他TLRs更为明显,TLR8分子的变化可显著影响关节软骨损伤修复的进程。
    目的:验证mir-99a-5p如何调节TLR8受体介导的先天免疫应答来治疗创伤性软骨损伤。
    方法:重物撞击兔膝关节内侧髁造成内侧髁软骨损伤。通过病理和影像学分析,证明了创伤性软骨损伤动物模型的建立是否成功。通过病毒转染软骨细胞建立细胞模型,证明TLR8在影响软骨损伤的先天性免疫应答中的作用。通过转录组测序,TLR8,mir-99a-5p,被预测,并进行了基础实验以证明它们如何与先天免疫反应相互作用以影响软骨损伤。
    结果:TLR8是免疫系统的受体蛋白,在免疫细胞中广泛表达。在我们的研究中,我们发现TLR8表达定位于溶酶体和内体。Mir-99a-5p可以负调控TLR8激活PI3K-AKT份子通路,加重软骨毁伤。抑制TLR8的表达可有效降低关节软骨损伤的发生率。
    结论:根据本研究的结果,mir-99a-5p可能是预测创伤性软骨损伤的有效分子标志物,靶向TLR8是预防或早期治疗软骨损伤的新方法。
    BACKGROUND: Traumatic cartilage injury is an important cause of osteoarthritis (OA) and limb disability, and toll-like receptors (TLRs) mediated innate immune response has been confirmed to play a crucial role in cartilage injury. In the previous study, we found that the activation of TLR8 molecules in injured articular cartilage was more obvious than other TLRs by establishing an animal model of knee impact injury in rabbits, and the changes of TLR8 molecules could significantly affect the process of articular cartilage injury and repair.
    OBJECTIVE: To verify how mir-99a-5p regulates TLR8 receptor mediated innate immune response to treat traumatic cartilage injury.
    METHODS: The impact of a heavy object on the medial condyle of the rabbit\'s knee joint caused damage to the medial condylar cartilage. Through pathological and imaging analysis, it was demonstrated whether the establishment of an animal model of traumatic cartilage injury was successful. Establishing a cell model by virus transfection of chondrocytes to demonstrate the role of TLR8 in the innate immune response to impact cartilage injury. Through transcriptome sequencing, potential targets of TLR8, mir-99a-5p, were predicted, and basic experiments were conducted to demonstrate how they interact with innate immune responses to impact cartilage damage.
    RESULTS: TLR8 is a receptor protein of the immune system, which is widely expressed in immune cells. In our study, we found that TLR8 expression is localized in lysosomes and endosomes. Mir-99a-5p can negatively regulate TLR8 to activate PI3K-AKT molecular pathway and aggravate cartilage damage. Inhibiting TLR8 expression can effectively reduce the incidence of articular cartilage damage.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results from this study, mir-99a-5p may be an effective molecular marker for predicting traumatic cartilage injury and targeting TLR8 is a novel and promising approach for the prevention or early treatment of cartilage damage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:MHV370是人Toll样受体(TLR)7和8的双重拮抗剂,在体外和体内抑制细胞因子和干扰素刺激的基因,并在小鼠狼疮模型中证明了疗效。这项首次针对人类的研究旨在评估安全性,耐受性,单剂量和多剂量MHV370在健康成人中的药代动力学和药效学,以及食物消耗对单剂量MHV370的影响。
    方法:这是第一阶段,随机,安慰剂对照研究分三个部分进行。在A部分,参与者接受(3:1)单次递增剂量(SAD)1,3,10,20,40,80,160,320,640和1000mgMHV370或安慰剂.在B部分,参与者接受(3:1)多次递增剂量(MAD)25,50,100,200和400mgMHV370每日两次(b.i.d)或安慰剂,共14天.在C部分,参与者在禁食或进食条件下接受200mgMHV370的开放标签单剂量.安全,评价了药代动力学和药效学参数.
    结果:MHV370耐受性良好,研究中未观察到安全信号。在评估的剂量范围内没有发生剂量限制性不良事件。MHV370的血浆浓度随着剂量的增加而增加(SAD为3-1000mg,平均[SD]最大血浆浓度范围为0.97[0.48]至1670[861.0]ng/mL,对于MAD为25-400mgb.i.d.在第1天的29.5[7.98]至759[325.0]ng/mL)。食物的摄取对MHV370的药代动力学没有相干影响。药效学数据表明,时间和剂量依赖性地抑制了TLR7介导的CD69在B细胞上的表达(从SAD160mg和MAD50mgb.i.d.开始,在给药后24小时抑制为100%),并且在离体刺激后TLR8介导的TNF释放(从SAD320mg和MAD100mgb.i.d.开始,在给药后24小时抑制>90%)。
    结论:安全性,药代动力学和药效学数据支持MHV370在TLR7和TLR8过度激活导致的全身性自身免疫性疾病中的进一步发展.
    OBJECTIVE: MHV370, a dual antagonist of human Toll-like receptors (TLR) 7 and 8, suppresses cytokines and interferon-stimulated genes in vitro and in vivo, and  has demonstrated efficacy in murine models of lupus. This first-in-human study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple doses of MHV370 in healthy adults, as well as the effects of food consumption on a single dose of MHV370.
    METHODS: This was a phase 1, randomised, placebo-controlled study conducted in three parts. In part A, participants received (3:1) a single ascending dose (SAD) of 1, 3, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640 and 1000 mg MHV370 or placebo. In part B, participants received (3:1) multiple ascending doses (MAD) of 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg MHV370 twice daily (b.i.d) or placebo for 14 days. In part C, participants received an open-label single dose of 200 mg MHV370 under fasted or fed conditions. Safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated.
    RESULTS: MHV370 was well tolerated, and no safety signal was observed in the study. No dose-limiting adverse events occurred across the dose range evaluated. Plasma concentrations of MHV370 increased with dose (mean [SD] maximum plasma concentrations ranged from 0.97 [0.48] to 1670 [861.0] ng/mL for SAD of 3-1000 mg, 29.5 [7.98] to 759 [325.0] ng/mL for MAD of 25-400 mg b.i.d. on day 1). The intake of food did not have a relevant impact on the pharmacokinetics of MHV370. Pharmacodynamic data indicated time- and dose-dependent inhibition of TLR7-mediated CD69 expression on B cells (100% inhibition at 24 h post-dose starting from SAD 160 mg and MAD 50 mg b.i.d.) and TLR8-mediated TNF release after ex vivo stimulation (>90% inhibition at 24 h post-dose starting from SAD 320 mg and MAD 100 mg b.i.d.).
    CONCLUSIONS: The safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data support the further development of MHV370 in systemic autoimmune diseases driven by the overactivation of TLR7 and TLR8.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    E6742是一种双重toll样受体(TLR)7和TLR8拮抗剂,已经进行了安全性评估,耐受性,和E6742在健康志愿者中的药代动力学。在单次递增剂量(SAD)研究中,42名受试者在禁食状态下接受了10-800毫克的E6742,以及在进食状态下用于评估食物效果的100毫克队列。在一项多次递增剂量(MAD)研究中,18名受试者每天两次接受100-400mg的E6742,持续7天。在禁食条件下,各剂量组的E6742迅速吸收,中位tmax为1.50至2.50小时。并以2.37至14.4小时的中位数t½消除。多次口服后,在第7天达到稳定状态。在SAD研究中,观察到Cmax的剂量比例,AUC(0-t),和AUC(0-inf)值E6742高达800毫克,但这些值略小于10mg时的剂量比例。在MAD研究中,E6742的Cmax和AUC(0-12h)ss似乎在100和200mg之间几乎成比例增加,而这些参数在400mg时显示出超过剂量比例的增加。除了安全性和良好的耐受性,这项研究表明,在E6742治疗后的外周血中,细胞因子浓度以剂量依赖性方式受到抑制.目前正在进行针对系统性红斑狼疮患者的进一步临床研究。
    The first-in-human phase I study for E6742, a dual toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 and TLR8 antagonist, has been conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of E6742 in healthy volunteers. In a single ascending dose (SAD) study, 42 subjects received 10-800 mg of E6742 in the fasted state, as well as a 100-mg cohort in the fed state for evaluating the effect of food. In a multiple ascending dose (MAD) study, 18 subjects received 100-400 mg of E6742 twice daily for 7 days. E6742 was rapidly absorbed with a median tmax ranging from 1.50 to 2.50 hours across dose groups under the fasted condition, and eliminated with a median t½ ranging from 2.37 to 14.4 hours. After multiple oral doses, a steady state was reached by day 7. In the SAD study, dose proportionality was observed for Cmax , AUC(0-t) , and AUC(0-inf) values of E6742 up to 800 mg, but these values were slightly less than dose proportional at 10 mg. In the MAD study, the Cmax and AUC(0-12h)ss of E6742 appeared to be almost dose proportionally increased between 100 and 200 mg, while these parameters showed more than a dose proportional increase at 400 mg. In addition to safety and good tolerability, this study demonstrated cytokine concentrations in cultured peripheral blood in response to E6742 were suppressed in a dose-dependent manner. Further clinical studies targeting systemic lupus erythematosus patients are currently underway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于先天性肺畸形(CLM)的差异表达基因(DEGs)和选择性剪接(AS)景观知之甚少。我们应用了基于参考的RNA测序(RNA-seq)文库的测序读数组装,以从最常见的CLM类型中识别病变和正常肺组织中的DEG和AS景观。包括先天性肺气道畸形-Ⅰ(CPAM-Ⅰ),CPAM-Ⅱ,叶内封存(ILS),和ILS与CPAM(ILS-CPAM)。我们分析了AS事件(ASEs)的表达谱和相关生物学功能。我们进一步构建了RNA结合蛋白(RBP)基因与相应的ASE共表达调控网络,以探索调控网络中的相关通路。在四种类型的CLM中确定了十个DEG,包括八个上调基因和两个下调基因。此外,检测到16个差分ASE,包括基因MACF1、RFX2和FBXL4。基因本体论(GO)富集主要在胚胎视觉畸形和凋亡过程中,KEGG通路主要富集在PI3K/AKT信号通路中。我们还在CPAM-I中的1979年DEG中检测到13个差异表达的RBP,其中MACF1基因中的ASEs与RBP基因TLR8和PTRH1密切相关。此外,我们证实PTRH1,NSUN7和DZIP1L的表达水平大量增加,TLR8,MEF2A的表达水平,与对照组相比,CPAM-I肺组织中的NIPBL降低。建议不同类型的CLM中的ASEs与正常对照明显不同,CPAM-I畸形组织中发生的ASEs差异与其他类型有很大不同,这证明了CLMs的复杂发病机制,并为未来研究阐明CLMs的发展机制提供了基础。
    Little is known about differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and alternative splicing (AS) landscapes in congenital lung malformations (CLMs). We applied reference-based assembly of sequencing reads from RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) libraries to identify DEGs and AS landscapes in the lesions and normal lung tissue from the most common types of CLMs, including congenital pulmonary airway malformation-Ⅰ (CPAM-Ⅰ), CPAM-Ⅱ, intralobar sequestration (ILS), and ILS with CPAM (ILS-CPAM). We analyzed the expression profiles and related biological functions of AS events (ASEs). We further constructed a co-expression regulatory network between RNA binding protein (RBP) genes and corresponding ASEs to explore the related pathways in the regulated network. Ten DEGs were identified in the four types of CLMs, including eight upregulated genes and two downregulated genes. Additionally, 16 differential ASEs were detected, including the genes MACF1, RFX2, and FBXL4. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment was mainly observed in embryonic visual malformation and apoptotic process, and the KEGG pathway mainly enriched in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. We also detected 13 differentially expressed RBPs among 1979 DEGs in CPAM-I, in which ASEs in the MACF1 gene and RBP genes TLR8 and PTRH1 were closely associated. Moreover, we confirmed that the expression levels of PTRH1, NSUN7, and DZIP1L abundantly increased and the expression levels of TLR8, MEF2A, and NIPBL decreased in the CPAM-I lung tissue compared with the controls. It is suggested that ASEs in different types of CLMs is prominently different from normal controls, and ASEs differences occurring in CPAM-I malformation tissue are dramatically different from other types, which demonstrates the complex pathogenesis of CLMs and provides foundations for future studies to elucidate the mechanisms of developing CLMs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    这项研究评估了安全性,耐受性,药代动力学(PK),以及单次和多次口服剂量的enpatoran(以前称为M5049)的药效学(PD),一种新的toll样受体(TLR)7和8双重拮抗剂,以及食物对健康参与者单剂量的影响。在这个第一阶段,随机(3:1),双盲,安慰剂对照研究,96名参与者接受了单次和多次递增口服剂量的enpatoran。单剂量队列的参与者使用前哨给药策略接受一剂enpatoran(1、3、9、25、50、100或200mg)或安慰剂。多剂量组接受enpatoran(每天一次9、25或200mg,或每天两次25或50mg)或安慰剂14天。安全,耐受性,PK,和PD(离体刺激的细胞因子分泌)在两个部分中进行评估。食物的效果是在开放标签中评估的,25mg单剂量队列中的单向交叉研究。单次和多次口服剂量高达200mg的enpatoran具有良好的耐受性,并且在禁食或进食条件下没有观察到明显的剂量限制性不良事件或安全性信号。PK参数在评估的剂量范围内呈线性和剂量成正比,在25mg的食物中观察到轻微的吸收延迟和较低的峰浓度。观察到离体刺激的白介素6分泌的暴露依赖性抑制,最大抑制在200毫克。Enpatoran在高达200mg的剂量下耐受性良好。进一步调查enpatoran是保证作为一个潜在的治疗由TLR7/8过度激活驱动的疾病,如系统性红斑狼疮和COVID-19肺炎。
    This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single and multiple oral doses of enpatoran (formerly named M5049), a new toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 and 8 dual antagonist, and the effect of food on a single dose in healthy participants. In this single phase 1, randomized (3:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 96 participants received single and multiple ascending oral doses of enpatoran. Participants in single-dose cohorts received one dose of enpatoran (1, 3, 9, 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg) or placebo using a sentinel dosing strategy. Multiple-dose cohorts received enpatoran (9, 25, or 200 mg once daily, or 25 or 50 mg twice daily) or placebo for 14 days. Safety, tolerability, PK, and PD (ex vivo-stimulated cytokine secretion) were assessed in both parts. The effect of food was assessed in an open-label, one-way crossover study in the 25 mg single-dose cohort. Single- and multiple-oral doses of enpatoran up to 200 mg were well tolerated and no significant dose-limiting adverse events or safety signals were observed under fasting or fed conditions. PK parameters were linear and dose-proportional across the dose range evaluated, with a slightly delayed absorption and lower peak concentration observed at 25 mg with food. Exposure-dependent inhibition of ex vivo-stimulated interleukin-6 secretion was observed, with maximum inhibition at 200 mg. Enpatoran was well tolerated at doses up to 200 mg. Further investigation of enpatoran is warranted as a potential treatment for diseases driven by TLR7/8 overactivation, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and COVID-19 pneumonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    为了减轻COVID-19的影响,迫切需要一种疫苗。BBV152是一种全病毒体灭活的SARS-CoV-2疫苗,其配制有吸附到明矾(Algel-IMDG)或明矾(Algel)上的Toll样受体7/8激动剂分子。
    我们做了双盲,多中心,随机化,在印度的11家医院进行对照1期试验,以评估BBV152的安全性和免疫原性。18-55岁的健康成年人被研究者认为是健康的。排除SARS-CoV-2核酸和/或血清学测试阳性的个体。参与者被随机分配接受三种疫苗制剂中的一种(3μg与Algel-IMDG,6μg与Algel-IMDG,或6μg与Algel)或仅Algel对照疫苗组。使用网络响应平台进行分组随机化。参与者和研究者被掩盖到治疗组分配。在第0天(随机化当天)和第14天施用两个肌内剂量的疫苗。主要结果为疫苗接种后2小时和7天以及整个研究期间的局部和全身反应原性事件。包括严重不良事件。次要结果是基于野生型病毒中和的血清转化(从基线增加至少4倍)。通过细胞内染色和ELISpot评估细胞介导的应答。该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04471519)注册。
    在2020年7月13日至30日之间,对827名参与者进行了筛查,其中375人被录取。在注册的参与者中,每个100人被随机分配到三个疫苗组,75人被随机分配到对照组(仅Algel)。在两次剂量之后,Algel-IMDG组3μg患者中有17名(17%;95%CI10·5-26·1)参与者报告了局部和全身不良反应,Algel-IMDG组6μg中21(21%;13·8-30·5),Algel组6μg中14(14%;8·1-22·7),仅Algel组中有10个(10%;6·9-23·6)。最常见的不良事件是注射部位疼痛(375例参与者中有17例[5%])。头痛(13[3%]),疲劳(11[3%]),发烧(九[2%]),恶心或呕吐(七[2%])。所有征求的不良事件均为轻度(62个中的43个[69%])或中度(19个[31%]),且在首次给药后更为频繁。在6μg的Algel组中报告了一例病毒性肺炎的严重不良事件,与疫苗无关。使用Algel-IMDG的3μg血清转化率(%)分别为87·9、91·9和82·8,6μg与Algel-IMDG,和6μg与Algel组,分别。在来自两个Algel-IMDG组的16名参与者的子集中检测到CD4+和CD8+T细胞应答。
    BBV152导致可耐受的安全性结果和增强的免疫反应。选择两种Algel-IMDG制剂用于2期免疫原性试验。进一步的疗效试验是必要的。
    巴拉特生物技术国际。
    To mitigate the effects of COVID-19, a vaccine is urgently needed. BBV152 is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine formulated with a toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule adsorbed to alum (Algel-IMDG) or alum (Algel).
    We did a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 1 trial to assess the safety and immunogenicity of BBV152 at 11 hospitals across India. Healthy adults aged 18-55 years who were deemed healthy by the investigator were eligible. Individuals with positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and/or serology tests were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either one of three vaccine formulations (3 μg with Algel-IMDG, 6 μg with Algel-IMDG, or 6 μg with Algel) or an Algel only control vaccine group. Block randomisation was done with a web response platform. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment group allocation. Two intramuscular doses of vaccines were administered on day 0 (the day of randomisation) and day 14. Primary outcomes were solicited local and systemic reactogenicity events at 2 h and 7 days after vaccination and throughout the full study duration, including serious adverse events. Secondary outcome was seroconversion (at least four-fold increase from baseline) based on wild-type virus neutralisation. Cell-mediated responses were evaluated by intracellular staining and ELISpot. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04471519).
    Between July 13 and 30, 2020, 827 participants were screened, of whom 375 were enrolled. Among the enrolled participants, 100 each were randomly assigned to the three vaccine groups, and 75 were randomly assigned to the control group (Algel only). After both doses, solicited local and systemic adverse reactions were reported by 17 (17%; 95% CI 10·5-26·1) participants in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group, 21 (21%; 13·8-30·5) in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group, 14 (14%; 8·1-22·7) in the 6 μg with Algel group, and ten (10%; 6·9-23·6) in the Algel-only group. The most common solicited adverse events were injection site pain (17 [5%] of 375 participants), headache (13 [3%]), fatigue (11 [3%]), fever (nine [2%]), and nausea or vomiting (seven [2%]). All solicited adverse events were mild (43 [69%] of 62) or moderate (19 [31%]) and were more frequent after the first dose. One serious adverse event of viral pneumonitis was reported in the 6 μg with Algel group, unrelated to the vaccine. Seroconversion rates (%) were 87·9, 91·9, and 82·8 in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG, 6 μg with Algel-IMDG, and 6 μg with Algel groups, respectively. CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were detected in a subset of 16 participants from both Algel-IMDG groups.
    BBV152 led to tolerable safety outcomes and enhanced immune responses. Both Algel-IMDG formulations were selected for phase 2 immunogenicity trials. Further efficacy trials are warranted.
    Bharat Biotech International.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    瑞喹莫特(R848)和莫托莫德(VTX-2337)是咪喹莫特的第二代实验衍生物,一种具有免疫刺激特性的咪唑喹啉,20多年前最初被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于局部治疗光化性角化病和生殖器疣。瑞喹莫德和motolimod都作为Toll样受体7(TLR7)和/或TLR8的激动剂起作用,迄今向抗原呈递细胞(APC)递送佐剂样信号。根据这样的活动,这些化合物目前被研究作为治疗各种恶性肿瘤的免疫刺激剂,特别是与基于肽的组合,基于树突状细胞,基于癌细胞裂解物,或基于DNA的疫苗。这里,我们总结了最近收集到的支持瑞喹莫特和motolimod以及其他TLR7/TLR8激动剂作为抗癌药物发展的临床前和临床证据.
    Resiquimod (R848) and motolimod (VTX-2337) are second-generation experimental derivatives of imiquimod, an imidazoquinoline with immunostimulatory properties originally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the topical treatment of actinic keratosis and genital warts more than 20 years ago. Both resiquimod and motolimod operate as agonists of Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) and/or TLR8, in thus far delivering adjuvant-like signals to antigen-presenting cells (APCs). In line with such an activity, these compounds are currently investigated as immunostimulatory agents for the treatment of various malignancies, especially in combination with peptide-based, dendritic cell-based, cancer cell lysate-based, or DNA-based vaccines. Here, we summarize preclinical and clinical evidence recently collected to support the development of resiquimod and motolimod and other TLR7/TLR8 agonists as anticancer agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a pivotal component of the innate immune system that seem to have a role in the pathogenesis of psychosis. The purpose of this work was to compare the expression and functionality of 9 TLRs in three peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (monocytes, B cells, and T cells) between 33 drug-naïve first-episode psychosis (FEP) individuals and 26 healthy volunteers, at baseline and after 3-month of antipsychotic treatment. The expression of TLRs 1-9 were assessed by flow cytometry. For the assessment of the TLR functionality, cells collected in sodium heparin tubes were polyclonally stimulated for 18 h, with different agonists for human TLR1-9. The results of our study highlight the role that TLR5 and TLR8 might play in the pathophysiology of psychosis. We found a lower expression of these receptors in FEP individuals, regarding healthy volunteers at baseline and after 3-month of treatment on the three PBMCs subsets. Most TLRs showed a lower functionality (especially reduced intracellular levels of TNF-α) in patients than in healthy volunteers. These results, together with previous evidence, suggest that individuals with psychosis might show a pattern of TLR expression that differs from that of healthy volunteers, which could vary according to the intensity of immune/inflammatory response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    Selgantolimod is a novel oral, selective Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) agonist in development for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). TLR8 is an endosomal innate immune receptor and a target for treatment of viral infections. This first-in-human study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of selgantolimod in healthy volunteers.
    Of 71 subjects enrolled, 59 received a single dose of selgantolimod (0.5, 1.5, 3 or 5 mg) or placebo, and 12 were evaluated for food effect. Safety, PK and PD activity by induction of cytokines, chemokines and acute phase proteins were assessed. PK/PD analyses were conducted.
    Single doses of 0.5-5 mg were generally safe. No serious adverse events (AEs) or AEs leading to discontinuation were reported, and most were Grade 1 in severity. Selgantolimod displayed rapid absorption and dose-proportional PK and PD activity. Food had minimal effect on PK but resulted in diminished PD activity. In PK/PD analyses, near-saturation of induction for most evaluated biomarkers occurred at the 5-mg dose.
    Single doses of up to 5 mg selgantolimod were safe and induced dose-dependent PD responses. These data support evaluation of selgantolimod in combination with other agents in future clinical studies of CHB. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registration: ACTRN12616001646437.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号