Time delays

时间延迟
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:大多数肺癌诊断为晚期;其原因是可变且不清楚的。
    方法:对肺癌患者进行前瞻性评估,以量化各种时间表并确定延误的原因。时间线定义为症状发作之间的时间间隔,第一次看医生,第一次专家访问,诊断和治疗日期。
    结果:共纳入410例患者,大多数患有晚期疾病。首次就诊的中位时间为30天(四分位距[IQR]20-90),50天(IQR20-110)转诊到我们的中心,23天(IQR14-33)到达诊断,和24天(IQR14.5-34)开始治疗。抗结核治疗的管理进一步延迟转诊至专科中心。治疗延误与表现状况有关,疾病阶段和治疗类型。在多变量分析中,教育和组织学影响诊断延迟和治疗延迟。与化疗相比,接受靶向治疗的患者的治疗延迟较少。各种时间延迟并不影响总生存期。
    结论:教育状况差和抗结核治疗不当是诊断延误时间较长的主要因素。建立疾病意识和高度的临床怀疑对于克服肺癌护理中的这些缺陷至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: The majority of lung cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage; the reasons for which are variable and unclear.
    METHODS: Lung cancer patients were evaluated prospectively to quantify various timelines and establish reasons for delays. Timelines were defined as time intervals between symptom onset, first physician visit, first specialist visit, date of diagnosis and treatment.
    RESULTS: A total 410 patients were included, majority having advanced disease. The median period for a first visit to a physician was 30 days (interquartile range [IQR] 20-90), 50 days (IQR 20-110) for referral to our centre, 23 days (IQR 14-33) to reach diagnosis, and 24 days (IQR 14.5-34) to initiate treatment. Administration ofanti-tuberculosis treatment further delayed referral to specialist centre. Treatment delays were related to performance status, disease stage and treatment type. On multivariate analysis, education and histology affected diagnosis delay and treatment delay. Treatment delay was less in those who received targeted therapy compared to chemotherapy. Various time delays did not affect the overall survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: Poor education status and inappropriate anti-tubercular treatment were primary factors associated with longer diagnostic delays. Creating disease awareness and high clinical suspicion are essential to overcome these lacunae in lung cancer care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    In the high-prevalence setting of Pakistan, screening, diagnosis and treatment services for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients are commonly offered in specialized facilities. We aimed to describe the cascade of care in a Médecins Sans Frontières primary health care clinic offering CHC care in an informal settlement in Karachi, Pakistan.
    This was a retrospective cohort analysis using routinely collected data. Three different screening algorithms were assessed among patients with one or more CHC risk factors.
    Among the 87 348 patients attending the outpatient clinic, 5003 (6%) presented with one or more risk factors. Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) positivity was 38% overall. Approximately 60% of the CHC patients across all risk categories were in the early stage of the disease, with an aspartate aminotransferase:platelet ratio index score <1. The sequential delays in the cascade differed between the three groups, with the interval between screening and treatment initiation being the shortest in the cohort tested with GeneXpert onsite.
    Delays between screening and treatment can be reduced by putting in place more patient-centric testing algorithms. New strategies, to better identify and treat the hidden at-risk populations, should be developed and implemented.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号