Thyroid Carcinoma, Anaplastic

甲状腺癌,间变性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)具有高度侵袭性,容易发生远处转移(DM),预后很差.本研究旨在构建ATC合并DM患者的准确生存预测模型,为综合评估和治疗规划提供参考。
    我们从SEER数据库中提取了2004年至2019年间诊断为DM的ATC患者的数据,以7:3的比例将它们随机分为训练集和验证集。对训练集依次进行单变量和多变量Cox回归分析,以确定总生存期(OS)的独立预后因素,并构建3个月的列线图。6个月,根据所有确定的独立预后因素,ATC糖尿病患者的8个月OS。接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线分析,决策曲线分析(DCA)曲线分析,和校准曲线分别绘制在训练集和验证集上,以证明模型的性能。此外,根据风险评分将患者分为高危组和低危组,和Kaplan-Meier(KM)生存曲线用于说明两组之间的生存差异。
    本研究共纳入322例患者。单变量和多变量Cox回归分析确定了ATCDM患者OS的5个独立预后因素:手术,肿瘤大小,年龄,化疗,和放射治疗。3个月的列线图,6个月,并根据这些因素建立了8个月的OS。训练集AUC值(3个月AUC:0.767,6个月AUC:0.789,8个月AUC:0.795)和验证集AUC值(3个月AUC:0.753,6个月AUC:0.798,8个月AUC:0.806)以及校准曲线展示了模型的优异适用性和准确性。此外,DCA曲线表明该模型具有显著的临床净获益.KM曲线还证实了该模型对患者OS的出色分层能力。
    本研究中开发的列线图准确预测ATCDM患者的OS。它可以帮助临床医生为这些患者制定适当的治疗策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is highly invasive, prone to distant metastasis (DM), and has a very poor prognosis. This study aims to construct an accurate survival prediction model for ATC patients with DM, providing reference for comprehensive assessment and treatment planning.
    UNASSIGNED: We extracted data of ATC patients with DM diagnosed between 2004 and 2019 from the SEER database, randomly dividing them into a training set and a validation set in a ratio of 7:3. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were sequentially performed on the training set to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and construct nomograms for 3-month, 6-month, and 8-month OS for ATC patients with DM based on all identified independent prognostic factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA) curve analysis, and calibration curves were separately plotted on the training and validation sets to demonstrate the model\'s performance. Furthermore, patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on their risk scores, and the Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were used to illustrate the survival differences between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 322 patients were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified five independent prognostic factors for OS in ATC patients with DM: surgery, tumor size, age, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Nomograms for 3-month, 6-month, and 8-month OS were established based on these factors. The training set AUC values (3-month AUC: 0.767, 6-month AUC: 0.789, 8-month AUC: 0.795) and validation set AUC values (3-month AUC: 0.753, 6-month AUC: 0.798, 8-month AUC: 0.806) as well as the calibration curves demonstrated excellent applicability and accuracy of the model. Additionally, the DCA curves indicated substantial clinical net benefit of the model. The KM curves also confirmed the model\'s excellent stratification ability for patient OS.
    UNASSIGNED: The nomogram developed in this study accurately predicts OS for ATC patients with DM. It can assist clinicians in formulating appropriate treatment strategies for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:原发性甲状腺鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和未分化甲状腺癌(ATC)显示出明显的临床和组织学重叠。它们的生物学行为非常相似,以至于第五届WHO将SCC更新为ATC的形态模式,而不是单独的实体。然而,确定它们为相同组织学类型的分子基因组证据是有限的。我们旨在从分子分型的角度探讨它们是否属于同一分类。
    方法:一个队列纳入了15个SCCs和15个ATC。进行全外显子组测序(WES)和RNA测序以分析分子遗传和基因表达谱。
    结果:显著差异突变基因为BRAF,DPCR1,PCYOX1L,BRSK2,NRG1,PRR14L,TET1,VAMP4表明突变水平的差异,以及高频突变基因的差异,SCC的肿瘤突变负荷远低于ATC。SCC中的突变共现和相互排斥的频率低于ATC。筛选了2047个差异表达基因,表明基因表达差异极强。在主成分分析中,ATC和SCC可以明显地聚集在一起,分别,同时,它们可以明确区分。无监督聚类分析验证了它们确实可以彼此清楚地分离,这表明它们可能是两个不同的实体。
    结论:尽管SCC被归类为ATC的一种形态模式,但仍存在争议。我们发现SCC表现出与ATC不同的分子遗传特征。尽管第五世界卫生组织将它们分类在一起,这项研究可能为下一版WHO分类提供强有力的分子遗传学证据,该分类可能允许分离甲状腺SCC和ATC.
    BACKGROUND: Primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the thyroid and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) show significant clinical and histologic overlap. Their biological behaviors are so similar that the fifth WHO updates SCC as a morphologic pattern of ATC rather than a separate entity. However, molecular genomic evidence that determines them as the same histologic type is limited. We aimed to explore whether they belong to the same classification from a molecular-typing perspective.
    METHODS: A cohort enrolled 15 SCCs and 15 ATCs was collected. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-sequencing were performed to analyze molecular genetic and gene-expression profiles.
    RESULTS: Significantly differential-mutant genes were BRAF, DPCR1, PCYOX1L, BRSK2, NRG1, PRR14L, TET1, VAMP4 suggesting differences in mutation level, as well as differences in high-frequency mutated genes, and SCC had a much lower tumor mutation burden than ATC. Mutational co-occurrence and mutual exclusion were less frequent in SCC than in ATC. 2047 differential-express genes were screened, indicating differences in gene expression were extremely strong. In principal component analysis, ATC and SCC could be notably clustered together, respectively, meanwhile they could be explicitly distinguished. Unsupervised clustering analysis validated they can indeed be clearly separated from each other which demonstrated that they may be two distinctive entities.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is controversial yet SCC is classified as a morphologic pattern of ATC. We revealed that SCC exhibited molecular genetic characteristics distinct from ATC. Although the fifth WHO categorizes them together, this study may provide strong molecular genetic evidence for the next edition of WHO classification that may allow for the separation of thyroid SCC from ATC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)是最具侵袭性的甲状腺癌。虽然ATC很少见,但它占甲状腺癌相关死亡人数的比例过高。在这里,我们在斑马鱼幼虫中开发了ATC异种移植模型,我们可以在体内研究肿瘤发生和治疗反应。使用小鼠(T4888M)和人(C643)衍生的荧光标记的ATC细胞系,我们显示这些细胞系显示不同的移植率,质量体积,扩散,细胞死亡,血管生成潜力和中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞募集和浸润。接下来,使用PIP-FUCCI报告基因跟踪体内增殖,我们观察到细胞处于细胞周期的每个阶段。此外,我们进行了超过48小时的长期非侵入性活体显微镜检查,以了解肿瘤微环境中单细胞水平的细胞动力学.最后,我们测试了两种药物治疗,AZD2014和dabrafenib和trametinib的联合治疗表明我们的模型可用作ATC新治疗化合物的有效筛选平台。总之,我们表明斑马鱼异种移植是研究甲状腺癌发生和肿瘤微环境的一个很好的模型,同时也是体内测试新疗法的合适模型。
    Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is of the most aggressive thyroid cancer. While ATC is rare, it accounts for a disproportionately high number of thyroid cancer-related deaths. Here, we developed an ATC xenotransplant model in zebrafish larvae, where we can study tumorigenesis and therapeutic response in vivo. Using both mouse (T4888M) and human (C643)-derived fluorescently labeled ATC cell lines, we show these cell lines display different engraftment rates, mass volume, proliferation, cell death, angiogenic potential, and neutrophil and macrophage recruitment and infiltration. Next, using a PIP-FUCCI reporter to track proliferation in vivo, we observed cells in each phase of the cell cycle. Additionally, we performed long-term non-invasive intravital microscopy over 48 h to understand cellular dynamics in the tumor microenvironment at the single-cell level. Lastly, we tested two drug treatments, AZD2014 and a combination therapy of dabrafenib and trametinib, to show our model could be used as an effective screening platform for new therapeutic compounds for ATC. Altogether, we show that zebrafish xenotransplants make a great model to study thyroid carcinogenesis and the tumor microenvironment, while also being a suitable model to test new therapeutics in vivo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于广泛的组织病理学特征和罕见的疾病,低分化甲状腺癌(PDTC)和间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)之间的临床病理边界尚不清楚。除此之外,死亡率最高,治疗方式不规范,PDTC/ATC人群没有进行全面的描述,并与组织学特征的程度进行比较,治疗反应,预后因素,和死亡归因分析。
    从监测中确定了2000年至2018年的4,947名PDTC/ATC患者。流行病学,和结束结果(SEER)数据库。应用Kaplan-Meier存活曲线估计和Cox比例风险回归。
    总的来说,PDTC的5年和10年DSS分别为71.9%和68.0%,分别,而5年和10年OS分别为59.3%和51.2%,分别。ATC患者的中位生存时间为3个月,1年OS为26.9%,1年DSS为31.2%。在后续期间,68.1%的PDTC/ATC队列死亡,其中51.6%归因于甲状腺恶性肿瘤,16.5%归因于非甲状腺原因。前三个常见的非甲状腺死亡原因是其他癌症,下呼吸系统疾病,还有心脏病.甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的组织学特征是PDTC患者的主要病理类型(51.7%),而76.7%的ATC患者病理特征为无法识别。在ATC病例中发现的肉瘤组织学特征遭受最高的总死亡率(与PTC,HR=2.61,95%CI1.68-4.06,P<0.001)。年龄较大的无法识别的组织学特征,更先进的AJCCN1b,AJCCM1和SEER阶段,肿瘤大小大于5厘米,和更多的侵袭性肿瘤扩展是独立的不良预后预测因子。
    PDTC/ATC队列的人群分析为更好地理解PDTC和ATC病例之间的差异以及临床实践和进一步研究的指导提供了可靠的支持。
    UNASSIGNED: The clinic-pathological boundary between poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is unclear due to a wide spectrum of histopathological features and the rarity of the disease. In addition to that, with the highest mortality rate and non-standard treatment modality, the PDTC/ATC population has not been subjected to comprehensive description and comparison with the extent of histological characteristics, therapeutic response, prognostic factors, and death attribution analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 4,947 PDTC/ATC patients from 2000 to 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimation and Cox proportional hazard regression were applied.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, the 5- and 10-year DSS for PDTC were 71.9% and 68.0%, respectively, whereas the 5- and 10-year OS are 59.3% and 51.2%, respectively. The median survival time for ATC patients was 3 months with 1-year OS being 26.9% and 1-year DSS being 31.2%. During the follow-up period, 68.1% of the PDTC/ATC cohort were dead, 51.6% of which were attributed to thyroid malignancies and 16.5% to non-thyroid causes. The top three common non-thyroid causes of death were miscellaneous cancers, lower respiratory system disease, and heart disease. The histological feature of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) was the leading pathological category for PDTC patients (51.7%), whereas 76.7% of ATC patients\' pathological feature was characterized as unidentifiable. Sarcoma histological characteristics found in ATC cases suffer the highest overall mortality (vs. PTC, HR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.68-4.06, P < 0.001). Older age unidentifiable histology feature, more advanced AJCC N1b, AJCC M1, and SEER stage, tumor size larger than 5 cm, and more invasive tumor extension were independent bad outcome predictors.
    UNASSIGNED: The populational analysis of the PDTC/ATC cohort has provided reliable support for better understanding of the difference between PDTC and ATC cases and the guidance of clinical practice and further studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)是一种罕见的侵袭性肿瘤。我们仍然缺乏有效的治疗选择,所以存活率仍然很低。这里,我们旨在评估乐伐替尼和派博利珠单抗联合作为ATC系统一线治疗的活性.
    方法:在回顾性分析中,在ATC患者的机构队列中,我们调查了lenvatinib(起始剂量为每日14~24mg)和pembrolizumab(每3周200mg)作为一线治疗的活性和耐受性.
    结果:5例转移性ATC患者接受了lenvatinib和pembrolizumab作为全身一线治疗。中位无进展生存期为4.7(范围0.8-5.9)个月,中位总生存期为6.3个月(范围0.8-未达到).在第一次随访时,一名患者有部分反应,三名患者病情稳定,1例患者由于伴随急性感染性甲状腺炎对评估的干扰而无法正式评估.然后,该患者稳定了一年以上,并且在数据截止时仍在接受治疗,没有疾病进展。进一步的分析显示缺乏DNA错配修复,高CD8+淋巴细胞浸润,这个病人的巨噬细胞浸润低。在其他病人中,两个人在药物不良反应和治疗降级后病情进展,两人在第一次演出后死亡。对于所有患者来说,PD-L1联合阳性评分为12%~100%.
    结论:lenvatinib和pembrolizumab的组合在治疗初期的ATC患者中是有效的,并且具有中等的耐受性,偶尔有长期的反应。然而,我们无法确认之前报道的这种联合治疗在预处理患者中的异常缓解.
    BACKGROUND: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare and aggressive neoplasm. We still lack effective treatment options, so survival rates remain very low. Here, we aimed to evaluate the activity of the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab as systemic first-line therapy in ATC.
    METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we investigated the activity and tolerability of combined lenvatinib (starting dose 14 to 24 mg daily) and pembrolizumab (200 mg every three weeks) as first-line therapy in an institutional cohort of ATC patients.
    RESULTS: Five patients with metastatic ATC received lenvatinib and pembrolizumab as systemic first-line therapy. The median progression-free survival was 4.7 (range 0.8-5.9) months, and the median overall survival was 6.3 (range 0.8-not reached) months. At the first follow-up, one patient had partial response, three patients had stable disease, and one patient was formally not evaluable due to interference of assessment by concomitant acute infectious thyroiditis. This patient was then stable for more than one year and was still on therapy at the data cutoff without disease progression. Further analyses revealed deficient DNA mismatch repair, high CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration, and low macrophage infiltration in this patient. Of the other patients, two had progressive disease after adverse drug reactions and therapy de-escalation, and two died after the first staging. For all patients, the PD-L1 combined positive score ranged from 12 to 100%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab was effective and moderately tolerated in treatment-naïve ATC patients with occasional long-lasting response. However, we could not confirm the exceptional responses for this combination therapy reported before in pretreated patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    背景:在乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)和间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)中经常发现BRAFV600的驱动突变,其中BRAF抑制剂已显示出临床有效性。这项日本2期研究评估了BRAF抑制剂的疗效和安全性,恩科拉非尼,结合MEK抑制剂,比米替尼,在BRAFV600突变甲状腺癌患者中。
    方法:第二阶段,开放标签,在10个机构进行的非对照研究针对BRAFV600突变的局部晚期或远处转移性甲状腺癌患者,这些患者不适合治愈性治疗,对≥1个先前的血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR)靶向方案变得难治性/不耐受或被认为不适合那些。主要终点是集中评估客观缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括反应持续时间(DOR),无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS),和安全。
    结果:我们纳入了22例BRAFV600E突变甲状腺癌患者:17例分化型甲状腺癌(DTC),5例ATC。在数据截止时(2022年10月26日),中位随访时间为11.5(范围,3.4-19.0)个月。集中评估的ORR的主要终点为54.5%(95%置信区间[CI],32.2-75.6;12例患者部分缓解,10例疾病稳定)。DTC和ATC患者的ORR分别为47.1%(17个中的8个)和80.0%(5个中的4个),分别。通过中央评估和OS的DOR和PFS的中位数在总体中未达到,DTC子组,或ATC子组。12个月时,持续反应率为90.9%,PFS和OS率为78.8%,和81.8%,分别。所有患者出现≥1次不良事件(AEs):6例患者出现3级AEs(27.3%)。没有患者出现4-5级AE。最常见的3级AE是脂肪酶升高(4例患者[18.2%])。通过适当的监测和剂量调整,这些毒性大多是可以控制的。
    结论:恩科拉非尼联合比尼美替尼治疗符合主要终点标准,并显示出BRAFV600E突变甲状腺癌患者的临床获益,无论其组织学类型如何,如DTC或ATC,没有发现新的安全问题。因此,恩科非尼联合比尼美替尼可能是BRAFV600突变甲状腺癌的新治疗选择。
    Background: Driver mutations at BRAF V600 are frequently identified in papillary thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), in which BRAF inhibitors have shown clinical effectiveness. This Japanese phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, combined with an MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, in patients with BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted at 10 institutions targeted patients with BRAF V600-mutated locally advanced or distant metastatic thyroid cancer not amenable to curative treatment who became refractory/intolerant to ≥1 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted regimen(s) or were considered ineligible for those. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We enrolled 22 patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer: 17 had differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and 5 had ATC. At data cutoff (October 26, 2022), the median follow-up was 11.5 (range = 3.4-19.0) months. The primary endpoint of centrally assessed ORR was 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.2-75.6; partial response in 12 patients and stable disease in 10). The ORRs in patients with DTC and ATC were 47.1% (8 of 17) and 80.0% (4 of 5), respectively. The medians for DOR and PFS by central assessment and for OS were not reached in the overall population, the DTC subgroup, or the ATC subgroup. At 12 months, the rate of ongoing response was 90.9%, and the PFS and OS rates were 78.8% and 81.8%, respectively. All patients developed ≥1 adverse events (AEs): grade 3 AEs in 6 patients (27.3%). No patients developed grade 4-5 AEs. The most common grade 3 AE was lipase increased (4 patients [18.2%]). Those toxicities were mostly manageable with appropriate monitoring and dose adjustment. Conclusions: Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib met the primary endpoint criteria and demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer regardless of its histological type, such as DTC or ATC, with no new safety concerns identified. Encorafenib plus binimetinib could thus be a new treatment option for BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Clinical Trial Registration number: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT2011200018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们分析了基因检测的结果,以研究日本晚期甲状腺癌的突变频率。纳入了不可切除或转移性甲状腺癌的患者(n=96)进行回顾性图表回顾。基因组检测结果,在2020年5月至2023年4月期间进行了分析。患者的中位年龄为73.5岁(范围,17-88);59是女性,39人是男人。总的来说,17例患者患有甲状腺未分化癌(ATC),68例甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC),7人患有滤泡性甲状腺癌,6例甲状腺低分化癌(PDTC)。81例分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)和PDTC,88.9%为耐放射性碘,所有病例中有32.7%以前曾接受过多种激酶抑制剂治疗.在空管案件中,52.9%有BRAF突变,5.9%有RET融合。在PTC案例中,83.1%有BRAF突变,9.2%有RET融合,1.5%有NTRK融合。ATC和PTC各1例肿瘤突变负荷≥10。ATC病例TP53改变的患病率明显高于其他病例(82.3%vs.11.8%),而TERT启动子突变的频率在ATC病例中为88.2%,在其他病例中为64.7%,虽然没有显著差异。总之,58.8%的ATC,PTC的93.8%,42.9%的PDTC有与治疗药物相关的遗传改变。需要进行主动基因组测试以增加治疗选择。
    We analyzed the outcomes of genetic testing to study the frequency of mutations in advanced thyroid cancer in Japan. Patients (n = 96) with unresectable or metastatic thyroid carcinoma were included for retrospective chart review. Results of gene panel testing, which was performed between May 2020 and April 2023, were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 73.5 years (range, 17-88); 59 were women, and 39 were men. Overall, 17 patients had anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), 68 had papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), 7 had follicular thyroid carcinoma, and 6 had poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC). Of the 81 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and PDTC, 88.9% were radioactive iodine-refractory, and 32.7% of all cases had previously been treated with multiple kinase inhibitors. Of ATC cases, 52.9% had BRAF mutations, and 5.9% had RET fusion. Of PTC cases, 83.1% had BRAF mutations, 9.2% had RET fusion, and 1.5% had NTRK fusion. One case each of ATC and PTC had a tumor mutation burden of ≥10. ATC cases had a significantly higher prevalence of TP53 alterations than the other cases (82.3% vs. 11.8%), whereas the frequencies of TERT promoter mutations were 88.2% in ATC cases and 64.7% in the other cases, albeit without a significant difference. In conclusion, 58.8% of ATC, 93.8% of PTC, and 42.9% of PDTC had genetic alterations linked to therapeutic agents. Active gene panel testing is required to increase treatment options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)是一种罕见且经常致命的甲状腺癌。ATC生存率的异质性程度尚未完全研究。这项研究使用来自法国国家三级护理中心网络的多中心真实世界数据评估了与ATC患者的总体生存率(OS)相关的因素。方法:在这个多中心,回顾性队列研究,从法国ENDOCAN-TUTHYREF网络的国家数据库中确定了2010年至2020年间诊断的所有ATC患者.使用Cox比例风险模型在多变量分析中检查了与OS相关的因素。结果:本研究共纳入360例患者。其中,220(61%)为女性,中位年龄为72岁(四分位距:62-80)。纯和混合(同步转化)ATC(p-ATC和st-ATC)患者的百分比分别为62.5%和26.7%,分别。中位OS为6.8个月[置信区间,CI:5.5-8.1]:IVa阶段未达到,IVb为11.4个月[8.2-17.8],IVc为4.6个月[3.5-5.7]。手术,颈部放射治疗,化疗,最佳支持性护理达到69人(19.2%),214(59.4%),254(70.6%),66名(18.3%)病人,分别。在多变量分析中,包括IVb-IVc期患者,在东部肿瘤协作组表现状态为0-1的患者中观察到显著较高的OS(风险比[HR],0.6;[CI,0.4-0.9],p<0.02),阶段IVb[HR,0.5;CI,0.4-0.8,p<0.001],和多模式治疗(手术和放化疗)[HR,0.07;CI,0.04-0.1,p<0.001]。与明显更差的操作系统相关的变量包括:p-ATC(vs.ST-ATC)[人力资源,1.83;CI,1.33-2.51,p=0.001]和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)>5.05[HR,2.05,CI,1.39-3.05,p<0.001]。结论:与ATCOS改善独立相关的因素包括:欧洲肿瘤协作组的表现状况,疾病阶段,多模态治疗,同步变换的ATC,和较低的NLR。在接受多模式治疗的选定ATC患者中观察到长期OS。
    Background: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare and frequently fatal type of thyroid cancer. The degree of heterogeneity in survival rates for ATC is incompletely studied. This study evaluated the factors associated with overall survival (OS) of patients with ATC using multicenter real-world data from a national tertiary care center network in France. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, all patients with ATC diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were identified from the national database of the French ENDOCAN-TUTHYREF network. Factors associated with OS were examined in multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The study included 360 patients. Of these, 220 (61%) were female and the median age was 72 years (interquartile range: 62-80). The percentages of patients with pure and mixed (synchronously-transformed) ATC (p-ATC and st-ATC) were 62.5% and 26.7%, respectively. The median OS was 6.8 months [confidence interval, CI: 5.5-8.1]: not reached for stage IVa, 11.4 months [8.2-17.8] for IVb, and 4.6 months [3.5-5.7] for IVc. Surgery, radiation therapy to the neck, chemotherapy, and best supportive care were administered to 69 (19.2%), 214 (59.4%), 254 (70.6%), and 66 (18.3%) patients, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, including stage IVb-IVc patients, significantly higher OS was observed in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status of 0-1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.6; [CI, 0.4-0.9], p < 0.02), stage IVb [HR, 0.5; CI, 0.4-0.8, p < 0.001], and multimodal treatment (surgery and chemoradiotherapy) [HR, 0.07; CI, 0.04-0.1, p < 0.001]. Variables associated with significantly worse OS included: p-ATC (vs. st-ATC) [HR, 1.83; CI, 1.33-2.51, p = 0.001] and a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >5.05 [HR, 2.05, CI, 1.39-3.05, p < 0.001]. Conclusions: Factors independently associated with improved OS in ATC included: European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease stage, multimodality treatment, synchronously transformed ATC, and lower NLR. Long-term OS was observed in selected patients with ATC who underwent multimodal treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    N/A.
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)是一种高度侵袭性的恶性肿瘤,预后不良。这项研究旨在确定独立的危险因素,并构建易于使用的列线图来预测ATC患者早期死亡的可能性。
    方法:2004年至2015年期间被诊断为ATC的患者,流行病学,和最终结果(SEER)数据库被纳入本研究,用于模型开发和内部验证。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析以确定ATC早期死亡的独立危险因素。随后开发了用于预测ATC的全因早期死亡(ACED)和癌症特异性早期死亡(CSED)概率的列线图。在内部队列中全面评估和验证了列线图的性能。
    结果:本研究共纳入696例ATC患者,其中488名患者在训练队列中,208名患者在验证队列中。单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析确定了五个独立因素(肿瘤大小,M阶段,手术,ACED模型中的放疗和化疗)和CSED中的六个变量(性别,肿瘤大小,M阶段,手术,放疗和化疗)建立列线图的模型。校准曲线和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线在训练(ACED:AUC值:0.814(0.776-0.852);CSED:0.778(0.736-0.820))和验证集(ACED:0.762(0.696-0.827);CSED:0.745(0.678-0.812))均显示出令人满意的功效和一致性。此外,决策曲线分析(DCA)显示了两种列线图在临床应用中的有利潜力.
    结论:两个列线图有助于临床医生识别危险因素并预测ATC患者的早期死亡概率,从而指导个体化治疗,改善预后。
    BACKGROUND: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with dismal prognosis. This study aimed to identify the independent risk factors and construct a readily-to-use nomogram to predict the probability of early death in ATC patients.
    METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ATC between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were enrolled in this study for model development and internal validation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for early death of ATC. Nomograms for predicting the probability of all-cause early death (ACED) and cancer-specific early death (CSED) of ATC were subsequently developed. The performance of the nomograms was comprehensively evaluated and validated in an internal cohort.
    RESULTS: A total of 696 ATC patients were included in this study, of which 488 patients in the training cohort and 208 patients in the validation cohort. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified five independent factors (tumor size, M stage, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) in the ACED model and six variables in the CSED (gender, tumor size, M stage, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) model for the establishment of the nomograms. Calibration curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed satisfactory efficacy and consistency both in the training (ACED: AUC values: 0.814 (0.776-0.852); CSED: 0.778 (0.736-0.820)) and validation sets (ACED: 0.762 (0.696-0.827); CSED: 0.745 (0.678-0.812)). In addition, the decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated the favorable potential of the two nomograms in clinical application.
    CONCLUSIONS: The two nomograms assist clinicians to identify risk factors and predict the early death probability among ATC patients, thus guide individualized treatment to improve the prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号