Thoracic interventions are frequently performed by radiologists, but guidelines on appropriateness criteria and technical considerations to ensure patient safety regarding such interventions is lacking. These guidelines, developed by the Canadian Association of Radiologists, Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and Canadian Society of Thoracic Radiology focus on the interventions commonly performed by thoracic radiologists. They provide evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus informed best practices for patient preparation; biopsies of the lung, mediastinum, pleura and chest wall; thoracentesis; pre-operative lung nodule localization; and potential complications and their management.

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) occurs in 15% of all cancer patients and usually portends poor prognosis while also serving to limit the patient\'s quality of life. Palliation of symptoms has been the goal for the management of these effusions while keeping the patient\'s hospital stay to a minimum. Traditionally, this has been achieved by chest tube drainage followed by the instillation of sclerosing agents, such as talc, in the pleural space. A recent increase in evidence for the effectiveness and convenience of indwelling pleural catheters has changed the management of MPE, which is reflected in the guidelines released by the American Thoracic Society as well their European Counterpart (ERS/BTS). In this article, we aim to review the current management practices and guidelines for MPE.

Pneumothorax (PTX) represents accumulation of the air in the pleural space. A large or tension pneumothorax can collapse the lung and cause hemodynamic compromise, a life-threatening disorder. Traditionally, neonatal pneumothorax diagnosis has been based on clinical images, auscultation, transillumination, and chest X-ray findings. This approach may potentially lead to a delay in both diagnosis and treatment. The use of lung US in diagnosis of PTX together with US-guided thoracentesis results in earlier and more precise management. The recommendations presented in this publication are aimed at improving the application of lung US in guiding neonatal PTX diagnosis and management.

Pneumothorax is a common pathology, but optimal management strategies are not yet defined. There are significant differences in international guidelines and therefore variation in clinical practice.There is increasing interest in pneumothorax research, particularly primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), with evidence of lung abnormalities in this group without clinically apparent lung disease and recently completed clinical trials aiming to optimize management. The most robust evidence base is that of the equivalence of needle aspiration and chest tube insertion for initial management of PSP; although, patients with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax may also benefit. A convincing case for surgical intervention or thoracoscopy and talc poudrage to prevent recurrence at first episode in PSP has yet to be made. Clinicians should be vigilant for PSP being the first manifestation of a systemic disease, and should have a low threshold for onward referral. Time to change guidelines? First, chest tube drainage and hospitalization without recurrence prevention should no longer be standard treatment, as this has no advantage over the less invasive manual aspiration, which moreover can be performed on an outpatient basis in an important number of patients. The results of recent trials in conservative and ambulatory management are eagerly awaited. Second, shared decision-making should become more important with the well-informed patient, who may want to avoid a 1 in 3 recurrence rate and therefore will have the possibility to choose treatment including recurrence prevention even after the first episode of PSP. Third, surgical research should urgently make clear if the current practice of resection of emphysema-like changes is routinely necessary, alongside pleurodesis. Future studies should utilize risk stratification by clinical and radiological parameters (e.g., high-resolution computed tomography scanning and digital air leak monitoring) to predict short- and long-term outcomes, and hence personalize management.

UNASSIGNED: The guidelines from the British Thoracic Society (BTS) regarding the investigation of unilateral pleural effusions recommend computed tomography (CT) in exudates. We decided to investigate if clinicians follow BTS guidelines\' recommendations with respect to CT in patients with unilateral pleural effusions. Secondly, to investigate the diagnostic consequences of following and not following this recommendation.
UNASSIGNED: The study was a retrospective, non-randomized study including consecutive patients referred to our tertiary centers in 2013-2016 because of unilateral pleural effusion. Patients undergoing chest CT for unilateral pleural effusion of unknown cause after thoracentesis and chest X-ray were included. Patients were categorized as having pleural exudates or transudates, according to Light\'s criteria, if applicable. We registered use of CT, and calculated diagnostic values.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 323 of the 465 included patients underwent CT (69%). CT was performed in the majority of patients not having an exudate (transudates: n=40; 54%; Light\'s criteria not assessed: n=111; 67%). 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT without prior CT was performed in 32 patients with an exudate (58%). The sensitivity of a non-guideline supported CT (70%) was significantly higher compared to a guideline supported CT (47%), P value <0.045. The post-test probability of a positive guideline-supported CT [likelihood ratio (LR) positive 3.26] for a later diagnosis of thoracic malignancy increased the probability from 25% to 52%. A negative CT (LR negative 0.62) decreased the probability to 17%. For a non-guideline-supported CT the numbers were (LR positive 3.42) 53% and (LR negative 0.38) 11%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Clinicians appear not to follow BTS guidelines when deciding to perform chest CT. The relevance of this deviation is supported by the superior sensitivity of CT non-guideline supported CT. Overall, CT is associated with suboptimal sensitivity and negative predictive values for the diagnosis of thoracic malignancy.

This Guideline, a collaborative effort from the American Thoracic Society, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society of Thoracic Radiology, aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to guide contemporary management of patients with a malignant pleural effusion (MPE).
A multidisciplinary panel developed seven questions using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes) format. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and the Evidence to Decision framework was applied to each question. Recommendations were formulated, discussed, and approved by the entire panel.
The panel made weak recommendations in favor of: 1) using ultrasound to guide pleural interventions; 2) not performing pleural interventions in asymptomatic patients with MPE; 3) using either an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) or chemical pleurodesis in symptomatic patients with MPE and suspected expandable lung; 4) performing large-volume thoracentesis to assess symptomatic response and lung expansion; 5) using either talc poudrage or talc slurry for chemical pleurodesis; 6) using IPC instead of chemical pleurodesis in patients with nonexpandable lung or failed pleurodesis; and 7) treating IPC-associated infections with antibiotics and not removing the catheter.
These recommendations, based on the best available evidence, can guide management of patients with MPE and improve patient outcomes.

暂无摘要。

Hepatic Hydrothorax (HH) is defined as a pleural effusion greater than 500 ml in association with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. It is an uncommon complication of cirrhosis, most frequently seen in association with decompensated liver disease. The development of HH remains incompletely understood and involves a complex pathophysiological process with the most acceptable explanation being the passage of the ascetic fluid through small diaphragmatic defects. Given the limited capacity of the pleural space, even the modest pleural effusion can result in significant respiratory symptoms. The diagnosis of HH should be suspected in any patient with established cirrhosis and portal hypertension presenting with unilateral pleural effusion especially on the right side. Diagnostic thoracentesis should be performed in all patients with suspected HH to confirm the diagnosis and rule out infection and alternative diagnoses. Spontaneous bacterial empyema and spontaneous bacterial pleuritis can complicate HH and increase morbidity and mortality. HH can be difficult to treat and in our review below we will list the therapeutic modalities awaiting the evaluation for the only definitive therapy, which is liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to define the competencies in ultrasound knowledge and skills that are essential for medical trainees to master to perform ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization, thoracentesis, and paracentesis.
METHODS: Experts in the 3 procedures were identified by a snowball technique through 3 Canadian tertiary academic health centers. Experts completed 2 rounds of surveys, including an 88-item central venous catheterization survey, a 96-item thoracentesis survey, and an 89-item paracentesis survey. For each item, experts were asked to determine whether the knowledge/skill described was essential, important, or marginal. Consensus on an item was defined as agreement by at least 80% of the experts. For items on which consensus was not reached during the first round of surveys, a second survey was created in which the experts were asked to rate the item in a binary fashion (essential/important versus marginal/unimportant).
RESULTS: Of the 27 experts invited to complete each survey, 25 (93%) completed the central venous catheterization survey; 22 (81%) completed the thoracentesis survey; and 23 (85%) completed the paracentesis survey. The experts represented 8 specialties from 8 cities within Canada. A total of 22, 32, and 28 items were determined to be essential competencies for central venous catheterization, thoracentesis, and paracentesis, respectively, whereas 47, 38, and 42 competencies were determined to be important, and 8, 13, and 10 were determined to be marginal. The ability to perform real-time direct ultrasound guidance was considered essential only for the performance of central venous catheterization insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents expert consensus-derived ultrasound competencies that should be considered during the design and implementation of procedural skills training for learners.