Thiopental

硫喷妥钠
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To summarize the knowledge on the effect of anesthetics employed right before euthanasia on biological outcomes.
    METHODS: A systematic review of the literature to find studies with isoflurane, ketamine, halothane, pentobarbital, or thiopental just before euthanasia of laboratory rats or mice.
    METHODS: Controlled studies with quantitative data available.
    METHODS: The search, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) were performed independently by two reviewers using a structured form. For each outcome, an effect size (ES) was calculated relative to the control group. Meta-analysis was performed using robust variance meta-regression for hierarchical data structures, with adjustment for small samples.
    RESULTS: We included 20 studies with 407 biological outcomes (110 unique). RoB analysis indicated that 87.5% of the domains evaluated showed unclear risk, 2% high risk, and 10.5% low risk. The effect size for all anesthetics considered together was 0.99 (CI95% = 0.75-1.23; p < 0.0001). Sub-analyses indicate high effect sizes for pentobarbital (1.14; CI95% = 0.75-1.52; p < 0.0001), and isoflurane (1.01; CI95% = 0.58-1.44; p = 0.0005) but not for ketamine (1.49; CI95% = -7.95-10.9; p = 0.295).
    CONCLUSIONS: We showed that anesthetics interfere differently with the majority of the outcomes assessed. However, our data did not support the use of one anesthetic over others or even the killing without anesthetics. We conclude that outcomes cannot be compared among studies without considering the killing method. This protocol was registered at Prospero (CRD42019119520).
    BACKGROUND: There was no direct funding for this research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Despite well-known advantages, propofol remains off-label in many countries for general anesthesia in children under 3 years of age due to insufficient evidence regarding its use in this population. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol compared with other general anesthetics in children under 3 years of age undergoing surgery through a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing randomized clinical trials.
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to find all randomized clinical trials comparing propofol with another general anesthetic that included children under 3 years of age. The relative risk or arcsine-transformed risk difference for dichotomous outcomes and the weighted or standardized mean difference for continuous outcomes were estimated using a random-effects model.
    RESULTS: A total of 249 young children from 6 publications were included. The children who received propofol had statistically significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures, but hypotension was not observed in the propofol groups. The heart rate, stroke volume index, and cardiac index were not significantly different between the propofol and control groups. The propofol groups showed slightly shorter recovery times and a lower incidence of emergence agitation than the control groups, while no difference was observed for the incidence of hypotension, desaturation, and apnea.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that propofol use for general anesthesia in young healthy children undergoing surgery does not increase complications and that propofol could be at least comparable to other anesthetic agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: An ideal induction drug for cesarean section (CS) must have quick action, with minimum side effects such as awareness, hemodynamic compromise, and neonatal depression. Thiopentone is frequently used; however, no reliable evidence is available to support its use as a dedicated hypnotic agent in this setting.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis, using PRISMA methodology, of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing women undergoing CS using thiopentone with those undergoing CS with propofol, ketamine, or benzodiazepines as hypnotic agents.
    METHODS: Comprehensive search without language restrictions of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registers until May 2015, with an update in January 2017. Included trials must have reported at least one of the following variables: neonatal arterial or venous umbilical blood gas, maternal systolic blood pressure pre- and post-intubation, or Apgar score.
    RESULTS: A total of 911 patients from 18 RCTs were eligible for quantitative analysis. The increase in maternal systolic blood pressure was smaller in patients administered propofol, compared with those administered thiopentone (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -11.52 [-17.60, -5.45]; p = 0.0002). Induction with propofol also resulted in a significantly lower umbilical arterial pO2 (WMD: -0.12 [-0.20, -0.04]; p = 0.004) than induction with thiopentone. A comparison between propofol and thiopentone revealed no significant differences in other umbilical blood gas parameters or in Apgar scores. In contrast, when comparing ketamine with thiopentone, the number of neonates with a lower Apgar score (<7) at 1 and 5 min was significantly higher in the ketamine group than in the thiopentone group (p = 0.004).
    CONCLUSIONS: The evidence, based on sparse and relatively old trials, indicates that propofol and thiopentone are equally suited for CS. After 1 and 5 min, ketamine yields lower Apgar scores than thiopentone. Additional well-designed trials are needed to reach firmer conclusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Mitochondrial disorders are a clinically and biochemically diverse group of disorders which may involve multiple organ systems. General anaesthesia (GA) poses a potential risk of decompensation in children with mitochondrial disorders, and there is little guidance for anaesthetists and other clinicians regarding the optimal anaesthetic agents and perioperative management to provide to patients with mitochondrial disease[15]. The aim of this review was to document adverse events and perioperative complications from GA in patients with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disorders. A retrospective chart review of patients with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disorders who had undergone GA was undertaken. The indication for GA, anaesthetic agents utilised, length of admission and post anaesthetic complications were documented and analysed. Twenty-six patients with genetically proven mitochondrial disease underwent 65 GAs. Thirty-four (52%), received propofol as their induction agent. Thirty-three (51%) patients received sevoflurane for the maintenance of anaesthesia, while 8 (12%) received isoflurane and 24 (37%) received propofol. The duration of most GAs was short with 57 (87%) lasting less than 1 h. Perioperative complications occurred in five patients while under GA including ST segment depression, hypotension and metabolic acidosis in one. All five patients were stabilised successfully and none required ICU admission as a consequence of their perioperative complications. The duration of hospital stay post GA was <24 h in 25 (38%) patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: No relationship between choice of anaesthetic agent and subsequent perioperative complication was observed. It is likely that individual optimisation on a case-by-case basis is more important overall than choice of any one particular technique. What is Known: • General anaesthesia (GA) poses a potential risk of decompensation in children with mitochondrial disorders. • There is a great diversity in the anaesthetic approaches undertaken in this cohort, and little guidance exists for anaesthetists and other clinicians regarding the optimal anaesthetic agents and perioperative management to provide to patients with mitochondrial disease. What is New: • In this study of 26 patients with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease who underwent 65 GAs, no relationship between choice of anaesthetic agent and subsequent perioperative complication was observed • It is likely that individual optimisation on a case-by-case basis is more important overall than choice of any one particular technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    BACKGROUND: Alpha lipoic acid is a powerful antioxidant widely used for the supplementary treatment of diabetic neuropathy. Intoxication with alpha lipoic acid is very rare. There is no reported dose of safety in children.
    METHODS: A 14-month-old previously healthy girl was referred to our hospital with the diagnosis of drug intoxication. She was admitted to the emergency department with lethargy and continuing involuntary movements for several hours after she had ingested an unknown amount of alpha lipoic acid. On admission she was lethargic and had myoclonic seizures involving all extremities. She had no fever and laboratory examinations were normal except for mild metabolic acidosis. The seizures were unresponsive to bolus midazolam, phenytoin infusion and levetiracetam infusion. She was taken to the pediatric intensive care unit with the diagnosis of status epilepticus. After failure of the treatment with midazolam infusion she was intubated and thiopental sodium infusion was started. Her myoclonic seizures were controlled with thiopental sodium infusion. After 48 h intubation and mechanical ventilation thiopental sodium was gradually reduced and then stopped. Following the withdraw of thiopental sodium, she was seizure free on her discharge on the 8th day.
    CONCLUSIONS: Alpha lipoic acid and derivatives cause side effects in children like refractory convulsions. They are frequently rendered as vitamins by diabetic patients and are left at places where children can easily access them. Therefore, when faced with refractory convulsions in children who have had no disease before, intoxication by medicaments with alpha lipoic acid should be taken into consideration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    BACKGROUND: Mistakes in the identification and administration of drugs may be fatal. This is especially so in the practice of anaesthesia. This is a report of 2 cases of near fatality due to mistakes in drug administration from look-alike medications.
    OBJECTIVE: To highlight the significance of medication errors in our practice and to discuss the best methods of prevention.
    METHODS: A report of two cases of errors in the administration of drugs during the conduct of anaesthesia. The subsequent management of the cases is presented, and the findings from the literature are discussed.
    RESULTS: In case 1, an adult male presented for herniorrhaphy and after induction with propofol 1mg/kg intravenously, Pancuronium bromide injection 4 mg was administered intravenously, in the place of suxamethonium chloride injection. In case 2, For induction of anaesthesia, 100mg of thiopentone sodium was administered in place of 25mg of the same drug because Thiopentone 1 gm vial was mistaken for Thiopentone 500 mg vial in a 2 year old girl. In both cases, the errors were detected early and there were no adverse sequelae.
    CONCLUSIONS: Medication errors are a potential source of iatrogenic harm to patients undergoing anaesthesia. Strict adherence to principles as well as constant vigilance would minimize this problem.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Failure to respond to antiepileptic drugs in uncontrolled seizure activity such as refractory status epilepticus (RSE) has led to the use of anaesthetic drugs. Coma is induced with anaesthetic drugs to achieve complete control of seizure activity. Thiopental sodium and propofol are popularly used for this purpose. Both agents have been found to be effective. However, there is substantial lack of evidence as to which of the two drugs is better in terms of clinical outcome.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, adverse effects, and short- and long-term outcomes of RSE treated with one of the two anaesthetic agents, thiopental sodium or propofol.
    METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (10 May 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 4 of 12, The Cochrane Library 2012), and MEDLINE (1946 to May week 1, 2012). We also searched (10 May 2012) ClinicalTrials.gov, The South Asian Database of Controlled Clinical Trials, and IndMED (a bibliographic database of Indian Medical Journals).
    METHODS: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled studies (regardless of blinding) of control of RSE using either thiopental sodium or propofol.
    METHODS: Two review authors screened the search results and reviewed abstracts of relevant and eligible trials before retrieving the full text publications.
    RESULTS: One study was available for review. This study was a small, single-blind, multicentre trial studying adults with RSE and receiving either propofol or thiopental sodium for the control of seizure activity (Rossetti 2011). This study showed a wide confidence interval suggesting that the drugs may differ in efficacy up to more than two-fold. There was no evidence of a difference between the drugs with respect to the outcome measures such as control of seizure activity and functional outcome at three months.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is lack of robust and randomised controlled evidence that can clarify the efficacy of propofol and thiopental sodium over each other in the treatment of RSE. There is a need for large, randomised controlled trials for this serious condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Rapid sequence intubation is an essential bullet in the maintenance of patency of the airway during intubation in emergency. It is a valid method in all those situations where you can not determine whether the patient is fasting or not. But RSI is not applicable in all critically ill patients. The presence of severe acidosis, depletion of intravascular volume, heart failure and severe pulmonary disease may complicate the pre-induction period as the induction, leading to the onset of vasodilatation and hypotension. Another complication is represented by Hypoxemia during the manoeuvre. The algorithm of RSI consists in six steps: pre-oxygenation, premedication, myo-relaxation and induction, intubation, primary and secondary confirmation, post-intubation patient management. Propofol has replaced Thiopental as the most common intravenous ipnotic. In hypotensive patients Ketamine represents a viable alternative. Succinylcholine is the most common neuromuscular relaxant used in the RSI. The not depolarizing NMBAs are an alternative to Succinylcholine. Among these, the most important is the Rocuronium. This drug is characterized by a fairly rapid onset (1-2 min) and an intermediate half-life (45-70 min). The onset depends on the dosage used. The problem that limits the use of Rocuronium is the fact that its duration of action is much longer than that of Succinylcholine, especially when used at higher doses. This problem can be solved through the use of Sugammadex. As a muscle relaxant chelating Sugammadex antagonizes the effects induced by Rocuronium on muscle tissue and quickly resolve the blockade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号