OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the application of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) guidelines to the management of dogs and cats at risk of developing thrombosis using a case-based approach.
BACKGROUND: Dogs and cats become at risk of developing thrombosis from a wide range of conditions. These conditions often involve a specific insult followed by an inflammatory response and when combined with other contributing factors (eg, hypercoagulability, vascular endothelial injury, hemodynamic changes) create favorable conditions for thrombosis.
METHODS: Development of thrombosis in small animals remains challenging to demonstrate. Compatible clinical signs, the presence of known risk factors, and supporting diagnostic tests may be highly suggestive of the development of thrombosis.
METHODS: Therapeutic recommendations in accordance with the CURATIVE guidelines for dogs and cats are described in specific case vignettes presented. Discussion is centered on antithrombotic drug choices and dosing protocols, as outlined in Domains 2 and 3 of the CURATIVE guidelines. Where appropriate, guidelines related to therapeutic monitoring (Domain 4) and discontinuation of antithrombotics (Domain 5) were included.
CONCLUSIONS: In small animals at risk of developing thrombosis, overall prognosis may be improved by following consensus-based recommendations on the use of antithrombotics as outlined in the CURATIVE guidelines. Whether such interventions have any impact on outcome requires further investigation.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for therapeutic monitoring of antithrombotic drugs in small animals, develop guidelines regarding antithrombotic monitoring, and identify knowledge gaps in the field.
METHODS: First, a standardized, systematic literature review was conducted to address predefined PICO (Population/Patient, Intervention, Control, Outcome) questions, with categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality. Preliminary guidelines were developed by PICO worksheet authors and the domain chair. Thereafter, a Delphi-style survey was used to develop consensus on guidelines regarding therapeutic monitoring of antithrombotics in dogs and cats.
METHODS: Academic and referral veterinary medical centers.
RESULTS: PICO questions regarding the utility of therapeutic monitoring were developed for 6 different antithrombotic drugs or drug classes, including aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, unfractionated heparin, the low molecular weight heparins, and rivaroxaban, The majority of the literature pertaining to therapeutic monitoring of antithrombotic drugs was either performed in experimental animal models of disease or involved studies of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy laboratory animals. There was a paucity of high level of evidence studies directly addressing the PICO questions, which limited the strength of recommendations that could be provided. The final guidelines recommend that therapeutic monitoring should be performed when using warfarin or unfractionated heparin in dogs and cats at risk of thrombosis. There is insufficient evidence to make strong recommendations for therapeutic monitoring of aspirin or low molecular weight heparin in dogs and cats at this time.
CONCLUSIONS: As in other CURATIVE domains, significant knowledge gaps were highlighted, indicating the need for substantial additional research in this field. Ongoing investigation of the role of therapeutic monitoring of antithrombotic therapies will undoubtedly facilitate improved outcomes for dogs and cats at risk of thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Voriconazole is an azole antifungal utilized for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in hematologic patients. Previous studies have revealed decreased efficacy and increased toxicity with subtherapeutic <1 mcg/mL and supratherapeutic > 4 mcg/mL levels. A voriconazole dose modification guideline was introduced in July 2014 based on a retrospective analysis.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the voriconazole dose modification guideline. Secondary objectives were to identify patient-specific characteristics that contribute to inadequate levels, adverse effects, and breakthrough invasive fungal infections.
METHODS: This prospective study included 128 patients with 250 admissions who received voriconazole from July 2014 to February 2016. Eligible adult patients receiving voriconazole for prophylaxis or treatment with at least one trough level, drawn appropriately, were included. Demographics, adverse effects, and breakthrough invasive fungal infections were documented.
RESULTS: Voriconazole use was categorized as: new start, new start with loading dose, or continuation of home therapy. The median initial levels were 1.5, 3.5, and 1.7 mcg/mL with 62% (73/119), 55% (6/11), and 60% (72/120) within the therapeutic range, respectively. Using the voriconazole dose modification guideline, 80% were within goal by the second dose adjustment. Age ≤ 30 and BMI ≤ 25 kg/m2 had higher rates of subtherapeutic levels in the new start cohorts (p = 0.024 and p = 0.009). Approximately 7.6% of patients experienced an adverse effect with neurologic/psychological being the most common. A total of 8.5% of patients had a possible, probable or proven breakthrough invasive fungal infections while on voriconazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the voriconazole dose modification guideline, the number of patients that reached therapeutic range improved from 36% to 80% by the second dose adjustment (p = 0.007). This voriconazole dose modification guideline can be utilized to help dose and adjust voriconazole in order to achieve therapeutic levels.

BACKGROUND: With the prevalence of and hospitalizations for gout increasing, optimizing care for patients with gout is imperative. The 2012 American College of Rheumatology gout guidelines emphasize that timely monitoring is key to achieving serum urate (SUA) goals. Few studies have examined this metric following the 2012 update, and to our knowledge, none have examined a veteran population.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence to urate-lowering therapy (ULT) monitoring guidelines in a veteran population.
METHODS: This is a single-center, multisite, retrospective chart review of US veterans receiving ULT for gout within the VA (Veterans Affairs) Tennessee Valley Healthcare System from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015. The primary end point was percentage of patients with a SUA within 6 months of initial xanthine oxidase inhibitor prescription. Secondary end points included percentage of patients with SUA <6 mg/dL and percentage of patients with uptitration following SUA above goal.
RESULTS: A total of 601 patients met inclusion criteria for the study; after application of exclusion criteria, 505 were analyzed. Of these, 295 patients (58%) did not have a SUA drawn within 6 months, and 162 patients (32%) reached the end of the study period without SUA measured. Of 226 patients with SUA above goal on initial check, 64 (28%) had timely dose adjustment, whereas 143 patients (63%) had no adjustment. A total of 161 patients (32%) had a SUA at goal within the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of ULT monitoring at a major VA medical center were suboptimal, and improved adherence to guideline recommendations is needed.