■整容是一种流行的面部年轻化方法。最常见的技术是浅表肌腱膜系统(SMAS)折叠,有几个变化。然而,最佳方法尚不清楚。这篇综述分析了以前的研究,以比较SMAS整容技术,他们的结果,和并发症发生率。
■使用MEDLINE进行了系统搜索,科克伦,Embase,和谷歌学者电子数据库在2022年9月。该搜索包括2000年1月至2022年9月发表的研究,使用“整容”等关键词,“\”并发症,“和”结果。\"
■这篇综述研究了27项选定的研究,这些研究评估了6项SMAS整容技术。这些研究共涉及6086名患者,超过85%的人对手术结果感到满意。并发症的发生率因使用的技术而异,SMAS皮瓣和复合SMAS技术的并发症发生率最高(5.75%)和最低(0.05%),分别。最常见的并发症是暂时性面神经损伤(0.85%)和皮肤坏死(0.41%)。迄今为止,仅报道一例永久性面神经损伤。
■根据我们的发现,SMAS整容技术可实现较高的患者满意度,并发症发生率因技术而异。复合SMAS技术显示并发症发生率最低,而SMAS皮瓣显示最高的比率。然而,一些研究没有报告所有的并发症,这使得很难确定最佳方法。因此,未来的研究需要确定最美观、并发症风险最低的技术.
UNASSIGNED: Facelift procedures are a popular method of facial rejuvenation. The most common technique is superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, with several variations. However, the optimal approach remains unclear. This
review analyzed previous studies to compare SMAS facelift
techniques, their outcomes, and complication rates.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases in September 2022. The search included studies published from January 2000 to September 2022 using keywords such as \"facelift,\" \"complications,\" and \"outcomes.\"
UNASSIGNED: This
review examined 27 selected studies that evaluated 6 SMAS facelift
techniques. The studies involved 6086 patients in total, over 85% of who were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. The complication rates varied depending on the technique used, with the SMAS flap and composite SMAS technique having the highest (5.75%) and lowest (0.05%) complication rates, respectively. The most common complications were temporary facial nerve injury (0.85%) and skin necrosis (0.41%). To date, only one case of permanent facial nerve injury has been reported.
UNASSIGNED: On the basis of our findings, SMAS facelift
techniques achieve high patient satisfaction rates, with complication rates that vary by technique. The composite SMAS technique showed the lowest complication rates, whereas the SMAS flap showed the highest rate. However, some studies have not reported all complications, making it difficult to determine the best approach. Therefore, future studies are required to identify the most aesthetically pleasing technique with the lowest complication risk.