UNASSIGNED: Task shifting from general practitioners (GPs) to other health professionals could solve the increased workload, but an overview of the evidence is lacking for out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC).
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the content and quality of task shifting from GPs to other health professionals in clinic consultations and home visits in OOH-PC.
UNASSIGNED: Four database literature searches were performed on 13 December 2021, and updated in August 2023. We included articles that studied content (patient characteristics, reason for encounter) and/or quality (patient satisfaction, safety, efficiency) of task shifting in face-to-face contacts at OOH-PC. Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion and assessed the methodological quality of included articles using the JBI critical appraisal checklist. Data was extracted and results were synthesised in a narrative summary.
UNASSIGNED: The search identified 1,829 articles, resulting in the final inclusion of seven articles conducted in the UK or the Netherlands. Studies compared GPs with other health professionals (mainly nurses). These other health professionals saw patients with less urgent health problems, younger patients, and patients with less complex health problems than GPs. Most studies concluded that other health professionals provided safe and vastly efficient care corresponding to the level of GPs but findings about productivity were inconclusive.
UNASSIGNED: The level of safety and efficiency of care provided by other health professionals in OOH-PC seems like that of GPs, although they mainly see patients presenting with less urgent and less complex health problems.
Task shifting from general practitioners to other health professionals could increase treatment capacity in out-of-hours primary care.Task shifting occurs for care to patients with less urgent and less complex health issues.The long-term implications of task shifting in out-of-hours primary care should be investigated.

Many populations experience difficulty accessing eye care, especially in rural areas. Implementing workforce recruitment and retention strategies, as well as task shifting through widening scope of practice, can improve eye care accessibility. This article provides novel evidence on the compatibility of these strategies aimed at enhancing ophthalmic workforce recruitment, retention, and efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: The global burden of blindness is unequally distributed, affects rural areas more, and is frequently associated with limited access to eye care. The World Health Organization has specified both task shifting and increasing human resources for eye health as instruments to improve access to eye care in underserved areas. However, it is uncertain whether these two instruments are sufficiently compatible to provide positive synergic effects. To address this uncertainty, we conducted a structured literature review and synthesized relevant evidence relating to task shifting, workforce recruitment, retention, and eye care. Twenty-three studies from across the globe were analyzed and grouped into three categories: studies exploring recruitment and retention in human resources for eye health in general, studies discussing the relationship between task shifting and recruitment or retention of health workers in general, and studies specifically discussing task shifting and recruitment or retention in eye care workers.
RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that incentives are effective for initiating task shifting and improving recruitment and retention in rural areas with a stronger effect noted in midlevel eye care professionals and trainees. Incentives can take various forms, e.g., financial and nonfinancial. The consideration of context-specific motivational factors is essential when designing strategies to facilitate task shifting and to improve recruitment and retention.

UNASSIGNED: For primary healthcare systems to bring care closer to the communities, the availability of appropriate human resources is crucial. The primary care workforce in the world is expanding to include non-physician health workers (NPHWs) to increase its capacity. Also, NPHWs as mid-level health providers (MLHPs) are currently being employed in high- and low-income countries to assist doctors and specialists to make up for the scarcity of health professionals. Given the wide prevalence in the deployment of NPHWs as mid-level health providers, this article collates recent evidence on the role of MLHPs in improving access to primary healthcare services, and their enablers and barriers in integrating them in primary care teams. The article also presents gaps in evidence and recommendations for the way forward.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic search of contemporary literature published from January 2012 to September 2022 was undertaken using two bibliographic databases (PubMed and Cochrane) and hand searching the reference list of retrieved papers. Duplicates, papers older than ten years, and whose focus was not on primary healthcare were excluded. The papers finalised for appraisal were scrutinised for key themes and their summaries were collated for analysis. The papers comprised of twenty-four quantitative, twenty-three qualitative, and nine mixed approach study designs (n = 56) due to which a narrative approach was conducted as per guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: The review identified and presents the following themes - task shifting and its effectiveness in service delivery, quality of care, enablers and barriers of NPHWs in primary health care in both HIC and LMIC settings.
UNASSIGNED: Task-shifting interventions need effective engagement and constant coordination with relevant stakeholders. For this, policymakers, public health researchers, healthcare professionals of all cadres and community members need to be involved across all stages of introduction and absorption of the cadre into the primary healthcare delivery system.

The burgeoning administrative workload on physicians in Japan\'s healthcare system has necessitated innovative approaches to optimize clinical care. Integrating doctor clerks, tasked with administrative and clerical duties, has emerged as a potential solution to alleviate this burden. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of doctor clerks in improving physicians\' working conditions and patient care quality. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Ichushi Web and Google Scholar from January 2000 to September 2023. Data were extracted on publication year, study setting, department focus, work scope, and outcomes of doctor clerk implementation. The search identified 3570 studies, with 17 meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies were performed in general hospitals with 76.5% (13/17). The studies regarding university hospitals were 17.6% (3/17). Only one study was performed in a community hospital with 5.9% (1/17). More than half of doctor clerks worked not explicitly allocated to one department and did their work not specific to one department with 52.9% (9/17). Three studies report that doctor clerks collaborate with orthopedic surgeons. Two studies report that doctor clerks collaborate with emergency medicine physicians. Each study reports that doctor clerks collaborate with respiratory or general medicine. The most frequent is document support, with 94.1% (16/17). The second most frequent working content is consultation support, with 47.1% (8/17). The third most frequently working content is ordering support, with 23.5% (4/17). Call response, secretary work, education support, research support, conference support, and other professional support are included, each with 5.9% (1/17). Regarding clinical outcomes, five studies assessed a reduction in physician paperwork time (29.4%). Four studies assessed the frequency of the contents of doctor clerks\' work (23.5%). Four studies assessed the positive perception of physicians (23.5%). Four studies assessed the amount of the reduction in physicians\' overtime work (23.5%). Three studies assess the amount of the reduction in hospital costs (17.6%). One study assessed part-time physicians\' fatigue reduction (5.9%). Each study assessed the quality of patient care, such as doctor\'s clerk education for standardization, increase in the number of patients accepted, reduction in medical incidents, decrease in patient waiting time, and primary to tertiary prevention. Introducing doctor clerks in Japan\'s healthcare system shows promise in enhancing physicians\' working conditions and potentially improving patient care. However, conclusive evidence on the impact on patient care quality necessitates further investigation, serving as a foundation for future policy and healthcare system optimization.

UNASSIGNED: Task shifting, an approach to address physician shortage through redistribution of clinical tasks, may help address the high burden of chronic respiratory diseases like asthma and COPD. We aimed to measure its utility and impact in the Obstructive Lung Disease program (OLD).
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at five integrated outpatient departments of Primary Care Program within Indus Hospital & Health Network, Pakistan, from January 2018 to March 2023. After a formative evaluation, registered nurses were trained as Lung Health Nurses (LHNs) to perform spirometry, collect Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) including Asthma Control Test (ACT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score and COPD Assessment Test (CAT), counsel on inhaler use and tobacco cessation, and refer to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Data was collected online contemporaneously on REDCap and later analyzed using Excel and STATA 14.
UNASSIGNED: Pre-implementation, a monthly average of 126 asthmatics and 33 COPD patients visited primary care centers. Medical records of 147 OLD patients showed 8% received inhaler education, 3% completed ACT and 2% had mMRC documented. Implementation included capacity building of nine LHNs. Of 7427 referrals to the program, 86% underwent nurse-led assessments. LHNs performed spirometry (92%), PROMs assessments [ACT (89%), CAT (91%), mMRC (85%)], inhaler education (97%), tobacco cessation advice (85%) and made PR referrals (94%).
UNASSIGNED: Trained nurses can play a role in providing holistic and timely care for patients with CRDs and strengthen existing healthcare systems. Future directions may include expanding nurse clinical counselling roles through telehealth monitoring and home management.

The current medical shortage and increasing healthcare needs lead to the overcrowding of primary care services. In an effort to cope with this, task sharing models of care have been implemented between healthcare professionals. Varied terms are used to describe these models. In France, “cooperation protocol” pathways have been established between general practitioners and physiotherapists.
The aim of this narrative review is to define the terms used to describe models of task sharing involving physiotherapists for musculoskeletal care and to describe these models and their impact in order to suggest evolution prospects of French experimentations.
Delegation, task shifting, substitution, supplementation and advanced practice terms were found in the literature. A clear distinction is suggested between substitution and supplementation. Advanced practice physiotherapy is internationally defined and recognized. Advanced practice physiotherapy models of care seem to improve care access and quality of care without increasing costs. In France, two cooperation protocols have been implemented between general practitioners and physiotherapists for musculoskeletal disorders. Regarding the obstacles to their deployment, these models could evolve considering the international and formally defined framework of advanced practice physiotherapy.
Task sharing models of care involving physiotherapists could be promising strategies to improve access to care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Further studies are needed to better define the models, their objectives and to evaluate their impact in the French context.
L’engorgement des services de soins primaires et l’augmentation de la demande de soins conduisent à des difficultés croissantes d’accès aux soins de premier recours pour les patients souffrant de troubles musculosquelettiques. Pour y faire face, plusieurs modèles de partage de tâches entre les professionnels de santé sont mis en place. Dans la littérature, différentes notions sont employées pour décrire ces modèles. En France, ces expérimentations peuvent prendre la forme de « protocoles de coopération » établis entre les médecins généralistes et les kinésithérapeutes.
Cette revue narrative vise à définir les notions employées pour décrire les modèles de partage de tâches impliquant les kinésithérapeutes dans la prise en charge des troubles musculosquelettiques à l’international, puis à décrire ces modèles et leur impact pour aboutir à des perspectives d’évolution des expérimentations françaises.
Les notions de « délégation », de « transfert », de « substitution », de « supplémentation » et de « pratique avancée » sont employées dans la littérature. À la différence des termes « délégation » et « transfert », une distinction claire est retrouvée entre la substitution et la supplémentation. La pratique avancée en kinésithérapie est quant à elle, définie et reconnue à l’international. Elle permettrait d’améliorer l’accès et la qualité des soins, sans augmentation des coûts. En France, deux protocoles nationaux de coopération entre les médecins généralistes et les kinésithérapeutes existent pour les troubles musculo-squelettiques. En tenant compte des freins à leur déploiement rencontrés sur le terrain, ces modèles gagneraient à être repensés en s’inspirant du cadre international de la pratique avancée en kinésithérapie.
Les modèles de partage de tâches impliquant les kinésithérapeutes en soins primaires semblent être des leviers d’amélioration de l’accès aux soins pour les patients souffrant de troubles musculosquelettiques. Davantage d’études permettant de mieux définir les modèles, leurs objectifs et d’en évaluer l’efficacité dans le contexte français restent nécessaires.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound scan is one of the essential assessments that is crucial in the early identification of health risks during antenatal care. Its accessibility to women in low-and middle-income countries remains a serious challenge because ultrasound scans are not within the scope of practice for midwives. However, task shifting and extension of scope of practice aim to train midwives to assess pregnant women through an ultrasound scan. This paper aims to report the findings of a scoping review on the training of midwives to perform obstetric ultrasound scans in Africa.
METHODS: The 6-step iterative framework for scoping reviews by Arksey and O\'Malley was used to determine the extent of qualitative and quantitative evidence available on the training of midwives on obstetric ultrasound scans, which includes specifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, selecting studies, extracting and charting data, collating, summarising, and synthesising and reporting findings.
RESULTS: A total of 12 articles from eight African countries were included in this scoping review. Three main themes and 13 sub-themes emerged and they are: obstetric ultrasound scan training, challenges experienced by midwives from task shifting and extension of scope of practice regarding obstetric ultrasound scan, and the value of task shifting and extension of scope of practice regarding obstetric ultrasound scan to midwives.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the available evidence that the training of midwives on obstetric ultrasound scans is essential to ensure the accessibility of quality antenatal health services, the training of midwives on obstetric ultrasound scans in some African countries remains a serious challenge. It is evident from this scoping review results that there is a need for African countries to incorporate obstetric ultrasound scans as part of the scope of practice of midwives. Task shifting necessitates prioritising the training of midwives on the use of obstetric ultrasound scans as one of the steps towards the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal number 3 targets by 2030.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a complex global health issue overburdening health systems especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This burden is becoming more severe and complex as the global shortage of cancer care workforce persists. Since task shifting offers an alternative to address workforce shortages, a systematic review with the following research question was carried out: What is the scope of roles and tasks shifted to nonphysician health workers in improving access to cancer control services? The aim of this review is to critically identify, appraise and present evidence on how task shifting could be integrated and scaled to expand access to quality cancer control services in LMICs.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to critically identify, appraise and present evidence on how task shifting could be integrated and scaled to expand access to quality cancer control services in LMICs.
METHODS: Four databases were searched - CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and SCOPUS from inception to October 15, 2022, and included all studies that reported task shifting of cancer control services to nonphysician health workers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines was followed to report the review process. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment scale. The studies were summarized using narrative synthesis. A meta-analysis could not be carried out because the review only assessed the scope of roles that were shifted to nonphysician health workers and because of the heterogeneity in the characteristics of the studies included in the review.
RESULTS: The search identified 170 articles out of which 16 were included in the review. Three studies were randomized controlled trials, four were cluster randomized trials, while 9 were cross-sectional. Tasks were shifted to primary healthcare workers, nurses, and community health workers. Tasks shifted included screening, patient education, and diagnostic procedures. Evidence from the studies showed that the quality and effectiveness of tasks performed were comparable, and in some cases, better than usual care.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed that tasks in certain areas of cancer control services such as screening, education, and diagnosis can be shifted to nonphysician health workers and that it could be effective in improving access to certain cancer control services. Therefore, this review has shown that task shifting could be an effective strategy in addressing current workforce shortages in cancer care and that there is a need to examine the care required along the cancer continuum to better understand which interventions can most effectively be shifted to more advanced health professionals such as pharmacists to improve access to cancer control services in LMICs.

BACKGROUND: Human resources for health (HRH) shortages are a major limitation to equitable access to healthcare. African countries have the most severe shortage of HRH in the world despite rising communicable and non-communicable disease (NCD) burden. Task shifting provides an opportunity to fill the gaps in HRH shortage in Africa. The aim of this scoping review is to evaluate task shifting roles, interventions and outcomes for addressing kidney and cardiovascular (CV) health problems in African populations.
METHODS: We conducted this scoping review to answer the question: \"what are the roles, interventions and outcomes of task shifting strategies for CV and kidney health in Africa?\" Eligible studies were selected after searching MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, and Africa journal online (AJOL). We analyzed the data descriptively.
RESULTS: Thirty-three studies, conducted in 10 African countries (South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, and Uganda) were eligible for inclusion. There were few randomized controlled trials (n = 6; 18.2%), and tasks were mostly shifted for hypertension (n = 27; 81.8%) than for diabetes (n = 16; 48.5%). More tasks were shifted to nurses (n = 19; 57.6%) than pharmacists (n = 6; 18.2%) or community health workers (n = 5; 15.2%). Across all studies, the most common role played by HRH in task shifting was for treatment and adherence (n = 28; 84.9%) followed by screening and detection (n = 24; 72.7%), education and counselling (n = 24; 72.7%), and triage (n = 13; 39.4%). Improved blood pressure levels were reported in 78.6%, 66.7%, and 80.0% for hypertension-related task shifting roles to nurses, pharmacists, and CHWs, respectively. Improved glycaemic indices were reported as 66.7%, 50.0%, and 66.7% for diabetes-related task shifting roles to nurses, pharmacists, and CHWs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the numerus HRH challenges that are present in Africa for CV and kidney health, this study suggests that task shifting initiatives can improve process of care measures (access and efficiency) as well as identification, awareness and treatment of CV and kidney disease in the region. The impact of task shifting on long-term outcomes of kidney and CV diseases and the sustainability of NCD programs based on task shifting remains to be determined.

Numerous studies have reported task shifting and task sharing due to various reasons and with varied scopes of health services, either task-shifted or -shared. However, very few studies have mapped the evidence on task shifting and task sharing. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize evidence on the rationale and scope of task shifting and task sharing in Africa. We identified peer-reviewed papers from PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL bibliographic databases. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were charted to document data on the rationale for task shifting and task sharing, and the scope of tasks shifted or shared in Africa. The charted data were thematically analyzed. Sixty-one studies met the eligibility criteria, with fifty-three providing insights on the rationale and scope of task shifting and task sharing, and seven on the scope and one on rationale, respectively. The rationales for task shifting and task sharing were health worker shortages, to optimally utilize existing health workers, and to expand access to health services. The scope of health services shifted or shared in 23 countries were HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, hypertension, diabetes, mental health, eyecare, maternal and child health, sexual and reproductive health, surgical care, medicines\' management, and emergency care. Task shifting and task sharing are widely implemented in Africa across various health services contexts towards ensuring access to health services.