BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women globally. Over-activated estrogen receptor (ER) α signaling is considered the main factor in luminal breast cancers, which can be effectively managed with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) like tamoxifen. However, approximately 30-40% of ER + breast cancer cases are recurrent after tamoxifen therapy. This implies that the treatment of breast cancer is still hindered by resistance to tamoxifen. Recent studies have suggested that post-translational modifications of ERα play a significant role in endocrine resistance. The stability of both ERα protein and its transcriptome is regulated by a balance between E3 ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinases. According to the current knowledge, approximately 100 deubiquitinases are encoded in the human genome, but it remains unclear which deubiquitinases play a critical role in estrogen signaling and endocrine resistance. Thus, decoding the key deubiquitinases that significantly impact estrogen signaling, including the control of ERα expression and stability, is critical for the improvement of breast cancer therapeutics.
METHODS: We used several ER positive breast cancer cell lines, DUB siRNA library screening, xenograft models, endocrine-resistant (ERα-Y537S) model and performed immunoblotting, real time PCR, RNA sequencing, immunofluorescence, and luciferase activity assay to investigate the function of USP36 in breast cancer progression and tamoxifen resistance.
RESULTS: In this study, we identify Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 36 (USP36) as a key deubiquitinase involved in ERα signaling and the advancement of breast cancer by deubiquitinases siRNA library screening. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that USP36, but not its catalytically inactive mutant (C131A), could promote breast cancer progression through ERα signaling. Conversely, silencing USP36 inhibited tumorigenesis. In models resistant to endocrine therapy, silencing USP36 destabilized the resistant form of ERα (Y537S) and restored sensitivity to tamoxifen. Molecular studies indicated that USP36 inhibited K48-linked polyubiquitination of ERα and enhanced the ERα transcriptome. It is interesting to note that our results suggest USP36 as a novel biomarker for treatment of breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed the possibility that inhibiting USP36 combined with tamoxifen could provide a potential therapy for breast cancer.

Resistance to endocrine therapy is a major clinical challenge in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Obesity is associated with the clinical response to ER-positive breast cancers; however, the mechanism underlying obesity-induced resistance to endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancers remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying obesity-induced resistance to tamoxifen (TAM), an anti-estrogen agent, in the ER-positive breast cancer cell line MCF-7 using differentiated adipocyte-conditioned medium (D-CM). Treatment of the cells with D-CM promoted TAM resistance by reducing TAM-induced apoptosis. The expression levels of the ERα target genes were higher in D-CM-treated cells than those in untreated ones. In contrast, when the cells were cultured in the presence of TAM, the expression levels were decreased, with or without D-CM. Moreover, the expression of the markers for cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) and mammosphere formation was enhanced by co-treating with D-CM and TAM, compared with TAM alone. The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway was activated in MCF-7 cells by D-CM treatment, even in the presence of TAM. Inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway decreased the expression levels of the CSC markers, suppressed mammosphere formation, and resensitized to TAM via inducing apoptosis in D-CM-treated cells. These results indicate that the conditioned medium of differentiated adipocytes promoted TAM resistance by inducing the CSC phenotype through activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in ER-positive breast cancer cells. Thus, the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway may be a therapeutic target in obese patients with ER-positive breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer manifests as a heterogeneous pathology marked by complex metabolic reprogramming essential to satisfy its energy demands. Oncogenic signals boost the metabolism, modifying fatty acid synthesis and glucose use from the onset to progression and therapy resistant-forms. However, the exact contribution of metabolic dependencies during tumor evolution remains unclear.
METHODS: In this study, we elucidate the connection between FASN and LDHA, pivotal metabolic genes, and their correlation with tumor grade and therapy response using datasets from public repositories. Subsequently, we evaluated the metabolic and proliferative functions upon FASN and LDHA inhibition in breast cancer models. Lastly, we integrated metabolomic and lipidomic analysis to define the contributions of metabolites, lipids, and precursors to the metabolic phenotypes.
RESULTS: Collectively, our findings indicate metabolic shifts during breast cancer progression, unvealling two distinct functional energy phenotypes associated with aggressiveness and therapy response. Specifically, FASN exhibits reduced expression in advance-grade tumors and therapy-resistant forms, whereas LDHA demonstrates higher expression. Additionally, the biological and metabolic impact of blocking the enzymatic activity of FASN and LDHA was correlated with resistant conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: These observations emphasize the intrinsic metabolic heterogeneity within breast cancer, thereby highlighting the relevance of metabolic interventions in the field of precision medicine.

Background: Tamoxifen is commonly used in the treatment of hormonal-positive breast cancer. However, 30%-40% of tumors treated with tamoxifen develop resistance; therefore, an important step to overcome this resistance is to understand the underlying molecular and metabolic mechanisms. In the present work, we used metabolic profiling to determine potential biomarkers of tamoxifen resistance, and gene expression levels of enzymes important to these metabolites and then correlated the expression to the survival of patients receiving tamoxifen. Methods: Tamoxifen-resistant cell lines previously developed and characterized in our laboratory were metabolically profiled with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) using cryogenic probe, and the findings were correlated with the expression of genes that encode the key enzymes of the significant metabolites. Moreover, the effect of significantly altered genes on the overall survival of patients was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier plotter web tool. Results: We observed a significant increase in the levels of glutamine, taurine, glutathione, and xanthine, and a significant decrease in the branched-chain amino acids, valine, and isoleucine, as well as glutamate and cysteine in the tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to tamoxifen sensitive cells. Moreover, xanthine dehydrogenase and glutathione synthase gene expression were downregulated, whereas glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase was upregulated compared to control. Additionally, increased expression of xanthine dehydrogenase was associated with a better outcome for breast cancer patients. Conclusion: Overall, this study sheds light on metabolic pathways that are dysregulated in tamoxifen-resistant cell lines and the potential role of each of these pathways in the development of resistance.

OBJECTIVE: Aggressive breast cancer (BC) cells show high expression of Rho GTPase activating protein 29 (ARHGAP29), a negative regulator of RhoA. In breast cancer cells in which mesenchymal transformation was induced, ARHGAP29 was the only one of 32 GTPase-activating enzymes whose expression increased significantly. Therefore, we investigated whether there is a correlation between expression of ARHGAP29 and tumor progression in BC. Since tamoxifen-resistant BC cells exhibit increased mesenchymal properties and invasiveness, we additionally investigated the relationship between ARHGAP29 and increased invasion rate in tamoxifen resistance. The question arises as to whether ARHGAP29 is a suitable prognostic marker for the progression of BC.
METHODS: Tissue microarrays were used to investigate expression of ARHGAP29 in BC and adjacent normal breast tissues. Knockdown experiments using siRNA were performed to investigate the influence of ARHGAP29 and the possible downstream actors RhoC and pAKT1 on invasive growth of tamoxifen-resistant BC spheroids in vitro.
RESULTS: Expression of ARHGAP29 was frequently increased in BC tissues compared to adjacent normal breast tissues. In addition, there was evidence of a correlation between high ARHGAP29 expression and advanced clinical tumor stage. Tamoxifen-resistant BC cells show a significantly higher expression of ARHGAP29 compared to their parental wild-type cells. After knockdown of ARHGAP29 in tamoxifen-resistant BC cells, expression of RhoC was significantly reduced. Further, expression of pAKT1 decreased significantly. Invasive growth of three-dimensional tamoxifen-resistant BC spheroids was reduced after knockdown of ARHGAP29. This could be partially reversed by AKT1 activator SC79.
CONCLUSIONS: Expression of ARHGAP29 correlates with the clinical tumor parameters of BC patients. In addition, ARHGAP29 is involved in increased invasiveness of tamoxifen-resistant BC cells. ARHGAP29 alone or in combination with its downstream partners RhoC and pAKT1 could be suitable prognostic markers for BC progression.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide, with Hormone Receptor (HR)+ being the predominant subtype. Tamoxifen (TAM) serves as the primary treatment for HR+ breast cancer. However, drug resistance often leads to recurrence, underscoring the need to develop new therapies to enhance patient quality of life and reduce recurrence rates. Artemisinin (ART) has demonstrated efficacy in inhibiting the growth of drug-resistant cells, positioning art as a viable option for counteracting endocrine resistance. This study explored the interaction between artemisinin and tamoxifen through a combined approach of bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation. Five characterized genes (ar, cdkn1a, erbb2, esr1, hsp90aa1) and seven drug-disease crossover genes (cyp2e1, rorc, mapk10, glp1r, egfr, pgr, mgll) were identified using WGCNA crossover analysis. Subsequent functional enrichment analyses were conducted. Our findings confirm a significant correlation between key cluster gene expression and immune cell infiltration in tamoxifen-resistant and -sensitized patients. scRNA-seq analysis revealed high expression of key cluster genes in epithelial cells, suggesting artemisinin\'s specific impact on tumor cells in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC tissues. Molecular target docking and in vitro experiments with artemisinin on LCC9 cells demonstrated a reversal effect in reducing migratory and drug resistance of drug-resistant cells by modulating relevant drug resistance genes. These results indicate that artemisinin could potentially reverse tamoxifen resistance in ER-positive breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The intricate molecular mechanisms underlying estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast carcinogenesis and resistance to endocrine therapy remain elusive. In this study, we elucidate the pivotal role of GPR81, a G protein-coupled receptor, in ER+ breast cancer (BC) by demonstrating low expression of GPR81 in tamoxifen (TAM)-resistant ER+ BC cell lines and tumor samples, along with the underlying molecular mechanisms.
METHODS: Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) levels and lipid accumulation were explored using MDA and FAβO assay, BODIPY 493/503 staining, and Lipid TOX staining. Autophagy levels were assayed using CYTO-ID detection and Western blotting. The impact of GPR81 on TAM resistance in BC was investigated through CCK8 assay, colony formation assay and a xenograft mice model.
RESULTS: Aberrantly low GPR81 expression in TAM-resistant BC cells disrupts the Rap1 pathway, leading to the upregulation of PPARα and CPT1. This elevation in PPARα/CPT1 enhances FAO, impedes lipid accumulation and lipid droplet (LD) formation, and subsequently inhibits cell autophagy, ultimately promoting TAM-resistant BC cell growth. Moreover, targeting GPR81 and FAO emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy, as the GPR81 agonist and the CPT1 inhibitor etomoxir effectively inhibit ER+ BC cell and tumor growth in vivo, re-sensitizing TAM-resistant ER+ cells to TAM treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlight the critical and functionally significant role of GPR81 in promoting ER+ breast tumorigenesis and resistance to endocrine therapy. GPR81 and FAO levels show potential as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in clinical settings for TAM-resistant ER+ BC.

Tamoxifen (TAM) resistance presents a major clinical obstacle in the management of estrogen-sensitive breast cancer, highlighting the need to understand the underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic approaches. We showed that dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics were involved in TAM resistance by protecting against mitochondrial apoptosis. The dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics were associated with increased mitochondrial fusion and decreased fission, thus preventing the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c to the cytoplasm following TAM treatment. Dynamin-related GTPase protein mitofusin 1 (MFN1), which promotes fusion, was upregulated in TAM-resistant cells, and high MFN1 expression indicated a poor prognosis in TAM-treated patients. Mitochondrial translocation of MFN1 and interaction between MFN1 and mitofusin 2 (MFN2) were enhanced to promote mitochondrial outer membrane fusion. The interaction of MFN1 and cristae-shaping protein optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) and OPA1 oligomerization were reduced due to augmented OPA1 proteolytic cleavage, and their apoptosis-promoting function was reduced due to cristae remodeling. Furthermore, the interaction of MFN1 and BAK were increased, which restrained BAK activation following TAM treatment. Knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of MFN1 blocked mitochondrial fusion, restored BAK oligomerization and cytochrome c release, and amplified activation of caspase-3/9, thus sensitizing resistant cells to apoptosis and facilitating the therapeutic effects of TAM both in vivo and in vitro. Conversely, overexpression of MFN1 alleviated TAM-induced mitochondrial apoptosis and promoted TAM resistance in sensitive cells. These results revealed that dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics contributes to the development of TAM resistance, suggesting that targeting MFN1-mediated mitochondrial fusion is a promising strategy to circumvent TAM resistance.

Estrogen receptor (ER) positive patients compromise about 70% of breast cancers. Tamoxifen, an antagonist of ERα66 (the classic ER), is the most effective and the standard first-line drug. However, its efficacy is limited by the development of acquired resistance.
A specific inhibitor of Hsp70-Bim protein-protein interaction (PPI), S1g-2, together with an inhibitor of Hsp70-Bag3 PPI, MKT-077 and an ATP-competitive inhibitor VER155008, were used as chemical tools. Cell viability assays, co-immunoprecipitation and gene knockdown were used to investigate the role of Hsp70 in tamoxifen resistance. A xenograft model was established in which tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer (MCF-7/TAM-R) cells maintained in the presence of 5 μM tamoxifen were subcutaneously inoculated. The anti-tumor efficiency of S1g-2 was measured after a daily injection of 0.8 mg/kg for 14 days.
It was revealed that Hsp70-Bim PPI protects ERα-positive breast cancer from tamoxifen-induced apoptosis through binding and stabilizing ERα36, rather than ERα66, resulting in sustained EGFR mRNA and protein expression. Disruption of Hsp70-Bim PPI and downregulation of ERα36 expression in tumor samples are consistent with the in vitro functions of S1g-2, resulting in about a three-fold reduction in tumor volume.
The in vivo activity and safety of S1g-2 illustrated that it is a potential strategy for Hsp70-Bim disruption to overcome tamoxifen-resistant ER-positive breast cancer.

Tamoxifen (TAM) is the primary drug for treating estrogen receptor alpha-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC). However, resistance to TAM can develop in some patients, limiting its therapeutic efficacy. The ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) family has been associated with the development, progression, and drug resistance of various cancers. To explore the role of USPs in TAM resistance in BC, we used qRT-PCR to compare USP expression between TAM-sensitive (MCF-7 and T47D) and TAM-resistant cells (MCF-7R and T47DR). We then modulated USP46 expression and examined its impact on cell proliferation, drug resistance (via CCK-8 and EdU experiments), glycolysis levels (using a glycolysis detection assay), protein interactions (confirmed by co-IP), and protein changes (analyzed through Western blotting). Our findings revealed that USP46 was significantly overexpressed in TAM-resistant BC cells, leading to the inhibition of the ubiquitin degradation of polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1). Overexpression of PTBP1 increased the PKM2/PKM1 ratio, promoted glycolysis, and intensified TAM resistance in BC cells. Knockdown of USP46 induced downregulation of PTBP1 protein by promoting its K48-linked ubiquitination, resulting in a decreased PKM2/PKM1 ratio, reduced glycolysis, and heightened TAM sensitivity in BC cells. In conclusion, this study highlights the critical role of the USP46/PTBP1/PKM2 axis in TAM resistance in BC. Targeted therapy against USP46 may represent a promising strategy to improve the prognosis of TAM-resistant patients.