Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia referred for ablation. Periprocedural conduction system damage was a primary concern during AVNRT ablation. This study aimed to assess the incidence of permanent atrioventricular (AV) block and the success rate associated with different types of catheters in slow pathway ablation.
A literature search was performed to identify studies that compared various techniques, including types of radiofrequency ablation (irrigated and nonirrigated) and different sizes of catheter tip cryoablation (4, 6, and 8-mm), in terms of their outcomes related to permanent atrioventricular block and success rate. To assess and rank the treatments for the different outcomes, a random-effects model of network meta-analysis, along with p-scores, was employed.
A total of 27 studies with 5110 patients were included in the analysis. Overall success rates ranged from 89.78% to 100%. Point estimation showed 4-mm cryoablation exhibited an odds ratio of 0.649 (95%CI: 0.202-2.087) when compared to nonirrigated RFA. Similarly, 6-mm cryoablation had an odds ratio of 0.944 (95%CI: 0.307-2.905), 8-mm cryoablation had an odds ratio of 0.848 (95%CI: 0.089-8.107), and irrigated RFA had an odds ratio of 0.424 (95%CI: 0.058-3.121) compared to nonirrigated RFA.
Our study found no significant difference in the incidence of permanent AV block between the types of catheters. The success rates were consistently high across all groups. These findings emphasize the potential of both RF ablation (irrigated and nonirrigated catheter) and cryoablation as viable options for the treatment of AVNRT, with similar safety and efficacy profile.

Pseudo-pacemaker syndrome (PPMS) is a rare complication of first-degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block in which a very prolonged PR interval causes AV dyssynchrony and subsequent symptoms of hemodynamic instability in the absence of an implanted pacemaker. The aim of this manuscript was to describe a unique case of PPMS and to provide a comprehensive review of the topic to help clinicians in the diagnosis and management of this condition. Through systematic research on PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCO, and Ovid MEDLINE and using the search strings \"pseudo-pacemaker syndrome\" and \"symptomatic first-degree AV block,\" we identified 14 articles accounting for 17 cases of PPMS, including our case report. The most common age group for PPMS was middle-aged and young adults, with an average age of 47 years. Palpitations were the most common presenting symptom and four main etiologies of PPMS were identified, as follows: (1) Idiopathic PPMS with evidence of impaired conduction over the AV node (20% of cases), (2) PPMS associated with reversable inflammatory causes (13%) or (3) associated with iatrogenic surgical or interventional procedures leading to the permanent damage of the normal AV conduction system (20%), and, finally, (4) PPM related to dual AV nodal physiology (DAVNP) as a primary finding (27%) or occurring after fast or slow pathway ablation for treatment of AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (20%). Treatment should be patient-tailored and based on the specific etiology once identified. However, the treatment of PPMS due to DAVNP without AVNRT presentation is yet to be clarified.

Over the past few years, smartwatches have become increasingly popular in the monitoring of arrhythmias. Although the detection of atrial fibrillation with smartwatches has been the subject of various articles, there is no comprehensive research on the detection of arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation. In this study, we included individual cases from the literature to identify the characteristics of patients with smartwatch-detected arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation.
PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS were searched for case reports, case series, or cohort studies that reported individual participant-level data, until January 6, 2022. The following search string was used for each databases: (\'Smart Watch\' OR \'Apple Watch\' OR \'Samsung Gear\') AND (\'Supraventricular Tachycardia\' OR \'Cardiac Arrhythmia\' OR \'Ventricular Tachycardia\' OR \'Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia\' OR \'Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia\' OR \'Heart Block\' OR \'Atrial Flutter\' OR \'Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia\' OR \'Bradyarrhythmia\').
A total of 52 studies from PubMed, 20 studies from Embase, and 200 studies from SCOPUS were identified. After screening, 18 articles were included. A total of 22 patients were obtained from 14 case reports or case series. Four cohort studies evaluating various arrhythmias were included. Arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia, atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, and sinus bradycardia, were detected with smartwatches.
Cardiac arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation are also commonly detected with smartwatches. Smartwatches have an important potential besides traditional methods in the detection of arrhythmias and clinical practice.

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most frequent regular tachycardia in humans. In this review, we describe the most recent discoveries regarding the anatomical, physiological, and molecular biological features of the atrioventricular junction that could underlie the typical slow-fast AVNRT mechanisms, as these insights could lead to the proposal of a new theory concerning the circuit of this arrhythmia. Despite several models have been proposed over the years, the precise anatomical site of the reentrant circuit and the pathway involved in the slow-fast AVNRT have not been conclusively defined. One possible way to evaluate all the hypotheses regarding the nodal tachycardia circuit in humans is to map this circuit. Thus, we tried to identify the slow potential of nodal and inferior extension structures by using automated mapping of atrial activation during both sinus rhythm and typical slow-fast AVNRT. This constitutes a first step toward the definition of nodal area activation in sinus rhythm and during slow-fast AVNRT. Further studies and technical improvements in recording the potentials of the atrioventricular node structures are necessary to confirm our initial results.

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmias. An understanding of gender-related differences in AVNRT epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, outcome, and complications can help guide a more effective diagnosis and treatment of the condition. The study aimed to perform a review of the available literature regarding all aspects of gender-related differences of AVNRT. We focused on all aspects of gender-related differences regarding AVNRT between men and women. A literature search was performed using Google Scholar, PubMed, Springer, Ovid, and Science Direct. Many investigations have demonstrated that the prevalence of AVNRT exhibited a twofold women-to-men predominance. The potential mechanism behind this difference due to sex hormones and autonomic tone. Despite being more common in women, there is a delay in offering and performing the first-line therapy (catheter ablation) compared to men. There were no significant gender-related discrepancies in patients who underwent ablation therapy for AVNRT, regarding the acute success rate of the procedure, long-term success rate, and recurrence of AVNRT. AVNRT is more common in women due to physiological factors such as sex hormones and autonomic tone. Catheter ablation is equally safe and efficacious in men and women; however, the time between the onset of symptoms and ablation is significantly prolonged in women. It is important for the medical community to be aware of this discrepancy and to strive to eliminate such disparities that are not related to patients\' choices.

Atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia. Radiofrequency ablation has been the most prevalent method for slow pathway ablation but carries risk of atrioventricular node injury. Focal cryoablation has been utilized as an alternative ablation modality; however, there has been concern about decreased efficacy, resulting in a higher rate of recurrence postablation. We also report outcomes from two international centers using an 8-mm cryocatheter and complete a thorough comparison of existing data on ablation of AVNRT.
Previous reviews included studies from 2006 onward. These studies included use of the 4 mm focal cryocatheter, which has largely been abandoned in current adult practice. We will cite more contemporary studies within the past 10 years, which also includes use of the 6 and 8 mm cryocatheter.
The use of focal cryoablation allows for reversible injury during AVNRT ablation, providing safety from permanent atrioventricular node injury. With the appropriate ablation endpoints, 8 mm focal cryoablation is more effective for permanent lesion formation, leading to lower recurrences.

Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia (BBRVT) is characterized by a unique, fast (200-300 beats/min), monomorphic wide complex tachycardia (WCT) associated with syncope, hemodynamic compromise, and cardiac arrest. It is challenging to diagnose, requiring a His bundle recording and specific pacing maneuvers. The overall incidence has been reported to be up to 20% among patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) undergoing electrophysiologic studies. We report a case of BBRVT in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) presenting as a WCT with recurrent implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks. We describe all the characteristic features of BBRVT and discuss its differential. We also discuss the role of ablation for this condition.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular-nodal-reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is a form of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that is relatively common in the emergency department (ED). It is rarely indicative of underlying electrical or structural pathology.
OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates the literature and controversies concerning treatment of AVNRT in the ED.
CONCLUSIONS: For treatment of narrow-complex tachycardia, Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support guidelines recommend the use of vagal maneuvers, followed by adenosine. Recent literature suggests that nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, such as verapamil and diltiazem, may be as effective as adenosine, without the negative short-term side effects. Multiple studies have demonstrated that although adenosine is rapid acting, there is no statistically significant difference in conversion rate between adenosine and calcium channel blockers. Both medications result in a conversion rate above 90%, but there are significantly more minor adverse effects, such as flushing or chest discomfort, with adenosine. Calcium channel blockers are a viable option for treatment for AVNRT, especially in refractory states. Beta-blockers have been evaluated but should not be used routinely due to lower efficacy. AVNRT is the most common tachydysrhythmia in pregnancy, and vagal maneuvers and adenosine are first line. Electrical cardioversion should be utilized for hemodynamically unstable patients. Most patients with AVNRT may be discharged with appropriate follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Several studies demonstrate that nondihydropyridine calcium channels (verapamil and diltiazem) are equally as efficacious as adenosine in converting AVNRT to sinus rhythm, without the negative (albeit short-lived) side effects. If given over 20 min, the risk for hypotension is low.

Supraventricular arrhythmias are an important and increasing cause of morbidity in adults with congenital heart disease, requiring specific management strategies. Pharmacological treatment has limited efficacy, and is often associated with some side-effects. Major improvements in catheter ablation techniques have opened new opportunities to better understand underlying mechanisms of supraventricular arrhythmias, offer better therapy, and eventually improve symptoms and quality of life in these patients. An array of tools and techniques are necessary to access relevant anatomical areas to address the arrhythmogenic substrate. The mechanism of these arrhythmias is mostly related to macroreentry around surgical scars or cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter. The efficacy of catheter ablation is mainly dependent on the underlying congenital heart condition, with the most complex cases typically being associated with atrial switch and Fontan surgeries. Although relatively high rates of recurrence are seen after a single procedure, additional attempts are often helpful to decrease recurrences and improve symptoms. Catheter ablation in such patients continues to present many unique challenges that are best addressed by experienced multidisciplinary teams, at centres equipped with the proper catheters, imaging capabilities, mapping systems and support staff needed to maximize safety and success. Consensus indications have emerged that often support ablation as first-line therapy in these patients. In this comprehensive review, we aim to describe the specific issues associated with ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias in adult congenital heart disease, assess the results in contemporary practice and, finally, review the current indications.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia referred for ablation. High success rates have been accompanied with a small risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. Cryoablation has been used as an alternative to radiofrequency (RF) ablation, but studies have been underpowered in comparing the 2 techniques.
RESULTS: An electronic search and hand-search of reference lists for published and unpublished data was carried out. Comparative studies (cohort and randomized controlled trials) of RF versus cryoablation for AVNRT were identified independently by 2 reviewers. Searches were limited to English language human studies. The primary metameter was long-term AVNRT recurrence (>2 months postprocedure and ECG/electrophysiology study [EPS]-documented) and secondary metameters included acute procedural failure and AV block requiring pacing. A total of 5,617 patients in 14 trials were included in this systematic review. Acute procedural failure with cryoablation was slightly higher than with RF ablation, but the difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio [RR] 1.44 [95% confidence interval; CI 0.91-2.28], P = 0.12). Long-term recurrence was higher with cryoablation (RR 3.66 [95% CI 1.84-7.28], P = 0.0002) even after adjusting for larger (6 mm) cryocatheter tips, \"insurance lesions\" and longer (>6 months) follow-up duration. RF ablation for AVNRT was associated with permanent AV block in 0.75% of patients, but was not reported in any patients treated with cryoablation (n = 1066, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for AVNRT. Although late-recurrence is more common with cryoablation than with RF ablation, avoidance of permanent AVN block makes it an attractive option in patients where the avoidance of AV block assumes higher priority (such as children and young adults).