Tachyarrhythmia

快速性心律失常
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    指南是指导患者诊断和治疗以改善卫生专业人员决策过程的重要工具。它们会根据新的证据定期更新。2021年,2022年和2023年的四个新指南提到了儿科起搏和除颤。永久性起搏有一些相关变化。在房室传导阻滞患者中,我们降低了建议植入起搏器的心率限值,以减少过早植入起搏器.然而,强调心率标准不是绝对的,因为血流动力学不耐受的心动过缓的体征或症状甚至可能以更高的速率发生。在窦房结功能障碍中,有症状的心动过缓是最相关的起搏建议.当认为心室起搏量高时,越来越多地使用和推荐生理性起搏。新的建议表明,循环记录仪可以指导遗传性心律失常综合征的管理,并且可能对严重但不频繁的心悸有用。关于除颤器植入,主要变化是一级预防建议。在肥厚型心肌病中,儿科风险计算器已纳入指南.在扩张型心肌病中,由于罕见的心源性猝死在儿科年龄,低射血分数标准被降级为II级.在长QT综合征中,新的标准包括严重延长QTc,根据基因型有不同的限制,和一些特定的突变。在致心律失常性心肌病中,血流动力学耐受性室性心动过速和心律失常性晕厥降级为II级推荐.总之,这些新指南旨在评估心脏可植入电子设备的所有方面,并改进治疗策略.
    Guidelines are important tools to guide the diagnosis and treatment of patients to improve the decision-making process of health professionals. They are periodically updated according to new evidence. Four new Guidelines in 2021, 2022 and 2023 referred to pediatric pacing and defibrillation. There are some relevant changes in permanent pacing. In patients with atrioventricular block, the heart rate limit in which pacemaker implantation is recommended was decreased to reduce too-early device implantation. However, it was underlined that the heart rate criterion is not absolute, as signs or symptoms of hemodynamically not tolerated bradycardia may even occur at higher rates. In sinus node dysfunction, symptomatic bradycardia is the most relevant recommendation for pacing. Physiological pacing is increasingly used and recommended when the amount of ventricular pacing is presumed to be high. New recommendations suggest that loop recorders may guide the management of inherited arrhythmia syndromes and may be useful for severe but not frequent palpitations. Regarding defibrillator implantation, the main changes are in primary prevention recommendations. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, pediatric risk calculators have been included in the Guidelines. In dilated cardiomyopathy, due to the rarity of sudden cardiac death in pediatric age, low ejection fraction criteria were demoted to class II. In long QT syndrome, new criteria included severely prolonged QTc with different limits according to genotype, and some specific mutations. In arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, hemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmic syncope were downgraded to class II recommendation. In conclusion, these new Guidelines aim to assess all aspects of cardiac implantable electronic devices and improve treatment strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经研究了β受体阻滞剂在危重病中的作用,在过去的二十年中,有关这些药物对危重病人的保护作用的数据已在文献中反复报道。然而,在危重患者中使用β受体阻滞剂的问题上,科学团体仍缺乏共识和指南.本文件的目的是支持危重患者使用β受体阻滞剂的临床决策过程。这份文件的接受者是医生,护士,医护人员,以及其他参与患者护理过程的专业人员。
    方法:意大利麻醉学会,镇痛,复苏和重症监护(SIAARTI)选择了一个专家小组,并要求他们定义在危重成年患者中使用β受体阻滞剂的关键方面。专家在此过程中遵循的方法符合改良的Delphi和RAND-UCLA方法的原则。专家们以翔实的文字形式提出了声明和支持性理由。发言的总体清单遭到盲目投票以达成共识。
    结果:文献检索表明,危重患者的肾上腺素能应激和心率增加与器官功能障碍和死亡率增加有关。因此,心率控制在危重病人的管理中似乎至关重要。需要针对继发性心动过速的鉴别诊断和节律紊乱的治疗进行仔细的临床评估。此外,在排除低血容量后,脓毒性休克患者可考虑使用β受体阻滞剂治疗持续性心动过速.静脉给药应该是首选的给药途径。
    结论:β受体阻滞剂对危重患者的保护作用已在文献中反复报道。它们在心率加快的急性治疗中的使用需要了解病理生理学和仔细的鉴别诊断。因为心动过速的所有原因都应该首先排除和解决。
    BACKGROUND: The role of β-blockers in the critically ill has been studied, and data on the protective effects of these drugs on critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature over the last two decades. However, consensus and guidelines by scientific societies on the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients are still lacking. The purpose of this document is to support the clinical decision-making process regarding the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients. The recipients of this document are physicians, nurses, healthcare personnel, and other professionals involved in the patient\'s care process.
    METHODS: The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects underlying the use of β-blockers in critically ill adult patients. The methodology followed by the experts during this process was in line with principles of modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales in the form of informative text. The overall list of statements was subjected to blind votes for consensus.
    RESULTS: The literature search suggests that adrenergic stress and increased heart rate in critically ill patients are associated with organ dysfunction and increased mortality. Heart rate control thus seems to be critical in the management of the critically ill patient, requiring careful clinical evaluation aimed at both the differential diagnosis to treat secondary tachycardia and the treatment of rhythm disturbance. In addition, the use of β-blockers for the treatment of persistent tachycardia may be considered in patients with septic shock once hypovolemia has been ruled out. Intravenous application should be the preferred route of administration.
    CONCLUSIONS: β-blockers protective effects in critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature. Their use in the acute treatment of increased heart rate requires understanding of the pathophysiology and careful differential diagnosis, as all causes of tachycardia should be ruled out and addressed first.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    这个国际多学科专家共识声明旨在提供全面的指导,可以在心脏电生理学家的护理点参考。心脏病学家,和其他医疗保健专业人员,关于孕妇和胎儿心律失常的管理。本文件涵盖与心律失常相关的一般概念,包括缓慢和快速性心律失常,在怀孕期间患者和胎儿。建议提供最佳的方法来诊断和评估心律失常;选择侵入性和非侵入性的选择治疗心律失常;和疾病和患者特定的考虑因素时,风险分层,诊断,以及治疗孕妇和胎儿的心律失常。还确定了知识差距和未来研究的新方向。
    This international multidisciplinary expert consensus statement is intended to provide comprehensive guidance that can be referenced at the point of care to cardiac electrophysiologists, cardiologists, and other health care professionals, on the management of cardiac arrhythmias in pregnant patients and in fetuses. This document covers general concepts related to arrhythmias, including both brady- and tachyarrhythmias, in both the patient and the fetus during pregnancy. Recommendations are provided for optimal approaches to diagnosis and evaluation of arrhythmias; selection of invasive and noninvasive options for treatment of arrhythmias; and disease- and patient-specific considerations when risk stratifying, diagnosing, and treating arrhythmias in pregnant patients and fetuses. Gaps in knowledge and new directions for future research are also identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号