TIRADS

TiRADS
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    目的:比较中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(C-TIRADS)与公认的ACR-TIRADS指南在鉴别良性和恶性甲状腺结节方面的诊断效能。
    方法:收集了2019年10月至2021年11月在我们中心接受甲状腺超声检查的1627例患者的2064个结节。结节分为两组:“≥1cm”和“<1cm”。由两名具有15年以上经验的医师观察并记录每个结节的超声特征,并根据ACR-TIRADS和C-TIRADS指南进行分类。分别。
    结果:ACR-TIRADS指南的曲线下面积高于C-TIRADS指南的曲线下面积(0.922,P=0.017),C-TIRADS指南的特异性和阳性预测值更高(81.64%,88.72%,所有P<0.05),在结节<1cm的亚组中更为显着(P=0.001)。此外,两个指南对结节≥1cm的诊断效能指标无统计学差异.与C-TIRADS相比,ACR-TIRADS有效减少了不必要的活检(P<0.05)。
    结论:两个指南对甲状腺结节的诊断有很高的一致性,C-TIRADS指南具有更高的特异性和简单性,而在减少活检数量方面不如ACR-TIRADS指南。
    To compare the diagnostic efficacy of the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (C-TIRADS) with the well-accepted ACR-TIRADS guidelines in identifying benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
    A total of 2064 nodules were collected from 1627 patients undergoing thyroid ultrasonography in our center between October 2019 and November 2021. Nodules were divided into two groups: \"≥1 cm\" and \"<1 cm\". Ultrasound features of each nodule were observed and recorded by two physicians with more than 15 years of experience and classified according to the ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS guidelines, respectively.
    The area under the curve of the ACR-TIRADS guideline was higher than that of the C-TIRADS guideline (0.922, P = 0.017), the specificity and positive predictive value of the C-TIRADS guideline were higher (81.64%, 88.72%, all P < 0.05), which was more significant in the subgroup of nodules <1 cm (P = 0.001). In addition, there was no statistical difference between the two guidelines in the diagnostic efficacy indicators for nodules ≥1 cm. The ACR-TIRADS effectively reduced unnecessary biopsies compared with the C-TIRADS (P < 0.05).
    There was high agreement between the two guidelines for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, C-TIRADS guidelines had a higher specificity and simplicity while were inferior to the ACR-TIRADS guidelines in terms of reducing the number of biopsies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Ultrasound (US) risk-stratification systems for investigation of thyroid nodules may not be as useful as anticipated.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to assess the performance and costs of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Image Reporting And Data System (ACR-TIRADS).
    UNASSIGNED: We examined the data set upon which ACR-TIRADS was developed, and applied TR1 or TR2 as a rule-out test, TR5 as a rule-in test, or applied ACR-TIRADS across all nodule categories. We assessed a hypothetical clinical comparator where 1 in 10 nodules are randomly selected for fine needle aspiration (FNA), assuming a pretest probability of clinically important thyroid cancer of 5%.
    UNASSIGNED: The gender bias (92% female) and cancer prevalence (10%) of the data set suggests it may not accurately reflect the intended test population. Applying ACR-TIRADS across all nodule categories did not perform well, with sensitivity and specificity between 60% and 80% and overall accuracy worse than random selection (65% vs 85%). Test performance in the TR3 and TR4 categories had an accuracy of less than 60%. Using TR5 as a rule-in test was similar to random selection (specificity 89% vs 90%). Using TR1 and TR2 as a rule-out test had excellent sensitivity (97%), but for every additional person that ACR-TIRADS correctly reassures, this requires >100 ultrasound scans, resulting in 6 unnecessary operations and significant financial cost.
    UNASSIGNED: Perhaps surprisingly, the performance ACR-TIRADS may often be no better than random selection. The management guidelines may be difficult to justify from a cost/benefit perspective. A prospective validation study that determines the true performance of TIRADS in the real-world is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Thyroid ultrasound (US) is a key examination for the management of thyroid nodules. Thyroid US is easily accessible, noninvasive, and cost-effective, and is a mandatory step in the workup of thyroid nodules. The main disadvantage of the method is that it is operator dependent. Thyroid US assessment of the risk of malignancy is crucial in patients with nodules, in order to select those who should have a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy performed. Due to the pivotal role of thyroid US in the management of patients with nodules, the European Thyroid Association convened a panel of international experts to set up European guidelines on US risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Based on a review of the literature and on the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Thyroid Association, and Korean guidelines, the panel created the novel European Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System, called EU-TIRADS. This comprises a thyroid US lexicon; a standardized report; definitions of benign and low-, intermediate-, and high-risk nodules, with the estimated risks of malignancy in each category; and indications for FNA. Illustrated by numerous US images, the EU-TIRADS aims to serve physicians in their clinical practice, to enhance the interobserver reproducibility of descriptions, and to simplify communication of the results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号