Superior vena cava

上腔静脉
  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    (1)背景:外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)是医学上常用的导管。显示尖端位置是PICC功能和相关并发症的主要决定因素。ECG指导的最新进展可能会促进日常练习。本研究旨在比较两种心电图技术,就它们的尖端位置精度而言,穿刺部位布置图,和信号质量;(2)方法:这项随机开放研究(1:1)包括320名参与者。一种PICC引导技术使用生理盐水(ST)的ECG信号传输;另一种技术使用导丝(WT)。通过胸部X射线上导管尖端与腔室交界处(DCAJ)之间的距离来比较技术,插入点止血时间,以及集线器与插入点之间的体外导管长度;(3)结果:ST之间的平均DCAJ差异有统计学意义(1.36cm,95%CI:1.22-1.37)和WT(1.12厘米,95%CI:0.98-1.25;p=0.013)组。当DCAJ被归类为最佳时,次优,或不足,技术之间的差异对临床影响有限(p=0.085).然而,与ST组(50%患者无延迟;p<0.001)相比,WT组穿刺部位的止血时间明显更好(82%患者无延迟).相反,ST获得最佳和次优体外长度的频率明显高于WT(100%与66%;p<0.001);(4)结论:ECG引导技术实现了显着不同的尖端位置,但差异对临床影响最小.然而,每种技术在PICC插入点都有一个重要的缺点:WT的体外导管明显更长,ST的止血延迟明显更长.
    (1) Background: The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is commonly used in medicine. The tip position was shown to be a major determinant in PICC function and related complications. Recent advances in ECG guidance might facilitate daily practice. This study aimed to compare two ECG techniques, in terms of their tip-position accuracy, puncture site layout, and signal quality; (2) Methods: This randomized open study (1:1) included 320 participants. One PICC guidance technique used ECG signal transmission with saline (ST); the other technique used a guidewire (WT). Techniques were compared by the distance between the catheter tip and the cavoatrial junction (DCAJ) on chest X-rays, insertion-point hemostasis time, and the extracorporeal catheter length between the hub and the insertion point; (3) Results: The mean DCAJs were significantly different between ST (1.36 cm, 95% CI: 1.22-1.37) and WT (1.12 cm, 95% CI: 0.98-1.25; p = 0.013) groups. When DCAJs were classified as optimal, suboptimal, or inadequate, the difference between techniques had limited clinical impact (p = 0.085). However, the hemostasis time at the puncture site was significantly better with WT (no delay in 82% of patients) compared to ST (no delay in 50% of patients; p < 0.001). Conversely, ST achieved optimal and suboptimal extracorporeal lengths significantly more frequently than WT (100% vs. 66%; p < 0.001); (4) Conclusions: ECG guidance technologies achieved significantly different tip placements, but the difference had minimal clinical impact. Nevertheless, each technique displayed an important drawback at the PICC insertion point: the extracorporeal catheter was significantly longer with WT and the hemostasis delay was significantly longer with ST.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:关于经验性上腔静脉隔离术(SVCI)是否提高阵发性心房颤动(PAF)成功率的数据存在矛盾。本研究试图首先探讨SVC触发AF的特点,其次,研究了在没有诱发SVC触发因素的情况下,除了环肺静脉隔离(CPVI)外,电解剖标测引导的SVCI对PAF消融结果的影响。
    方法:共有130名接受PAF消融术的患者在消融术前进行了电生理研究。在确定了SVC触发因素的患者中,除CPVI外还进行SVCI。没有引发SVC触发因素的患者以1:1的比例随机分配给CPVI加SVCI或仅CPVI。主要终点是在消融后12个月没有抗心律失常药物的情况下,在3个月的消隐期后30秒内没有任何记录的房性快速性心律失常。
    结果:在30例(23.1%)PAF患者中发现了SVC触发因素。12个月时,接受CPVI加SVCI的SVC诱发者中,93.3%没有房性快速性心律失常。在没有引发SVC触发器的患者中,除CPVI外,SVCI并未增加房性快速性心律失常的发生率(87.9%vs.79.6%,对数秩p=0.28)。
    结论:在没有可识别的SVC触发因素的患者中,除CPVI外,电解剖标测引导的SVCI并未增加PAF消融的成功率。
    OBJECTIVE: Data about whether empirical superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (SVCI) improves the success rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) are conflicting. This study sought to first investigate the characteristics of SVC-triggered atrial fibrillation and secondly investigate the impact of electroanatomical mapping-guided SVCI, in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI), on the outcome of PAF ablation in the absence of provoked SVC triggers.
    RESULTS: A total of 130 patients undergoing PAF ablation underwent electrophysiological studies before ablation. In patients for whom SVC triggers were identified, SVCI was performed in addition to CPVI. Patients without provoked SVC triggers were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to CPVI plus SVCI or CPVI only. The primary endpoint was freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting over 30 s after a 3-month blanking period without anti-arrhythmic drugs at 12 months after ablation. Superior vena cava triggers were identified in 30 (23.1%) patients with PAF. At 12 months, 93.3% of those with provoked SVC triggers who underwent CPVI plus SVCI were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias. In patients without provoked SVC triggers, SVCI, in addition to CPVI, did not increase freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (87.9 vs. 79.6%, log-rank P = 0.28).
    CONCLUSIONS: Electroanatomical mapping-guided SVCI, in addition to CPVI, did not increase the success rate of PAF ablation in patients who had no identifiable SVC triggers.
    BACKGROUND: ChineseClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2000034532.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    这项前瞻性观察性研究使用经食道超声心动图研究了中心静脉导管通过右颈内静脉的最佳插入深度。气管插管后,麻醉师在病人的食道中插入了一个食道超声心动图探针。研究人员用超声心动图将导管尖端放置在cristaterminalis上边缘上方2cm处,它被定义为最佳点。我们测量了导管的插入长度。使用测得的最佳深度和一些患者参数进行Pearson相关性测试。我们提出了将导管放置在最佳位置的新公式。共有89名受试者参加了该试验。测量的最佳深度与患者身高参数之间的相关系数最高(0.703,p<0.001)。我们做了一个新的公式\'高度(厘米)/10-1.5厘米\'。该公式对最优区的准确率为71.9%(95%置信区间;62.4-81.4%),当我们比较时,这是以前的公式或指南中最高的。总之,经食管超声心动图评估中心静脉导管尖端,我们可以做一个新的公式\'高度(厘米)/10-1.5\',这似乎比以前的其他指导方针更好。
    This prospective observational study investigated the optimal insertion depth of the central venous catheter through the right internal jugular vein using transesophageal echocardiography. After tracheal intubation, the anesthesiologist inserted a probe for esophageal echocardiography into the patient\'s esophagus. The investigators placed the catheter tip 2 cm above the superior edge of the crista terminalis with echocardiography, which was defined as the optimal point. We measured the inserted length of the catheter. Pearson correlation tests were performed with the measured optimal depth and some patient parameters. We made a new formula for placing the catheter at the optimal position. A total of 89 subjects were enrolled in this trial. The correlation coefficient between the measured optimal depth and the patient\'s parameters was the highest for patient height (0.703, p < 0.001). We made a new formula of \'height (cm)/10 - 1.5 cm\'. The accuracy rate of this formula for the optimal zone was 71.9% (95% confidence interval; 62.4 - 81.4%), which was the highest among the previous formulas or guidelines when we compared. In conclusion, the central venous catheter tip was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography, and we could make a new formula of \'height (cm)/10 - 1.5\', which seemed to be better than other previous guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:由于靠近传导系统,对海希斯亚通道(AP)的射频(RF)导管消融可能具有挑战性。
    方法:在三个中心共纳入30例顺氏AP患者进行消融,其中12人(40%)曾尝试下腔静脉(IVC)入路消融失败。所有患者均优先使用上腔静脉(SVC)的上级方法进行消融。
    结果:在30例患者中有28例(93.3%)的SVC方法中消除了对HisianAP。剩下的两个病人,为了成功消除AP,需要从IVC进行额外的消融.在首次射频应用期间,有两名患者出现了可逆性完全性房室传导阻滞和PR延长。在平均15.6±4.6个月的随访时间内,29例(96.7%)患者获得了长期的复发性心律失常。
    结论:使用直接SVC方法对上方的副HisianAP进行导管消融既安全又有效,尤其是在IVC入路常规消融失败的患者中,应予以考虑.
    BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of para-Hisian accessory pathways (APs) can be challenging due to proximity to the conduction system.
    METHODS: A total of 30 consecutive patients with para-Hisian AP were enrolled for ablation in three centers, 12 (40%) of whom had previously failed attempted ablation from the inferior vena cava (IVC) approach. Ablation was preferentially performed using a superior approach from the superior vena cava (SVC) in all patients.
    RESULTS: The para-Hisian AP was eliminated from the SVC approach in 28 of 30 (93.3%) patients. In the remaining two patients, additional ablation from IVC was required to successfully eliminate the AP. There were two patients experienced reversible complete atrial-ventricular block and PR prolongation during the first RF application. Long-term freedom from recurrent arrhythmia was achieved in 29 (96.7%) patients over a mean follow-up duration of 15.6 ± 4.6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation of para-Hisian AP from above using a direct SVC approach is both safe and effective, and should be considered especially in patients who have failed conventional ablation attempts from IVC approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:肺静脉隔离术(PVI)是治疗心房颤动(AF)的标准消融策略。然而,PVI无反应者重复程序的最佳策略仍不清楚.
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在调查接受重复手术的患者中PVI无应答者的发生率,以及重复消融复发的预测因素。
    UNASSIGNED:共筛查了2016年8月至2019年7月在两个中心接受重复消融的276例连续患者。共纳入64例(22%)持续性PVI患者。技术,如低压区修改,线性消融,非肺静脉触发消融,并进行了上腔静脉(SVC)的经验性隔离。
    未经评估:在20.0±9.9个月的随访后,42例(65.6%)患者无房性心律失常。据报道,非阵发性房颤的复发和非复发组之间存在显着差异(50vs.23.8%,p=0.038),糖尿病(27.3vs.4.8%,p=0.02),和经验上腔静脉(SVC)隔离(28.6vs.60.5%,p=0.019)。多因素回归分析表明,经验SVC隔离是无复发的独立预测因素(95%CI:1.64-32.8,p=0.009)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示经验性和非经验性SVC隔离组之间复发的显着差异(HR:0.338;95%CI:0.131-0.873;p=0.025)。
    UNASSIGNED:重复手术中大约22%的患者是PVI无应答者。非阵发性房颤和糖尿病与再消融后复发相关。经验SVC分离可能会改善PVI无反应者重复程序的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the standard ablation strategy for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal strategy of a repeat procedure for PVI non-responders remains unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to investigate the incidence of PVI non-responders in patients undergoing a repeat procedure, as well as the predictors for the recurrence of repeat ablation.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 276 consecutive patients who underwent repeat ablation from August 2016 to July 2019 in two centers were screened. A total of 64 (22%) patients with durable PVI were enrolled. Techniques such as low voltage zone modification, linear ablation, non-PV trigger ablation, and empirical superior vena cava (SVC) isolation were conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: After the 20.0 ± 9.9 month follow-up, 42 (65.6%) patients were free from atrial arrhythmias. A significant difference was reported between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups in non-paroxysmal AF (50 vs. 23.8%, p = 0.038), diabetes mellitus (27.3 vs. 4.8%, p = 0.02), and empirical superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (28.6 vs. 60.5%, p = 0.019). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that empirical SVC isolation was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrence (95% CI: 1.64-32.8, p = 0.009). Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrates significant difference in recurrence between empirical and non-empirical SVC isolation groups (HR: 0.338; 95% CI: 0.131-0.873; p = 0.025).
    UNASSIGNED: About 22% of patients in repeat procedures were PVI non-responders. Non-paroxysmal AF and diabetes mellitus were associated with recurrence post-re-ablation. Empirical SVC isolation could potentially improve the outcome of repeat procedures in PVI non-responders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估脉冲电场(PEF)消融系统的初步安全性和效果。
    方法:使用脉冲场消融(PFA)系统隔离肺静脉(PV)和上腔静脉(SVC),其中包括PEF发生器和电极。使用新型圆形导管在6个猪中研究了PFA的影响,该导管具有设计用于心脏标测系统的组合功能(标测/消融)。PEF发生器递送具有高振幅(800-2000V)和短脉冲持续时间的双相脉冲电脉冲串。电压映射,PV和SVC电位,口直径,4周后收集膈神经和食道活力数据,之后对动物实施安乐死以进行大体组织病理学分析。
    结果:PFA100%隔离了PV和SVC,其中四个应用的平均脉冲数为100-150个脉冲,不会引起肌肉抽搐.PFA不会引起PV狭窄或膈神经功能障碍。组织学分析证实,100%经壁无任何静脉狭窄或膈损伤。病理随访显示,PFA选择性消融心肌细胞,但保留血管,食道,和膈神经;消融后,心肌组织呈均匀纤维化。
    结论:PFA系统在初步猪模型中是安全可行的,能有效分离PVs和SVC。可以在没有膈麻痹或狭窄的情况下实现透壁组织损伤。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effect of a pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation system.
    METHODS: The pulmonary veins (PVs) and superior vena cava (SVC) were isolated with the pulsed field ablation (PFA) system, which included a PEF generator and an electrode. The effects of PFA were investigated in six porcines using a novel circular catheter with combined functions (mapping/ablation) designed to work with a cardiac mapping system. The PEF generator delivered a train of biphasic pulsed electric pulses with a high amplitude (800-2000 V) and short pulse duration. The voltage mapping, PVs and SVC potentials, ostial diameters, and phrenic nerve and esophagus viability data were collected 4 weeks later, after which the animals were subsequently euthanized for gross histopathology analysis.
    RESULTS: PFA 100% isolated the PVs and SVC with four applications with a mean pulse number of 100-150 pulses, causing no muscle convulsion. PFA does not cause PV stenosis or phrenic nerve dysfunction. Histological analysis confirmed 100% transmurally without any venous stenoses or phrenic injuries. Pathology follow-up showed that PFA had selectively ablated cardiomyocytes but spared blood vessels, the esophagus, and phrenic nerves; after ablation, the myocardial tissue showed homogeneous fibrosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The PFA system is safe and feasible in the preliminary porcine model, which can effectively isolate PVs and SVCs. Transmural tissue damage can be achieved without phrenic palsy or stenosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经授权:中心静脉导管(CVC)尖端的位置对于减少并发症非常重要。我们研究的目的是使用穿刺部位与右第三肋间隙(PS-RTICS)之间的距离比较改良的Peres高度公式和界标方法,并开发出正确定位CVC尖端的可靠公式。
    未经批准:此预期,随机研究是对400名男女患者进行的,18岁及以上,计划进行右颈内静脉插管。根据用于确定要插入的CVC长度的技术,将患者随机分为两组:A组,使用修改后的Peres\'高度公式,也就是说,患者身高(cm)/10-2和B组,使用PS-RTICS之间的距离并从中减去一个,即(PS-RTICS)-1。隆突被认为是CVC最佳插入的标志,这在术后胸部X光检查中得到证实。将如此获得的数据制成表格并进行分析。P<0.05的相关系数和回归系数具有统计学意义。
    未授权:在A组中,插入导管的平均长度为15.18±0.73cm,导管尖端位于隆突远端2.41±0.85cm(P=0.001).在A组中98.45%的患者发现过度插入。在B组中,插入导管的平均长度为14.12±0.85cm,导管尖端位于隆突远端0.20±1.18cm.
    UASSIGNED:尽管地标和修改后的Peres\'高度公式精度都很低,界标技术在预测右颈内静脉插管导管的正确深度方面具有优越性。
    UNASSIGNED: The position of the tip of the central venous catheter (CVC) is important to minimise complications. The aim of our study was to compare modified Peres\' height formula and landmark method using distance between puncture site and right third intercostal space (PS-RTICS) and to develop a reliable formula for correct positioning of tip of the CVC.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective, randomised study was conducted on 400 patients of either gender, of age 18 years and older, scheduled to undergo right internal jugular venous cannulation. Depending on the technique used for deciding the length of CVC to be inserted, the patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A, using modified Peres\' height formula, that is, height of patient (cm)/10-2 and Group B, using distance between PS-RTICS and subtracting one from it, that is (PS-RTICS)-1. The carina was taken as the landmark for optimum insertion of CVC, which was confirmed on postprocedure chest X-ray. Data so obtained were tabulated and analysed. P<.05 was considered statistically significant for correlation and regression coefficients.
    UNASSIGNED: In group A, the mean length of catheter inserted was 15.18 ± 0.73 cm and the catheter tip was found to be 2.41 ± 0.85 cm distal to carina (P =0.001). Over-insertion was found in 98.45% patients in group A. In group B, the mean length of catheter inserted was 14.12 ± 0.85 cm and the catheter tip was found to be 0.20 ± 1.18 cm distal to carina.
    UNASSIGNED: Though both landmark and modified Peres\' height formula has low accuracy, landmark technique is superior in predicting correct depth of right internal jugular venous cannulation catheter.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    上腔静脉(SVC)是心房颤动(AF)患者非肺静脉(PV)异位的主要组成部分。研究人员发现心外膜脂肪组织(EAT)体积与AF基质有关,这可以由低电压区域(LVA)定义。本研究旨在探讨SVC-EAT与SVC-AF的关系。26例SVC-AF触发者被确定为SVC-AF组。其他三组被定义为LVA-AF组(LVA>5%),非LVA-AF组(LVA<5%),体检(PE)组。使用心脏风险评估模块获得左心房周围的EAT(LA-EAT)和SVC-EAT体积。根据SVC/LA-EAT比率,SVC-AF组与三个对照组之间存在显着差异(SVC-AF组0.092±0.041vs.LVA-AF组0.054±0.026,非LVA-AF组0.052±0.022,PE组0.052±0.019,均P<0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线分析提示SVC/LA-EAT比值的最佳截点为6.8%,用于检测SVC-AF患者。灵敏度为81.1%,73.1%的特异性,曲线下面积为0.83(95%置信区间,0.75-0.91)。具有SVC-AF的那些具有较高的SVC/LA-EAT比率,并且如果SVC/LA-EAT比率超过6.8%,则可以考虑经验SVC隔离。
    The superior vena cava (SVC) is the main component of non-pulmonary vein (PV) ectopy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Researchers have found that epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume is related to the AF substrate, which can be defined by the low voltage area (LVA). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between SVC-EAT and SVC-AF. Twenty-six patients with SVC-AF triggers were identified as the SVC-AF group. Other three groups were defined and included as the LVA-AF group (LVA>5%), non-LVA-AF group (LVA<5%), and physical examination (PE) group. EAT around left atrium (LA-EAT) and SVC-EAT volumes were obtained using a cardiac risk assessment module. According to the SVC/LA-EAT ratio, there are significant differences between the SVC-AF group and the three control groups (the SVC-AF group 0.092±0.041 vs. the LVA-AF group 0.054±0.026, the non-LVA-AF group 0.052±0.022, and the PE group 0.052±0.019, all P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggests the optimal cut-off point of SVC/LA-EAT ratio is 6.8% for detecting SVC-AF patients, with 81.1% sensitivity, 73.1% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.91). Those with SVC-AF have a higher SVC/LA-EAT ratio and empirical SVC isolation could be considered if the SVC/LA-EAT ratio was over 6.8%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肝上皮样血管内皮瘤(HEHE)是一种罕见的血管源性恶性肿瘤。经典的,HEHE通常与成像相关,显示多灶性异质增强的肝结节和组织学检查显示在增生性纤维基质背景中混合的上皮样细胞和树突状细胞。虽然通常被描述为低至中等程度的惰性肿瘤,在考虑移植候选资格时,必须确定是否存在肝外扩散。我们描述了一个案例研究,其中HEHE被拒绝移植到上腔静脉的独特转移模式。这是先前未报道的HEHE转移位置,可能有助于扩大我们对该疾病潜在转移部位的当前理解。
    Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare malignant tumor of vascular origin. Classically, HEHE is typically associated with imaging demonstrating multifocal heterogeneously enhancing hepatic nodules and histologic examination revealing mixed epithelioid and dendritic cells in a proliferative fibrous stromal background. While generally described as a low-to-intermediate grade indolent tumor, it is essential to establish the presence or absence of extrahepatic spread when considering transplant candidacy. We describe one case study in which a transplant was denied to a unique metastatic pattern of HEHE to the superior vena cava. This is a previously unreported location of metastasis of HEHE and may serve to broaden our current understanding of potential metastatic sites for this disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:脐带挤奶(UCM)是一种允许产后胎盘输血的方法。在研究中已经证明了该方法的若干益处。然而,我们对这种方法的血流动力学影响的了解在足月婴儿中有限.这项研究的目的是评估UCM对足月儿的血流动力学影响。
    方法:在这项前瞻性随机对照研究中,149名出生周37周或以上的健康足月婴儿被随机分配到UCM或立即脐带钳夹(ICC)组。在开始的2至6小时内,对所有新生儿进行了盲超声心动图评估。
    结果:UCM组上腔静脉(SVC)流量测量值高于ICC组(132.47±37.0mL/kg/minvs.126.62±34.3mL/kg/min),但这种差异没有统计学意义。左心房直径(12.23±1.99mmvs.11.43±1.78mm)和左心房与主动脉舒张直径比(1.62±0.24vs.1.51±0.22)在UCM组中明显更高。UCM和ICC组之间的其他超声心动图参数没有显着差异。
    结论:
    Umbilical cord milking (UCM) is a method that allows for postnatal placental transfusion. The benefits of UCM have been demonstrated in some studies, but knowledge about its haemodynamic effects in term infants is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the haemodynamic effects of UCM in term infants.
    In this prospective, randomised controlled study, 149 healthy term infants with a birth week of ≥37 weeks were randomly assigned to either the UCM or immediate cord clamping (ICC) group. Blinded echocardiographic evaluations were performed in all the neonates in the first 2-6 h.
    Superior vena cava (SVC) flow measurements were higher in the UCM group compared to the ICC group (132.47 ± 37.0 vs. 126.62 ± 34.3 mL/kg/min), but this difference was not statistically significant. Left atrial diameter (12.23 ± 1.99 vs. 11.43 ± 1.78 mm) and left atrium-to-aorta diastolic diameter ratio (1.62 ± 0.24 vs. 1.51 ± 0.22) were significantly higher in the UCM group. There were no significant differences in other echocardiographic parameters between the two groups.
    We found no significant difference in the SVC flow measurements in term infants who underwent UCM versus those who underwent ICC. This lack of significant difference in SVC flow may be explained by the mature cerebral autoregulation mechanism in term neonates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号