Stoppa

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的描述采用改良Stoppa入路治疗髋臼骨折患者的临床和影像学结果。方法对2020年6月至2021年6月采用改良Stoppa入路治疗的成人髋臼骨折患者进行前瞻性分析,最短随访时间为12个月。分析包括人口统计,流行病学,围手术期数据,以及术后影像学和功能结果。结果本研究共15例,男性14人(93.3%),女性1人(6.67%)。术后断层评估显示解剖减少了50%,13.6%的不完美下降,36.4%的受试者减少得很差。关于功能分数,Harris髋关节评分为56~100分,平均值为92.5.Majeed骨盆评分将功能结局分为36.5%,40.6%良好,18.7%中等,在4.2%的病例中表现不佳。结论本病例系列研究表明,复位质量与功能结局之间以及手术时间与复位质量之间存在正统计学相关性。在一年的随访中的功能结果证明,这种方法可以是髋臼前骨折的极好替代方法。
    Objective  To describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a cohort of patients with acetabular fractures treated with the modified Stoppa approach. Methods  We conducted a prospective analysis of adult patients with acetabular fractures treated using the modified Stoppa approach from June 2020 to June 2021, with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The analysis included demographic, epidemiological, and perioperative data, as well as postoperative radiographic and functional outcomes. Results  The study included 15 cases, with 14 men (93.3%) and 1 woman (6.67%). A postoperative tomographic evaluation revealed an anatomical reduction in 50%, an imperfect reduction in 13.6%, and a poor reduction in 36.4% of the subjects. Regarding the functional scores, the Harris Hip Score ranged from 56 to 100, with a mean value of 92.5. The Majeed Pelvic Score classified the functional outcome as excellent in 36.5%, good in 40.6%, moderate in 18.7%, and poor in 4.2% of the cases. Conclusion  The present case series study demonstrated positive statistical relevance between reduction quality and functional outcomes and between the time until surgery and the reduction quality. The functional outcomes at a one-year of follow-up demonstrate that this approach can be an excellent alternative for anterior acetabulum fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:双侧腹股沟疝可以同时安全修复,开放或微创,选修sce-nario.手术方式的选择取决于病人的状态,疝的特点,外科医生和患者偏好。在两种方法之间进行选择时是否应考虑年龄标准仍然是一个争论的问题。考虑到对双侧腹股沟疝修补术的最佳修复尚无共识,本研究的目的是对双侧腹股沟疝患者的择期手术方法进行分析。材料和方法:研究双侧腹股沟疝患者的开放与腹腔镜暴露之间的关系,我们进行了一项病例对照研究.在我们的回顾性分析中,病例(23例)为开放入路疝修补术,对照组(82例)为腹腔镜疝修补术。我们分析了两组变量:第一,与患者特征相关(年龄65岁,BMI30kg/m2,吸烟习惯,HTA状态,COPD状态,DM状态,使用抗凝剂,肿瘤状态的存在)和第二,与疝特征相关的变量(腹股沟腹疝,复发性疝和复杂性疝)。结果:病例的平均年龄为73.26(±12.99)岁,对照组为,是56.48(±15.15)年。单变量分析表明四个变量具有统计学意义:年龄65岁,腹股沟阴囊疝,新塑料的地位,和抗凝剂的使用。当引入多变量分析时,我们注意到只有两个变量,年龄65岁(OR=4.183,95%CI[1.289,13.572],p=0.017)和抗凝剂的使用(OR=38.876,95%CI[1.305,1158.011],p=0.035)达到统计学意义。结论:这项研究表明,当我们提到双侧腹股沟疝修补术时,65岁患者接受开放手术的风险至少是65岁患者的4倍.此外,对于同一年龄组,使用抗凝剂增加开放式疝修补术的风险是微创修补术的38倍。有趣的是,在我们的研究中,未发现疝特征与开放式疝修补术和年龄65岁相关.在我们的研究中,我们发现年龄65岁与选择开放式疝修补术而不是微创修补术有关,这可能与年龄相关的风险因素有关。需要进一步研究年龄和年龄相关危险因素对双侧腹股沟疝修补术疗效的影响。
    Introduction: Bilateral inguinal hernia can be safely repaired simultaneously, open or minimally invasive, in an elective sce-nario. The choice of surgical approach depends on the patient\'s status, hernia characteristics, surgeons and patient preferences. Whether age criteria should be considered when selecting between the two approaches is still a matter of debate. Considering that there is no consensus regarding the best repair in bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy, the aim of the study is to perform an analysis regarding elective surgical approach of patients with bilateral inguinal hernias. Material and Methods: To study the relationship between exposure to an open versus laparoscopic approach in patients with bilateral inguinal hernia, we conducted a case-control study. In our retrospective analysis, cases (23 patients) were the open-approach hernia repair, and controls (82 patients) were laparoscopic hernia repair. We analyzed two sets of variables: first, related to patient characteristics (age 65 years, BMI 30 kg/m2, smoking habit, HTA status, COPD status, DM status, use of anticoagulants, presence of neoplastic status) and second, variables related to hernia features (inguinoscrotal hernia, recurrent hernia and complicated hernia). Results: The mean age for cases was 73.26 (Ã+-12.99) years and that of controls, was 56.48 (Ã+-15.15) years. Univariate analysis demonstrated four variables with statistical significance: age 65 years, inguinoscrotal hernia, neo-plastic status, and anticoagulant use. When introduced into the multivariate analysis, we noted that only two variables, age 65 years (OR=4.183, 95% CI [1.289, 13.572], p=0.017) and use of anticoagulants (OR=38.876, 95% CI [1.305, 1158.011], p=0.035) reached statistical significance. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that when we refer to bilateral inguinal hernia repair, patients aged 65 years are at risk of having an open procedure at least fourfold more than patients aged 65 years. In addition, the use of anticoagulants increases the risk of open hernia repair 38 times more than that of minimally invasive repair for the same age group. Interestingly, in our study, hernia characteristics were not found to be associated with open hernia repair and age 65 years. In our study we found that age 65 years is associated with electing open hernia repair over minimally invasive repair, which can be linked to age-related risk factors. Further re-search is needed to investigate the impact of age and age-related risk factors on surgical outcomes of bilateral inguinal hernia repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with the use of Stoppa approach for fractures of the acetabulum with quadrilateral plate involvement.
    METHODS: Retrospective study; level iv. All patients were operated in a third level trauma center. The surgical team was experienced in the management of pelvic fractures. Data about patients, injuries, treatment features and clinical and radiological results were collected. We performed a statistical analysis; both descriptive and analytical.
    RESULTS: 16 patients integrated the sample. 15 suffered associated fracture patterns. Anatomical plates were used in 15. Four required extended approaches. Reduction was anatomical in 9. 7 suffered some complication, needing the additional surgical procedures in 4. The surgical site infection rate was particularly high, appearing in 3.
    CONCLUSIONS: Radiological results were within the previously reported. We had a high complication rate, particularly infection. This outcome may be influenced by the special complexity of our cases and the adaptation process to a new technique.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the Stoppa approach we achieved lots of good or anatomical reductions. However, is an exigent and not without complications technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    Choosing the best operative technique for unilateral inguinal hernia is a challenge for surgeons. Therefore, anticipating loss of strength in the lower extremity muscles could be the initial step to make the right decision. To this end, this prospective randomized controlled study compared the physical activity parameters of the lower extremity muscles in patients who underwent total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) and Stoppa repair.
    Fifty patients with unilateral inguinal hernia who were 18-65 years of age were admitted to a single institution in a metropolitan city in Turkey. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to parallel study arms of TEP and STOPPA repair. They were evaluated in the preoperative period and on the postoperative day 3 for an objective isometric and isokinetic assessment of the pain-related functional changes in the lower extremity muscles.
    The measurement results obtained with the Cybex device on the postoperative day 3 were presented as numeric parameters in the digital setting, where the Stoppa repair resulted in a higher loss of strength in the lower extremities compared to the TEP repair. With respect to the total workforce loss in isokinetic muscular measurements at 90 °C/s extension, 90 °C/s flexion, 180 °C/s extension and 180 °C/s flexion, the difference between the TEP repair and Stoppa repair was statistically significant in favor of TEP repair (p < 0.05).
    This study is the first comparative study in the literature to demonstrate the favorable impact of the laparoscopic hernia repair on the physical activity on the same anatomic site compared to the open surgical procedure by using quantitative values.
    Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02813057.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Anterior pelvic ring surgery includes a variety of plating techniques and insertion of retrograde superior pubic ramus screws. Anterior acetabular surgery also includes fixation through an ilioinguinal or Stoppa approach. These exposures risk injury to the spermatic cord and accompanying genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve. The primary aim of this study was to identify the distance between the midline and the spermatic cords in adult male cadaveric specimens. The secondary aim was to determine spermatic cord diameters and measure the distance between the spermatic cord and implant during instrumentation of a retrograde superior pubic ramus medullary screw.
    METHODS: Extended Pfannenstiel and Stoppa approaches were performed on 18 embalmed male cadavers bilaterally. Spermatic cord characteristics were recorded and a number of measurements were performed to determine the distance of implants and the midline from the spermatic cord.
    RESULTS: The average distance between the midline and spermatic cords was 34.2 mm. The average distance between the spermatic cord and implant was 18.2 mm. Eleven of the thirty-six dissections had abnormalities including cord lipomas and inguinal hernias. The average cord diameter was 18.6 mm. The average cord diameter in those with abnormalities was 24.9 mm and 16 mm in those without abnormalities, this difference was statistically significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Due to the proximity of the spermatic cord, the surgeon should either formally expose the cord or limit lateral dissection from the midline during Pfannenstiel and Stoppa exposures. Similarly, the surgeon should use soft-tissue sleeves and oscillating drills to avoid injury to the contralateral spermatic cord during the insertion of retrograde superior pubic ramus medullary screws.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号