Splenic Artery

脾动脉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:钝性脾损伤(BSI)的非手术治疗(NOM)在适当的患者中被广泛接受。脾动脉栓塞术(SAE)在高级别损伤中可能在增加NOM的成功率中起重要作用。我们以前实施了一项协议,要求转诊所有接受NOM的BSIIII-V级SAE。目前尚不清楚并发症的风险以及纵向结果。我们旨在检查该方案的脾残率和安全性。我们假设脾抢救率会很高,并发症会很低。
    方法:在我们的1级创伤中心进行了为期9年的回顾性研究。收集了维持BSIIII-V级的患者的损伤特征和结果。比较NOM方案(SAE)和非方案(无血管造影或血管造影但无栓塞)的结果。检查血管造影的并发症。
    结果:在2010年1月至2019年2月之间,570名患者患有III-V级BSI。在359(63%)中尝试了NOM,总抢救率为91%(328)。其中,305个符合协议,54个不符合协议(41个没有血管造影,13个没有血管造影,但没有SAE)。在学习期间,对于每一个级别的损伤,与非协议组相比,在协议组中观察到较高的抢救率(III级,97%(181/187)与89%(32/36),四级,91%(98/108)与69%(9/13)和V级,80%(8/10vs.0%(0/5)。方案与方案的总体抢救率为94%(287)。76%(41)偏离方案(p<0.001,Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel检验)。在318例接受血管造影的患者中,仅有8例发生并发症(2%)。其中包括5个通路并发症和3个脓肿。
    结论:对于非手术治疗的所有严重脾损伤,使用需要常规脾动脉栓塞的方案是安全的,并发症发生率非常低。与非SAE患者相比,具有脾血管栓塞失败率的NOM在所有较高等级的损伤中都得到了改善。因此,对于所有血液动力学稳定的所有高级类型的患者,应将SAE视为此类损伤的主要治疗形式。
    OBJECTIVE: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) is well accepted in appropriate patients. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) in higher-grade injuries likely plays an important role in increasing the success of NOM. We previously implemented a protocol requiring referral of all BSI grades III-V undergoing NOM for SAE. It is unknown the risk of complications as well as longitudinal outcomes. We aimed to examine the splenic salvage rate and safety profile of the protocol. We hypothesized the splenic salvage rate would be high and complications would be low.
    METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at our Level 1 trauma center over a 9-year period. Injury characteristics and outcomes in patients sustaining BSI grades III-V were collected. Outcomes were compared for NOM on protocol (SAE) and off protocol (no angiography or angiography but no embolization). Complications for angiographies were examined.
    RESULTS: Between January 2010 and February 2019, 570 patients had grade III-V BSI. NOM was attempted in 359 (63 %) with overall salvage rate of 91 % (328). Of these, 305 were on protocol while 54 were off protocol (41 no angiography and 13 angiography but no SAE). During the study period, for every grade of injury a pattern was seen of a higher salvage rate in the on-protocol group when compared to the off-protocol group (Grade III, 97 %(181/187) vs. 89 %(32/36), Grade IV, 91 %(98/108) vs. 69 %(9/13) and Grade V, 80 %(8/10 vs. 0 %(0/5). The overall salvage rate was 94 %(287) on protocol vs. 76 %(41) off protocol (p < 0.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Complications occurred in only 8 of the 318 who underwent angiography (2 %). These included 5 access complications and 3 abscesses.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of a protocol requiring routine splenic artery embolization for all high-grade spleen injuries slated for non-operative management is safe with a very low complication rate. NOM with splenic angioembolization failure rate is improved as compared to non-SAE patients\' at all higher grades of injury. Thus, SAE for all hemodynamically stable patients of all high-grade types should be considered as a primary form of therapy for such injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究评估了胎儿胰腺的大小和回声,妊娠糖尿病(GDM)孕妇的脾动脉(SA)波形。
    方法:这项前瞻性病例对照研究于2022年10月至2023年11月进行,包括124名孕妇(62名GDM患者和62名对照)。胰腺周长,胰腺回声,脐动脉多普勒测量(收缩/舒张比[S/D]和搏动指数[PI]),SA多普勒测量(S/D,PI,收缩期峰值速度[PSV],时间平均最大速度[TAMV],比较GDM组和对照组之间的压力梯度[PG]平均值和最大值)。
    结果:在GDM组中,平均胰腺周长更高,2/3级回声更常见,而1级回声在对照组中更为常见(分别为p&lt;0.001和p&lt;0.001)。GDM组的SAS/D和PI测量值明显高于对照组(分别为p<0.001和p=0.001)。此外,GDM组的PGmax显著高于对照组(p=0.038)。胰周与SAPSV呈正相关(p=0.004)。此外,胰周与PGmean和PGmax呈正相关(分别为p=0.010和p=0.016)。胰腺回声的增加与SAS/D和PI测量值呈正相关(分别为p=0.007和p=0.002)。PGmax也与胰腺回声增加呈正相关(p=0.023)。
    结论:这项研究表明,GDM孕妇的胎儿胰腺大小和回声明显高于对照组。在GDM组中,SA多普勒波形与S/D和PI升高相关的血管阻力增加一致。
    BACKGROUND: This study evaluated fetal pancreas size and echogenicity, and splenic artery (SA) waveforms in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
    METHODS: This prospective case-control study was performed from October 2022 to November 2023 and included 124 pregnant women (62 with GDM and 62 controls). Pancreatic circumference, pancreatic echogenicity, umbilical artery Doppler measurements (systolic/diastolic ratio [S/D] and pulsatility index [PI]), SA Doppler measurements (S/D, PI, peak systolic velocity [PSV], time-averaged maximum velocity, and pressure gradient [PG] mean and maximum) values were compared between the GDM and control groups.
    RESULTS: The mean pancreatic circumference was higher and grade 2/3 echogenicity was more common in the GDM group, while grade 1 echogenicity was more common in the control group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). SA S/D and PI measurements were significantly higher in the GDM group than in the control group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Moreover, PGmax was significantly higher in the GDM group than in the control group (p = 0.038). Pancreatic circumference was positively correlated with SA PSV (p = 0.004). Additionally, pancreatic circumference was positively correlated with PGmean and PGmax (p = 0.010 and p = 0.016, respectively). The increase in pancreas echogenicity was positively correlated with SA S/D and PI measurements (p = 0.007 and p = 0.002, respectively). PGmax was also positively correlated with increased pancreas echogenicity (p = 0.023).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that fetal pancreas size and echogenicity were significantly higher in pregnant women with GDM than in controls. SA Doppler waveforms were consistent with an increase in vascular resistance associated with elevations of both S/D and PI in the GDM group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:保留脾血管的胰体远端切除术(SVP-SPDP)比牺牲脾血管的SPDP具有更低的脾梗死风险,但技术要求更高。机器人辅助SVP-SPDP(RSVP-SPDP)的学习曲线仍未报告。本研究旨在分析一位外科医生的RSVP-SPDP围手术期结果和学习曲线。
    方法:纳入2015年5月至2023年1月在中山大学附属第一医院接受RSVP-SDP治疗的74例患者。通过使用累积和(CUSUM)分析对学习曲线进行回顾性分析。
    结果:62例患者行RSVP-SPDP(保脾率:83.8%)。根据CUSUM曲线,手术时间(中位数,318vs.220分钟;P<0.001)和术中出血量(中位数,50vs.50mL;P=0.012)后显著改良16例。输血率(12.5%vs.3.4%;P=0.202),术后主要发病率(6.3%vs.3.4%;P=0.524),和术后住院时间(中位数,10vs.8天;P=0.120)后16例改良但未到达统计学差别。术后无一例出现脾梗死或脓肿。
    结论:RSVP-SPDP是经过学习曲线选择的患者安全可行的方法。16例患者手术时间及术中出血量均有改善。
    OBJECTIVE: Splenic vessel-preserving spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SVP-SPDP) has a lower risk of splenic infarction than the splenicvessel-sacrificing SPDP, but it is more technically demanding. Learning curve of robotic-assisted SVP-SPDP (RSVP-SPDP) remains unreported. This study sought to analyze the perioperative outcomes and learning curve of RSVP-SPDP by one single surgeon.
    METHODS: Seventy-four patients who were intended to receive RSVP-SPDP at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between May 2015 and January 2023 were included. The learning curve were retrospectively analyzed by using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses.
    RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent RSVP-SPDP (spleen preservation rate: 83.8%). According to CUSUM curve, the operation time (median, 318 vs. 220 min; P < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (median, 50 vs. 50 mL; P = 0.012) was improved significantly after 16 cases. Blood transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 3.4%; P = 0.202), postoperative major morbidity rate (6.3% vs. 3.4%; P = 0.524), and postoperative length-of-stay (median, 10 vs. 8 days; P = 0.120) improved after 16 cases but did not reach statistical difference. None of the patients had splenic infarction or abscess postoperatively.
    CONCLUSIONS: RSVP-SPDP was a safe and feasible approach for selected patients after learning curve. The improvement of operation time and intraoperative blood loss was achieved after 16 cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:为了确定患病率,临床和放射学特征,相关因素,治疗,以及感染性心内膜炎(IE)脾动脉瘤(SAAs)的预后。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了我们机构收治的474例明确IE患者(2005-2020)。
    结果:6名患者有SAAs(1.3%;3名女性;平均年龄:50岁)。在所有情况下,诊断是通过腹部计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)获得的。SAAs-IE为单发和囊状,平均直径为30mm(范围:10-90mm)。SAAs-IE为脾内(n=4)或肝门(n=2)。链球菌属。是优势生物(n=4)。在所有情况下,受累于左侧天然瓣膜(主动脉,n=3;二尖瓣,n=2;二尖瓣-主动脉,n=1)。在一半的患者中,SAA是沉默的,并通过腹痛(n=2)和心脏手术后发烧的复发(n=1)来显示。所有患者均行紧急瓣膜置换术。一名患者在24小时内死于多器官衰竭。对于其他人来说,4例患者在瓣膜置换术后进行了顺利的线圈栓塞(3例早期诊断,1例8周)。剩下的病人,在第16天在腹部CTA诊断出SAA-IE,仅在适当的抗生素治疗下即可完全解决。
    结论:SAAs-IE是一种罕见的临床症状。SAAs-IE可以位于脾内或肺门位置。在这种情况下,血管内治疗是安全的。根据目前的指导方针,通过腹部CTA进行的放射学筛查可以检测到沉默的SAA,这些SAA可以通过血管内治疗来预防破裂。这些SAA的延迟形成可以证明在抗生素治疗结束时CTA控制是合理的。
    BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence, the clinical and radiological features, associated factors, treatment, and outcome of splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) in infective endocarditis (IE).
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 474 consecutive patients admitted to our institution with definite IE (2005-2020).
    RESULTS: Six patients had SAAs (1.3%; 3 women; mean age: 50 years). In all cases, the diagnosis was obtained by abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA). SAAs-IE were solitary and saccular with a mean diameter of 30 mm (range: 10-90 mm). SAAs-IE were intrasplenic (n = 4) or hilar (n = 2). Streptococcus spp. were the predominant organisms (n = 4). In all cases, a left-sided native valve was involved (aortic, n = 3; mitral, n = 2; mitral-aortic, n = 1). SAAs were silent in half patients and were revealed by abdominal pain (n = 2) and by the resurgence of fever after cardiac surgery (n = 1). All patients underwent emergent valve replacement. One patient died within 24 hr from multiorgan failure. For the others, uneventful coil embolization was performed in 4 patients after valve replacement (3 diagnosed early and 1 at 8 weeks). In the remaining patient, SAA-IE diagnosed at abdominal CTA at day 16, with complete resolution under appropriate antibiotherapy alone.
    CONCLUSIONS: SAAs-IE are a rare occurrence that may be clinically silent. SAAs-IE can be intrasplenic or hilar in location. Endovascular treatment in this context was safe. According to current guidelines, radiologic screening by abdominal CTA allowed the detection of silent SAAs which could be managed by endovascular treatment to prevent rupture. The delayed formation of these SAAs could justify a CTA control at the end of antibiotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:原位肝移植后,肝动脉血流受损可能导致胆道缺血和移植物丢失。脾功能亢进和肝动脉血流受损的这种情况被定义为脾动脉盗血综合征。本研究的目的是探讨围手术期因素与原位肝移植患者脾动脉盗血综合征的关系。
    方法:在2014年至2022年期间接受原位肝移植的45例患者被纳入研究。患者的数据来自医院数据库,包括术中麻醉和术后重症监护记录。
    结果:11例患者被诊断为脾动脉盗血综合征。脾动脉盗血综合征患者对术中血管加压药的需求较高(P=.016),术中尿量较低(P=.031)。在术后重症监护随访中,脾动脉盗血综合征患者在最初48小时内C反应蛋白水平较高(P=0.030).
    结论:术中使用血管加压药,尿量低,术后早期高C反应蛋白水平与原位肝移植患者脾动脉盗血综合征的发生有关。未来的研究应集中于研究可能导致脾动脉盗血综合征发展的系统性灌注不足的生物标志物。
    After orthotopic liver transplant, ischemia of biliary tract and graft loss may occur due to impaired hepatic arterial blood flow. This situation with hypersplenism and impaired hepatic arterial blood flowis defined as splenic artery steal syndrome.The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between perioperative factors and splenic artery steal syndrome in orthotopic liver transplant patients.
    Forty-five patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplant between 2014 and 2022 were included in the study. The data for the patients were obtained from the hospital database, including the intraoperative anesthesiology and postoperative intensive care records.
    Eleven patients were diagnosed with splenic artery steal syndrome. Patients with splenic artery steal syndrome had higher need for intraoperative vasopressor agents (P = .016) and exhibited lower intraoperative urine output (P = .031). In the postoperative intensive care follow-up, patients with splenic artery steal syndrome had higher levels of C-reactive protein during the first 48 hours (P = .030).
    Intraoperative administration of vasopressor drugs, low urine output, and early postoperative high C-reactive protein levels were associated with the development of splenic artery steal syndrome in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant. Future studies should focus on investigation of biomarkers associated systemic hypoperfusion that may contribute to the development of splenic artery steal syndrome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Controlled Clinical Trial
    BACKGROUND Splenic artery steal syndrome (SASS) can aggravate liver damage in patients with cirrhosis. This study explored whether SASS could be an effective therapeutic target for improving hepatic artery perfusion and liver function in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 87 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis and portal hypertension hypersplenism admitted to our General Surgery Department for splenectomy and pericardial devascularization surgery were selected. A total of 35 cases met the diagnostic criteria of SASS and were assigned to the SASS group; the remaining 52 cases were assigned to the control group. The indicators before, during, and after surgery were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS There were no significant differences in preoperative and intraoperative indicators between SASS group and control group (P>0.05). The MELD score 7 days after surgery and the hepatic artery diameter and hepatic artery velocity 14 days after surgery in both groups were significantly better than before surgery. The MELD score 7 days after surgery in the SASS group was significantly better than that in the control group, and the hepatic artery diameter and hepatic artery velocity 14 days after surgery in the SASS group were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Splenectomy and pericardial devascularization surgery was an effective treatment to redirect blood flow to the hepatic artery for cirrhotic patients diagnosed with SASS. The introduction of cirrhotic SASS into clinical practice may benefit more patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension and hypersplenism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估腹腔干(CT)分支的形态,左胃(LGA),普通肝(CHA),来自哥伦比亚人口样本的尸体标本中的脾(SA)动脉。
    方法:对在Bucaramanga的医学研究所接受法医尸检的人尸体腹部上段26块进行的描述性横断面研究,哥伦比亚。腹腔干的血管床,随后,用半合成树脂灌注.
    结果:LGA的直径,CHA,SA为3.6±0.8mm,5,2±1.2mm,5.9±1.0mm,分别。统计上,LGA和SA是不同的(p=<0.001)。SA在8个(31%)样本中遵循线性轨迹,在4个(15%)中略有曲折,和曲折的14(54%)。弯曲指数为1.25±0.18。在CHA的分支中,肝固有动脉(PHA)直径4.8±1.2mm,长度18.8±9.1mm,而胃十二指肠动脉(GDdA)为4.1±0.8mm。在2例(7.7%)中,发现来自LGA的副肝动脉向左肝叶提供灌注.最后,在2例(7.7%)中,SA独立于腹主动脉。
    结论:观察到的CT分支的出现发生率与文献报道的水平相同。表征,以及它们的变体,LGA,CHA,在上腹部段的外科手术中必须考虑SA,避免医源性并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the morphology of the branches of celiac trunk (CT), left gastric (LGA), common hepatic (CHA), and splenic (SA) arteries in cadaveric specimens from a sample of a Colombian population.
    METHODS: descriptive cross-sectional study of 26 blocks from the abdominal upper segment of human cadavers who underwent forensic autopsies at the Instituto de Medicina Legal at Bucaramanga, Colombia. The vascular beds of the celiac trunk were, subsequently, perfused with a semi-synthetic resin.
    RESULTS: the diameters of LGA, CHA, and SA were 3.6±0.8mm, 5,2±1.2mm, and 5.9±1.0mm, respectively. Statistically, LGA and SA were different (p=<0.001). SA followed a linear trajectory in 8 (31%) samples, slightly tortuous in 4 (15%), and tortuous in 14 (54%). The tortuosity index was 1.25±0.18. Of the branches of CHA, the proper hepatic artery (PHA) had 4.8±1.2mm in diameter and 18.8±9.1mm in length, whereas the gastroduodenal artery (GDdA) had 4.1±0.8mm. In 2 cases (7.7%), an accessory hepatic artery from the LGA was found to supply perfusion to the left hepatic lobe. Finally, in 2 cases (7.7%) the SA came independently from the abdominal aorta.
    CONCLUSIONS: the observed emergence incidence of the CT branches from the same level as reported in the literature is lower. The characterization, along with their variants, of LGA, CHA, and SA must be considered in surgical procedures in the upper abdominal segment, to avoid iatrogenic complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在评估双微导管技术治疗囊状脾动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。
    方法:从2013年11月至2020年10月,56例囊状脾动脉瘤患者在我们机构接受了双微导管技术的血管内治疗。技术上的成功定义为动脉瘤腔的栓塞,而没有阻塞父动脉。临床成功定义为没有因脾动脉瘤而死亡,没有再干预,1、6和12个月时复发或器官功能障碍。
    结果:技术成功率为100%。未观察到与血管造影或栓塞相关的主要并发症。轻微的并发症包括发烧,疼痛,恶心,13例患者出现轻微并发症。在1个月,临床成功率为96.4%。在6个月和12个月时,临床成功率为92.9%。没有动脉瘤复发或需要再干预。
    结论:双微导管技术线圈栓塞治疗囊状脾动脉瘤是一种安全有效的方法,为希望保留其原始血流动力学的患者提供了合理的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the double microcatheter technique in the treatment of saccular splenic artery aneurysms.
    METHODS: From November 2013 to October 2020, 56 patients with saccular splenic artery aneurysms underwent endovascular treatment with the double microcatheter technique at our institution. Technical success was defined as embolization of the aneurysmal cavity with no obstruction of the parent artery. Clinical success was defined as no deaths due to splenic artery aneurysms, and no reintervention, recrudescence or organ dysfunction at 1, 6, and 12 months.
    RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%. No major complications related to angiography or embolization were observed. Minor complications included fever, pain, and nausea, and 13 patients developed minor complications. At 1 month, the rate of clinical success was 96.4%. At 6 and 12 months, the clinical success rate was 92.9%. There were no aneurysmal recurrences or necessities of reintervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Coil embolization with the double microcatheter technique is a safe and effective modality for treating saccular splenic artery aneurysms and offers a reasonable choice for patients who want to retain their original hemodynamics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:自主神经系统是炎症的关键调节因子。迷走神经的电刺激已被证明具有一些临床前功效。然而,只有少数临床研究被报道治疗炎症性疾病。本研究评估,第一次,接受微创食管切除术(MIE)的患者的脾动脉神经血管束(SpANVB)的神经调节,其中SpANVB作为程序的一部分被暴露。
    未经评估:这个单中心,单臂研究纳入了13例接受MIE的患者。在MIE的腹部阶段,在SpANVB周围放置了一个新的袖口,并施加刺激。主要终点是应用和去除袖带的可行性和安全性。次要终点包括刺激过程中刺激对SpA血流变化的影响,探索点是术后第2天和第3天(POD)的C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。
    未经授权:所有患者都成功接受了安置,刺激,和移除SpANVB上的袖带,没有与研究程序相关的不良事件。刺激与脾动脉血流的总体减少有关,但与血压或心率的变化无关。与历史倾向得分匹配(PSM)对照相比,POD2的CRP水平(124vs.197mg/ml,p=0.032)和POD3(151vs.221mg/ml,p=0.033)在接受刺激的患者中更低。
    UNASSIGNED:这项首次人体研究首次证明,在SpANVB周围施加袖带并随后进行刺激是安全的,可行,可能对MIE术后炎症反应有影响。这些发现表明,SpANVB刺激可能为急性或慢性炎症条件下的免疫调节治疗提供新方法。
    UNASSIGNED: The autonomic nervous system is a key regulator of inflammation. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve has been shown to have some preclinical efficacy. However, only a few clinical studies have been reported to treat inflammatory diseases. The present study evaluates, for the first time, neuromodulation of the splenic arterial neurovascular bundle (SpA NVB) in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), in which the SpA NVB is exposed as part of the procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-center, single-arm study enrolled 13 patients undergoing MIE. During the abdominal phase of the MIE, a novel cuff was placed around the SpA NVB, and stimulation was applied. The primary endpoint was the feasibility and safety of cuff application and removal. A secondary endpoint included the impact of stimulation on SpA blood flow changes during the stimulation, and an exploratory point was C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on postoperative day (POD) 2 and 3.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients successfully underwent placement, stimulation, and removal of the cuff on the SpA NVB with no adverse events related to the investigational procedure. Stimulation was associated with an overall reduction in splenic arterial blood flow but not with changes in blood pressure or heart rate. When compared to historic Propensity Score Matched (PSM) controls, CRP levels on POD2 (124 vs. 197 mg/ml, p = 0.032) and POD3 (151 vs. 221 mg/ml, p = 0.033) were lower in patients receiving stimulation.
    UNASSIGNED: This first-in-human study demonstrated for the first time that applying a cuff around the SpA NVB and subsequent stimulation is safe, feasible, and may have an effect on the postoperative inflammatory response following MIE. These findings suggest that SpA NVB stimulation may offer a new method for immunomodulatory therapy in acute or chronic inflammatory conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较血液动力学稳定(HDS)和血液动力学不稳定(HDU)患者脾动脉栓塞(SAE)治疗急性脾损伤(ASI)的疗效。SAE的非手术治疗已成为ASI患者HDS的公认做法;然而,用于治疗患有ASI的HDU患者的SAE尚未得到很好的研究。
    方法:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括52例HDU和HDS患者,他们在1级创伤中心接受了ASISAE。HDU定义为干预前记录的最低收缩压<90mmHg。利用美国创伤外科协会(AAST)脾损伤量表,AAST1-3级被定义为低年级,4-5年级被定义为高年级。主要结果是30天的存活和需要后续的脾切除术。
    结果:75%(n=39)的患者为HDS,25%(n=13)为HDU。接受SAE的HDU患者中,大多数(69%)不需要脾切除术,与95%的HDS患者相比(P=0.03)。HDU和HDS患者的30天生存率没有显着差异。无重大不良事件记录。高级别和低级别脾损伤之间的30天患者生存率或随后的脾切除术率没有显着差异。
    结论:在这项回顾性队列研究中,有ASI的HDU和HDU患者的不良事件或SAE后30天生存率无统计学差异.作者得出结论,SAE对于患有ASI的HDU患者可以是一种安全有效的治疗选择,包括严重的脾损伤.
    To compare the outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE) for acute splenic injury (ASI) between patients who are hemodynamically stable (HDS) and hemodynamically unstable (HDU). Nonoperative management with SAE has become an accepted practice for patients who are HDS with ASI; however, SAE for the treatment of patients who are HDU with ASI has not been well studied.
    A retrospective cohort study was performed, including 52 patients who were HDU and HDS who underwent SAE for ASI at a Level 1 trauma center. HDU was defined as the lowest recorded systolic blood pressure prior to intervention <90 mm Hg. Utilizing the American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) splenic injury scale, AAST Grades 1-3 were defined as low grade, and Grades 4-5 were defined as high grade. The primary outcomes were survival at 30 days and the need for subsequent splenectomy.
    Seventy-five percent (n = 39) of the patients were HDS, and 25% (n = 13) were HDU. The majority (69%) of patients who were HDU who underwent SAE did not require splenectomy, compared with 95% of patients who were HDS (P = .03). No significant difference in 30-day survival between patients who were HDU and HDS was noted. No major adverse events were recorded. There was no significant difference in 30-day patient survival or the rate of subsequent splenectomy between high-grade and low-grade splenic injuries.
    In this retrospective cohort study, there was no statistically significant difference in the adverse events or 30-day post-SAE survival rates between patients who were HDS and HDU with ASI. The authors conclude that SAE can be a safe and effective treatment option for patients who are HDU with ASI, including high-grade splenic injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号