BACKGROUND: There are concerns that airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury may exacerbate an existing neurological deficit, cause a new spinal cord injury or be hazardous due to precautions to avoid neurological injury. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for practicing clinicians to support safe and effective airway management in this setting.
METHODS: An expert multidisciplinary, multi-society working party conducted a systematic review of contemporary literature (January 2012-June 2022), followed by a three-round Delphi process to produce guidelines to improve airway management for patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury.
RESULTS: We included 67 articles in the systematic review, and successfully agreed 23 recommendations. Evidence supporting recommendations was generally modest, and only one moderate and two strong recommendations were made. Overall, recommendations highlight key principles and techniques for pre-oxygenation and facemask ventilation; supraglottic airway device use; tracheal intubation; adjuncts during tracheal intubation; cricoid force and external laryngeal manipulation; emergency front-of-neck airway access; awake tracheal intubation; and cervical spine immobilisation. We also signpost to recommendations on pre-hospital care, military settings and principles in human factors.
CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that the pragmatic approach to airway management made within these guidelines will improve the safety and efficacy of airway management in adult patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury.

BACKGROUND: This narrative review aims to evaluate the impact of current spinal immobilization practices on clinical outcomes in adult trauma patients with suspected or confirmed spinal injury to direct the creation of improved practice management guidelines.
METHODS: PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were searched for studies that evaluated the impact of spine immobilization practices during resuscitation in adult trauma patients and reported associated clinical outcomes. Outcomes included neurological deficits, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS), ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS), discharge disposition, long-term functional status (modified Rankin scale), vascular injury rate, and respiratory injury rate.
RESULTS: Nine studies were included in this review, divided into two groups based on patient immobilization status. Patients compared with and without cervical immobilization had higher mortality, longer ICU-LOS, and a higher incidence of neurological deficits if immobilized. Immobilization only was associated with a higher incidence of indirect neurological injury and poor functional outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Spinal immobilization during resuscitation in adult trauma patients is associated with a higher risk of neurological injury, in-hospital mortality, and longer ICU-LOS. Further research is needed to provide strong evidence for spinal immobilization guidelines and identify the optimal method and timing for immobilization practices in trauma patients.

This review aims to evaluate current practices regarding spine immobilization in pediatric trauma patients to evaluate their efficacy, reliability, and impact on clinical outcomes to guide future research and improved evidence-based practice guidelines.
PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were queried for studies pertaining to spinal immobilization practices in pediatric trauma patients. Articles were separated into studies that explored both the efficacy and clinical outcomes of spine immobilization. Outcomes evaluated included frequency of spinal imaging, self-reported pain level, emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS), and ED disposition.
Six articles were included, with two studies examining clinical outcomes and 4 studies evaluating the efficacy and reliability of immobilization techniques. Immobilized children were significantly more likely to undergo cervical spine imaging (OR 8.2, p < 0.001), be admitted to the floor (OR 4.0, p < 0.001), be taken to the ICU or OR (OR 5.3, p < 0.05) and reported a higher median pain score. Older children were significantly more likely to be immobilized. No immobilization techniques consistently achieved neutral positioning, and patients most often presented in a flexed position. Lapses in immobilization occurred in 71.4% of patients.
Immobilized pediatric patients underwent more cervical radiographs, and had higher hospital and ICU admission rates, and higher mean pain scores than those without immobilization. Immobilization was inconsistent across age groups and often resulted in lapses and improper alignment. Further research is needed to identify the most appropriate immobilization techniques for pediatric patients and when to use them.

Survey of cases.
To evaluate the opinion of experts in the diagnostic process of clinically relevant Spinal Post-traumatic Deformity (SPTD).
SPTD is a potential complication of spine trauma that can cause decreased function and quality of life impairment. The question of when SPTD becomes clinically relevant is yet to be resolved.
The survey of 7 cases was sent to 31 experts. The case presentation was medical history, diagnostic assessment, evaluation of diagnostic assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Means, ranges, percentages of participants, and descriptive statistics were calculated.
Seventeen spinal surgeons reviewed the presented cases. The items\' fracture type and complaints were rated by the participants as more important, but no agreement existed on the items of medical history. In patients with possible SPTD in the cervical spine (C) area, participants requested a conventional radiograph (CR) (76%-83%), a flexion/extension CR (61%-71%), a computed tomography (CT)-scan (76%-89%), and a magnetic resonance (MR)-scan (89%-94%). In thoracolumbar spine (ThL) cases, full spine CR (89%-100%), CT scan (72%-94%), and MR scan (65%-94%) were requested most often. There was a consensus on 5 out of 7 cases with clinically relevant SPTD (82%-100%). When consensus existed on the diagnosis of SPTD, there was a consensus on the case being compensated or decompensated and being symptomatic or asymptomatic.
There was strong agreement in 5 out of 7 cases on the presence of the diagnosis of clinically relevant SPTD. Among spine experts, there is a strong consensus to use CT scan and MR scan, a cervical CR for C-cases, and a full spine CR for ThL-cases. The lack of agreement on items of the medical history suggests that a Delphi study can help us reach a consensus on the essential items of clinically relevant SPTD.
Level V.

UNASSIGNED: Spinal assessment and immobilisation has been a topic of debate for many years where, despite an emerging evidence base and the delivery of new guidance overseas, little has changed within UK pre-hospital practice. Since 2018, South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust has spent time working with local trauma networks and expertise from within the region and international colleagues to develop a set of C-spine assessment and immobilisation guidelines that reflect the current best available international evidence and significant changes in international pre-hospital practice from settings such as Scandinavia and Australasia.
UNASSIGNED: A specialist group was commissioned to review the topic of pre-hospital spinal immobilisation and explore potential for evidence-based improvement. In conjunction with local trauma networks, subject matter experts and a thorough review of recent literature, a series of recommendations were made in order to improve spinal care within the authoring trust.
UNASSIGNED: Seven recommendations were made, and an updated set of guidelines produced. These included the removal of semi-rigid collars from pre-hospital spinal immobilisation; the creation of two tiers of patients to ensure that the high-risk and low-risk populations are considered separately and an accompanying decision tool to safeguard both cohorts; an increased emphasis on the risk of spinal injury in the frail and older patient; an emphasis on spinal motion restriction rather than rigid immobilisation; an increased emphasis on self-extrication; and the use of a marker for emergency departments.
UNASSIGNED: An updated set of guidance has been produced using a combination of specialist and expert opinion alongside a literature review with close involvement of key stakeholders, both public and professional. The new guidance helps to ensure a patient-centred approach where each person is considered an individual with their risk of injury and management measures tailored to their specific needs.

OBJECTIVE: Physical examination and computed tomography (CT) are useful to rule out cervical spine injury (CSI). Computed tomography scans increase lifetime cancer risk in children from radiation exposure. Most CSI in children occur between the occiput and C4. We developed a cervical spine (C-spine) clearance guideline to reduce unnecessary CTs and radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients.
METHODS: A pediatric C-spine clearance guideline was implemented in September 2018 at our Level 2 Pediatric Trauma Center. Guidance included CT of C1 to C4 to scan only high-yield regions versus the entire C-spine and decrease radiation dose. A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing preguideline and postguideline of all pediatric trauma patients younger than 8 years screened for CSI from July 2017 to December 2020. Primary endpoints included the following: number of full C-spine and C1 to C4 CT scans and radiation dose. Secondary endpoints were CSI rate and missed CSI. Results were compared using χ 2 and Wilcoxon rank-sum test with P < 0.05 significant.
RESULTS: The review identified 726 patients: 273 preguideline and 453 postguideline. A similar rate of total C-spine CTs were done in both groups (23.1% vs 23.4%, P = 0.92). Full C-spine CTs were more common preguideline (22.7% vs 11.9%, P < 0.001), whereas C1 to C4 CT scans were more common post-guideline (11.5% vs 0.4%, P < 0.001). Magnetic resonance imaging utilization and CSIs identified were similar in both groups. The average radiation dose was lower postguideline (114 vs 265 mGy·cm -1 ; P < 0.001). There were no missed CSI.
CONCLUSIONS: A pediatric C-spine clearance guideline led to increasing CT of C1 to C4 over full C-spine imaging, reducing the radiation dose in children.
METHODS: Level IV, therapeutic.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Injuries to the subaxial cervical spine are increasing and have an increased neurological risk compared to the thoracic and lumbar spines. The current treatment recommendations according to the therapeutic recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) as well as the S1 guidelines of the German Trauma Society (DGU) are presented. This second part of the article describes the correct indications and treatment planning for injuries to the cervical spine. Based on the AOSpine classification for subaxial cervical spine injuries, decisions can be made about conservative or surgical treatment as well as individual details of the treatment. The underlying principles of treatment are relief of neurological structures, restoration of stability and reconstruction/preservation of the physiological alignment.
UNASSIGNED: Verletzungen der subaxialen HWS nehmen zu und weisen ein im Vergleich zu Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule erhöhtes neurologisches Risiko auf. Dargestellt werden die aktuellen Behandlungsempfehlungen gemäß den Therapieempfehlungen der Sektion Wirbelsäule (DGOU) und der S1-Leitlinie der DGU. Der vorliegende 2. Teil des Beitrags beschreibt die korrekte Indikationsstellung und Therapieplanung für Halswirbelverletzungen. Ausgehend von der AOSpine-Klassifikation für subaxiale HWS-Verletzungen können Entscheidungen über eine konservative oder operative Therapie sowie einzelne Details der Therapie getroffen werden. Die grundlegenden Therapieprinzipien lauten Entlastung neurologischer Strukturen, Wiederherstellung von Stabilität und Rekonstruktion/Erhalt des physiologischen Alignments.

暂无摘要。