Sodium Channel Blockers

钠通道阻断剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:关于抗癫痫药物(ASM)安全性的高质量证据的利用受到缺乏标准化报告的限制。本研究旨在使用真实世界数据检查ASM的安全性。(2)方法:数据收集自2012年至2021年的韩国不良事件报告系统数据库(KAERS-DB)。总的来说,分析46,963例药物不良反应(ADR)-药物对。(3)结果:在系统器官类别级别,最常见的钠通道阻滞剂(SCB)类别是皮肤(37.9%),神经学(16.7%),和精神病(9.7%)。对于非SCB,这些是神经学的(31.2%),胃肠道(22.0%),和精神疾病(18.2%)。SCBs最常见的不良反应是皮疹(17.8%),瘙痒(8.2%),和头晕(6.7%)。非SCB与头晕有关(23.7%),嗜睡(13.0%),恶心(6.3%)。皮疹,瘙痒,出现荨麻疹,平均而言,两天后,SCB与非SCB进行了比较。性/生殖障碍的报告频率为0.23%。SCB被报告为病因的频率高于非SCB(59.8%vs.40.2%,费希尔的精确检验,p<0.0001)。(4)结论:基于现实世界的数据,ASM的安全性被确定.与非SCB诱导的ADR相比,SCB诱导的ADR表现出不同的模式。
    (1) Background: The utilization of high-quality evidence regarding the safety of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is constrained by the absence of standardized reporting. This study aims to examine the safety profile of ASMs using real-world data. (2) Methods: The data were collected from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database (KAERS-DB) between 2012 and 2021. In total, 46,963 adverse drug reaction (ADR)-drug pairs were analyzed. (3) Results: At the system organ class level, the most frequently reported classes for sodium channel blockers (SCBs) were skin (37.9%), neurological (16.7%), and psychiatric disorders (9.7%). For non-SCBs, these were neurological (31.2%), gastrointestinal (22.0%), and psychiatric disorders (18.2%). The most common ADRs induced by SCBs were rash (17.8%), pruritus (8.2%), and dizziness (6.7%). Non-SCBs were associated with dizziness (23.7%), somnolence (13.0%), and nausea (6.3%). Rash, pruritus, and urticaria occurred, on average, two days later with SCBs compared to non-SCBs. Sexual/reproductive disorders were reported at a frequency of 0.23%. SCBs were reported as the cause more frequently than non-SCBs (59.8% vs. 40.2%, Fisher\'s exact test, p < 0.0001). (4) Conclusions: Based on real-world data, the safety profiles of ASMs were identified. The ADRs induced by SCBs exhibited different patterns when compared to those induced by non-SCBs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:钠通道阻滞剂(SCB)传统上被用作主要针对灭活过程的抗癫痫药物。在一个旨在寻找潜在抗惊厥药的药物发现项目中,我们已经确认了阿比多,最初是一种抗病毒药物,作为一个有效的SCB。为了评估其抗惊厥潜力,我们已经彻底检查了它的生物物理特性以及它对动物癫痫模型的影响。
    方法:使用膜片钳记录来研究阿比多尔的电生理特性,以及阿比多尔的结合和解结合动力学,卡马西平和拉科沙胺.此外,我们使用三种不同的癫痫发作模型在雄性小鼠中评估了阿比妥的抗惊厥作用。
    结果:Arbidol通过阻断钠通道有效抑制神经元癫痫样活动。与卡马西平和拉科沙胺相比,Arbidol通过与Nav1.2通道的快速和缓慢失活相互作用而表现出独特的作用方式。动力学研究表明,结合和非结合速率可能与这三种药物的特定特征有关。Arbidol靶向局部麻醉剂的经典结合位点,有效抑制Nav1.2癫痫突变的功能获得效应,在最大电休克模型和皮下戊四氮模型中表现出不同程度的抗惊厥作用,但在毛果芸香碱诱导的癫痫持续状态模型中没有作用.
    结论:阿比多显示出作为抗惊厥药的潜力,提供一种独特的行动模式,使其与现有的SCB区分开来。
    OBJECTIVE: Sodium channel blockers (SCBs) have traditionally been utilized as anti-seizure medications by primarily targeting the inactivation process. In a drug discovery project aiming at finding potential anticonvulsants, we have identified arbidol, originally an antiviral drug, as a potent SCB. In order to evaluate its anticonvulsant potential, we have thoroughly examined its biophysical properties as well as its effects on animal seizure models.
    METHODS: Patch clamp recording was used to investigate the electrophysiological properties of arbidol, as well as the binding and unbinding kinetics of arbidol, carbamazepine and lacosamide. Furthermore, we evaluated the anticonvulsant effects of arbidol using three different seizure models in male mice.
    RESULTS: Arbidol effectively suppressed neuronal epileptiform activity by blocking sodium channels. Arbidol demonstrated a distinct mode of action by interacting with both the fast and slow inactivation of Nav1.2 channels compared with carbamazepine and lacosamide. A kinetic study suggested that the binding and unbinding rates might be associated with the specific characteristics of these three drugs. Arbidol targeted the classical binding site of local anaesthetics, effectively inhibited the gain-of-function effects of Nav1.2 epileptic mutations and exhibited varying degrees of anticonvulsant effects in the maximal electroshock model and subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol model but had no effect in the pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus model.
    CONCLUSIONS: Arbidol shows promising potential as an anticonvulsant agent, providing a unique mode of action that sets it apart from existing SCBs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    大型队列研究和变异特异性电生理学已经能够描绘不同的SCN2A癫痫表型,表型-基因型相关性,预测钠通道阻滞剂的药物敏感性,以及临床医生和家庭的长期预测。SCN2A病理变异最常见的临床表现之一是良性家族性新生儿-婴儿惊厥(BFNIS),其特征是在生命的第一天到23个月大之间发作,通常会消退,自发或在钠通道阻滞剂的帮助下,在生命的头两年内。2004年,Berkovic等人。报道了一个受SCN2A相关BFNIS影响的小男孩的案例,其母亲,携带相同的病理变异,在婴儿期也有BFNIS。我们的病例报告集中在上述女性身上,40多年后,又缉获了两次,因此开启了成年期SCN2A相关癫痫发作的可能性。
    Large cohort studies and variant-specific electrophysiology have enabled the delineation of different SCN2A-epilepsy phenotypes, phenotype-genotype correlations, prediction of pharmacosensitivity to sodium channel blockers, and long-term prognostication for clinicians and families. One of the most common clinical presentations of SCN2A pathological variants is benign familial neonatal-infantile seizures (BFNIS), which are characterized by seizure onset between the first day of life and 23 months of age and typically resolve, either spontaneously or with the aid of sodium channel blockers, within the first 2 years of life. In 2004, Berkovic et al. reported the case of a young boy affected by SCN2A-related BFNIS whose mother, who carried the same pathological variant, had also presented with BFNIS in infancy. Our case report focuses on the aforementioned woman who, more than 40 years later, presented two additional seizures, therefore opening the possibility of a role for SCN2A-related seizures in adulthood.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在就SCN8A相关疾病的诊断/治疗达成共识。利用修改后的Delphi过程,一个由经验丰富的临床医生和护理人员组成的全球队列提供了诊断输入,表型,治疗,和SCN8A相关疾病的管理。
    方法:核心小组(13名临床医生,一名研究员,六名护理人员),分为三个亚组(诊断/表型,治疗,合并症/预后),进行了文献综述,并提出了改进的德尔菲过程的问题。28位临床专家,一名研究员,来自16个国家的13名护理人员参加了随后的三轮调查。我们将共识定义为:强烈共识,≥80%完全同意;中等共识,≥80%完全/部分同意,<10%不同意;和适度的共识,67%-79%完全/部分同意,10%不同意。
    结果:早期诊断对于SCN8A相关疾病的长期临床结局很重要。有五种表型:三种具有早期癫痫发作(严重发育性和癫痫性脑病[DEE],轻度/中度DEE,自限性(家族性)婴儿癫痫[SeL(F)IE])和两个发作较晚/无癫痫发作(神经发育迟缓伴广泛性癫痫[NDDwGE],无癫痫的NDD[NDDwoE])。看护者代表六名严重DEE患者,五个轻度/中度DEE,一个NDDwGE,还有一个NDDwoe.癫痫发作/发育延迟发作时的表型因年龄而异,癫痫发作类型,脑电图/磁共振成像发现,一线治疗。功能增益(GOF)与功能丧失(LOF)对于告知治疗是有价值的。钠通道阻滞剂是GOF的最佳一线治疗方法,严重的DEE,轻度/中度DEE,和SeL(F)IE;左乙拉西坦在GOF患者中相对禁忌。NDDwGE的一线治疗是丙戊酸盐,乙苏肟,或拉莫三嗪;钠通道阻滞剂在LOF患者中相对禁忌。
    结论:这是关于SCN8A相关疾病的诊断和治疗的首次全球共识。这种共识将减少疾病识别的知识差距,并为这种异质性疾病的首选治疗提供信息。这种共识允许更多的临床医生提供循证护理,并使SCN8A家庭能够为他们的孩子辩护。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop consensus for diagnosis/management of SCN8A-related disorders. Utilizing a modified Delphi process, a global cohort of experienced clinicians and caregivers provided input on diagnosis, phenotypes, treatment, and management of SCN8A-related disorders.
    METHODS: A Core Panel (13 clinicians, one researcher, six caregivers), divided into three subgroups (diagnosis/phenotypes, treatment, comorbidities/prognosis), performed a literature review and developed questions for the modified Delphi process. Twenty-eight expert clinicians, one researcher, and 13 caregivers from 16 countries participated in the subsequent three survey rounds. We defined consensus as follows: strong consensus, ≥80% fully agree; moderate consensus, ≥80% fully/partially agree, <10% disagree; and modest consensus, 67%-79% fully/partially agree, <10% disagree.
    RESULTS: Early diagnosis is important for long-term clinical outcomes in SCN8A-related disorders. There are five phenotypes: three with early seizure onset (severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy [DEE], mild/moderate DEE, self-limited (familial) infantile epilepsy [SeL(F)IE]) and two with later/no seizure onset (neurodevelopmental delay with generalized epilepsy [NDDwGE], NDD without epilepsy [NDDwoE]). Caregivers represented six patients with severe DEE, five mild/moderate DEE, one NDDwGE, and one NDDwoE. Phenotypes vary by age at seizures/developmental delay onset, seizure type, electroencephalographic/magnetic resonance imaging findings, and first-line treatment. Gain of function (GOF) versus loss of function (LOF) is valuable for informing treatment. Sodium channel blockers are optimal first-line treatment for GOF, severe DEE, mild/moderate DEE, and SeL(F)IE; levetiracetam is relatively contraindicated in GOF patients. First-line treatment for NDDwGE is valproate, ethosuximide, or lamotrigine; sodium channel blockers are relatively contraindicated in LOF patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first-ever global consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of SCN8A-related disorders. This consensus will reduce knowledge gaps in disease recognition and inform preferred treatment across this heterogeneous disorder. Consensus of this type allows more clinicians to provide evidence-based care and empowers SCN8A families to advocate for their children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电压门控钠通道亚型,Nav1.7、Nav1.8和Nav1.9主要在外周感觉神经元中表达。最近的遗传研究表明,它们参与病理性疼痛的处理,并且Nav1.7,Nav1.8或Nav1.9的阻断将成为有前途的药物疗法,尤其是对于神经性疼痛。越来越多的药物发现计划已针对任一亚型获得选择性抑制剂,该抑制剂可在不影响心血管和中枢神经系统的情况下缓解疼痛。尽管它们都没有被批准。在这里,我们描述了ANP-230的体外特征,这是一种正在临床开发中的新型钠通道阻滞剂。令人惊讶的是,显示ANP-230可阻断三种疼痛相关亚型,具有相似效力的人Nav1.7、Nav1.8和Nav1.9,但对人心脏Nav1.5通道和大鼠中枢Nav通道的抑制活性较低。使用不同阶跃脉冲协议的电压钳实验表明,ANP-230具有“强直阻滞”作用模式,没有状态和使用依赖性。此外,ANP-230在人Nav1.7稳定表达细胞中引起激活曲线的去极化偏移并减慢门控动力学。在人Nav1.8稳定表达细胞以及大鼠背根神经节神经元中通常观察到激活曲线的去极化位移。这些数据表明ANP-230抑制Nav通道的非常独特的机制。最后,ANP-230以浓度依赖的方式降低大鼠背根神经节神经元的兴奋性。总的来说,这些有希望的结果表明ANP-230可能是治疗神经性疼痛的有效药物.
    Voltage-gated sodium channel subtypes, Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 are predominantly expressed in peripheral sensory neurons. Recent genetic studies have revealed that they are involved in pathological pain processing and that the blockade of Nav1.7, Nav1.8, or Nav1.9 will become a promising pharmacotherapy especially for neuropathic pain. A growing number of drug discovery programs have targeted either of the subtypes to obtain a selective inhibitor which can provide pain relief without affecting the cardiovascular and central nervous systems, though none of them has been approved yet. Here we describe the in vitro characteristics of ANP-230, a novel sodium channel blocker under clinical development. Surprisingly, ANP-230 was shown to block three pain-related subtypes, human Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 with similar potency, but had only low inhibitory activity to human cardiac Nav1.5 channel and rat central Nav channels. The voltage clamp experiments using different step pulse protocols revealed that ANP-230 had a \"tonic block\" mode of action without state- and use-dependency. In addition, ANP-230 caused a depolarizing shift of the activation curve and decelerated gating kinetics in human Nav1.7-stably expressing cells. The depolarizing shift of activation curve was commonly observed in human Nav1.8-stably expressing cells as well as rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. These data suggested a quite unique mechanism of Nav channel inhibition by ANP-230. Finally, ANP-230 reduced excitability of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in a concentration dependent manner. Collectively, these promising results indicate that ANP-230 could be a potent drug for neuropathic pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:临床关注钠通道阻滞剂氟卡尼和普罗帕酮(SCB)对心血管疾病患者的潜在致心律失常作用。SCB用于在EAST-AFNET4中提供早期节律控制(ERC)治疗。
    方法:我们分析了主要安全性结果(死亡,中风,或与节律控制治疗相关的严重不良事件)和主要疗效结局(心血管死亡,EAST-AFNET4中ERC患者(n=1395)摄入SCB期间的中风和因心力衰竭或急性冠状动脉综合征恶化而住院)。该方案不鼓励左心室射血分数降低的患者使用氟卡尼和普罗帕酮,并建议在治疗后QRS延长>25%时停止治疗。
    结果:689例患者(年龄69(8)岁;CHA2DS2-VASc3.2(1);177例心力衰竭;41例既往心肌梗死,CABG或PCI;26伴左心室肥厚>15mm;中位治疗持续时间1,153[237,1,828]天)。与从未接受过SCB的患者(SCBnever4.9/100(150/3,083)患者年相比,接受SCB治疗的患者的主要疗效转归发生率较低(3/100(99/3,316),p<0.001)。与SCBnever患者(4.2/100(135/3,220)患者年相比,接受SCB的患者的主要安全性结果在数值上较少(2.9/100(96/3,359)患者年)。调整后的p=0.015)。2年的窦性心律在组间相似(SCB537/610(88);SCBnever472/579(82))。
    结论:在EAST-AFNET4试验中,氟卡尼或普罗帕酮的长期治疗似乎是安全的,可以提供有效的ERC治疗,包括选择患有稳定性心血管疾病的患者,如冠状动脉疾病和稳定性心力衰竭。
    背景:ISRCTN04708680,NCT01288352,EudraCT2010-021258-20,www。easttrial.org.
    OBJECTIVE: Clinical concerns exist about the potential proarrhythmic effects of the sodium channel blockers (SCBs) flecainide and propafenone in patients with cardiovascular disease. Sodium channel blockers were used to deliver early rhythm control (ERC) therapy in EAST-AFNET 4.
    RESULTS: We analysed the primary safety outcome (death, stroke, or serious adverse events related to rhythm control therapy) and primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for worsening of heart failure (HF) or acute coronary syndrome) during SCB intake for patients with ERC (n = 1395) in EAST-AFNET 4. The protocol discouraged flecainide and propafenone in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and suggested stopping therapy upon QRS prolongation >25% on therapy. Flecainide or propafenone was given to 689 patients [age 69 (8) years; CHA2DS2-VASc 3.2 (1); 177 with HF; 41 with prior myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, or percutaneous coronary intervention; 26 with left ventricular hypertrophy >15 mm; median therapy duration 1153 [237, 1828] days]. The primary efficacy outcome occurred less often in patients treated with SCB [3/100 (99/3316) patient-years] than in patients who never received SCB [SCBnever 4.9/100 (150/3083) patient-years, P < 0.001]. There were numerically fewer primary safety outcomes in patients receiving SCB [2.9/100 (96/3359) patient-years] than in SCBnever patients [4.2/100 (135/3220) patient-years, adjusted P = 0.015]. Sinus rhythm at 2 years was similar between groups [SCB 537/610 (88); SCBnever 472/579 (82)].
    CONCLUSIONS: Long-term therapy with flecainide or propafenone appeared to be safe in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial to deliver effective ERC therapy, including in selected patients with stable cardiovascular disease such as coronary artery disease and stable HF. Clinical Trial Registration ISRCTN04708680, NCT01288352, EudraCT2010-021258-20, www.easttrial.org.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    福尔马林试验是研究啮齿动物急性疼痛的一种方法。类似于福尔马林,注射谷氨酸和藜芦碱也会产生伤害性反应。这项研究调查了阿片类药物相关的化合物是否可以抑制相同剂量的小鼠中谷氨酸和藜芦碱诱导的伤害性反应。吗啡(3mg/kg),氢吗啡酮(0.4mg/kg),或芬太尼(0.03mg/kg)抑制谷氨酸引起的伤害性反应,但不是在相同剂量下的藜芦碱引起的伤害性反应。然而,高剂量吗啡(10mg/kg),氢吗啡酮(2mg/kg),或芬太尼(0.1mg/kg)显着降低了veratrine诱导的伤害性反应。这些结果表明,使用吗啡时需要高剂量,氢吗啡酮,或芬太尼用于钠通道相关性神经性疼痛,如异位活动。因此,如果稳定增加阿片类药物的剂量以缓解疼痛,人们就会担心过量和滥用。相比之下,曲美布汀(100mg/kg)和芬太尼类似物异丁酰芬太尼(iBF;0.1mg/kg)抑制了谷氨酸和维乐碱引起的伤害性反应。此外,N-异丁酰基芬太尼(nor-iBF;1mg/kg),它是iBF的代谢产物,抑制维他命碱诱导的伤害性反应。此外,iBF的最佳镇痛剂量,不像芬太尼,运动活动仅略有增加,并且不会减慢胃肠道运输。癌症疼痛是由炎症驱动的复杂疾病,神经病,和癌症特异性机制。因此,iBF可能具有比芬太尼更好的镇痛药的潜力。
    The formalin test is one approach to studying acute pain in rodents. Similar to formalin, injection with glutamate and veratrine can also produce a nociceptive response. This study investigated whether opioid-related compounds could suppress glutamate- and veratrine-induced nociceptive responses in mice at the same dose. The administration of morphine (3 mg/kg), hydromorphone (0.4 mg/kg), or fentanyl (0.03 mg/kg) suppressed glutamate-induced nociceptive response, but not veratrine-induced nociceptive response at the same doses. However, high doses of morphine (10 mg/kg), hydromorphone (2 mg/kg), or fentanyl (0.1 mg/kg) produced a significant reduction in the veratrine-induced nociceptive response. These results indicate that high doses are required when using morphine, hydromorphone, or fentanyl for sodium channel-related neuropathic pain, such as ectopic activity. As a result, concerns have arisen about overdose and abuse if the dose of opioids is steadily increased to relieve pain. In contrast, trimebutine (100 mg/kg) and fentanyl analog isobutyrylfentanyl (iBF; 0.1 mg/kg) suppressed both glutamate- and veratrine-induced nociceptive response. Furthermore, nor-isobutyrylfentanyl (nor-iBF; 1 mg/kg), which is a metabolite of iBF, suppressed veratrine-induced nociceptive response. Besides, the optimal antinociceptive dose of iBF, unlike fentanyl, only slightly increased locomotor activity and did not slow gastrointestinal transit. Cancer pain is a complex condition driven by inflammatory, neuropathic, and cancer-specific mechanisms. Thus, iBF may have the potential to be a superior analgesic than fentanyl.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高渗碳酸氢钠被提倡用于治疗钠通道阻滞剂中毒,但它的功效在不同的钠通道阻滞剂中有所不同。本评论解决了高渗碳酸氢钠疗法在心脏毒性药物中毒中的常见陷阱和适当用法。
    血清碱化最好通过高渗碳酸氢钠和过度换气(PCO2~30-35mmHg[0.47-0.6kPa])的协同作用来实现。这减少了实现血清碱化(pH~7.45-7.55)所需的碳酸氢钠剂量,并避免了过量高渗碳酸氢钠的不利影响。
    三环抗抑郁药中毒对碳酸氢钠治疗反应良好,但许多其他钠通道阻滞剂可能不会。例如,阻断细胞间缝隙连接的药物,如安非他酮,对碱化反应不好。对于预期反应未知的钠通道阻滞剂中毒,1-2mmol/kg碳酸氢钠的推注可用于评估对碱化的反应。
    高渗碳酸氢钠可引起电解质异常,如低钾血症和低钙血症,导致QT间期延长和扭转性室性心动过速与具有混合钠和钾心脏通道特性的药物中毒,如羟氯喹和氟卡尼。
    如果在QRS波持续时间<100ms之前给药,通常会出现剂量过多的高渗碳酸氢钠。延长的QRS波持续时间对于钠通道阻滞剂毒性不是特异性的。一些钠通道阻滞剂没有反应,即使有回应,QRS波持续时间需要几个小时才能完全恢复到正常。此外,QRS波延长可能是由于速率依赖性束支传导阻滞。所以,在达到血清碱化(pH~7.45-7.55)后,不应给予进一步的剂量。
    避免患者过量使用高渗碳酸氢钠的进一步策略是设定最大剂量。超过6mmol/kg可能会引起高钠血症,流体过载,代谢性碱中毒,和脑水肿在许多病人和可能是致命的。
    我们建议在钠通道阻滞剂中毒患者中使用高渗碳酸氢钠治疗,这些患者具有临床上明显的毒性,例如癫痫发作,休克(收缩压<90mmHg,平均动脉压<65mmHg)或室性心律失常。我们建议初始推注1-2mmol/kg的高渗碳酸氢钠,如果病人不稳定,可以重复,最大剂量为6mmol/kg。建议与机械通气和过度通气一起使用,以实现血清碱化(PCO2〜30-35mmHg[4-4.7kPa])和pH〜7.45-7.55。反复推注高渗碳酸氢钠,必须监测和纠正钾和钠异常,并观察血清pH值和心电图的变化。
    高渗碳酸氢钠是某些钠通道阻滞剂中毒的有效解毒剂,如三环抗抑郁药,当用于适当的剂量时,它与过度换气协同作用,以实现血清碱化和减少钠通道阻滞。然而,有许多陷阱,可导致过量的碳酸氢钠治疗和严重的不良反应。
    UNASSIGNED: Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is advocated for the treatment of sodium channel blocker poisoning, but its efficacy varies amongst different sodium channel blockers. This Commentary addresses common pitfalls and appropriate usage of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate therapy in cardiotoxic drug poisonings.
    UNASSIGNED: Serum alkalinization is best achieved by the synergistic effect of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate and hyperventilation (PCO2 ∼ 30-35 mmHg [0.47-0.6 kPa]). This reduces the dose of sodium bicarbonate required to achieve serum alkalinization (pH ∼ 7.45-7.55) and avoids adverse effects from excessive doses of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate.
    UNASSIGNED: Tricyclic antidepressant poisoning responds well to sodium bicarbonate therapy, but many other sodium channel blockers may not. For instance, drugs that block the intercellular gap junctions, such as bupropion, do not respond well to alkalinization. For sodium channel blocker poisonings in which the expected response is unknown, a bolus of 1-2 mmol/kg sodium bicarbonate can be used to assess the response to alkalinization.
    UNASSIGNED: Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate can cause electrolyte abnormalities such as hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia, leading to QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes in poisonings with drugs that have mixed sodium and potassium cardiac channel properties, such as hydroxychloroquine and flecainide.
    UNASSIGNED: Excessive doses of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate commonly occur if it is administered until the QRS complex duration is < 100 ms. A prolonged QRS complex duration is not specific for sodium channel blocker toxicity. Some sodium channel blockers do not respond, and even when there is a response, it takes a few hours for the QRS complex duration to return completely to normal. In addition, QRS complex prolongation can be due to a rate-dependent bundle branch block. So, no further doses should be given after achieving serum alkalinization (pH ∼ 7.45-7.55).
    UNASSIGNED: A further strategy to avoid overdosing patients with hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is to set maximum doses. Exceeding 6 mmol/kg is likely to cause hypernatremia, fluid overload, metabolic alkalosis, and cerebral oedema in many patients and potentially be lethal.
    UNASSIGNED: We propose that hypertonic sodium bicarbonate therapy be used in patients with sodium channel blocker poisoning who have clinically significant toxicities such as seizures, shock (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg) or ventricular dysrhythmia. We recommend initial bolus dosing of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate of 1-2 mmol/kg, which can be repeated if the patient remains unstable, up to a maximum dose of 6 mmol/kg. This is recommended to be administered in conjunction with mechanical ventilation and hyperventilation to achieve serum alkalinization (PCO2∼30-35 mmHg [4-4.7 kPa]) and a pH of ∼7.45-7.55. With repeated bolus doses of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate, it is imperative to monitor and correct potassium and sodium abnormalities and observe changes in serum pH and on the electrocardiogram.
    UNASSIGNED: Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is an effective antidote for certain sodium channel blocker poisonings, such as tricyclic antidepressants, and when used in appropriate dosing, it works synergistically with hyperventilation to achieve serum alkalinization and to reduce sodium channel blockade. However, there are many pitfalls that can lead to excessive sodium bicarbonate therapy and severe adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    呼吸暂停事件是可怕的,但在很大程度上是良性事件,通常发生在婴儿中。这里,我们报告了纯合SCN1AL263V错义突变婴儿的明显危及生命的呼吸暂停事件,在杂合子家族成员中引起家族性偏瘫性偏头痛3型,在没有癫痫的情况下。在Scn1aL263V敲入小鼠模型中进行与婴儿事件一致的观察,在呼吸暂停之前有一个大的脑干DC移位,表明严重的脑干去极化。L263V突变在转染的HEK293细胞中引起NaV1.1功能效应的获得。钠通道阻断减轻了功能增益特性,拯救了Scn1aL263V小鼠的致死性呼吸暂停,并降低了患者严重呼吸暂停事件的发生频率。因此,这项研究表明,SCN1AL263V可引起危及生命的呼吸暂停事件,在小鼠模型中,这是由严重的脑干去极化引起的。除了与婴儿猝死综合征病理生理学潜在相关外,这些数据表明,钠通道阻滞剂可被认为是治疗具有这些和其他功能获得SCN1A突变的患者的呼吸暂停事件.
    Apneic events are frightening but largely benign events that often occur in infants. Here, we report apparent life-threatening apneic events in an infant with the homozygous SCN1AL263V missense mutation, which causes familial hemiplegic migraine type 3 in heterozygous family members, in the absence of epilepsy. Observations consistent with the events in the infant were made in an Scn1aL263V knock-in mouse model, in which apnea was preceded by a large brainstem DC-shift, indicative of profound brainstem depolarization. The L263V mutation caused gain of NaV1.1 function effects in transfected HEK293 cells. Sodium channel blockade mitigated the gain-of-function characteristics, rescued lethal apnea in Scn1aL263V mice, and decreased the frequency of severe apneic events in the patient. Hence, this study shows that SCN1AL263V can cause life-threatening apneic events, which in a mouse model were caused by profound brainstem depolarization. In addition to being potentially relevant to sudden infant death syndrome pathophysiology, these data indicate that sodium channel blockers may be considered therapeutic for apneic events in patients with these and other gain-of-function SCN1A mutations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    NaV1.8通道,主要见于周围神经系统,被认为是慢性疼痛的关键因素之一。分子VX-150最初有望靶向该通道,但VX-150的II期试验未显示预期的疼痛缓解结果.通过分析VX-150和NaV1.8的相互作用模式,我们开发了两个总共19个分子的系列,并检查了它们对NaV1.8的体外结合亲和力和体内镇痛作用。一种化合物,名为2j,在慢性炎症性疼痛和神经性疼痛模型中,对NaV1.8通道具有显著的活性,并显示出有效的疼痛缓解。我们的研究指出,2j是开发更安全的止痛疗法的有力竞争者。
    The NaV1.8 channel, mainly found in the peripheral nervous system, is recognized as one of the key factors in chronic pain. The molecule VX-150 was initially promising in targeting this channel, but the phase II trials of VX-150 did not show expected pain relief results. By analyzing the interaction mode of VX-150 and NaV1.8, we developed two series with a total of 19 molecules and examined their binding affinity to NaV1.8 in vitro and analgesic effect in vivo. One compound, named 2j, stood out with notable activity against the NaV1.8 channel and showed effective pain relief in models of chronic inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain. Our research points to 2j as a strong contender for developing safer pain-relief treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号