In France, sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common rare disease and represents the most prevalent genetic disorder, with 19,800 to 32,400 patients diagnosed in 2016 and 1:714 newborns affected in 2019. SCD is caused by a single mutation in the β-globin gene, resulting in the production of abnormal hemoglobin (called HbS), chronic hemolytic anemia, and impaired red blood cell rheology. SCD patients face several severe acute and chronic complications, including stroke, acute chest syndrome (ACS), painful vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), organ failure, and a high risk of infections. As patients\' care pathway remains unclear in France, a roundtable advisory board meeting was organized in the country to provide insights into the management of SCD in alignment with clinical guidelines. The meeting brought together a panel of esteemed key opinion leaders (KOLs) in SCD management, encompassing both clinical practice and research. During the meeting, the KOLs discussed clinical practices and their alignment with French guidelines, identifying areas of concordance and discrepancy. They also addressed disparities in SCD clinical practices across regions and medical centers. The KOLs discussed the prophylactic and therapeutic options currently available for SCD patients in France, with a focus on transfusion therapies, especially automated red blood cell exchange (aRBCX). The results of this advisory board meeting provide a valuable platform for gathering expert perspectives on SCD management, clinical practices, guideline alignment, and the potential for contributions to guideline updates.

Therapeutic innovation to address sickle cell disease (SCD) is at a historical apex, characterized by a drug discovery, development, and commercialization landscape that includes potentially curative gene therapies. Given the wide geographic distribution of SCD, with a major presence in Africa, it is imperative that new medicines are designed to meet the specific needs of persons with SCD everywhere. Target product profiles (TPPs) detail the desired attributes of new medicines and serve as a guide for drug developers. To support research efforts for curative treatments for SCD, we mobilized a large multi-disciplinary expert group to generate consensus-driven TPPs for ex vivo and in vivo SCD gene therapies, utilizing a modified Delphi methodology supplemented with virtual workshops. The main findings are TPPs that describe 20 minimal and optimal criteria for novel gene therapy products in categories of scope (3 criteria), performance/safety (11 criteria), manufacturing (4 criteria), and administration (2 criteria). TPPs for ex vivo and in vivo products differed in some performance/safety criteria and all criteria pertaining to manufacturing and administration. These outputs will ideally support development of durable treatments that are safe, efficacious, and practical for persons with SCD in global settings.

Asplenic patients are at high risk of serious infectious or thrombotic complications, especially when they are not adequately informed of the risk and not closely followed. Ladhani et al. on behalf of the British Society for Haematology propose updated guidelines for managing these patients. Healthcare professionals need to improve infection prevention in patients with hypofunctional or absent spleen through better identification and immunisation using established national registries. Commentary on: Ladhani et al. Prevention and treatment of infection in patients with absent or hypofunctional spleen: A British Society for Haematology guideline. Br J Haematol 2024;204:1672-1686.

To date, hydroxyurea is the only effective and safe drug that significantly reduces morbidity and mortality of individuals with Sickle cell disease. Twenty years of real-life experience has demonstrated that hydroxyurea reduces pain attacks, vaso-occlusive events, including acute chest syndrome, the number and duration of hospitalizations and the need for transfusion. The therapeutic success of hydroxyurea is directly linked to access to the drug, the dose used and adherence to treatment which, in part, is correlated to the availability of hydroxyurea. This consensus aims to reduce the number of mandatory exams needed to access the drug, prioritizing the requesting physician\'s report, without affecting patient safety.

Antenatal screening/testing of pregnant women should be carried out according to the guidelines of the National Health Service (NHS) Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening Programme. Newborn screening and, when necessary, follow-up testing and referral, should be carried out according to the guidelines of the NHS Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening Programme. All babies under 1 year of age arriving in the United Kingdom should be offered screening for sickle cell disease (SCD). Preoperative screening for SCD should be carried out in patients from ethnic groups in which there is a significant prevalence of the condition. Emergency screening with a sickle solubility test must always be followed by definitive analysis. Laboratories performing antenatal screening should utilise methods that are capable of detecting significant variants and are capable of quantitating haemoglobins A2 and F at the cut-off points required by the national antenatal screening programme. The laboratory must ensure a provisional report is available for antenatal patients within three working days from sample receipt.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) requires coordinated, specialized medical care for optimal outcomes. There are no United States (US) guidelines that define a pediatric comprehensive SCD program. We report a modified Delphi consensus-seeking process to determine essential, optimal, and suggested elements of a comprehensive pediatric SCD center. Nineteen pediatric SCD specialists participated from the US. Consensus was predefined as 2/3 agreement on each element\'s categorization. Twenty-six elements were considered essential (required for guideline-based SCD care), 10 were optimal (recommended but not required), and five were suggested. This work lays the foundation for a formal recognition process of pediatric comprehensive SCD centers.

This was a retrospective, multi-site observational cohort of 233 encounters of patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) who received analgesia for acute pain crisis related to SCD from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Patient encounters were categorized based on whether they received analgesia within guideline directed 60 minutes of emergency department (ED) arrival. The primary outcome was time to a pain score reduction of ≥30% on the numerical rating scale. Assessments were also conducted for potential disparities leading to suboptimal care. Time to pain score reduction of ≥30% was significantly less in those receiving analgesia within 60 minutes of arrival compared to delayed analgesia [3.5 hours (2.5-10) vs 8.0 hours (4.5-22.5), p < 0.001]. Patients receiving timely analgesia also saw a faster time to ED disposition and achieved pain reduction goals more frequently at hospital discharge. We found that patients with a history of substance use disorder documented in their chart were less likely to receive timely analgesia. Our study indicated that when patients with SCD received analgesia in accordance with guideline recommendations, pain goals were achieved faster with an improvement in outcomes. Providing optimal care can be difficult, but education and standardized policies may help mitigate this gap.

Priapism is a persistent penile erection that continues hours beyond, or is unrelated to, sexual stimulation and results in a prolonged and uncontrolled erection. Given its time-dependent and progressive nature, priapism is a situation that both urologists and emergency medicine practitioners must be familiar with and comfortable managing.
A comprehensive search of the literature on acute ischemic priapism and non-ischemic priapism (NIP) was performed by Emergency Care Research Institute for articles published between January 1, 1960 and May 1, 2020. A search of the literature on NIP, recurrent priapism, prolonged erection following intracavernosal vasoactive medication, and priapism in patients with sickle cell disease was conducted by Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center for articles published between 1946 and February 19, 2021. Searches identified 4117 potentially relevant articles, and 3437 of these were excluded at the title or abstract level for not meeting inclusion criteria. Full texts for the remaining 680 articles were ordered, and ultimately 203 unique articles were included in the report.
This Guideline provides a clinical framework for the treatment (non-surgical and surgical) of NIP, recurrent ischemic priapism, and priapism in patients with sickle cell disease. The treatment of patients with a prolonged erection following intracavernosal vasoactive medication is also included. The AUA guideline on the diagnosis of priapism and the treatment of acute ischemic priapism was published in 2021.
All patients with priapism should be evaluated emergently to identify the sub-type of priapism (acute ischemic versus non-ischemic) and those with an acute ischemic event should be provided early intervention when indicated. NIP is not an emergency and treatment must be based on patient objectives, available resources, and clinician experience. Management of recurrent ischemic priapism requires treatment of acute episodes and a focus on future prevention of an acute ischemic event. Sickle cell disease patients presenting with an acute ischemic priapism event should initially be managed with a focus on urologic relief of the erection; standard sickle cell assessment and interventions should be considered concurrent with urologic intervention. Treatment protocols for a prolonged, iatrogenic erection must be differentiated from protocols for true priapism.

With the dramatic increase in the pipeline for new sickle cell disease (SCD) therapies in recent years, the time is ripe to ensure a robust body of evidence is available for decision making by regulators, payers, clinicians, and patients. Harmonization of the outcomes selected across interventional trials enables optimal post-trial appraisal and decision making through valid pooled analyses and indirect comparisons. We employed a structured, multi-stakeholder consensus process to develop core outcome sets (COS) for use in clinical trials of SCD interventions.
CoreSCD utilized a modified Delphi method adapted from the standards recommended by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative. An initial list of candidate outcomes was developed through a targeted literature review and input from an 11-member advisory committee. A 44-member multi-stakeholder Delphi Panel was established and included patients and family members, advocates, clinicians, researchers, payers, health technology assessors, representatives from government agencies, and industry representatives. Patients/advocates comprised 25% of the Delphi Panel and orientation and training was provided prior to the consensus process to ensure all were prepared to participate meaningfully. Panelists completed three rounds of an online survey to rate the importance of candidate outcomes for inclusion in the COS. Summary data was provided between each voting round and an in-person consensus meeting was held between the second and third round of voting. Consensus rules were applied following each round of voting to eliminate outcomes that did not meet predetermined criteria for retention.
Consensus was reached for two core outcome sets. The final COS for trials of disease-modifying therapies includes ten outcomes and the COS for trials of acute interventions includes six outcomes. Both core sets include clinical outcomes as well as outcomes related to functioning/quality of life, resource utilization, and survival/mortality.
Use of the COS in clinical development programs for SCD will help to ensure that relevant, consistent outcomes are available for decision making across the product lifecycle.

暂无摘要。