Serotonin syndrome

5 - 羟色胺综合征
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    5-羟色胺综合征(SS)是由5-羟色胺能药物引起的医源性危及生命的病症。SS的治疗包括给予5-羟色胺拮抗剂(赛庚啶)。然而,赛庚啶的给药方案在文献中并不统一.
    我们回顾性评估了23例神经内科收治的符合Hunter标准的SS患者(>18岁)。
    平均年龄为35.2岁,52%是女性。10名患者在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗,而13名病人被送进病房。反射亢进是最常见的临床特征(100%),其次是克隆(91%),心动过速(83%),震颤(83%)。其他常见的临床特征是僵硬(65%),肠鸣音增加(61%),发汗(48%),发烧(43%),高血压(39%),和肌阵挛症(30%)。除一名患者外,所有患者均接受了两种或多种5-羟色胺能药物。曲马多是最常见的5-羟色胺能药物(39%),其次是丙戊酸钠(21%),和阿米替林(21%)。所有患者均接受赛庚啶治疗。入住ICU的所有患者均接受12mg的负荷剂量,然后每2小时2mg,持续至少24小时。入住病房的所有患者每天3次给予4mg赛庚啶。每个患者在24小时内对赛庚啶至少有一些反应。赛庚啶的总剂量和治疗时间在患者之间有所不同。
    治疗剂量在24小时内对赛庚啶的任何反应,即使是部分的,可能是SS存在的诊断指标。
    UNASSIGNED: Serotonin syndrome (SS) is an iatrogenic life-threatening condition caused by serotonergic agents. The treatment for SS involves the administration of a serotonin antagonist (cyproheptadine). However, the dosing schedule for cyproheptadine is not uniform in the literature.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively evaluated 23 adult patients (>18 years) admitted to the Neurology Department and met the Hunter criteria for SS.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age was 35.2 years, and 52% were female. Ten patients were managed in the intensive care unit (ICU), whereas thirteen patients were admitted to the ward. Hyperreflexia was the most common clinical feature (100%), followed by clonus (91%), tachycardia (83%), and tremor (83%). Other common clinical features were rigidity (65%), increased bowel sound (61%), diaphoresis (48%), fever (43%), hypertension (39%), and myoclonus (30%). All but one patient received two or more serotonergic drugs. Tramadol was the most common serotonergic agent (39%), followed by sodium valproate (21%), and amitriptyline (21%). Cyproheptadine was administered to all patients. All patients admitted in the ICU received a loading dose of 12 mg followed by 2 mg every 2 h for at least 24 h. All patients admitted to the ward were given 4 mg of cyproheptadine three times each day. Every patient showed at least some response to cyproheptadine within 24 h. The total doses of cyproheptadine and the length of treatment differed between patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Any response to cyproheptadine at a therapeutic dose within 24 h, even a partial one, could be a diagnostic indicator of the existence of SS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    情绪稳定剂和其他精神药物可导致严重的药物不良事件(ADE)。然而,发病率仍然未知。我们旨在(a)确定双相情感障碍或分裂情感障碍患者中严重ADE的发生率,(b)探讨锂暴露的作用,和(c)描述病因。
    本研究是LiSIE(影响和副作用的锂研究)回顾性队列研究的一部分。在2001年至2017年之间,瑞典Norrbotten地区的患者,诊断为双相情感障碍或分裂情感障碍,对精神药物的严重ADE进行了筛查,导致了至关重要的,麻醉后,或重症监护。我们确定了严重ADE的发病率/1,000人年(PY)。
    在1,521名患者中,我们确定了41个严重的ADE,产生每1000PY1.9个事件的发生率。存在锂和有因果关系的ADE与没有锂暴露的ADE之间的发生率比(IRR)为2.59(95%CI1.20-5.51;p=0.0094)。<65岁和≥65岁患者的ADE的IRR为3.36(95%CI1.63-6.63;p=0.0007)。最常见的ADE是慢性锂中毒,过度镇静,和心脏/血压相关事件。
    与双相情感障碍(BD)或分裂情感障碍(SZD)治疗相关的严重ADE并不常见,但并不罕见。老年人尤其处于危险之中。暴露于锂的个体的风险更高。当患者出现新的或不清楚的躯体症状时,应始终检查血清锂浓度。然而,其他情绪稳定剂和其他精神药物也会出现严重的ADE。
    UNASSIGNED: Mood stabilisers and other psychotropic drugs can lead to serious adverse drug events (ADEs). However, the incidence remains unknown. We aimed to (a) determine the incidence of serious ADEs in patients with bipolar or schizoaffective disorders, (b) explore the role of lithium exposure, and (c) describe the aetiology.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is part of the LiSIE (Lithium-Study into Effects and Side Effects) retrospective cohort study. Between 2001 and 2017, patients in the Swedish region of Norrbotten, with a diagnosis of bipolar or schizoaffective disorder, were screened for serious ADEs to psychotropic drugs, having resulted in critical, post-anaesthesia, or intensive care. We determined the incidence rate of serious ADEs/1,000 person-years (PY).
    UNASSIGNED: In 1,521 patients, we identified 41 serious ADEs, yielding an incidence rate of 1.9 events per 1,000 PY. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) between ADEs with lithium present and causally implicated and ADEs without lithium exposure was significant at 2.59 (95% CI 1.20-5.51; p = 0.0094). The IRR of ADEs in patients <65 and ≥65 years was significant at 3.36 (95% CI 1.63-6.63; p = 0.0007). The most common ADEs were chronic lithium intoxication, oversedation, and cardiac/blood pressure-related events.
    UNASSIGNED: Serious ADEs related to treatment of bipolar (BD) or schizoaffective disorder (SZD) were uncommon but not rare. Older individuals were particularly at risk. The risk was higher in individuals exposed to lithium. Serum lithium concentration should always be checked when patients present with new or unclear somatic symptoms. However, severe ADEs also occurred with other mood stabilisers and other psychotropic drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:5-羟色胺综合征是由5-羟色胺能药物引起的一种罕见且可能致命的药物不良反应,是由于中枢神经系统中5-羟色胺浓度增加或5-HT受体激活所致。我们分析了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据集中的不良事件,以调查与5-羟色胺综合征报告相关的主要药物类别以及与年龄和性别相关的报告风险。
    方法:我们分析了FAERS数据库的数据,以评估与5-羟色胺综合征报告相关的主要药物类别,以及与年龄和性别相关的报告风险。
    结果:我们发现8,997例5-羟色胺综合征;选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)是报告最多的一类药物,其次是阿片类药物和其他抗抑郁药。药物类别的最高报告赔率(ROR)是单胺氧化酶(MAO)抑制剂(45.99,95%置信区间(CI):41.21-51.33)和SSRIs(32.66,95%CI:31.33-34.04),ROR最高的10种活性物质是莫洛贝胺,异卡波肼,奥克替坦,tranylcypromine,美利曲辛,苯乙嗪,利奈唑胺,阿莫沙平,瑞波西汀和色氨酸;ROR值范围为色氨酸的44.19(95%CI:25.38-76.94)至莫氯贝胺的388.36(95%CI:314.58-479.46)。最常见药物的ROR在老年人组(65岁)中更高,男性更高。
    结论:处方者需要警惕能够提高5-羟色胺浓度或影响5-羟色胺能神经传递的药物,同样,当使用具有不太为人所知的5-羟色胺综合征风险的药物时,比如利奈唑胺和曲坦.
    BACKGROUND: Serotonin syndrome is a rare and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction caused by serotonergic drugs and is due to an increase in serotonin concentration or activation of the 5-HT receptor in the central nervous system. We analysed adverse events in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data set to investigate the main drug classes related to reports of serotonin syndrome and the reporting risk in relation to age and sex.
    METHODS: We analysed data from the FAERS database to evaluate the main drug classes related to reports of the serotonin syndrome, and the reporting risk in relation to age and sex.
    RESULTS: We found 8,997 cases of serotonin syndrome; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was the class of drugs with most reports, followed by opioids and other antidepressants. The highest Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) for drug classes was for monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors (45.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 41.21-51.33) and SSRIs (32.66, 95% CI: 31.33-34.04), while the ten active substances with the highest ROR were moclobemide, isocarboxazid, oxitriptane, tranylcypromine, melitracen, phenelzine, linezolid, amoxapine, reboxetine and tryptophan; with values of ROR ranging from 44.19 (95% CI: 25.38-76.94) of tryptophan to 388.36 (95% CI: 314.58-479.46) of moclobemide. The ROR for the most commonly involved drugs was higher in the group of older adults (65 > years old), and higher in males.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prescribers need to be vigilant about drugs that can raise serotonin concentration or influence serotonergic neurotransmission, also when using drugs with less well-known risk for serotonin syndrome, like linezolid and triptans.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:老年人的多药疗法正在稳步增加,许多药物的组合可能会导致不良反应,特别是如果药物在药效学上相互作用。例子是增加跌倒风险的累加或协同作用,出血,5-羟色胺综合征和尖端扭转。已开发临床决策支持系统JanusmedRiskProfile,以根据患者用药清单发现此类风险。
    目的:这项以注册为基础的回顾性研究的主要目的是研究老年患者(65岁或以上)在多重用药(定义为使用5种或5种以上药物)中的药效学风险。第二,我们研究了在斯德哥尔摩地区的主要电子健康记录系统中引入Janusmed风险简介是否影响了患者处方组合的比例,这些组合增加了所定义的九种不良反应类别的风险(抗胆碱能作用,出血,便秘,正交统计,QT延长,肾毒性,镇静,癫痫发作和5-羟色胺综合征)。
    方法:所有65岁或以上的处方药数据,在JanusmedRiskProfile中检索并分析了至少5种合并用药的风险类别.比较了在引入之前(第1期)和之后(第2期)的4个月期间具有高/中度风险的患者比例。
    结果:第1期(2016年11月至2017年2月)共127,719名患者,第2期(2017年11月至2018年2月)的131,458例患者被纳入研究.9种特性(抗胆碱能作用,出血,便秘,正交统计,QT延长,肾毒性,镇静,癫痫发作和5-羟色胺能作用)分别为10.9、34.7、32.8、33.6、17.2、0.7、15.4、0.5和2.4%,分别,在第1期和第2期的10.4、35.5、32.8、33.3、10.8、0.71、14.9、0.5和2.3%。镇静和QT延长的变化有统计学意义,最明显的QT延长从17.2降至10.8%(p<0.001)。在分析高风险患者时,出血的减少显着,正交统计,QT延长和镇静。
    结论:老年人接触药物组合会增加潜在严重不良反应的风险。处方者似乎对QT延长的警告尤其有反应,在电子健康记录系统中实施的Janusmed风险简介中呈现。
    Polypharmacy in older people is steadily increasing and a combination of many medicines may result in adverse effects, especially if the medicines interact pharmacodynamically. Examples are additive or synergistic effects increasing the risk of falls, haemorrhage, serotonin syndrome and torsade de pointes. The clinical decision support system Janusmed Risk Profile has been developed to find such risks based on a patients\' medication list.
    The main aim of this retrospective register-based study was to study what pharmacodynamic risks older patients (aged 65 years or older) on polypharmacy (defined as using five or more medicines) are exposed to. Second, we studied if the introduction of the Janusmed Risk Profile in the main electronic health record system in Region Stockholm influenced the proportion of patients prescribed combinations that increase the risk for the nine adverse-effect categories defined (anticholinergic effects, haemorrhage, constipation, orthostatism, QT prolongation, renal toxicity, sedation, seizures and serotonin syndrome).
    Data on all prescription medicines to individuals aged 65 years or older, and with at least five concomitant medicines were retrieved and analysed for the risk categories in the Janusmed Risk Profile. The proportions of patients with a high/moderate risk during a 4-month period before (period 1) and after (period 2) the introduction were compared.
    A total of 127,719 patients in period 1 (November 2016-February 2017), and 131,458 patients in period 2 (November 2017-February 2018) were included in the study. The proportion of patients with a high or moderate risk for each of the nine properties (anticholinergic effects, haemorrhage, constipation, orthostatism, QT prolongation, renal toxicity, sedation, seizures and serotonergic effects) were 10.9, 34.7, 32.8, 33.6, 17.2, 0.7, 15.4, 0.5 and 2.4%, respectively, in period 1 and 10.4, 35.5, 32.8, 33.3, 10.8, 0.71, 14.9, 0.5 and 2.3% in period 2. The changes for sedation and QT prolongation were statistically significant, with the most pronounced decrease for QT prolongation from 17.2 to 10.8% (p < 0.001). When analysing patients at a high risk, the decrease was significant for haemorrhage, orthostatism, QT prolongation and sedation.
    Older people are exposed to combinations of medications that increase the risk for potentially severe adverse effects. Prescribers seem to respond especially to warnings for QT prolongation, presented in the Janusmed Risk Profile implemented in the electronic health record system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗抑郁药的广泛处方及其在5-羟色胺综合征(SS)中的作用对于老年人的临床实践非常重要。这项研究旨在调查这些患者中抗抑郁药诱导的SS与相关变量的可能关联。
    方法:共纳入238名使用抗抑郁药的老年人。符合Hunter5-羟色胺毒性标准(HSTC)的SS患者被视为临床组(轻度,中度,或严重),和那些没有作为对照组的人。我们记录了所有患者的人口统计学和临床特征,包括年龄,性别,合并症指数,药物的数量,根据每天氟西汀的相关抗抑郁药的每日等效剂量,心电图检查结果,实验室结果,和管理。
    结果:所有患者的平均年龄为75.4±7.6岁,63.4%为女性。60名患者患有SS,而178名患者没有。有和没有SS的人在性别方面有显著差异,联合抗抑郁治疗的频率,抗抑郁剂日等效剂量(P<0.05)。SS患者最常见的诊断结果是震颤和反射亢进,31.7%为轻度,中等比例为68.3%,中位年龄和用药数量较高(P<0.041)。无论严重程度如何,所有患者均停用抗抑郁药,其中71.7%接受苯二氮卓类药物治疗,36.7%接受赛庚啶治疗。在调整了年龄和性别后,与SSRI+SNRI的使用关联,使用任何联合疗法,和每日等效剂量仍然显著。
    结论:在老年人中广泛使用单一或联合使用抗抑郁药代表了对SS的增加的临床关注,医生应该意识到老年患者与药物相关的并发症。
    BACKGROUND: Widespread prescription of antidepressants and their resulting role in serotonin syndrome (SS) are of great importance for clinical practice in the elderly. This study aims to investigate possible associations of antidepressant drug-induced SS with related variables in these patients.
    METHODS: A total of 238 older adults using antidepressants were included. Patients who fulfilled the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria (HSTC) for SS were considered as the clinical groups (mild, moderate, or severe), and those who did not as the control group. We recorded all patients\' demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, gender, comorbidity index, number of medications, daily equivalent dose of the relevant antidepressant according to fluoxetine per day, electrocardiogram test results, laboratory results, and management.
    RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 75.4 ± 7.6 years and 63.4% were female. Sixty patients had SS, while 178 patients did not. There was a significant difference between those with and without SS in terms of gender, frequency of combination antidepressant therapy, and daily equivalent antidepressant dose (P < 0.05). The most common diagnostic findings in SS patients were tremor and hyperreflexia and 31.7% was mild, and moderate in 68.3% with higher median age and number of medications (P < 0.041). Antidepressants were discontinued in all patients regardless of severity, of whom 71.7% were treated with benzodiazepines and 36.7% with cyproheptadine. After adjusting for age and sex, association with use of SSRI + SNRI, use of any combination therapy, and daily equivalent dose remained significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: The widespread single or combined use of antidepressants in older adults represents an increased clinical concern for SS and physicians should be aware of this drug-related complication in older patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Delirium is one of the most frequent complications in hospitalized elderly patients with additional costs such as prolongation of hospital stays and institutionalization, with risk of reduced functional recovery, long-term cognitive impairment, and increased morbidity and mortality. We analyzed the effect of individual pharmacotherapy management (IPM) in the University Hospital Halle in geriatric trauma patients on complicating delirium and aimed to identify associated factors.
    In a retrospective controlled clinical study of 404 hospitalized trauma patients ≥70 years we compared the IPM intervention group (IG) with a control group (CG) before IPM implementation. Delirium was recorded from the hospital discharge letter. The medication review and data records included baseline data, all medications, diagnoses, electrocardiogram (ECG), laboratory and vital parameters during hospitalization. The IPM internist and the senior trauma physician guaranteed personnel and structural continuity in the implementation of the interdisciplinary patient rounds.
    There was a highly matched congruence between CG and IG in terms of age, gender, residency, BMI, most diagnoses, and injury patterns to compare the two groups. The total number of medications per patient was 11.1 ± 4.9 (CG) versus 10.4 ± 3.6 (IG). Our targeted IPM focus on 6 frontline aspects with reduction of antipsychotics, anticholinergic burden, benzodiazepines, serotonergic opioids, elimination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions and overdosage reduced complicating delirium from 5% to almost zero at 0.5%. The association of IPM with a significant 10-fold reduction, OR = 0.09 [95% CI 0.01-0.7], in univariable regression, maintained of clinical relevance in multivariable regression OR = 0.1 [95% CI 0.01-1.1]. Factors most strongly associated with complicating delirium in univariable regression were cognitive dysfunction, nursing home residency, muscle relaxants, antiparkinsonian agents, xanthines, transient disorientation documented in the fall risk scale, antibiotic-requiring infections, antifungals, antipsychotics, and intensive care stay, the two latter maintaining significance in multivariable regression.
    IPM is associated with a highly effective prevention of complicating delirium in the elderly trauma patients. For patient safety it should be integrated as an essential preventative contribution. The associated factors help identify patients at risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    曲马多中毒很少引起5-羟色胺毒性,哪些机制仍然知之甚少。我们调查了曲马多中毒患者的曲马多药代动力学的变化,该患者表现出明显和长期的5-羟色胺毒性。
    一名21岁的男性自我摄入750毫克曲马多,200毫克索他洛尔,400mg-普萘洛尔和6mg-劳拉西泮。他是一名接受霉酚酸酯治疗的肾移植患者,他克莫司,泼尼松,还有帕罗西汀.他出现了短暂的心血管衰竭和长期的5-羟色胺毒性,需要镇静,肌肉麻痹,和赛庚啶,一个有利的结果。
    我们测量了曲马多的血浆浓度,M1,M2和M5使用液相色谱-串联质谱法,计算化合物的消除半衰期和代谢比,和基因分型的细胞色素参与曲马多的代谢。
    曲马多(6.1h)和M1(7.1h)的消除半衰期正常,而M2(26.5h)和M5(16.7h)的消除半衰期延长。M1代谢率(0.12)降低了2倍,M2代谢率(197)增加1000倍,M5代谢率(0.12)正常。基于基因分型的CYP2D6代谢状态正常的患者的这种代谢特征支持帕罗西汀和普萘洛尔对CYP2D6的抑制作用,两种强效机制抑制剂。只有M2以足够的浓度存在直到48小时才能解释延长的5-羟色胺毒性。
    明显和延长的5-羟色胺毒性归因于帕罗西汀和普萘洛尔相关的CYP2D6抑制曲马多代谢导致的M2产生增加。
    UNASSIGNED: Tramadol poisoning rarely causes serotonin toxicity, which mechanisms remain poorly understood. We investigated alterations in tramadol pharmacokinetics in a tramadol-poisoned patient who presented with marked and prolonged serotonin toxicity.
    UNASSIGNED: A 21-year-old male self-ingested 750 mg-tramadol, 200 mg-sotalol, 400 mg-propranolol and 6 mg-lorazepam. He was a kidney transplant patient treated with mycophenolate, tacrolimus, prednisone, and paroxetine. He developed transitory cardiovascular failure and prolonged serotonin toxicity requiring sedation, muscle paralysis, and cyproheptadine, with a favorable outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: We measured plasma concentrations of tramadol, M1, M2, and M5 using liquid-chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, calculated elimination half-lives and metabolic ratios of the compounds, and genotyped cytochromes involved in tramadol metabolism.
    UNASSIGNED: Elimination half-lives of tramadol (6.1 h) and M1 (7.1 h) were normal while those of M2 (26.5 h) and M5 (16.7 h) prolonged. M1 metabolic ratio (0.12) was 2-fold reduced, M2 metabolic ratio (197) 1000-fold increased and M5 metabolic ratio (0.12) normal. This metabolic profile in a patient with normal CYP2D6-metabolizer status based on genotyping supports CYP2D6 inhibition by paroxetine and propranolol, two strong mechanism-based inhibitors. Only M2 present in sufficient concentrations up to 48 h could explain the prolonged serotonin toxicity.
    UNASSIGNED: Marked and prolonged serotonin toxicity was attributed to increased M2 production due to paroxetine- and propranolol-related CYP2D6 inhibition of tramadol metabolism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在比利时,利奈唑胺用于治疗肺炎和皮肤及软组织感染,但使用更广泛,由于其口服生物利用度和对多重耐药生物体的活性。这可能会增加药物不良反应(ADR)的风险,特别是血液系统疾病(贫血,血小板减少),神经病,或者乳酸性酸中毒.我们分析了利奈唑胺的临床使用与比利时医院ADR发生的关系,并强调了与血小板减少症发展相关的危险因素。对2016年在四家比利时医院接受利奈唑胺治疗的成年患者的电子病历和实验室检查进行回顾性分析,从而收集了248种利奈唑胺治疗的ADR。只有19.7%的适应症在标签内。ADR包括43例血小板减少症,17贫血,4神经病,和4增加乳酸盐血症。在多变量分析中,血小板减少症的危险因素是治疗持续时间>10天,肾小球滤过率<60mL/min,Charlson指数≥4。利奈唑胺的标签外使用在比利时很常见,和ADR比产品特性摘要中报告的频率更高,但在统计学上与任何适应症无关。ADR的高患病率可能与我们人群中出现危险因素的患者比例高有关。强调前瞻性检测它们的重要性。
    In Belgium, linezolid is indicated for pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infections, but is more broadly used, due to its oral bioavailability and activity against multiresistant organisms. This could increase the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR), notably hematological disorders (anemia, thrombocytopenia), neuropathy, or lactic acidosis. We analyzed linezolid clinical use in relationship with occurrence of ADR in Belgian hospitals and highlighted risk factors associated with the development of thrombocytopenia. A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records and laboratory tests of adult patients treated with linezolid in four Belgian hospitals in 2016 allowed the collection of ADR for 248 linezolid treatments. Only 19.7% of indications were in-label. ADR included 43 thrombocytopenia, 17 anemia, 4 neuropathies, and 4 increases in lactatemia. In a multi-variate analysis, risk factors of thrombocytopenia were a treatment duration > 10 days, a glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min, and a Charlson index ≥ 4. Off-label use of linezolid is frequent in Belgium, and ADR more frequent than reported in the summary of product characteristics, but not statistically associated with any indication. This high prevalence of ADR could be related to a high proportion of patients presenting risk factors in our population, highlighting the importance of detecting them prospectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:5-羟色胺综合征(SS)是由5-羟色胺的过高浓度引起的未被诊断的药物诱发的临床综合征。关于慢性SS的信息非常有限。
    目的:为了评估流行病学,临床,和其他方面的阴险发作SS。
    方法:我们回顾性评估了14名连续成年患者(>18岁),这些患者在咨询时主诉时间超过6周,符合SS的Hunter标准。
    结果:平均年龄为41.1岁(范围:21-61岁),男性优势(64%)。虽然所有患者都有震颤,这是仅43%的患者的主诉.全身疼痛,失眠,躁动是常见的表现特征(各占50%)。其他常见的临床特征是四肢僵硬(43%),发汗(43%),步态障碍(36%),肠紊乱(36%),头晕(29%),性功能障碍(21%),不协调(14%),和疲劳(14%)SS诊断前症状的平均持续时间为13.5±5.8wk(范围:6-24wk)。阿米替林是最常见的药物(n=6,43%),其次是曲马多(n=5,36%)和丙戊酸钠(n=5,36%)。所有患者接受赛庚啶,一种5-羟色胺2A拮抗剂,作为治疗,并注意到在4-14d的过程中的良好反应。
    结论:该研究代表了慢性SS的最大研究。我们建议接受血清素能药物的患者在出现新症状时应进行身体检查,以确定是否存在SS。
    BACKGROUND: Serotonin syndrome (SS) is an underdiagnosed drug-induced clinical syndrome resulting from the excess intrasynaptic concentration of serotonin. Very limited information is available about chronic SS.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the epidemiological, clinical, and other aspects of the insidious onset SS.
    METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 14 consecutive adult patients (> 18 years) who had complaints for more than 6 wk at the time of consultation and met the Hunter criteria for SS.
    RESULTS: The mean age was 41.1 years (range: 21-61 years), with a male preponderance (64%). Although tremors were observed in all patients, this was a presenting complaint in only 43% of patients. Generalized body pain, insomnia, and restlessness were common presenting features (50% each). Other common clinical features were stiffness of the limbs (43%), diaphoresis (43%), gait disturbances (36%), bowel disturbances (36%), dizziness (29%), sexual dysfunctions (21%), incoordination (14%), and fatigue (14%) The mean duration of symptoms before the diagnosis of SS was 13.5 ± 5.8 wk (range: 6-24 wk). Amitriptyline was the most common drug (n = 6, 43%), followed by tramadol (n = 5, 36%) and sodium valproate (n = 5, 36%). All patients received cyproheptadine, a 5- hydroxytryptamine2A antagonist, as treatment and noted an excellent response over the course of 4-14 d.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest study on chronic SS. We suggest that patients receiving serotonergic drugs should be physically examined for the presence of SS upon the development of new symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the effects of safinamide on depression, motor symptoms, and the serotonin syndrome related to its co-administration with antidepressants in patients with Parkinson\'s disease (PD).
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients at 1 and 3 months of follow-up compared to baseline.
    RESULTS: n = 82 (safinamide 50 mg = 22, 100 mg = 60, with antidepressants = 44). First, we found improvement in depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: -6 ± 5.10 at 1 month and -7.27 ± 5.10 at 3 months, p < 0.0001; Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale: 60.3% and 69.5% of patients at 1 and 3 months reported some improvement). Second, safinamide improved the daily life activities and motor symptoms/motor complications (Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-II): -2.51 ± 6.30 and -2.47 ± 6.11 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001; III: -3.58 ± 8.68 and -4.03 ± 8.95 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001; IV: -0.61 ± 2.61 and -0.8 ± 2.53 at 1 and 3 months, p < 0.0001). Third, 7.31% and 8.53% of patients developed non-severe adverse events related to safinamide at 1 and 3 months. Serotonin syndrome was not observed in the patients treated with antidepressants; some isolated serotonin syndrome symptoms were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: Safinamide could be useful for treating depression in PD; it was effective for motor symptoms and motor complications and safe even when co-administered with antidepressants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号