Serotonin Receptor Agonists

5 - 羟色胺受体激动剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于lasmiditan的有效性和安全性的真实世界数据,一种治疗急性偏头痛的新药,是必要的。
    方法:我们进行了前瞻性,观察,多中心,真实世界的研究。共有48例偏头痛患者(44例女性,44.6±12.9岁)纳入本研究。
    结果:23名患者(47.9%)报告他们在服用lasmiditan后两小时无头痛,并被归类为应答者组。总的来说,44名患者(91.7%)在服用药物的两个小时内出现了至少一种副作用。头晕,嗜睡,萎靡不振,恶心,心悸报告56.3%(n=27),45.8%(n=22),37.5%(n=18),20.8%(n=10),和14.6%(n=7)的患者。48名患者中,20(41.7%)表明他们更喜欢lasmiditan,而不是以前的急性治疗。没有疗效的预测因素。
    结论:这项真实世界的研究证明了lasmiditan的有效性和安全性。超过90%的患者经历了lasmiditan的副作用。尽管发生了副作用,但大约40%的患者还是首选lasmiditan。
    BACKGROUND: Real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan, a new medication for acute migraine attacks, is necessary.
    METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, multi-center, real-world study. A total of 48 patients with migraine (44 females, 44.6 ± 12.9 years old) were included in this study.
    RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (47.9%) reported they were headache-free two hours after taking lasmiditan and were categorized into the responder group. In total, 44 patients (91.7%) experienced at least one side effect within two hours of taking the medication. Dizziness, somnolence, malaise, nausea, and palpitations were reported by 56.3% (n = 27), 45.8% (n = 22), 37.5% (n = 18), 20.8% (n = 10), and 14.6% (n = 7) of patients respectively. Of 48 patients, 20 (41.7%) indicated that they preferred lasmiditan to their previous acute treatment. There were no predictive factors for efficacy.
    CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan. More than 90% of patients experienced side effects from lasmiditan. Approximately 40% of patients preferred lasmiditan despite the occurrence of side effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有证据表明5-羟色胺受体亚型7(5-HT7)可能是神经保护的新治疗靶标。这项研究的目的是比较新的5-HT7受体激动剂(AH-494,AGH-238,AGH-194)与5-CT(5-羧基酰胺胺)在人神经母细胞瘤SH-SY5Y细胞中的神经保护和神经突生长潜力。结果表明,与未分化的细胞相比,视黄酸(RA)分化的细胞中的5-HT7mRNA表达明显更高,而在神经母细胞瘤实验培养基(DMEM)中培养的细胞中的5-HT7mRNA表达高于神经元(NB)培养基。此外,在用于神经保护评估的浓度(高达1μM)下,化合物的安全性对所有测试化合物都是有利的,而在较高浓度(高于10μM)的测试化合物之一,AGH-194似乎是细胞毒性的。虽然我们观察到5-CT和AH-494在DMEM中培养的UN-SH-SY5Y细胞中的相对适度的保护作用,在NB培养基中培养的UN-SH-SY5Y细胞中,我们发现所有测试的5-HT7激动剂均显着降低了H2O2诱发的细胞损伤。然而,5-HT7介导的神经保护与caspase-3活性的抑制无关,并且在暴露于H2O2的RA-SH-SY5Y细胞中未观察到。此外,所测试的5-HT7激动剂均未改变6-羟基多巴胺(6-OHDA)诱导的损伤,在NB中培养的UN-和RA-SH-SY5Y细胞中的1-甲基-4-苯基吡啶鎓离子(MPP)和多柔比星(Dox)。最后,我们显示了AH-494和AGH-194对神经突生长的刺激作用。获得的结果提供了对新的5-HT7激动剂的神经保护和神经突生长潜力的洞察。
    There is some evidence that the serotonin receptor subtype 7 (5-HT7) could be new therapeutic target for neuroprotection. The aim of this study was to compare the neuroprotective and neurite outgrowth potential of new 5-HT7 receptor agonists (AH-494, AGH-238, AGH-194) with 5-CT (5-carboxyamidotryptamine) in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. The results revealed that 5-HT7 mRNA expression was significantly higher in retinoic acid (RA)-differentiated cells when compared to undifferentiated ones and it was higher in cell cultured in neuroblastoma experimental medium (DMEM) compared to those placed in neuronal (NB) medium. Furthermore, the safety profile of compounds was favorable for all tested compounds at concentration used for neuroprotection evaluation (up to 1 μM), whereas at higher concentrations (above 10 μM) the one of the tested compounds, AGH-194 appeared to be cytotoxic. While we observed relatively modest protective effects of 5-CT and AH-494 in UN-SH-SY5Y cells cultured in DMEM, in UN-SH-SY5Y cells cultured in NB medium we found a significant reduction of H2O2-evoked cell damage by all tested 5-HT7 agonists. However, 5-HT7-mediated neuroprotection was not associated with inhibition of caspase-3 activity and was not observed in RA-SH-SY5Y cells exposed to H2O2. Furthermore, none of the tested 5-HT7 agonists altered the damage induced by 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion (MPP +) and doxorubicin (Dox) in UN- and RA-SH-SY5Y cells cultured in NB. Finally we showed a stimulating effect of AH-494 and AGH-194 on neurite outgrowth. The obtained results provide insight into neuroprotective and neurite outgrowth potential of new 5-HT7 agonists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:本分析的目的是在类似于现实环境的条件下,获得对患者特征和与lasmiditan使用和临床结果相关的其他因素的新见解。
    方法:这是对12个月数据的事后分析,阶段3的开放标签扩展(OLE),双盲,随机化,CENTURION对照试验,该研究检查了lasmiditan在四次偏头痛发作中作为急性治疗的有效性和安全性。完成主要研究且治疗≥3次发作的患者可继续接受OLE治疗。最初的Lasmiditan剂量是100毫克,根据研究者的判断,剂量调整为50mg或200mg。通过给药模式和完成状态总结患者和临床特征。基于不良事件(AE)频率通过剂量数量来评估安全性。
    结果:总计,445例患者在OLE期间使用lasmiditan治疗≥1次偏头痛发作,其中321人(72.1%)完成了研究。47%的患者在OLE期间仍使用100mg初始剂量,而20.2%的患者同时使用100mg和50mg,30.6%同时使用了100毫克和200毫克,和6(1.3%)使用多剂量水平。所有给药模式均与临床和患者报告的改善有关;然而,100mg组报告患者总体变化印象-偏头痛头痛状况改善的患者比例最高(56.5%vs33.4%-52.2%).相比之下,与100mg组相比,进行剂量调整的三组均有更高的完成率(72.1%-83.3%vs68.9%).随着持续使用lasmiditan,AE的频率降低。同时使用triptans和lasmiditan不会增加AE频率。
    结论:基于高持久性和患者满意度,对于大多数患者,100毫克的剂量似乎是最佳的。对于那些调整剂量水平的人来说,剂量调整似乎有利于提高疗效或耐受性,保留患者的治疗。总的来说,数据表明,无论AE的发生或频率如何,有疗效的患者都继续使用lasmiditan,并且持续使用似乎与较少的AE相关。
    背景:欧盟药物监管机构临床试验数据库(EudraCT):2018-001661-17;ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03670810;注册日期:2018年9月12日。
    BACKGROUND: The objective of this analysis was to gain new insights into the patient characteristics and other factors associated with lasmiditan usage and clinical outcomes under conditions resembling the real-world setting.
    METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of data from the 12-month, open-label extension (OLE) of the phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled CENTURION trial, which examined the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan as acute treatment across four migraine attacks. Patients completing the main study who treated ≥ 3 attacks could continue in the OLE. The initial lasmiditan dose was 100 mg, with dose adjustments to 50 mg or 200 mg allowed at the investigator\'s discretion. Patient and clinical characteristics were summarized by dosing pattern and completion status. Safety was assessed based on adverse event (AE) frequency by number of doses.
    RESULTS: In total, 445 patients treated ≥ 1 migraine attacks with lasmiditan during the OLE, 321 of whom (72.1%) completed the study. Forty-seven percent of patients remained on the 100-mg initial dose during the OLE whereas 20.2% used both 100 mg and 50 mg, 30.6% used both 100 mg and 200 mg, and 6 (1.3%) used multiple dose levels. All dosing patterns were associated with clinical and patient-reported improvement; however, the 100-mg group had the highest proportion of patients reporting improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change - Migraine Headache Condition (56.5% vs 33.4%-52.2%). In comparison, all three groups that made dose adjustments had higher rates of completion compared to the 100-mg group (72.1%-83.3% vs 68.9%). The frequency of AEs decreased with continued use of lasmiditan. Concomitant triptans and lasmiditan use did not increase AE frequency.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on high persistence and patient satisfaction rates, the 100-mg dose appears optimal for most patients. For those who adjusted dose levels, dose adjustments appeared beneficial to improve efficacy or tolerability, retaining patients on treatment. Collectively, the data suggest that patients who experienced efficacy continued to use lasmiditan regardless of the occurrence or frequency of AEs, and continued use appeared associated with fewer AEs.
    BACKGROUND: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT): 2018-001661-17; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03670810; registration date: September 12, 2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:在CENTURION3期随机对照试验的4个月双盲期之后,这个为期12个月的开放标签扩展收集了长达一年的剂量优化数据,使用模式,偏头痛相关的残疾,以及Lasmiditan治疗期间的生活质量。
    方法:偏头痛患者≥18岁,完成双盲阶段并治疗≥3次偏头痛发作,可以持续到12个月的开放标签延长期。初始口服雷米替坦剂量为100mg;随后可根据研究者的判断将剂量调整至50mg或200mg。
    结果:477例患者进入,321例(72.1%)完成了扩展;445例(93.3%)用lasmiditan治疗≥1次发作。在11327次袭击中,8654(76.4%)接受了lasmiditan治疗(其中84.9%涉及中度或重度疼痛)。到研究结束时,17.8%,58.7%,23.4%的患者服用了50、100和200毫克的Lasmiditan,分别。观察到残疾和生活质量的平均改善。最常见的治疗引起的不良事件是头晕(35.7%的患者,9.5%的攻击)。
    结论:在这12个月的延期期间,Lasmiditan的研究完成率很高,大多数攻击都是用lasmiditan治疗的,患者报告偏头痛相关残疾和生活质量改善.在暴露时间较长的情况下,没有观察到新的安全性发现。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03670810);欧盟药物监管机构临床试验数据库(EUDRACT:2018-001661-17)。
    Following the CENTURION phase 3 randomized controlled trial\'s four-month double-blind phase, this 12-month open-label extension collected data for up to one year about dose optimization, patterns of use, migraine-related disability, and quality of life during lasmiditan treatment.
    Migraine patients ≥18 years completing the double-blind phase and treating ≥3 migraine attacks could continue into the 12-month open-label extension. The initial oral lasmiditan dose was 100 mg; the dose could subsequently be adjusted to 50 mg or 200 mg at the investigator\'s discretion.
    477 patients entered and 321 (72.1%) completed the extension; 445 (93.3%) treated ≥1 attack with lasmiditan. Of 11,327 attacks, 8654 (76.4%) were lasmiditan-treated (84.9% of these involved moderate or severe pain). By study end, 17.8%, 58.7%, and 23.4% of patients were taking lasmiditan 50, 100, and 200 mg, respectively. Mean improvements were observed in disability and quality of life. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was dizziness (35.7% of patients, 9.5% of attacks).
    During this 12-month extension, lasmiditan was associated with a high rate of study completion, most attacks were treated with lasmiditan, and patients reported improvements in migraine-related disability and quality of life. No new safety findings were observed with longer exposure.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03670810); European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EUDRA CT: 2018-001661-17).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Cognitive impairment is a prominent clinical manifestation of vascular depression (VaDep). The current study aimed to assess the efficacy of tandospirone citrate in VaDep cases with mild cognitive impairment (VaDep-MCI) as well as the role of plasma monoamine neurotransmitters during the treatment. In this single-blind, randomized controlled study, 116 participants were randomly assigned to the tandospirone (tandospirone citrate-escitalopram) and control (escitalopram) groups. The primary endpoints were changes in cognitive test scores from baseline to Week 8, including the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Semantic Verbal Fluency (SVF) test, Trail Making Test (TMT), Digital Span Test (DST) and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) scores. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine repeated measures. The results showed that compared with the changes in the control group from baseline to Week 8, the tandospirone group showed more significant changes in SVF score at Weeks 4 (p < 0.05) and 8 (p < 0.001), and TMT (B-A) score at Week 8 (p < 0.05). RAVLT, DST and DCT scores were relatively stable in both groups during the study period. Moreover, mediation analysis showed that these results were not mediated by the alleviation of depression symptoms. Partial Spearman correlation analysis showed that only plasma 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) was positively correlated with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score after Bonferroni correction (r = 0.347, p < 0.001). Augmentation therapy with tandospirone citrate improved the executive and language functions of VaDep-MCI patients. Additionally, plasma 5-HT levels may serve as a potential biomarker of VaDep severity. These findings may provide clinical insights into the treatment of vascular depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项MONONOFU试验亚组分析评估了日本偏头痛患者中lasmiditan跨患者和偏头痛特征的疗效。
    MONONOFU试验是多中心的,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照研究。患者以3:7:6:7的比例随机分配,接受lasmiditan50毫克,100毫克,200毫克,或安慰剂用于疼痛发作后4小时内的单次偏头痛发作。在给药后2小时评估了lasmiditan与安慰剂的疗效,以缓解头痛疼痛的患者比例。通过患者特征(年龄,性别,体重,心血管危险因素(CVRF),和紧张型头痛的合并症),偏头痛疾病特征(偏头痛有先兆,偏头痛预防治疗,Triptan反应,和曲坦使用或不使用),和偏头痛发作特征(头痛严重程度,侵袭性头痛,在围产期攻击,给药时间,给药时间,经历过治疗引起的头晕不良事件(TEAE),并经历了TEAE的嗜睡)。使用Logistic回归;所有亚组分析均未使用多重校正统计检验进行分析。
    在所有患者亚组和Lasmiditan剂量中,治疗亚组之间的相互作用(每个手臂)在剂量后2小时的疼痛自由度均无统计学意义(p≥0.05)。除CVRF(100mg和200mg)外,先兆偏头痛(50毫克),曲坦反应(50毫克),和给药时间(200毫克)。在所有患者亚组的剂量后2小时,治疗与亚组的相互作用(总体)对于疼痛自由没有统计学意义(p≥0.05)。除了CVRF。较高比例的患者在剂量后2小时无疼痛时,用Lasmiditan治疗(50mg,100毫克,和200毫克)与安慰剂相比,不管大多数患者的特征,偏头痛的疾病特点,和偏头痛发作特征。
    虽然很少观察到相互作用,Lasmiditan可能是一个有希望的急性治疗选择,在广泛的日本偏头痛患者,因为疗效通常不受患者和偏头痛特征的影响。
    This MONONOFU trial subgroup analysis evaluates the efficacy of lasmiditan across patient and migraine characteristics in Japanese patients with migraine.
    MONONOFU trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomly assigned in a 3:7:6:7 ratio to receive lasmiditan 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, or placebo for a single migraine attack within 4 h of pain onset. Efficacy of lasmiditan vs placebo was evaluated at 2 h post dose for proportion of patients with headache pain freedom. Efficacy was assessed across patient characteristics (age, sex, body weight, cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), and comorbidity of tension-type headache), migraine disease characteristics (history of migraine with aura, migraine prevention therapy, triptan response, and triptan use or nonuse), and migraine attack characteristics (headache severity, aggressive headache, attack during perimenstrual period, time to dosing, time of dosing, experienced treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of dizziness, and experienced TEAE of somnolence). Logistic regression was used; all subgroup analyses were not analyzed with multiplicity-adjusted statistical tests.
    Treatment-by-subgroup interactions (by each arm) were not significant (p ≥ 0.05) for pain freedom at 2 h post dose across all patient subgroups and lasmiditan doses, except for CVRF (100 mg and 200 mg), migraine with aura (50 mg), triptan response (50 mg), and time to dosing (200 mg). Treatment-by-subgroup interactions (by overall) were not significant (p ≥ 0.05) for pain freedom at 2 h post dose across all patient subgroups, except for CVRFs. Higher proportions of patients were pain free at 2 h post dose when treated with lasmiditan (50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg) versus placebo, irrespective of most patient characteristics, migraine disease characteristics, and migraine attack characteristics.
    Although few interactions were observed, lasmiditan could be a promising acute treatment option in a wide range of Japanese patients with migraine, as efficacy is not generally influenced by patient and migraine characteristics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase III
    Lasmiditan是第一种5-HT1F受体激动剂,有潜力解决中国治疗偏头痛的巨大未满足的医疗需求。CENTURION研究是lasmiditan在高加索和中国偏头痛患者中的第一个3期研究。此事后分析进一步证明了lasmiditan在中国人群中的安全性,这是迫切需要的。
    患者被随机分为1:1:1至lasmiditan200毫克lasmiditan100毫克,或对照组。因治疗引起的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率,其严重性,评估了经常报告的TEAE(≥5%)的治疗发作的发生率。持续时间,发病,并分析了疗效与非常常见的TEAE(≥10%)的关系。
    本事后分析共纳入281名中国患者。没有报告死亡和研究药物相关治疗引起的严重不良事件(TESAE)。与安慰剂(26.6%)相比,接受lasmiditan200mg(73.9%)和100mg(66.3%)的患者中至少一种TEAE的发生率更高。TEAE的严重程度一般为轻度或中度,在第一次发作期间,经常报告的TEAE的发生率通常最高。非常常见的TEAE与lasmiditan包括头晕,虚弱,嗜睡,肌肉无力,疲劳,和恶心。在第一次发作期间,头晕的持续时间最长。无心脑血管缺血事件和5-羟色胺综合征。存在非常常见的TEAE(恶心除外),和严重的头晕,似乎对疗效没有负面影响。
    在CENTURION研究的中国人口中,大多数TEAE是神经系统的,轻度或中度严重程度,和自我限制。首次发作时频繁报告的TEAE的分布与主要队列不同,而中国人群中lasmiditan的总体安全性与CENTURION主要队列基本一致.在中国人群中没有观察到新的安全问题。
    NCT03670810。
    虽然偏头痛患者存在大量未满足的医疗需求,在过去的二十年中,中国还没有新的治疗偏头痛的化合物。这些未满足的医疗需求持续存在,因为据报道,目前用于偏头痛急性治疗的药物具有安全性和耐受性问题。Lasmiditan是一类新型的急性偏头痛药物(5-HT受体激动剂,对5-HT1F受体具有高选择性),在2期和3期研究中具有良好的疗效和安全性。由于中国和西方国家在临床实践上的一些差异,有必要在中国人群中获得更多关于lasmiditan安全性的证据,以支持其在临床实践中的使用。使用来自CENTURION研究的数据,进行了此事后分析,以显示中国人群中lasmiditan的详细安全性。大约一半的分析人群未被纳入已发表的主要队列。研究结果表明,在中国人群中,大多数治疗引起的不良事件(TEAE)是神经系统,轻度或中度严重程度,和自我限制。首次发作时频繁报告的TEAE的分布与主要队列不同,在中国人群中未观察到新的安全性问题。Lasmiditan在中国人群中的总体安全性与主要队列基本一致。结果提供了更多的证据,并强调lasmiditan可能被认为是一种有用的急性治疗选择,对中国的偏头痛患者具有可接受的安全性。
    Lasmiditan is the first 5-HT1F receptor agonist with potential to address the huge unmet medical needs for the treatment of migraine in China. The CENTURION study was the first phase 3 study of lasmiditan in Caucasian and Chinese patients with migraine. This post hoc analysis further demonstrates the safety profile of lasmiditan in the Chinese population and was urgently needed.
    Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to lasmiditan 200 mg lasmiditan 100 mg, or a control group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), their severity, and incidence by treated attacks for frequently reported TEAEs (≥ 5%) were evaluated. The duration, onset, and relationship of efficacy with very common TEAEs (≥ 10%) was analyzed.
    A total of 281 Chinese patients were included in this post hoc analysis. No deaths and no study drug-related treatment emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported. The incidence of at least one TEAE was higher in patients receiving lasmiditan 200 mg (73.9%) and 100 mg (66.3%) versus placebo (26.6%). TEAEs were generally mild or moderate in severity, and the incidence of frequently reported TEAEs was generally highest during the first attack. Very common TEAEs with lasmiditan included dizziness, asthenia, somnolence, muscular weakness, fatigue, and nausea. The duration of dizziness was longest during the first attack. There were no cardio-cerebrovascular ischemic events and serotonin syndrome. The presence of very common TEAEs (except nausea), and severe dizziness, did not appear to have a negative influence on the efficacy.
    In the Chinese population of the CENTURION study, most of the TEAEs were neurologic, of mild or moderate severity, and self-limiting. The distribution of frequently reported TEAEs at the first attack differed from the primary cohort, while the overall safety profile of lasmiditan in the Chinese population was generally consistent with the CENTURION primary cohort. No new safety concerns were observed in the Chinese population.
    NCT03670810.
    Although there is significant unmet medical need among patients with migraine, there has been no novel compound for treatment of migraine over past two decades in China. These unmet medical needs persist because the current available medications for the acute treatment of migraine are reported to have safety and tolerability issues. Lasmiditan is a new class of acute migraine medication (5-HT receptor agonist with high selectivity for the 5-HT1F receptor) with a proven efficacy and safety in phase 2 and 3 studies. Owing to some differences in clinical practice between China and western countries, there is need to get additional evidence on safety of lasmiditan in the Chinese population to support its usage in clinical practice.This post hoc analysis was conducted to present the detailed safety profile of lasmiditan in the Chinese population using data from the CENTURION study. Approximately half of the analyzed population was not covered in the published primary cohort.The results show that in the Chinese population of the study, most of the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were neurologic, of mild or moderate severity, and self-limiting. The distribution of frequently reported TEAEs at the first attack differed from the primary cohort with no new safety concerns observed in the Chinese population. The overall safety profile of lasmiditan in the Chinese population was generally consistent with the primary cohort. The results provide additional evidence and emphasize that lasmiditan may be considered as a useful acute treatment option with acceptable safety profile for patients with migraine in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    未经证实:某些偏头痛治疗对于有心血管疾病(CVD)或危险因素(CVRF)的患者是禁忌的。我们报告了lasmiditan的安全性和有效性,一种新的口服急性偏头痛治疗,没有心血管禁忌症,日本CVRF患者。
    未经批准:MONONOFU是一个多中心,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照,日本偏头痛患者的2期研究(符合国际头痛学会标准,偏头痛残疾评估评分≥11,禁用偏头痛≥1年)。符合条件的患者被随机分配(7:3:7:6)接受安慰剂或Lasmiditan50、100、200mg。这个预设的分析描述了心血管疾病,CVRF,和心血管治疗引起的不良事件(TEAE)。功效(无痛比例,经历了疼痛缓解,最麻烦的无症状,或给药后2小时无残疾)在CVRF亚组(≤1,≥2)内进行评估。
    未经证实:在846名随机患者中,分析691例(CVRF≤1:375;CVRF≥2:316)。接受lasmiditan治疗的≥1TEAE患者的比例与CVRF数无关。18例(3.8%)接受lasmiditan治疗的患者和3例(1.4%)接受安慰剂治疗的患者报告了可能的心血管TEAE。Lasmiditan在缓解疼痛方面比安慰剂更有效,症状,和残疾在两个CVRF亚组。CVRF亚组与疗效之间没有一致的关系。
    UASSIGNED:Lasmiditan在日本偏头痛和CVRF患者中具有良好的耐受性和有效性。
    UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03962738。
    UNASSIGNED: Some migraine treatments are contraindicated for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or risk factors (CVRFs). We report safety and efficacy of lasmiditan, a new oral acute migraine treatment with no cardiovascular contraindication, in Japanese patients with CVRFs.
    UNASSIGNED: MONONOFU was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study of Japanese patients with migraine (met International Headache Society criteria, Migraine Disability Assessment score ≥11, disabling migraine for ≥1 year). Eligible patients were randomized (7:3:7:6) to placebo or lasmiditan 50, 100, 200 mg. This prespecified analysis described CVDs, CVRFs, and cardiovascular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy (proportion pain-free, experienced pain relief, most bothersome symptom-free, or disability-free 2 hours post-dose) was evaluated within CVRF subgroups (≤1, ≥2).
    UNASSIGNED: Of 846 randomized patients, 691 were analyzed (CVRF≤1: 375; CVRF≥2: 316). The proportion of lasmiditan-treated patients with ≥1 TEAE was not related to CVRF numbers. Eighteen (3.8%) lasmiditan-treated and three (1.4%) placebo-treated patients reported likely cardiovascular TEAEs. Lasmiditan was more effective than placebo at relieving pain, symptoms, and disability in both CVRF subgroups. There was no consistent relationship between CVRF subgroups and efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: Lasmiditan was well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with migraine and CVRFs.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03962738.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Major depressive disorder is a severe illness that frequently manifests before the age of 18 years, often recurring later in life. Paediatric medical treatment options are scarce. The melatonin receptor agonist and 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptor antagonist agomelatine is used to treat adults, and could offer a new therapeutic option for paediatric patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the short-term antidepressant efficacy and safety of agomelatine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder.
    We performed a 12 week, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial in 46 specialist psychiatric units or centres in Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, and Ukraine. Participants (aged 7-17 years) were eligible if they were unresponsive to psychosocial therapy during the 3-week run-in period (Children\'s Depression Rating Scale-revised [CDRS-R] score of ≥45). Ethnicity was not recorded. We investigated short-term antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine (10 mg or 25 mg per day) versus placebo with an active control (fluoxetine 10-20 mg depending on symptom severity) after 12 weeks of treatment in children (aged 7-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) with major depressive disorder. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to agomelatine 10 mg, agomelatine 25 mg, placebo, or fluoxetine via an interactive response system with permuted-block randomisation. Standardised manualised psychosocial counselling, developed for this trial, was initiated from selection and continued throughout the study, including the open-label extension. All people involved in the conduct of the clinical trial and patients were masked to treatment allocation. Study outcomes were measured using standardised interviews at each study visit. The primary endpoint was change in CDRS-R raw score from baseline to week 12. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2015-002181-23.
    Between Feb 23, 2016, and Jan 14, 2020, 466 individuals were assessed for eligibility and of 400 included patients, 396 (247 [62%] girls, 149 [38%] boys; mean age 13·7 years [SD 2·7]) were analysed (full analysis set). The primary objective was met; 25 mg/day agomelatine (n=94, with n=102 receiving 10 mg/day) resulted in an improvement versus placebo (n=101) in CDRS-R raw score of 4·22 (95% CI 0·63-7·82; p=0·040) at 12 weeks, with a similar effect for fluoxetine (n=99), establishing assay sensitivity. The overall effect was confirmed in adolescents (n=317), but not in children (n=79). No unexpected safety signals were observed with agomelatine, with no significant weight gain or effect on suicidal behaviours.
    This first study in a paediatric population supports the efficacy of 25 mg/day agomelatine, in addition to psychosocial counselling, in treating adolescent patients with major depressive disorder, with no unexpected safety signals. This medication could provide another option in the limited psychopharmaceutical repertoire for management of major depressive disorder.
    Servier. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Lasmiditan(LTN)是一种用于成人偏头痛急性治疗的选择性5-HT1F受体激动剂。我们提供了来自安慰剂对照的详细安全性发现,双盲3期研究,LTN治疗4次发作(CENTURION)。
    方法:患者被随机分为1:1:1,以LTN200mg(LTN200),LTN100,或对照组,接受安慰剂3次发作,接受LTN50第3次或第4次发作(1:1)。对服用≥1剂量研究药物的患者进行安全性分析,在某些情况下,那些服用了所有4剂的人。
    结果:总体而言,1471名患者治疗4494次发作。治疗引起的严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率为-安慰剂,n=2(0.4%);LTN100,n=1(0.2%);LTN200,n=2(0.4%);在一名以上的患者中没有报告特异性治疗引起的SAE。Lasmiditan最常见的治疗紧急不良事件(TEAE)是头晕,感觉异常,疲劳,恶心,眩晕,和嗜睡;绝大多数是轻度或中度的。这些TEAE的发生率在第一次发作期间最高,在随后的发作期间下降。对于第一次发作时出现常见TEAE的患者,不到45%的人在随后的攻击中经历了相同的事件。在第一次发作中没有经历事件的患者在随后的发作中很少经历相同的事件。常见TEAE的发作时间为〜40分钟至1小时(取决于TEAE),对于个人TEAE,在不同的攻击中,发作是相似的。持续时间取决于TEAE和发作。感觉异常最短(所有发作<2小时);其他常见TEAE的范围为1.8至5.5小时,在所有发作之间通常相似。据报道,LTN给药后有2例患者出现5-羟色胺综合征;治疗组之间的自杀率没有明显差异;没有证据表明机动车事故增加。
    结论:在这个盲目的,控制,多次攻击研究,LTN通常与轻度或中度短期中枢神经系统相关的TEAE相关。TEAE在4次攻击中的频率趋于降低。
    背景:NCT03670810。
    BACKGROUND: Lasmiditan (LTN) is a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist for the acute treatment of migraine in adults. We present detailed safety findings from the placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 3 study, of LTN treatment across 4 attacks (CENTURION).
    METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to LTN 200 mg (LTN200), LTN100, or a control group that received placebo for 3 attacks and LTN50 for either the 3rd or 4th attack (1:1). Safety analyses were conducted for patients who took ≥1 dose of study drug and, in some cases, those who took all 4 doses.
    RESULTS: Overall, 1471 patients treated 4494 attacks. The incidences of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) were - placebo, n=2 (0.4 %); LTN100, n=1 (0.2 %); LTN200, n=2 (0.4 %); no specific treatment-emergent SAE was reported in more than one patient. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, nausea, vertigo, and somnolence; the vast majority were mild or moderate in severity. The incidences of these TEAEs were highest during the first attack and decreased during subsequent attacks. For patients who experienced a common TEAE with the first attack, less than 45 % experienced the same event in subsequent attacks. Patients who did not experience an event in the 1st attack infrequently experienced the same event in subsequent attacks. The time of onset of the common TEAE ranged from ~40 min to 1 h (dependent upon TEAE) and, for individual TEAE, the onset was similar across attacks. Duration was dependent upon TEAE and attack. It was shortest for paresthesia (< 2 h for all attacks); it ranged from 1.8 to 5.5 h for other common TEAEs and was generally similar across attacks. Serotonin syndrome was reported for 2 patients post LTN dosing; there were no meaningful differences across treatment groups in suicidality; there was no evidence of an increase in motor vehicle accidents.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this blinded, controlled, multiple-attack study, LTN was associated with generally mild or moderate CNS-related TEAEs of short duration. TEAEs tended to decrease in frequency across the 4 attacks.
    BACKGROUND: NCT03670810.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号