Seizure recurrence

癫痫复发
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:三分之一的青少年肌阵挛性癫痫(JME)患者具有耐药性。四分之三的人在实现无癫痫发作后尝试撤回抗癫痫药物(ASM)时癫痫发作复发。目前无法预测谁可能会产生耐药性并安全退出治疗。我们旨在确定耐药性和癫痫发作复发的预测因子,以便对JME患者的治疗结果进行个性化预测。
    UNASSIGNED:我们基于EMBASE和PubMed的系统搜索进行了个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析-最新更新于2021年3月11日-包括前瞻性和回顾性观察性研究,报告了诊断为JME的患者的治疗结果和至少一年随访后的可用癫痫发作结果数据。我们邀请作者分享标准化的IPD,以使用多变量逻辑回归确定耐药性的预测因素。我们排除了伪抗性个体。试图撤回ASM的子集被纳入ASM撤回后癫痫发作复发的多变量比例风险分析。该研究已在开放科学框架(OSF;https://osf.io/b9zjc/)上注册。
    未经ASSIGNED:我们的搜索产生了1641篇文章;53是合格的,其中24项研究的作者同意通过共享IPD进行合作。使用来自2518名JME患者的数据,我们发现了九种独立的耐药性预测因子:三种癫痫发作类型,精神病合并症,月经性癫痫,癫痫样病灶,种族,CAE的历史,癫痫家族史,癫痫持续状态,和高热惊厥.我们的多变量模型的内部-外部交叉验证显示受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为0·70(95CI0·68-0·72)。ASM戒断后癫痫发作的复发(n=368)由戒断开始时的较早年龄预测,更短的无癫痫发作间隔和更多当前使用的ASM,导致平均内部-外部交叉验证一致性统计量为0·70(95CI0·68-0·73)。
    UNASSIGNED:我们能够预测和验证JME患者的临床相关个性化治疗结果。个性化预测可以作为列线图和基于Web的工具访问。
    未经批准:明方。
    UNASSIGNED: A third of people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) are drug-resistant. Three-quarters have a seizure relapse when attempting to withdraw anti-seizure medication (ASM) after achieving seizure-freedom. It is currently impossible to predict who is likely to become drug-resistant and safely withdraw treatment. We aimed to identify predictors of drug resistance and seizure recurrence to allow for individualised prediction of treatment outcomes in people with JME.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis based on a systematic search in EMBASE and PubMed - last updated on March 11, 2021 - including prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on treatment outcomes of people diagnosed with JME and available seizure outcome data after a minimum one-year follow-up. We invited authors to share standardised IPD to identify predictors of drug resistance using multivariable logistic regression. We excluded pseudo-resistant individuals. A subset who attempted to withdraw ASM was included in a multivariable proportional hazards analysis on seizure recurrence after ASM withdrawal. The study was registered at the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://osf.io/b9zjc/).
    UNASSIGNED: Our search yielded 1641 articles; 53 were eligible, of which the authors of 24 studies agreed to collaborate by sharing IPD. Using data from 2518 people with JME, we found nine independent predictors of drug resistance: three seizure types, psychiatric comorbidities, catamenial epilepsy, epileptiform focality, ethnicity, history of CAE, family history of epilepsy, status epilepticus, and febrile seizures. Internal-external cross-validation of our multivariable model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0·70 (95%CI 0·68-0·72). Recurrence of seizures after ASM withdrawal (n = 368) was predicted by an earlier age at the start of withdrawal, shorter seizure-free interval and more currently used ASMs, resulting in an average internal-external cross-validation concordance-statistic of 0·70 (95%CI 0·68-0·73).
    UNASSIGNED: We were able to predict and validate clinically relevant personalised treatment outcomes for people with JME. Individualised predictions are accessible as nomograms and web-based tools.
    UNASSIGNED: MING fonds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评价左乙拉西坦(LEV)与苯妥英钠(PHT)二线抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗小儿惊厥性癫痫持续状态(SE)的疗效和安全性。
    PubMed,Embase,谷歌学者/谷歌,Scopus,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINAHL),Cochrane系统评价数据库和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册。
    2000年1月1日至2020年11月30日发表的评估LEV和PHT作为18岁以下儿童惊厥性SE二线药物的随机对照试验(RCT)。
    收集了关于在完成研究药物输注后5-60分钟内实现癫痫发作停止的儿童比例的数据(主要结果);以及在5分钟内癫痫发作停止的儿童比例,是时候停止癫痫发作了,癫痫发作复发1至24小时,插管和心血管不稳定(次要结局)。使用RevMan5.4版分析数据,并使用Cochrane偏差风险工具进行质量分析。研究方案在PROSPERO注册。
    纳入了12个RCT,其中2293名儿童。两种药物在5-60分钟内停止癫痫发作相似[LEV与82%PHT为77.5%,风险比(RR)=1.04,95%置信区间(95%CI)0.97-1.11,p=0.30]。与LEV相比,PHT在1-24小时内的癫痫发作复发更高(16.6%vs.9.7%,RR=0.63,95%CI0.44-0.90,p=0.01)。PHT组需要插管和机械通气的儿童比例较高(21.4%vs.14.2%,RR=0.54,95%CI0.30-0.98,p=0.04)。在5分钟内停止癫痫发作,是时候停止癫痫发作了,两种药物的心血管不稳定性相似。三个随机对照试验的偏倚风险较低,九个偏倚风险较高。
    LEV作为儿科惊厥性SE的二线ASM的疗效与PHT相似。与LEV相比,PHT在1到24小时之间的癫痫发作复发以及插管和机械通气的要求明显更高。
    To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) in comparison to phenytoin (PHT) as second line antiseizure medication (ASM) for Pediatric convulsive status epilepticus (SE).
    PubMed, Embase, Google scholar/Google, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
    Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing LEV and PHT as second line agent for convulsive SE in children <18 years published between 1 January 2000 and 30 November 2020.
    The data were pooled regarding the proportion of children achieving seizure cessation within 5-60 min of completion of study drug infusion (primary outcome); and seizure cessation within 5 min, time to achieve seizure cessation, seizure recurrence between 1 to 24 h, intubation and cardiovascular instability (secondary outcomes). Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.4 and quality analysis was done using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO.
    Twelve RCTs with 2293 children were included. Seizure cessation within 5-60 min was similar with both the drugs [82% in LEV vs. 77.5% in PHT, risk ratio (RR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.97-1.11, p = 0.30]. Seizure recurrences within 1-24 h was higher with PHT in comparison to LEV (16.6% vs. 9.7%, RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.01). Higher proportion of children in PHT group required intubation and mechanical ventilation (21.4% vs. 14.2%, RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.98, p = 0.04). Seizure cessation within 5 min, time to achieve seizure cessation, and cardiovascular instability were similar with both the drugs. Three RCTs were at low risk of bias and nine were at high risk of bias.
    The efficacy of LEV is similar to PHT as second line ASM for Pediatric convulsive SE. Seizure recurrences between 1 to24 h and requirement of intubation and mechanical ventilation were significantly higher with PHT in comparison to LEV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号