UNASSIGNED: Epilepsy is a persistent tendency to experience epileptic seizures and can lead to various neurobiological disorders, with an elevated risk of premature mortality. This study evaluates the efficacy of brivaracetam adjuvant therapy in patients with epilepsy.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective observational multicentre study that was conducted in Pakistan from March to September 2022, by using a non-probability convenience sampling technique. The population consisted of 543 individuals with a diagnosis of epilepsy for whom adjunctive brivaracetam (Brivera; manufactured by Helix Pharma Pvt Ltd., Sindh, Pakistan) was recommended by the treating physician. The research sample was drawn from various private neurology clinics of Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Islamabad and Peshawar. Data originating from routine patient visits, and assessments at three study time points, were recorded in the study case report form.
UNASSIGNED: Across 18 clinical sites, 543 individuals participated, with a mean age of 32.9 years. The most prescribed dosages were 50 mg BD, followed by 100 mg BD. Notably, brivaracetam combined with divalproex sodium was the most prevalent treatment, followed by brivaracetam with levetiracetam. At both the 14th and 90th day assessments, a significant reduction in seizure frequency was observed, with 63.1% of individuals showing a favourable response by day 90. Treatment-naive individuals exhibited higher rates of seizure freedom and response compared with treatment-resistant individuals.
UNASSIGNED: The study demonstrates the effectiveness of brivaracetam combination therapy in epilepsy management, with notable reductions in seizure frequency and favourable clinical responses observed, particularly in treatment-naive individuals.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy requires continuous medical attention from multiple healthcare specialists, specialized facilities, and community-based care. In Spain, there is no standardized approach to epilepsy care. The aim of this study was to identify the factors impacting on the delivery of high-quality care by exploring key steps and barriers along the patient journey through the Spanish National Healthcare System (NHS).
METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using opinions and experiences of neurologists, nurses, patients, and caregivers shared in discussion meetings. Using thematic content analyses, relevant aim-focused statements were coded according to prespecified issues in a discussion map (i.e., key steps and barriers), and sub-coded according to emerging issues. Thematic saturation and co-occurrence of key steps/barriers were evaluated to identify the most relevant factors impacting on the delivery of high-quality care.
RESULTS: Sixty-five stakeholders took part in discussion meetings (36 neurologists, 10 nurses, 10 patients, and nine caregivers). Six key steps on the patient journey were identified: emergency care, diagnosis, drug therapy, follow-up, referral, and interventional treatment. Of these, follow-up was the most relevant step impacting on the delivery of high-quality patient care, followed by drug therapy and diagnosis. Emergency care was considered a hot-spot step with impact throughout the patient journey. Communication (among HCPs and between HCPs and patients) was a barrier to the delivery of high-quality care at several stages of the patient journey, including drug therapy, follow-up, referral, and interventional treatment. Resource availability was a barrier for diagnosis (especially for confirmation), drug therapy (drug availability), and referral (lack of professionals and specialized centers, and long waiting lists).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study capturing perspectives of four key stakeholders involved in epilepsy care in Spain. We provide an overview of the patient journey through the Spanish NHS and highlight opportunities to improve the delivery of patient-centered care with a chronicity perspective.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with epilepsy may require prolonged medical care. In Spain, care is provided by a range of specialist and non-specialist centers. In this study, a team of Spanish neurologists, nurses, patients and caregivers identified barriers that affect the delivery of high-quality care for patients with epilepsy at each stage of their journey through the Spanish NHS. Specific epilepsy training for healthcare providers, appropriate resources for diagnosing and treating patients, and good communication between healthcare workers and patients were identified as important factors in providing high-quality care for patients with epilepsy.

UNASSIGNED: The opioid receptor mu1 is a protein coding gene that can have different codes for a protein and may have variations (polymorphisms) affecting how opioids work. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of the most common opioid receptor mu1 polymorphism (A118G) and any relationship between this polymorphism and features following tramadol overdose.
UNASSIGNED: This was a cross-sectional study of patients admitted with tramadol poisoning to an Iranian hospital. These patients were not taking any other drugs or medications and had no history of seizures.
UNASSIGNED: The results showed that among the 83 patients included in the study, 57 (69 per cent) had the AA genotype, 25 (30 per cent) had the AG genotype, and one (1 per cent) had the GG genotype for the opioid receptor mu1 A118G polymorphism. Nausea and/or vomiting occurred in nine (11 per cent) patients and dizziness in 38 (46 per cent) patients. Serious adverse events included seizures in 51 (60 per cent) patients and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation in 21 (25 per cent) patients. However, there was no significant association between the opioid receptor mu1 A118G polymorphism and these adverse events.
UNASSIGNED: In our study, the frequency of the A allele was greater than the G allele, and the AA genotype was more prevalent than AG. The GG genotype was the least common among the polymorphisms of opioid receptor mu1 rs1799971. There was no significant association between the opioid receptor mu1 A118G polymorphism and symptoms in tramadol-poisoned patients. Although these allele proportions are similar to the results reported in other Caucasian populations, they are dissimilar to the findings in Chinese and Singaporean populations. In these Asian studies, the predominant allele was the G allele. It has been suggested that a mutated G allele will decrease the production of opioid receptor mu1-related messenger ribonucleic acid and related proteins, leading to fewer mu-opioid receptors in the brain.
UNASSIGNED: This study found no significant association between the opioid receptor mu1 A118G polymorphism and adverse outcomes in tramadol-poisoned patients. However, more research is needed to draw more definitive conclusions due to the limited evidence and variability of opioid receptor mu1 polymorphisms in different populations.

UNASSIGNED: Seizure is one of the neurologic manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. There are few studies focused on the outcome of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and seizure.
UNASSIGNED: This was a subgroup analysis of patients with seizure based on a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study of COVID-19 patients admitted in 37 hospitals in the Philippines.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 10,881 patients with COVID-19 infection were included. Among these, 27 (0.2 %) patients had pre-existing seizure/epilepsy and 125 (1.1 %) had new-onset seizure. The patients with pre-existing seizure/epilepsy had a mean age of 49 years and majority were males (63.0 %). The patients with new-onset seizure had a mean age of 57 years and majority were males (60.5 %). Among patients with pre-existing seizure/epilepsy, there were no significant differences in the proportion of severe/critical COVID-19 (p = 0.131), all-cause mortality (p = 0.177), full/partial neurologic recovery (p = 0.190), ventilator use (p = 0.106), length of intensive care unit stay (p = 0.276), and length of hospitalization (p = 0.591). Patients with new-onset seizure were 2.65 times more likely to have severe/critical COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001), 3.12 times more likely to die (p < 0.001), and 3.51 times more likely to require a ventilator (p < 0.001) than those without new-onset seizure. New-onset seizure, however, was not significantly associated with full/partial neurologic recovery (p = 0.184) and prolonged length of hospitalization (p = 0.050).
UNASSIGNED: Severe/critical COVID-19 infection, higher mortality rate, and use of a ventilator were significantly higher among patients with new-onset seizure but not among patients with pre-existing seizure/epilepsy.

UNASSIGNED: Neonatal seizure is a common medical emergency that signals severe insult to the neonatal brain. It is a major risk factor for neonatal morbidity and mortality. It has a wide worldwide variation, ranging from 5 per 1000 live births in the United States of America to 39.5 per 1000 live births in Kenya. To decrease this significant figure, it is better to investigate its causes further. Therefore, this study aimed to assess its determinants since there was no prior evidence about it in the context of study area.
UNASSIGNED: Aim to assess the determinants of neonatal seizures among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units in the Awi Zone Hospitals, 2023.
UNASSIGNED: An institution based unmatched case-control study was conducted on 531 admitted eligible neonates from January 1, 2023, to May 30, 2023. A pretested tool was employed to collect data. The collected data were coded, edited, and entered into Epi-data version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS 26. Chi-square and odds ratios were used to assess the relationship between factors associated with the occurrence of neonatal seizure. Model goodness of fit was tested by Hosmer and Lemeshow. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was declared at P < 0.25 and P < 0.05 respectively to show a significant association with neonatal seizure at a 95 % level of significance.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 506 (130 cases and 376 controls) of admitted neonates were used in the final analysis model. Neonates admitted within 24 h of birth [AOR; 5.98 (95 %, CI: 2.18-16.43)], gestational age <32 weeks [AOR; 2.89 (95 %, CI: 1.29-6.53)], body temperature >37.5 °C [AOR; 4.82 (95 %, CI: 1.82-12.76)], blood glucose level <40 g/dl [AOR; 4.95 (95 %, CI: 2.06,11.88)], neonatal sepsis [AOR; 2.79 (95 %, CI: 1.46-5.35)] and perinatal asphyxia [AOR; 8.25 (95 %, CI: 4.23, 16.12)] were found to be determinants of neonatal seizure.
UNASSIGNED: and recommendations: In this study, neonatal seizure was determined by the factors of neonatal age, gestational age<32 weeks, body temperature >37.5 °C, blood glucose level <40 g/dl, neonatal sepsis, and perinatal asphyxia. Therefore, the presence of such factors requires prompt recognition and treatment.

Background The characteristics of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) are associated with neurological outcomes in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). We perform a longitudinal analysis of continuous monitoring of aEEG during therapeutic hypothermia and explore the association between aEEG interpretation and clinical neurological outcomes. Method We conducted a prospective cohort study on HIE neonates undergoing hypothermia with aEEG monitoring. Results A total of 37 HIE infants underwent hypothermia with improved aEEG background activity in 28 (75.7%) neonates, of which 18 (48.6%) neonates had background activity returned to a continuous pattern, and the median recovery time was 26.5 hours. Sleep-wake cycle (SWC) appeared in 14 (37.8%) cases, with a median onset time of 34.5 hours. Seizure activity on aEEG was present in 26 (70.3%) infants. Factors associated with poor outcomes at discharge included low voltage or flat trace background activity, a lack of improvement in background activity after hypothermia, and the absence of SWC. Neonates who took longer than 62 hours to return to continuous background activity (time to normal trace) or did not have SWC before the end of hypothermia were more likely to have unfavorable outcomes at discharge. Conclusions Longitudinal analysis of aEEG during hypothermia should be implemented in neonatal care units. The progression of these features on aEEG may predict neurological outcomes for HIE neonates.

BACKGROUND: There is not a preferred medication for treating refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and intravenous ketamine is increasingly used. Ketamine efficacy, safety, dosage, and influence of other variables on seizure cessation while on ketamine infusions are not well studied. We aimed to characterize ketamine effect on RSE, including interictal activity on electroencephalogram (EEG) and when done by Teleneurocritical care (TNCC).
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study from August 2017 to October 2022. Patients 18 years or older who had RSE and received ketamine were included. The primary outcome was effect of ketamine on RSE including interictal activity; secondary outcomes were effect of other variables on RSE, care by TNCC, ketamine infusion dynamics, adverse events, and discharge outcomes. Logistic regression was used.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients from five hospitals met inclusion criteria; 30 patients had RSE and interictal activity on EEG. Median age was 56.8 years (IQR 18.2) and 26% had previously diagnosed epilepsy. Sixteen (31%) patients were treated virtually by TNCC. In those with RSE on EEG, ketamine was added as the fourth antiseizure medication (mean 4.4, SD 1.6). An initial bolus of ketamine was used in 24% of patients (95 mg, IQR 47.5), the median infusion rate was 30.8 mcg/kg/min (IQR 40.4), and median infusion duration was 40 h (IQR 37). Ketamine was associated with 50% cessation of RSE and interictal activity at 24 h in 84% of patients, and complete seizure cessation in 43% of patients. In linear regression, ASMs prior to ketamine were associated with seizure cessation (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-6.9, p = 0.05), while the inverse was seen with propofol infusions (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.001-0.43, p = 0.01). RSE management by in-person NCC versus virtual by TNCC did not affect rates of seizure cessation.
CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine infusions for RSE were associated with reduced seizure burden at 24 h, with 84% of patients having 50% seizure reduction. Similar efficacy and safety was observed irrespective of underlying RSE etiology or when done via TNCC vs in-person NCC.

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of studies reporting the epilepsy spectrum using the 2017 and 2022 ILAE classification systems in everyday clinical practice. To identify gaps and opportunities in care we evaluated a hospital-based cohort applying these epilepsy classification systems, including aetiology and co-morbidity, and the utility of molecular genetic diagnosis to identify available precision therapies.
METHODS: Cross sectional retrospective study of all children with epilepsy (≤16 years) attending University Hospital Galway (2017-2022). Data collection and analysis of each case was standardised to ensure a systematic approach and application of the recent ILAE categorisation and terminology (2017 and 2022). Ethics approval was obtained.
RESULTS: Among 356 children, epilepsy was classified as focal (46.1 %), generalised (38.8 %), combined (6.2 %), and unknown (9 %). Epilepsy syndrome was determined in 145/356 (40.7 %), comprising 24 different syndromes, most commonly SeLECTS (9 %), CAE (7 %), JAE (6.2 %) and IESS (5.9 %). New aetiology-specific syndromes were identified (e.g. CDKL5-DEE). Molecular diagnosis was confirmed in 19.9 % (n = 71) which encompassed monogenic (13.8 %) and chromosomopathy/CNV (6.2 %). There was an additional 35.7 % (n = 127) of patients who had a presumed genetic aetiology of epilepsy. Remaining aetiology included structural (18.8 %, n = 67), infectious (2 %, n = 7), metabolic (1.7 %, n = 6) and unknown (30.3 %, n = 108). Encephalopathy categorisation was determined in 182 patients (DE in 38.8 %; DEE in a further 11.8 %) associated with a range of co-morbidities categorised as global delay (29.2 %, n = 104), severe neurological impairment (16.3 %, n = 58), and ASD (14.6 %, n = 52). Molecular-based \"precision therapy\" was deemed available in 21/356 (5.9 %) patients, with \"molecular precision\" approach utilised in 13/356 (3.7 %), and some benefit noted in 6/356 (1.7 %) of overall cohort or 6/71 (8.5 %) of the molecular cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying the latest ILAE epilepsy classification systems allow comparison across settings and identifies a major neuro-developmental co-morbidity rate and a large genetic aetiology. We identified very few meaningful molecular-based disease modifying \"precision therapies\". There is a monumental gap between aetiological identification, and impact of meaningful therapies, thus the new 2017/2022 classification clearly identifies the major challenges in the provision of routine epilepsy care.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosing Hashimoto\'s encephalopathy (HE) is challenging. In contrast to other types of autoimmune encephalitis, HE shows an excellent response to steroid treatment. We aimed to investigate the rates of antithyroid antibodies (ATAs) and probable HE in patients with unexplained mental dysfunction and compare the clinical characteristics between the good- and poor-outcome groups.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and electroencephalography (EEG) and neuroimaging findings of patients admitted to the Department of Neurology of our hospital from March 1, 2006, to February 28, 2023. Using our proposed diagnostic criteria for probable HE, we compared the clinical characteristics between the good- and poor-outcome groups. We also investigated the rates of ATA positivity and probable HE.
RESULTS: In total, 198 patients exhibited altered mentation, rapidly progressive cognitive decline, or myoclonus. ATA tests were performed on 86 patients, and the detection rates of ATAs and probable HE were 29.1% and 25.6%, respectively. Of the 22 patients enrolled, the good- and poor-outcome groups comprised 19 and 3 patients, respectively. Clinical seizures occurred in seven patients. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus on EEG was observed in six patients, all of whom were intractable to antiepileptic drugs. Nineteen of 21 patients (90.5%) treated with immunosuppressants showed good outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: HE is a rare clinical disorder, but not as rare as previously thought. When HE is suspected, steroids should be considered the first-line treatment. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment are critical to achieve good outcomes in HE.