Sedentary Behavior

久坐行为
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解减轻久坐时间与死亡率之间的关联所需的特定强度运动量可能有助于提供个性化处方和行为咨询。在这里,我们研究了久坐时间和特定强度体力活动与全因死亡率和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率的联合相关性.
    方法:前瞻性队列研究包括来自英国Biobank的73,729名成年人,他们的主要手腕上佩戴了AxivityAX3加速度计至少3天,作为一个周末的一天,2013年6月至2015年12月。我们考虑了每个强度带中久坐时间和身体活动的中间值,以确定减弱久坐时间与死亡率之间关联所需的身体活动量。
    结果:在中位数为6.9年的随访期间(628,807人年),我们记录了1521人死亡,包括388来自CVD。任何强度的体力活动都会减弱久坐时间与死亡率的不利关系。总的来说,每天至少有6分钟的剧烈体力活动,30分钟/天的MVPA,64分钟/天的适度体力活动,或163分钟/天的轻度体力活动(根据其他强度相互调整)减弱了久坐时间与死亡率之间的关联。仅在MVPA低的参与者中,久坐时间长与CVD死亡率风险高相关(HR1.96;95%CI1.23至3.14)。
    结论:每种体力活动强度的不同量可能会减弱久坐时间与死亡率之间的关联。
    OBJECTIVE: Understanding the amounts of intensity-specific movement needed to attenuate the association between sedentary time and mortality may help to inform personalized prescription and behavioral counselling. Herein, we examined the joint associations of sedentary time and intensity-specific physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study including 73,729 adults from the UK Biobank who wore an Axivity AX3 accelerometer on their dominant wrist for at least 3 days, being one a weekend day, between June 2013 and December 2015. We considered the median tertile values of sedentary time and physical activity in each intensity band to determine the amount of physical activity needed to attenuate the association between sedentary time and mortality.
    RESULTS: During a median of 6.9 years of follow-up (628,807 person-years), we documented 1521 deaths, including 388 from CVD. Physical activity of any intensity attenuated the detrimental association of sedentary time with mortality. Overall, at least a median of 6 min/day of vigorous physical activity, 30 min/day of MVPA, 64 min/day of moderate physical activity, or 163 min/day of light physical activity (mutually-adjusted for other intensities) attenuated the association between sedentary time and mortality. High sedentary time was associated with higher risk of CVD mortality only among participants with low MVPA (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.23 to 3.14).
    CONCLUSIONS: Different amounts of each physical activity intensity may attenuate the association between high sedentary time and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在调查社区中老年女性中加速度计测量的身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)与身体功能(PF)之间的关系。
    方法:本研究包括1,113名社区居住的老年女性,平均年龄为65±2岁。我们采用线性回归分析来研究PA和SB模式与PF之间的关系。PA变量由总PA时间组成,预测PA时间(持续等于或超过10分钟的连续PA),和零星的PA时间(持续少于10分钟的连续PA)。SB变量包括总SB时间,30分钟的SB(持续等于或超过30分钟的连续SB),和60分钟的SB(持续等于或超过60分钟的连续SB)。PF变量包括手握强度(HGS),闭眼单腿站立测试(OLSTEC),通常的步行速度(UWS),最大步行速度(MWS)和椅子站立时间(CT)。探讨中强强度PA(MVPA)和SB对PF的联合作用,我们将老年妇女参与SB和MVPA的持续时间分为不同的组合:低MVPA和高SB,低MVPA和低SB,高MVPA和高SB,高MVPA和低SB。
    结果:研究表明,30分钟的SB和CT之间存在显着关联,在调整总MVPA时间后仍然存在(P=0.021)。发现总MVPA和blotedMVPA与更好的UWS呈正相关,MWS,CT,和PFZ分数。当使用低MVPA和高SB的组合作为参考时,高MVPA和高SB组的PF回归系数上升了1.32(P<0.001),高MVPA和低SB组的PF回归系数上升了1.13(P<0.001)。
    结论:观察到下肢功能较差与延长,老年妇女不间断的SB,而不是总的SB时间。同时,MVPA参与不足也可能是导致老年女性PF较差的一个关键因素.参与更长的持续时间和更高强度的PA,例如持续至少10分钟或更长时间的MVPA发作,可能有助于更好的PF。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the relationships between accelerometer-measured physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) with physical function (PF) among older Chinese women in the community.
    METHODS: The present study comprised 1,113 community-dwelling older females, with an average age of 65 ± 2 years. We employed a linear regression analysis to investigate the relationship between patterns of PA and SB with PF. PA variables consisted of total PA time, bouted PA time (a continuous PA that lasts equal to or more than 10 min), and sporadic PA time (a continuous PA that lasts less than 10 min). SB variables included total SB time, 30-min bout of SB (a continuous SB that lasts equal to or more than 30 min), and 60-min bout of SB (a continuous SB that lasts equal to or more than 60 min). PF variables comprised handgrip strength (HGS), one-legged stance test with eyes closed (OLSTEC), usual walking speed (UWS), maximum walking speed (MWS) and chair-stand time (CT). To explore the joint effects of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) and SB on PF, we divided the duration of SB and MVPA participation in older women into different combinations: low MVPA & high SB, low MVPA & low SB, high MVPA & high SB, high MVPA & low SB.
    RESULTS: The study revealed a significant association between 30-min bout of SB and CT, which remained after adjusting for total MVPA time (P = 0.021). Both total MVPA and bouted MVPA were found to be positively associated with better UWS, MWS, CT, and PF Z-score. When the combination of low MVPA & high SB was used as a reference, the regression coefficients for PF ascended by 1.32 (P < 0.001) in the high MVPA & high SB group and by 1.13 (P < 0.001) in the high MVPA & low SB group.
    CONCLUSIONS: A significant association was observed between poorer lower limb function and prolonged, uninterrupted SB in older women, rather than with the total SB time. Concurrently, the insufficient engagement in MVPA may also be a crucial factor contributing to poorer PF in older women. Engaging in longer durations and higher intensity of PA, such as bouts of MVPA lasting a minimum of 10 min or longer, may contribute to better PF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    减少久坐行为(SB)在预防死亡率和慢性精神疾病方面的重要性具有良好的科学依据,但是SB可以在生活的不同领域积累,例如休闲时间SB,坐着时在家/工作/学校之间的交通(交通相关的SB),或在职业环境中,如工作或学习(职业SB),从积极的角度来看,SB的每个领域与福祉措施和生活质量的关联仍然存在不足。通过横断面调查,我们收集了584名参与者的数据,他们在2021年11月完成了一份问卷,并进行了Spearman相关性检验,分析了三个不同领域的SB与心理健康之间的关系,对生活的满意度,和生活质量。我们的结果表明,在调整身体活动后,性别,身体质量指数,吸烟史,慢性疾病状态,财务认知,睡眠质量/持续时间和大学组,在年轻的成年人(18至24岁),休闲时间SB与心理健康呈负相关(rho=-0.255;p=0.008),在成年人(25至64岁)中,职业SB与生活满意度(rho=-0.257;p<.001)和生活质量的心理组成部分(rho=-0.163;p=0.027)呈负相关。我们的发现强调了这样一种观点,即并非所有的SB都是相同的,未来减少人们生活中的SB的策略必须针对特定的SB领域,根据年龄段,以改善福祉和生活质量为目标。
    The importance of reducing sedentary behavior (SB) in the prevention of mortality and chronic and mental diseases is scientifically well grounded, but SB can be accumulated in diverse domains of life, such as leisure-time SB, transport between home/work/school when sitting (transport-related SB), or in occupational settings such as working or studying (occupational SB), and the associations for each domain of SB with well-being measures and quality of life are still underexplored from a positive perspective. Through a cross-sectional investigation, we collected data from 584 participants who completed a questionnaire throughout November 2021 and with Spearman correlation test, analysed the associations between SB in three different domains with psychological well-being, satisfaction with life, and quality of life. Our results indicated that after adjustment for physical activity, sex, body mass index, smoking history, chronic disease status, financial perception, quality/duration of sleep and university group, in younger adults (18 to 24 years old), leisure-time SB was negatively related to psychological well-being (rho = -0.255; p = 0.008), and in adults (25 to 64 years old), occupational SB was negatively related to satisfaction with life (rho = -0.257; p < .001) and the mental component of quality of life (rho = -0.163; p = 0.027). Our findings highlight the idea that not all SB is built the same and that future strategies to reduce SB from people\'s lives must target specific domains of SB according to the age group when aiming to improve well-being and quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)中身体活动(PA)与久坐行为之间关系的信息有限。因此,本研究旨在探讨加速度计测量的PA和久坐行为与CKD的关系。
    在2003-2004年和2005-2006年调查周期中,使用来自国家健康和营养检查调查的数据进行了横断面研究。单轴加速度计测量身体活动(PA)和久坐时间(ST)。PA和ST与估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和CKD几率的关联采用广义线性回归,多变量逻辑回归,和等时替换模型。
    本研究共纳入5,990名成人和605名CKD患者。与第一四分位数组中的个体相比,低强度体力活动(LIPA)第四个四分位数的参与者,中等至剧烈的体力活动(MVPA),和ST与52%(35%,65%)和42%(14%,62%)CKD和64%(17%,131%)CKD的几率更高,分别。用等效的LIPA/MVPA替代30分钟/天的ST有助于降低CKD的风险。
    研究结果表明,LIPA和MVPA升高和ST降低与CKD风险降低相关,用LIPA替代ST可降低CKD风险。
    UNASSIGNED: There is limited information about the relationship between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, this study aims to explore the associations of accelerometer-measured PA and sedentary behaviors with CKD.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 survey cycles. A uniaxial accelerometer measured physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST). The associations of PA and ST with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and odds of CKD adopted the generalized linear regression, multivariable logistic regression, and isotemporal substitution models.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 5,990 adults with 605 CKD patients were included in this study. Compared with the individuals in the first quartile group, participants in the fourth quartile of low-intensity physical activity (LIPA), moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and ST were associated with 52% (35%, 65%) and 42% (14%, 62%) lower odds of CKD and 64% (17%, 131%) higher odds of CKD, respectively. Substituting 30 min/day of ST with equivalent LIPA/MVPA contributed to risk reduction in CKD.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest that increased LIPA and MVPA and reduced ST were associated with a lower risk of CKD and that replacing ST with LIPA may decrease the risk of CKD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童肥胖在全球范围内日益被视为主要的公共卫生挑战,过多的久坐屏幕时间正在成为一个关键的风险因素。本研究旨在评估中国小学学龄儿童的休闲屏幕久坐时间,并探讨屏幕相关家庭因素与结果变量之间的关系。
    方法:我们的研究使用了来自北京五年级学生及其父母的横断面调查数据,中国,2018年4月至5月(n=2,373)。这些问题包括基本的人口统计信息,家庭社会经济地位,学生和家长久坐和锻炼的习惯,家庭内部沟通因素,和健康信仰模式。比较了不同人口群体儿童的娱乐屏幕久坐时间。该研究采用多元线性回归模型来检查儿童的屏幕时间与各种家庭因素之间的关联,以及整体家庭沟通的调节作用。
    结果:我们的发现显示,参与者的平均每日休闲屏幕久坐时间为2.4小时。不同人口统计类别的屏幕时间差异很大,包括儿童性,年龄,residence,父母的教育,家庭收入,家庭大小,和主要家庭成员。调整后,儿童拥有数字设备的比例(p<0.01),儿童个人房间(p<0.05),家庭一起观看屏幕(p<0.01),父母的屏幕时间与儿童休闲久坐的屏幕时间呈正相关(p<0.01)。父母对屏幕时间的限制(p<0.001)和减少坐着时间的态度(p<0.01)与儿童屏幕时间的减少相关。整体家庭沟通环境显著缓和了父母限制儿童屏幕时间的影响(p<0.001)。父母的正强化(p<0.05),和父母的休闲久坐屏幕时间(p<0.001)。
    结论:我们的发现强调了家庭动态的重要性,父母的做法,和沟通塑造儿童的屏幕时间行为,为减少儿童肥胖的量身定制干预措施和策略提供有价值的见解。
    BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is increasingly recognized as a major public health challenge worldwide, and excessive sedentary screen time is emerging as a key risk factor. This study aimed to assess the recreational screen sedentary time of Chinese primary school-aged children and investigate the relationship between screen-related family factors and the outcome variable.
    METHODS: Our study used data from a cross-sectional survey collected from fifth-grade students and their parents in Beijing, China, from April to May 2018 (n = 2,373). The questions included basic demographic information, family socioeconomic status, students\' and parents\' sedentary and exercising habits, within-family communicational factors, and health belief patterns. The recreational screen sedentary time of the children was compared across demographic groups. The study employed multivariate linear regression models to examine associations between children\'s screen time and various family factors, as well as the moderating effect of overall family communication.
    RESULTS: Our findings revealed an average daily recreational screen sedentary time of 2.4 h among participants. Screen time significantly varied across demographic categories, including children\'s sex, age, residence, parents\' education, household income, family size, and primary family member. After adjustment, the proportion of child-owned digital devices (p < 0.01), child\'s personal room (p < 0.05), family screen-viewing together (p < 0.01), and parental screen time (p < 0.01) were positively related to children\'s recreational sedentary screen time. Parental restrictions on screen time (p < 0.001) and attitudes toward reducing sitting time (p < 0.01) were correlated with a decrease in children\'s screen time. The overall family communication environment significantly moderated the effects of parental practice of restricting children\'s screen time (p < 0.001), positive reinforcement by parents (p < 0.05), and parents\' recreational sedentary screen time (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscored the significance of family dynamics, parental practices, and communication in shaping children\'s screen time behaviors, providing valuable insights for tailored interventions and strategies to reduce childhood obesity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究报道了体育锻炼与膝骨关节炎(KOA)的发生和进展之间的关联。然而,现有证据仍然有限且质量低下.本研究旨在探讨不同体力活动水平与KOA之间的因果关系。工具变量,以单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)为代表,被用来捕捉久坐的行为,适当的体育锻炼,过度的体力活动。来自英国生物银行全基因组关联研究数据集的聚合统计数据用于评估这些SNP对KOA的影响。使用方差倒数加权(IVW)估计因果关系,Egger先生,简单的模型,加权中位数,和加权模型方法。通过异质性和敏感性分析评估结果的稳定性。孟德尔随机化(MR)分析显示,久坐行为与KOA之间存在很强的关联,比值比(OR)为2.096(95%CI:1.506-2.917),P值为1.14×10-5。适当的体育锻炼行为与KOA表现出强烈的负相关性,OR为0.147(95%CI:0.037-0.582),P值为0.006。相反,过度体力活动行为与KOA呈显著正相关,OR为2.162(95%CI:1.327-3.521),P值为.002。我们的研究结果表明,久坐行为和过度体力活动被认为是KOA的危险因素,而进行适当的体育锻炼是对抗KOA发展的保护因素。
    Previous studies have reported an association between physical activity and the occurrence and progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, the existing evidence remains limited and of low-quality. This study aimed to examine the causal relationship between different levels of physical activity and KOA. Instrumental variables, represented by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), were utilized to capture sedentary behavior, appropriate physical exercise, and excessive physical activity. Aggregated statistics from the UK Biobank genome-wide association study dataset were used to assess the impact of these SNPs on KOA. Causality was estimated using inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR Egger, simple model, weighted median, and weighted model approaches. The stability of the results was assessed through heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis revealed a strong association between sedentary behavior and KOA, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.096 (95% CI: 1.506-2.917) and a P value of 1.14 × 10-5. Appropriate physical exercise behavior exhibited a strong negative association with KOA, with an OR of 0.147 (95% CI: 0.037-0.582) and a P value of 0.006. Conversely, excessive physical activity behavior showed a significant positive association with KOA, with an OR of 2.162 (95% CI: 1.327-3.521) and a P value of .002. Our findings indicate that sedentary behavior and excessive physical activity are identified as risk factors for KOA, whereas engaging in appropriate physical exercise emerges as a protective factor against the development of KOA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:体力活动不足(PA)是非传染性疾病(NCD)的主要危险因素,也是全球范围内过早死亡的主要原因之一。这项研究利用德黑兰队列研究数据(TeCS)研究了德黑兰成年人中PA不足的患病率和独立决定因素。
    方法:我们使用了TeCS的招募阶段数据和PA的完整数据。PA通过Likert缩放问题进行评估,并分为三组。利用2016年全国人口普查数据,确定了德黑兰地区PA不足的年龄和性别加权患病率.调整后的logistic回归模型用于中和影响因素,并确定与PA不足相关的因素。
    结果:在德黑兰的8213名成年公民中,PA不足的加权患病率为16.9%,在女性中患病率更高(19.0%vs.男性占14.8%)。此外,老年群体,失业,家庭主妇,受过文盲教育的参与者表现出更高的PA不足患病率(p<0.001)。此外,德黑兰中部和南部地区的PA不足率较高。关于调整后的回归模型,年龄较大(赔率[OR]:4.26,95%置信区间[95%CI]:3.24-5.60,p<0.001),教育水平较低(p<0.001),失业率(OR:1.80,95%CI:1.28-2.55,p=0.001),作为家庭主妇(OR:1.44,95%CI:1.15-1.80,p=0.002),较高的体重指数(BMI)(BMI>30的OR:1.85,95%CI:1.56-2.18,p<0.001),鸦片消费量(OR:1.92,95%CI:1.46-2.52,p<0.001),糖尿病(OR:1.25,95%CI:1.06-1.48,p=0.008),高血压(OR:1.29,95%CI:1.11-1.50,p=0.001),和冠状动脉疾病(OR:1.30,95%CI:1.05-1.61,p=0.018),与PA不足显著相关。
    结论:所确定的相关因素为决策者制定量身定制的干预策略以满足高危人群的需求提供了宝贵的指导。尤其是老年人和女性。
    BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and one of the leading causes of premature mortality worldwide. This study examined the prevalence and independent determinants of insufficient PA among adults resident of Tehran utilizing Tehran Cohort Study Data (TeCS).
    METHODS: We used the recruitment phase data from the TeCS with complete data on PA. PA was assessed through a Likert-scaled question and categorized into three groups. Utilizing data from the 2016 national census, the age- and sex-weighted prevalence of insufficient PA in Tehran was determined. The adjusted logistic regression model is used to neutralize influencing factors and determine the factors associated with insufficient PA.
    RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of insufficient PA was 16.9% among the 8213 adult citizens of Tehran, with a greater prevalence among females (19.0% vs. 14.8% among males). Additionally, older age groups, unemployed, housewives, and illiterate educated participants displayed a much higher prevalence of insufficient PA (p < 0.001). Moreover, Tehran\'s central and southern districts had higher rates of insufficient PA. Concerning the adjusted regression model, older age (Odds ratio [OR]: 4.26, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 3.24-5.60, p < 0.001), a lower education level (p < 0.001), unemployment (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.28-2.55, p = 0.001), being a housewife (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.15-1.80, p = 0.002), higher body mass index (BMI) (OR for BMI > 30: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.56-2.18, p < 0.001), opium consumption (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.46-2.52, p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.48, p = 0.008), hypertension (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.11-1.50, p = 0.001), and coronary artery diseases (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.05-1.61, p = 0.018), were significantly associated with insufficient PA.
    CONCLUSIONS: The identified associated factors serve as a valuable guide for policymakers in developing tailored intervention strategies to address the needs of high-risk populations, particularly among older adults and females.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    加拿大运动指南侧重于身体活动(PA),睡眠,和屏幕时间支持儿童的发展和降低患慢性病的风险。加速度计通常用于捕获这些行为;然而,由于潜在的错误分类,他们记录白天睡眠的能力有限。
    目的:本研究的目的是1)确定参加Guelph家庭健康研究的符合指南的儿童的患病率,以及2)比较不同睡眠测量方法的影响。
    方法:幼儿(1.5-<3年;n=128;所有运动行为的有效数据,n=70),学龄前儿童(3-<5年;n=143;所有运动行为的有效数据,n=104),和学龄儿童(5-<6岁;n=49;所有运动行为的有效数据,n=31)儿童被包括在内。通过家长报告和公布的规范数据获得屏幕时间和睡眠习惯。使用加速度计(wGT3X-BTActiGraph;右髋)记录PA和睡眠。
    结果:发现66%的幼儿,44%的学前教育,63%的学龄儿童符合屏幕时间准则。Further,63%的幼儿,98%的学龄前儿童,80%的学龄儿童符合PA指南。幼儿的睡眠指南依从性从3%到83%不等,27%至92%的学龄前儿童,32%至90%的学龄儿童。发现这些比例显著不同(Cochran的Q和McNemar的测试)。
    结论:几乎所有儿童都符合PA指南。相比之下,不到一半到三分之二的人符合屏幕时间指南。对睡眠指南的遵守程度因测量方法而异,强调标准化的必要性。
    Canadian movement guidelines focused on physical activity (PA), sleep, and screen time support childhood development and reduce the risk of chronic disease. Accelerometers are often used to capture these behaviors; however, they are limited in their ability to record daytime sleep due to potential misclassification.
    OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to 1) determine the prevalence of children enrolled in the Guelph Family Health Study who met the guidelines and to 2) compare the impact of different sleep measurement methods.
    METHODS: Toddlers (1.5-<3 years; n = 128; valid data for all movement behaviors, n = 70), preschoolers (3-<5 years; n = 143; valid data for all movement behaviors, n = 104), and school-aged (5-<6 years; n = 49; valid data for all movement behaviors, n = 31) children were included. Screen time and sleep habits were obtained through parental report and published normative data. PA and sleep were recorded using accelerometers (wGT3X-BT ActiGraph; right hip).
    RESULTS: It was found that 66 % of toddler, 44 % of preschool, and 63 % of school-aged children met the screen time guidelines. Further, 63 % of toddler, 98 % of preschooler, and 80 % of school-aged children met PA guidelines. Sleep guideline compliance ranged from 3 % to 83 % in toddler, 27 % to 92 % in preschooler, and 32 % to 90 % in school-aged children. These proportions were found to be significantly different (Cochran\'s Q and McNemar\'s tests).
    CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all children met PA guidelines. In contrast, less than half to two-thirds met screen time guidelines. Compliance with sleep guidelines varied substantially with measurement method, highlighting the need for standardization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究成年人中休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)和筛查坐姿时间与随后的疾病缺席的联合关联。
    方法:注册表关联随访研究。
    方法:要求芬兰成年人的代表性样本(n=10,300)填写FinHealth2017调查问卷。自我报告的LTPA分为三组:不活跃,适度活跃,活跃,并将坐姿时间分为两组:3小时或更短,每天超过3小时,为联合分析产生一个六类变量。问卷数据与芬兰社会保险机构关于疾病福利的登记数据(超过9天)相关联,包括诊断(随访2.9年)。分析样本仅限于工作年龄(18-64岁),其中包括5098名参与者。使用SPSS29调整协变量的逻辑回归分析检查相关性。
    结果:与体力活动者相比,非活动和高坐时间因精神障碍而缺勤的风险更高(OR2.07,95%CI1.03-4.18),低坐时间组。此外,不活动和低坐时间组(OR1.6995%CI1.12-2.55)和中等活动和高坐时间组(OR2.0695%CI1.15-3.67)的风险较高.没有发现全因和肌肉骨骼疾病疾病缺失的显着关联。
    结论:雇主和政策制定者可以支持减少坐在屏幕前,并在工作时间外增加LTPA,以防止心理健康问题和相关的缺勤。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine joint associations of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and screen sitting time with subsequent sickness absence among the adult population.
    METHODS: Registry linked follow-up study.
    METHODS: A representative sample of Finnish adults (n = 10,300) were asked to fill out a questionnaire for the FinHealth 2017 survey. Self-reported LTPA was classified into three groups: inactive, moderately active, and active, and screen sitting time into two groups: 3 h or less and over three hours a day, yielding a six-category variable for the joint analyses. Questionnaire data were linked to the Finnish Social Insurance Institution\'s register data on sickness benefits (over 9 days), including diagnoses (follow-up 2.9 years). The analytical samples were restricted to working age (18-64 years), which included 5098 participants. Associations were examined using logistic regression analysis adjusting for covariates with SPSS 29.
    RESULTS: The inactive and high sitting time had a higher risk for sickness absence due to mental disorders (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.03-4.18) compared with the physically active, low-sitting time group. Additionally, the inactive and low sitting time (OR 1.69 95% CI 1.12-2.55) and the moderately active and high-sitting time groups (OR 2.06 95% CI 1.15-3.67) had a higher risk. No significant associations were found for all-cause and musculoskeletal diseases sickness absence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Employers and policymakers could support reducing sitting in front of a screen and increase LTPA outside working hours to prevent mental health problems and related sickness absences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亲子二元干预对行为的影响尚不清楚。这项随机对照试验调查了,与控制条件相比,三种类型的体力活动(PA)计划干预(个人“I-for-me,\"二元\"我们为我,\"和协作\"we-for-us\")将减少父母及其子女的久坐行为(SB)时间。该研究涉及247个双体,包括父母(29-66岁)和他们的孩子(9-15岁),随机分为三种类型的PA计划干预组之一或控制条件。混合模型用于分析来自预注册试验(NCT02713438)的数据,其结果是加速度计测量的SB时间,在1周和36周随访时进行评估。虽然儿童的SB仍然不受规划干预的影响,在合作(p=.048)和个人(p=.042)计划条件下,父母之间的SB时间略有减少。仅在1周的随访中观察到效果。虽然实现了父母\'SB的短期减少,这些不是长期持续的。传递给亲子双元的PA计划干预措施并未显着降低儿童的SB,这可能是由于年轻人的需要增加独立于他们的父母。
    Effects of parent-child dyad interventions on behavior remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated if, compared with a control condition, three types of physical activity (PA) planning interventions (individual \"I-for-me,\" dyadic \"we-for-me,\" and collaborative \"we-for-us\") would reduce sedentary behavior (SB) time in parents and their children. The study involved 247 dyads comprising parents (aged 29-66) and their children (aged 9-15), randomized into one of the three types of PA planning-intervention arms or the control condition. Mixed models were applied to analyze data from a preregistered trial (NCT02713438) with the outcome of accelerometer-measured SB time, assessed at 1-week and 36-week follow-ups. Although children\'s SB remained unaffected by the planning interventions, a small reduction of SB time was found among parents in the collaborative (p = .048) and individual (p = .042) planning conditions. The effects were observed at the 1-week follow-up only. While short-term reductions in parents\' SB were achieved, these were not sustained long-term. PA planning interventions delivered to parent-child dyads did not substantially reduce children\'s SB, which may be due to young people\'s needs of increased independence from their parents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号