OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and outcomes of a modified technique for the implantation of scleral fixated Carlevale intraocular lens (IOL) (I71 FIL SSF. Soleko IOL Division, Pontecorvo, Italy), and to analyze the occurrence of adverse events.
METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study conducted revising patients charts from 2018 to 2023. Thirty-five eyes of 33 patients were included. Patients requiring IOL explantation had either IOL dislocation or opacification. The implantation of the Carlevale IOL was performed with the subconjunctival positioning of the anchors without any scleral flap. All maneuvers were performed transconjunctivally. The anatomical outcomes considered were IOL positioning, and the absence of postoperative complications. The functional outcomes analyzed were best correctedvisual acuity (BCVA) and refraction.
RESULTS: In all the cases, the IOL was well positioned and centered postoperatively. No cases of conjunctival erosion were recorded. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.9±0.6 logMar (mean±standard deviation) preoperatively and 0.5±0.5 logMar (mean±standard deviation) postoperatively. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was +6.8±7.7 dioptres, while postoperatively it was -1.1±1.6 dioptres. The most frequent procedure associated to secondary IOL implantation was posterior vitrectomy (25 eyes, 71.4%), which was performed with 25-gauge transconjunctival cannulas in the ciliary sulcus. The follow-up period was 24.5±16.9 months (mean±standard deviation).
CONCLUSIONS: The described mini-invasive technique for Carlevale IOL implantation is safe and effective. It can be recommended either as a stand-alone operation or associated to concurrent surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Lacking a standard technique, the surgical management of aphakia without capsular support remains to be optimized. The goal of this study is to analyze results for the Carlevale FIL-SSF intraocular lens and propose surgical recommendations.
METHODS: The P1.5 Collective performed a retrospective analysis, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, of the records of 72 implantations of the Carlevale FIL-SSF intraocular lens, specifically designed for sutureless scleral fixation in the ciliary sulcus.
RESULTS: The most common indication was exchange of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (70.8%). The surgery lasted a mean of 53.4minutes due to the creation of scleral flaps. The implant was damaged in 12.5% of cases. Visual acuity was improved in 83.3% of cases. The postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.3 diopters, with no change in corneal astigmatism. The implant was centered and stable in all cases. Two cases (2.8%) of cystoid macular edema were observed and resolved over six months.
CONCLUSIONS: A number of advantages of the Carlevale FIL-SSF intraocular lens make it a safe and effective solution for correction of aphakia in the absence of capsular support. It requires a longer than usual surgical procedure, and the implant must be handled with care. From their experience, the authors propose 7 recommendations to accelerate the learning curve.
CONCLUSIONS: In light of the results of this study, we propose the Carlevale FIL-SSF intraocular lens as the new standard for the correction of aphakia without capsular support, but other studies are necessary to determine its exact place within the heirarchy of other available techniques.

We compared the surgical outcomes and complications of refixation vs. exchange of dislocated intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients who underwent transscleral suture fixation combined with pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of IOL dislocation. A total of 83 eyes (n = 83 patients) with postoperative follow-up of ≥6 months were evaluated: 40 received refixation of dislocated IOL (refixation group) while 43 received IOL exchange (exchange group) treatment. Treatment outcomes, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, corneal cylinder, intraocular pressure (IOP), central macular thickness (CMT), and corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), and postoperative complications were retrospectively reviewed. BCVA improvement at 6 months after surgery was comparable between the groups. Postoperative decrease in corneal ECD was significantly greater in the exchange group than in the refixation group, but no significant differences were found in spherical equivalent, corneal cylinder, IOP, or CMT changes. The exchange group experienced significantly more frequent postoperative vitreoretinal complications, such as retinal detachment, choroidal effusion, cystoid macular edema, and secondary epiretinal membrane, than the refixation group. Without any reason to extract the dislocated IOL, reuse of the dislocated IOL would be a better surgical option for transscleral suture fixation to protect corneal endothelial cells and prevent postoperative vitreoretinal complications.