STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR)

立体定向心律失常放射消融 ( STAR )
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对难治性室性心动过速(VT)患者进行定向性心律失常放射消融术(STAR)显示出良好的效果。然而,临床数据稀缺且异质。停止。欧盟财团的成立是为了调查和协调欧洲的STAR。这项基准研究的主要目标是调查STOPSTORM项目中当前的治疗计划实践,作为未来协调的基准。
    方法:针对3例STAR病例,生成与心脏外危险器官和/或心脏亚结构重叠的规划目标体积(PTV)。要求参与中心根据内部临床实践创建具有25Gy剂量处方的单部分治疗计划。由专家小组审查所有治疗计划,并使用独立软件对ICRU报告91相关参数和人群剂量-体积-直方图的描述性统计进行基于人群知识的定量分析。此后,使用双阶段投票程序建立治疗计划共识声明.
    结果:20个研究中心提交了67份治疗计划。在大多数计划(75%)中,使用具有6MV无平坦滤波器束的强度调制电弧疗法(IMAT)。剂量处方主要基于PTVD95%(49%)或D96-100%(19%)。许多参与者更愿意通过减少PTV覆盖率来保留接近的心脏外器官(75%)和心脏亚结构(50%)。PTVD0.035cm3范围25.5-34.6Gy,表现出大量的剂量不均匀性。没有运动补偿或设置的估计治疗时间为2-80分钟。对于共识声明,波束技术规划达成了强有力的协议,剂量计算,处方方法和目标和心脏外关键结构之间的权衡。在心脏亚结构剂量限制和目标中期望的剂量不均匀性上未达成一致。
    结论:这项STOPSTORM多中心治疗计划基准研究在STAR治疗计划的几个方面显示出强烈的一致性,但也暴露了对其他人的分歧。为了规范和协调未来的STAR,达成共识,然而,迫切需要临床数据来制定可行的治疗计划指南.
    OBJECTIVE: STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) showed promising results in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, clinical data is scarce and heterogeneous. The STOPSTORM.eu consortium was established to investigate and harmonize STAR in Europe. The primary goal of this benchmark study was to investigate current treatment planning practice within the STOPSTORM project as a baseline for future harmonization.
    METHODS: Planning target volumes (PTV) overlapping extra-cardiac organs-at-risk and/or cardiac substructures were generated for three STAR cases. Participating centers were asked to create single fraction treatment plans with 25 Gy dose prescription based on in-house clinical practice. All treatment plans were reviewed by an expert panel and quantitative crowd knowledge-based analysis was performed with independent software using descriptive statistics for ICRU report 91 relevant parameters and crowd dose-volume-histograms. Thereafter, treatment planning consensus statements were established using a dual-stage voting process.
    RESULTS: Twenty centers submitted 67 treatment plans for this study. In most plans (75%) Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy (IMAT) with 6 MV flattening-filter-free beams was used. Dose prescription was mainly based on PTV D95% (49%) or D96-100% (19%). Many participants preferred to spare close extra-cardiac organs-at-risk (75%) and cardiac substructures (50%) by PTV coverage reduction. PTV D0.035cm3 ranged 25.5-34.6 Gy, demonstrating a large variety of dose inhomogeneity. Estimated treatment times without motion compensation or setup ranged 2-80 minutes. For the consensus statements, strong agreement was reached for beam technique planning, dose calculation, prescription methods and trade-offs between target and extra-cardiac critical structures. No agreement was reached on cardiac substructure dose limitations and on desired dose inhomogeneity in the target.
    CONCLUSIONS: This STOPSTORM multi-center treatment planning benchmark study showed strong agreement on several aspects of STAR treatment planning, but also revealed disagreement on others. To standardize and harmonize STAR in the future, consensus statements were established, however clinical data is urgently needed for actionable guidelines for treatment planning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在复发性室性心动过速(VT)患者中,急性定向心律失常放射性消融(STAR)显示了有希望的结果。STOPSTORM联盟的成立是为了调查和协调欧洲的STAR治疗。这项基准研究的主要目标是标准化STAR的风险器官(OAR)轮廓,包括心脏的详细结构,并认可每个参与中心。
    方法:STOPSTORM联盟的中心被要求在三个STAR案例中描述31个OAR。联盟专家小组审查了划定,并在向所有参与者提供了专门的研讨会反馈和认证之后。通过计算DICE相似系数(DSC)进行了进一步的定量分析,中位数协议距离(MDA),和95百分位数到协议的距离(HD95)。
    结果:20个中心参与了这项研究。基于DSC,MDA和HD95,众所周知的OAR在放疗中的轮廓相似,例如肺(中位DSC=0.96,中位MDA=0.1mm,中位HD95=1.1mm)和主动脉(中位DSC=0.90,中位MDA=0.1mm,中位HD95=1.5mm)。一些中心不包括胃食管交界处,导致胃和食道轮廓的差异。对于心脏亚结构,如腔室(DSC中位数=0.83,MDA中位数=0.2mm,HD95中位数=0.5mm),瓣膜(DSC中位数=0.16,MDA中位数=4.6mm,HD95中位数=16.0mm),冠状动脉(中位DSC=0.4,中位MDA=0.7mm,中位HD95=8.3mm)以及窦房和房室结(中位DSC=0.29,中位MDA=4.4mm,中位HD95=11.4mm),中心之间的偏差发生得更频繁。在专门的讲习班之后,所有中心都获得了认可,并建立了STAR轮廓共识准则。
    结论:这项STOPSTORM多中心关键结构轮廓基准研究显示了标准放射治疗OAR的高度一致性。然而,对于心脏子结构,轮廓出现较大的分歧,这可能对STAR治疗计划和剂量学评估产生重大影响。为了标准化OAR轮廓,建立了STAR中关键结构轮廓的共识准则。
    In patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT), STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) shows promising results. The STOPSTORM.eu consortium was established to investigate and harmonise STAR treatment in Europe. The primary goals of this benchmark study were to standardise contouring of organs at risk (OAR) for STAR, including detailed substructures of the heart, and accredit each participating centre.
    Centres within the STOPSTORM.eu consortium were asked to delineate 31 OAR in three STAR cases. Delineation was reviewed by the consortium expert panel and after a dedicated workshop feedback and accreditation was provided to all participants. Further quantitative analysis was performed by calculating DICE similarity coefficients (DSC), median distance to agreement (MDA), and 95th percentile distance to agreement (HD95).
    Twenty centres participated in this study. Based on DSC, MDA and HD95, the delineations of well-known OAR in radiotherapy were similar, such as lungs (median DSC = 0.96, median MDA = 0.1 mm and median HD95 = 1.1 mm) and aorta (median DSC = 0.90, median MDA = 0.1 mm and median HD95 = 1.5 mm). Some centres did not include the gastro-oesophageal junction, leading to differences in stomach and oesophagus delineations. For cardiac substructures, such as chambers (median DSC = 0.83, median MDA = 0.2 mm and median HD95 = 0.5 mm), valves (median DSC = 0.16, median MDA = 4.6 mm and median HD95 = 16.0 mm), coronary arteries (median DSC = 0.4, median MDA = 0.7 mm and median HD95 = 8.3 mm) and the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes (median DSC = 0.29, median MDA = 4.4 mm and median HD95 = 11.4 mm), deviations between centres occurred more frequently. After the dedicated workshop all centres were accredited and contouring consensus guidelines for STAR were established.
    This STOPSTORM multi-centre critical structure contouring benchmark study showed high agreement for standard radiotherapy OAR. However, for cardiac substructures larger disagreement in contouring occurred, which may have significant impact on STAR treatment planning and dosimetry evaluation. To standardize OAR contouring, consensus guidelines for critical structure contouring in STAR were established.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号